481 bull elk

J

Jon32184

Guest
Just got word that a man out of nevada who had bought the hefty price tag reservation bull elk tag in Arizona just got a 481 gross beast, pictures are being trademarked now and should be out soon once I get them I will get them on the website for everyone to enjoy, I will keep you all posted!!
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-17-09 AT 09:47PM (MST)[p]I heard 481 off the Hualapai with Double D outfitters. Loooonnng fourths.
 
If I recall, Double D are the two brothers from Kingman, no? If so, I wouldn't believe a word from either of them. Let's just say they are a quite haphazard with the truth. ;-)

TONY MANDILE
48e63dfa482a34a9.jpg

How To Hunt Coues Deer
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-18-09 AT 12:36PM (MST)[p]Just speaking the truth. This is not hearsay or from a third party. It was MY personal experience, and I don't like being made to look like an idiot to my readers to the point we had to publish a retraction for the lies.


TONY MANDILE
48e63dfa482a34a9.jpg

How To Hunt Coues Deer
 
Tony,

Well you shouldnt be writing about things you have no idea about. I happen to be a personal friend of theirs and was there when we killed the 481 bull. We will release a photo and then you can retract what your saying.

Thanks,

Mike
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-18-09 AT 01:16PM (MST)[p]I wrote about what I know about; the OUTRIGHT LIES they told me to get a story written. And what I said still goes; I wouldn't believe a word they say. Regardless if the bull scores 481 or 150, they still play fast and loose with the truth.

TONY MANDILE
48e63dfa482a34a9.jpg

How To Hunt Coues Deer
 
Double D's are from Bullhead if I remember right. Double check who you talk s#^t about. Maybe the same guys, maybe not. The 481 bull is the truth. Beautiful velvet bull too!
 
Yup, unfortunately I know who Darin and Derek are quite well. So did the game warden in Unit 10 who blew their story all to hell. And then when I confronted Darin on the phone with his lies, he didn't even have the decency to apologize.

TONY MANDILE
48e63dfa482a34a9.jpg

How To Hunt Coues Deer
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-18-09 AT 02:18PM (MST)[p]Few things I notice. If he had a personal experience then there is nothing to retract about his personal experience, he prefaced that. He just said HE wouldn't believe them because of his past experiences. I know people that stretch the truth frequently. Even they tell the truth sometimes but that doesn't mean I would believe anything they said until I saw proof. That is all he was saying. I say the same thing about the people I know who stretch the truth and I say it to them also. If the bull really is 481 the truth will come out and no harm is done.

Second, I am pretty sure that white man can't guide on the Rez so if they were involved I would be interested to see as to what extent they were involved if in fact it was killed on the Rez. Hope to see pics soon.
 
Its an interesting story. There was an Indian guide with them but he didnt do much, if anything. The D's knew the bull was there from prior events. I'll leave it at that.
 
Don't forget to take your ball home with you X( When someone has a beef with someone else, it is not trash talk if they have proof of the event and they aren't back biting. Doesn't seem like any back biting was going on just sharing a personal experience which could be substantiated. If the people, whom I don't know, have a problem with what is said then they can speak up for themselves. That's how business works. People who have a bad experience with the business share their bad experiences with others. If its not true then the business won't end up being hurt at the end of the day! If there is some truth to it then it will all weed itself out and the business won't flourish. Only time will tell.
 
I do not know the D's but I know Tom (who hunts/guides with them)and if the D's are anything like him, then Tony is right on the money.

I did hear from a very reliable source that it went over 480 and it was on the res.

It will be interesting to see...

I was also told the guy was from Oregon.
 
On double d,s website they show video of a bull called "the 3 fingers bull"Its in their elk photo gallery,440" last year ,good lookin bull.I wonder if its "THE ONE"
 
If someome killed a 481 bull it will be all over the sites shortly...These big 450 plus bulls are the easiest ones to kill. just pay top dollar and they will drive you to it...Personally I don't care if I ever see it!!! A 350 bull somebody hunted and arrowed on their own impresses me awhole lot more .....just the way Im wired.
 
nice book tony!! lol.. is that deer hunting for dummies?? no , but really... nice picture!!
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-18-09 AT 07:42PM (MST)[p]I wouldn't be too suprised if the spider bull is bumped in the next few years.
 
I saw the rack as it sat in a bath of formaldehyde under a tarp of plastic. It was not the "3 fingers bull"
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-18-09 AT 08:59PM (MST)[p]
tony. this is for you!

assumption #1 did double d make a statement about this topic yet?
#2 where they even there
#3 they are lying and no one knows even what they said
#4 you believe this game warden over double d. sounds
his word against theirs.


so here is the facts. there are rumors of a magnificent animal harvested by one of the greatest thing in the world. "the hunt"
appreciate the animal and the game. and please quit cheapening it for everyone else. let the story unfold then talk about the facts next time. next time you plan to give all of us advice about some thing. provide us with all the facts and let us make up our own minds. otherwise you are just talking trash.
 
I have seen the bull! Don't get me wrong, but it is just a 380 type bull with a deer looking eye guard that comes off his left main beam that is about 50-60 inches long.

By no means am I kicking the bull, but 480 looks hard to get.
Still a great animal. Great job guys.
TR
 
dan delmonaco,

well you were told wrong about oregon!! he was from n.v ! what you have to say is for sure hearsay !!
 
wow that 3 fingers is a big boy!! but how could it be 3 fingers? its out of season? (only gov. tag open,and he has not killed) they sure have an amazing photo page. are all of those kills from public lands in az?
 
The 481 was taken on the Hualapai Indian Reservation.
Double D does a lot of hunts on the X-1 ranch in unit 18a. The ranch is not open to the public.
 
BH95,
As I understand it, Tony is referring to the circumstances behind an article he wrote almost 10 years ago, and not the recent 481 bull.

RR
 
I DID TOO. POINT WAS HE MADE ASSUMPTIONS THEN AND NOW.THERE ARE 2 SIDES TO EVERY STORY YOU JUST HOPE TO PICK THE RIGHT ONE IF YOU WERE NOT THERE. I KNOW OF STORY HE TALKS ABOUT!
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-19-09 AT 03:28PM (MST)[p]>>I KNOW OF STORY HE TALKS ABOUT! <<

I doubt you do. If that was the case, you should quit now before you get embarassed. If you ask your handlers, they will quickly tell you that I have the FACTS in regards to their lies on my side.

And if necessary, I will gladly post such here, including the full article and the concrete proof that it was sham.

As for any assumptions, the only one I go by is once a liar, always a liar.

And no, the book isn't a guide for dummies. If it was, I would have included a dedication to you and used your picture on the cover instead of Sergio's. ;-)


TONY MANDILE
48e63dfa482a34a9.jpg

How To Hunt Coues Deer
 
>LAST EDITED ON Aug-19-09
>AT 03:28?PM (MST)

>
>>>I KNOW OF STORY HE TALKS ABOUT! <<
>
>I doubt you do. If that
>was the case, you should
>quit now before you get
>embarassed. If you ask your
>handlers, they will quickly tell
>you that I have the
>FACTS in regards to their
>lies on my side.
>
>And if necessary, I will gladly
>post such here, including the
>full article and the concrete
>proof that it was sham.
>
>
>As for any assumptions, the only
>one I go by is
>once a liar, always a
>liar.
>
>And no, the book isn't a
>guide for dummies. If it
>was, I would have included
>a dedication to you and
>used your picture on the
>cover instead of Sergio's. ;-)

now thats funny!!!!!!! ba ha ha ha
ajoe
>
>
>
>TONY MANDILE
>
48e63dfa482a34a9.jpg

>How To Hunt Coues Deer
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-19-09 AT 03:56PM (MST)[p]Good Gracious,Who gives a ##### about Mr.Mandiles problems with someone years ago ,Post a pic already !
 
>I have seen the bull! Don't
>get me wrong, but it
>is just a 380 type
>bull with a deer looking
>eye guard that comes off
>his left main beam that
>is about 50-60 inches long.
>
>
>By no means am I kicking
>the bull, but 480 looks
>hard to get.
>Still a great animal. Great
>job guys.
>TR


Like a thrid main beam?
 
MR.MANDILE ,rather than you leave the rest of us guessing why you have HI-JACKED this post ,Tell us about the issue you are referring to .So far you have talked alot of #####,and as of now ,you havnt explained yourself.Please elaborate ,I dont know anyone involved.Not you or the outfitter in question ,You obviously have a problem with the folks from Double D and as an avid hunter ,I would like to know the whole story you are talking about ,As an outdoor writer, it is youre responsibilty to confirm youre accusations.
 
Pleasure to meet you Tony,I hope you can understand my frustration with this post .It happens more than not that a excited individual post about a pic or an e-mail they recieved about an awesome Elk,Deer ,Sheep ,Lope or coyote that was harvsted and all of a sudden ,Someone shows up bad mouthing the folks involved with the hunt,or the score of the animal posted .You my freind have done exactly that ,You still have not elaborated on why !If you have info on this outfitting service that would make you feel compelled to post what you have ,its youre responsibility as an OUTDOOR WRITER to share that with the rest of youre freinds here at MM!I personally have never heard of Double D outfitters before this post .I have looked at their website ,It looks damn good to me .If you have some info to share ,you should .If you keep telling people to "Wait ,I Will Get To That " You should quit while yer ahead .FLDRW22/TOM If you would like to take this up with me personally ,my e-mail is [email protected]
 
I don't know what happened 10 years ago, But I think it funny as hell
AZHUNTIN (we aren't posting them pictures on this site)

What the hell???? who does he thinks runs this site Tony or the FOUNDER.
If he doesn't post the pictures then I guess TONY wins hands down and they lose.

If one man can make you backs water on a hunting site, Ask your GF or Wife if you can borrow those round hairy things out of her purse just for a few Minutes.

POST OR DON"T The pictures they will come out sooner or later.

I would say COWBOY UP but maybe PONY UP WILL HAVE TO DO.



"I have found if you go the extra mile it's Never crowded".
 
Tony,I apperciate yer response that you sent to my PM,Why wont you share that with everyone else .
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-19-09 AT 09:07PM (MST)[p]I for one don't need to see the proof......if BH95 is in fact related to DD clan, and you know just enough about genetics and behavioral influence then you should know all you need to know, LOL. That there is one card short of a full deck!
 
I don't have a dog in this fight.


But, for a guiding business not to take advantage of being able to post their success photos on the most viewed western hunting site in the country is like a wannabe hollywood actor turning down an offer to be in a Steven Spielberg Movie. Its exposure and free advertising, and no ones harshing your mellow with media kits, rate cards, and deadlines


Its illogical. Makes no sense.






















Maybe the Tony guy has a point.
 
OK Tony, you stole the thread and they say they're not sharing the photo, so what's the big deal that has you so pissed at these dude's that is now keeping us all from seeing the giant bull?

I received an email asking that I delete all of Tony's posts and the photo would be shared. But, I've read Tony's posts and they're just his opinions of these guys based on, what sounds like, personal dealings. Obviously I would have rather Tony just kept that stuff to himself rather than steal the thread, but he didn't.

I guess the way I see it is, who cares if Tony doesn't trust these guys anymore?!?! Tony has a right to his opinion and the rest of us have a right to our own. We can choose to side with Tony, the other guys, or not really care at all. In the end, most of us just want to see a picture of the bull, we don't care enough to get too involved in these "past" dealings.

Am I wrong here? Are Tony's posts out of line enough that they should be removed? I mean, I could understand deleting them if it were some new user with a phony name and nothing to backup the story. But, Tony is not hiding who he is or what he does, so I guess the way I see it, he's not just "taking a shot" at someone.

Anyway, since we get no photos in this thread, give me your opinion on how I should handle this stuff. Should Tony's posts be deleted or not? Why?
Trying to make this a better place! Tough balancing act sometimes.

Brian Latturner
MonsterMuleys.com
 
I dont think Tony's threads should be deleated...Like you said everyone has thier opinions and he was just sharing his....

And Founder, for what it's worth your doing a fine job with this website...I get on many websites and this one seems to have the best "balance" ..There's a fishing website I get on that is so over moderated it is rediculous and VERY anoying.

horsepoop.gif


Disclaimer:
The poster does not take any responsibility for any hurt or bad feelings. Reading threads poses inherent risks. The poster would like to remind readers to make sure they have a functional sense of humor before they visit any discussion board.
 
I personally feel you should NOT remove Tony's posts. I will repost what I said in post #13.

"Few things I notice. If he had a personal experience then there is nothing to retract about his personal experience, he prefaced that. He just said HE wouldn't believe them because of his past experiences. I know people that stretch the truth frequently. Even they tell the truth sometimes but that doesn't mean I would believe anything they said until I saw proof. That is all he was saying. I say the same thing about the people I know who stretch the truth and I say it to them also. If the bull really is 481 the truth will come out and no harm is done."

I personally am sick of guides feeling like they can't be bad mouthed........Are they not a business just like everyone else. I am a businessman where I provide a service. If I do something or don't do something that a past customer would accuse me of then it is their right and duty to express that experience just as I have the right to share my side if it is not correct. Then the public decides. We are smart enough to make educated, informed decisions. Don't let them hold you hostage. That isn't right and your site looses validity in my opinion if you bend to them. They have to earn respect. If it is important to them and they have truth and fact on their side then they can clear their name on the old matter. If it is an old action that they are not proud of then hey that's why decisions have consequences and they can go through the necessary steps to correct the problem and make amends. If they don't want to take those steps then make them deal with the consequences.
 
Founder,
I've been watching this one as well and I think Tony's comments should stand. He never did say anything that could be proved as slander just his personal feelings based on a past experience and if we can't speak our minds what good is this site? I say tell the little internet terrorist that you wont cave in to his demands. Those pics will surface soon enough without his blessing.....
 
If you nuke Tony's posts, then Feleno and NV's posts will be next in the Campfire section. Don't go there Founder.:)
 
FWIW I don't think Tony's posts should be deleted either.

____________________________________________________________________
"Now we come to the most important pre-season question. Do you just want to go elk hunting, or do you want to bring one back? If you desire the latter, there is no substitute for hard work. The bigger your goal, the harder the work required to get there. Good luck!" - Cameron R. Hanes
 
Tony's grief over these guys have nothing to do with this thread. I vote to get the post back on track and get rid off all the posts that do not apply no matter who wrote them. Then lets look at the PIC so we can all enjoy in somones success.
 
Founder, It's sad that once again a post gets hijacked. I had the same problem last spring with a post of mine about helping a MI child get in the woods (meaning what I could do to make a set-up that would work for him to go deer hunting) the next thing it turn into an attack on Trapking.

With that being said, Tony is just expressing his experiences and thats fine with me. Posts should stay.

Another thought nothing against Tony, but I really don't think his word is gospell and I can take his opinons or not.


Joe E Sikora
 
Well, since you asked........

Tony was placed in a bad position by these guys and was forced to jump thru his azz and do a retraction. This obviously caused loss of time, money and credibility on Tony's part.

This goes beyond one persons personal opinion. It's business.

If my character is put into play by something I did, in good faith, later to find out that it was not as advertised, I'm gonna take EVERY opportunity to express my dismay over that and any future issue with the offending party.

I might agree, that now that the "cat is out of the bag", Tony might ought to fill us in....but, that's his call.

I have prior bones to pick with some businesses and guides and if and when they are mentioned, you'll get my opinion on their performance.......subtle and mild mannered as I am.
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-20-09 AT 08:22AM (MST)[p]I don't post here a lot, so maybe my opinion doesn't count, but just the fact that they emailed you about removing his posts sounds fishy to me. If he has no credibility then why not let him speak his mind then produce evidence that shows he's lieing. Off track or not, it appears there is something they would rather was kept secret. Maybe their practices have changed, but the great things about past wrongs, they have a way of coming back and biting you in the...... Like it or not.

I like seeing photos of big elk, but if they had the gall to feel I felt their photo had any impact on the success of my site, I'd tell them where they can put their photo.

Keep the posts up.

I've got more interest in hering the story eluded to than seeing their photo.

www.newcobowhunter.blogspot.com
 
I guess I will go out on a limb here and say yes, his posts
should be deleted.

I actually enjoy reading Tony's other posts/threads. As far
as I am concerned, he is a respected member who I have found
to be credible.

I am not saying his story is incorrect, it could be true.

However, it really has nothing to do with the subject matter.
I think most would agree, the best thing about MM is the pic's.

Usually, the truth comes out regardless, eventually...
 
I say let tony's posts stay. he has not done anything wrong and he has been rather well mannered in his opinions. I would just like to hear what happened.
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-20-09 AT 08:33AM (MST)[p]DON'T NUKE TONY!!! LET HIM BE NO HARM NO FOUL!!!

I find it kind of funny that there is no pictures. Wouldn't you want to share a trophy like that???? What gives???

After all this is a place people come to BS and chat about hunting right?? Thank god noboby talked crap about the "Spider Bull". Hang on there was proof on that one right???
 
I am really new to this sight, so take it or leave it, but it seems that there was a legitimate issue years ago and I think the posts should be left as is, becuase at this point no one seems to know who is telling the truth and who is lying. Also to my knowledge we have not heard from the person who actually shot the bull. Wouldn't it be up to him where he wanted to post pics of his trophy. I would be kind of insulted if I were him, all these people having a huge spat over where pics of HIS trophy can or cannot be seen. Just my 2 cents worth.
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-20-09 AT 09:27AM (MST)[p]Brian,

See my reply to your PM. And if you sense the need to delete my posts in this thread, feel free to do it. It won't change anything I stated.

Nickman,

Your message was dead-on the money.

TONY MANDILE
48e63dfa482a34a9.jpg

How To Hunt Coues Deer
 
>LAST EDITED ON Aug-20-09
>AT 09:27?AM (MST)

>
>Brian,
>
>See my reply to your PM.
>And if you sense the
>need to delete my posts
>in this thread, feel free
>to do it. It won't
>change anything I stated.
>
>Nickman,
>
>Your message was dead-on the money.
>
>
>TONY MANDILE
>
48e63dfa482a34a9.jpg

>How To Hunt Coues Deer



Founder don't nuke it!!!!! He is not thinking straight... LOL But for real!!!
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-20-09 AT 11:09AM (MST)[p]I'd like to see Tony's posts stay. So what if some outfitter connected people come on here pounding their chests about a giant bull and pictures. But won't post until they are copyrighted?

They won't be able to sit on them for long. Probably the only accomplishment they've ever achieved. Sell some rich guy a bull.... whooopeeeee...... On private land no less, how is that different than all the pictures that float around the net of farmed elk???

--Bill
 
I think Tony's post should stay as well. I also do not believe that Tony has the obligation to provide any further information as his opinion is just that...his opinion. To comment further on any actions that have happened in the past would just further drive a wedge between fellow hunters as we all know that we are not going to agree on everything.

Now if Tony would like to further elaborate on actions in the past, I would love to see them so I can try to make my own informed decision when trying to hire a guide in the future. But I also have my own eyes, ears and mouth to investigate.
 
Keep his post active!!!! He has stated opinion and has not done anything that should result in his post being removed. He has always provided information on this site in a professional manner.....
 
If "Double D Outfitters" has changed their ways from what Tony speaks of, maybe they should give Tony the option to post the pictures in an article. Then they can show Tony and us that they have changed. This would be up to Tony if he would even want to do this. By not posting the pictures all "Double D Outfitters" is doing is giving Tony more of a credible story and discrediting themselves. Please post the pictures so we can see them.
 
It's kinda funny that after Tony posted that picture of those 3 bulls, that bh95 shut his pie hole,from what Ive read and seeing Tonys posts in the past that he shoots straight,dont nuke Tony
 
pics? geez if that guy wont show pics because one guy had a bad expericence with dd than must be something to hide... hmm if it was me id prove the guy wrong and put it up! and quit whinin
 
I believe one of the most important things a man has, is his word.
Tony makes a living out of words and to have someone deliberately let you say/print a bogus story is malicious. (all in their personal gain I might add)

Tony's posts will stay.

The pictures will surface eventually.

4678aec03a21ae00.jpg
 
i wouldnt delete tonys post that other guy is a whiny little baby. i think tony has every right to say his experience with them. they screwed tony and that should nt be kept hidden it was there own actions that cause it so they should be accouttable
 
No don't delete them, besides I could care less about another money bull killed during the summer............I agree with the post above where JoDog (I think) said he would rather see a 350 bull killed the hard the way.

WillPower


"My only regret in life is setting my goals too low"
 
WOW alot of stuff for a 370-380 bull with a 50" eyeguard, going straight up. It is off his left side between his 1st and 2nd.

THERE WILL BE ALOT BIGGER BULLS KILLED THIS YEAR!!

TR
 
I agree with others who said they dont care if they see the pic's.

really, as soon as they are put out anywhere they will be on this site within an hour. copyright?? are you kidding me, for what? a rez bull no one gives 2 chits about?
 
Sonara that only adds up to 430 still 50 pts. short. Maybe JK is going to put his story in one of the big mags. and some of them won't take your story if the pictures have been plastered all over the internet. I'm sure we will all be seeing pictures soon.
 
RE: 15 inch bases!!

OH boy - another 15 inch bases thread! Man have we been down this road already or what??

If these guides are going to piss and moan and not post the pic because of something someone on one of these forums said, they better get some thicker skin or get of off this site! What Tony said is mild mild mild in comparison to some of the crap that gets slung around here on a regular basis. If they can't take the heat and are going to be a bunch of crybaby-peepants-sugar-tit brats then who cares. Seriously, if you have nothing to hide then why get so overly-offended at one person's opinion that is based on a personal experience? Man up, apologize to Tony for any bad blood that might exist, post the pics and let the chips fall where they may.



UTROY
Proverbs 21:19 (why I hunt!)
 
Yes that is correct I put my hands on the bull, and find it hard to get to 481!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Amazing, 90 posts on this subject and not even a picture. This elk is getting more coverage than the spider bull, and we got to see pictures of that elk.
 
Way to go outdoor writer

Glad to hear someone is willing to speak the truth, even if it is an uncomfortable situation. Kudos Outdoor Writer!
 
RE: Way to go outdoor writer

I think the whole thread should be nuked. Titled 481 bull, 90+ posts and no pic.

Pics and a story please or just SHUT THE FFFFFFFFFFFFFFront door.
 
RE: Way to go outdoor writer

>I think the whole thread should
>be nuked. Titled 481
>bull, 90+ posts and no
>pic.
>
>Pics and a story please or
>just SHUT THE FFFFFFFFFFFFFFront door.
>


There will be big bulls killed in most western states, so for the love of God, don't make a post without pics. DUH! You are not getting a booby prize because you may have heard a big bull was killed. That won't be news to anyone. Pics please or stfu.
 
RE: Way to go outdoor writer

LAST EDITED ON Aug-21-09 AT 02:23PM (MST)[p]Long post, folks:

First, I apologize for taking over this thread. That wasn?t my intent. And? I would have dropped it until bowhunter95, who is obviously part of the DD tribe, got involved. So in deference to Founder, this will be my last comment in this thread.

Those who know me from this board or others also know that I usually avoid personal confrontations, name-calling, etc. on the boards. Of course, that doesn't mean I don't enjoy a healthy debate on an ISSUE as long as it's just that ? a civil and non-personal debate on the ISSUE.

I think once you read the rest of this, you'll understand why I made my initial comment. Some of you will likely disagree with me. I expect that and have no problem with it. I'm a big boy.

Perhaps some might even think I was dumb to not verify the story with more than the four people involved. Here's why I didn't see the need.

I've been in the outdoor writing business for nearly 40 years, full-time since 1984, and during that time I have had contacts, dealings and conversations with dozens upon dozens of outfitters, guides and hunters for any number of reasons, including writing articles. Other than this ONE instance with DD, I never had a reason to complain about the professionalism, friendliness and honesty of everyone involved. Thus, I had no reason to doubt the concocted tale of four people, and I wouldn't do it any different today. I still believe in the honesty of 99.9999% of the people I have contacts with.

And because of my profession, I'm well aware of the libel/slander statutes. Thus, I wouldn't make a statement that would leave me open to legal action -- at least one that would be won. In fact, I would love to have an attorney question the principles involved under oath in a countersuit. ;-)

My beef with DD goes way back to 2000 and the elaborate ruse they concocted so I would do an article on the three bulls in the photo above that their clients from TX killed in 1999 ? supposedly during the Nov. hunt in Unit 10. Not only did Darin Collins contact me and lie, but he also convinced his clients to lie during my interviews with them. (see the bolded parts, including actual quotes, in the article)

As soon as the article appeared, several readers contacted the magazine and me to tell us the bulls had been killed on the Hualapai Rez during the SEPTEMBER season and NOT in Unit 10 during the Nov. hunt, as perpetuated in the concocted tale.

One such reader from the Bullhead City area who knew the game warden in unit 10 had him check his list of permit holders for 1999; NONE of the three hunters had a permit in that unit for that year. Once I found this out, to be sure I had the AZ game department do a search of its entire database; same result - NONE of the three hunters had a permit in unit 10 that year. And since this is a matter of public record and available under the Freedom of Information Act, anyone can call the AGFD, even now, to verify that. This is a FACT, not opinion.

Now, if you look closely at the photo I added to the thread, you'll also not the absence of any AZ state tags attached to the antlers. I still have several other photos of the same bulls; no tags in any of them. Whoops. The law reads that tags must be attached IMMEDIATELY upon the kill.

That said, they MIGHT have attached them to the rear gambrels, which is also legal, but from my experience, most hunters attach the tags to the antlers. So this is only circumstantial evidence of the falsehoods. Then again, if they didn't have AZ tags, the absence would also make that FACT obvious. Sadly, I didn't notice and question it until after the incident concluded.

Also, note that bowhunter95 has yet to reply to the ?where and when? in my question to him. Maybe he hasn't been back in the past two days; then again, maybe he has been back but isn't about to be embarrassed even more.

Anyway, as a result of all this, we published a retraction in a later issue of the magazine, and when I confronted Darin Collins by phone, he didn't even apologize for the obvious ruse.

So given this experience, I stand by what I stated earlier. Now you all know why I say I will never believe anything from DD, regardless if they are telling the truth or not.

The article is below. The clients? names are redacted since they were also sort of victims in all this.

GRAND CANYON STATE BULLS​

The ?secret? that Arizona grows big bull elk ceased to be a secret many years ago. The odds of taking a 6X6 or better trophy bull are extremely high, and the chances for record-book class trophies are better than anywhere else in the country.

The Boone & Crockett Club (B&C), Pope & Young Club (P&Y) and Safari Club International (SCI) record books list dozens of bulls from the Grand Canyon State, several of which rank within the ?Top 10? in both the typical and non-typical categories. The B&C Records of North American Big Game alone contains more than 75 entries from Arizona in the typical and non-typical categories. One bull killed in 1997 by Las Vegas, Nev. resident Mike Shipsey on the San Carlos Apache Reservation isn't even listed, though. If it was however, it would rank as the non-typical world record because it scored an incredible 487 points.

With all the notoriety, however, drawing one of the hard-to-come-by permits has become quite difficult. And it's especially so for nonresidents because of the 10 percent limit on tags they may receive in any particular unit. But a trio of family members from Texas didn't let the lousy odds deter them from applying.

The head of the clan was 60-year-old ***** *****, Jr., a real estate developer from *****, Tex.

?I had already hunted and killed elk in a couple of states, but all those rumors about the monster bulls in Arizona kept going through my mind. So four years ago, I finally decided it was time to give it a go. I convinced my son ***** and my son-in-law ***** ***** to apply for a permit with me. *****, who lives in *****, had never hunted elk, and *****, who lives in *****, had only chased them around Colorado. He had killed a small bull in the process. ?

?Once we decided to apply for a permit, I began researching guides and settled on Double D Outfitters in Bullhead City, Arizona. Several people I spoke with had told me that the two ?D?s, Darin Collins and his brother, Derek, were aggressive young guys who knew where and how to hunt elk. Truer words were never uttered.?

?I called Darin and he didn't hesitate when I asked him what hunt unit we should apply for. His answer was, ?The best one ?10.? So that's what we did. BUT?Darin also mentioned that getting a permit in that unit was as likely as getting struck by lightning. His prophecy proved true. For three years, we got little pink cards back telling us we failed in the drawing and now have so many bonus points.?

In June, 1999, the Texas contingent again applied for the #3025, the November hunt in Unit 10. This time when the drawing took place in late July, the trio avoided the lightning but received their permits.


***** was ecstatic about the luck of the draw. ?I couldn't believe we actually succeeded in the lottery after all I had been told about our poor chances. Darin had told us that he and many of his prospective clients had been applying in that unit without success for years. So when he found out we had drawn, he said the hardest part of the hunt was over. After we arrived at camp, I believed him. Even though the rut was mostly over by them, we had bull elk serenading us to sleep the first night. ?

Unit 10 is a vast area that encompasses the Coconino Plateau in the north-central part of the state, just northwest of Williams. It borders the Hualapai Reservation on the west and the Havasupai Reservation to the north. The southern boundary is Interstate 40. There are lots of elk, with a very high bull-to-cow ratio and lots of trophy bulls. The hunting can be tough, however, because mostly low-slung cedars and junipers dominant the vegetation. Even though finding a high spot to glass is fairly easy, getting within range is a different matter. Once a hunter gets down into the thick stuff, seeing and approaching a good bull takes patience and more than a bit of luck.

On opening morning, the elder ***** paired off with Darin. ***** and *****?s son went searching for their trophies with Derek.

***** ***** was excited right from the start.

?We started off at daylight by listening for the bulls to bugle, and we heard them all around us. Then we did lots of glassing. By the time it got dark, I had seen at least 60 elk and at least five or six of them were ones I would have shot if I had been hunting alone. Fortunately I wasn?t.?

?Darin kept a tight rein on me every time I saw a shooter bull. He would constantly say, ?No, not what you want. It's only the first day, and there are a lot bigger ones around.? But I did pass up a 7X7 that was probably better than the two ***** and ***** killed. On the second day, we also saw about six or seven decent bulls, but none of them were as good as the one I passed up the day before.?

?On the third day, we saw two really good bulls. Later in the evening, we had been glassing and spotted my bull heading for a water tank. He was with a bunch of cows, but there were two other satellite bulls hanging around with them. When we first saw them, Darin?s rangefinder showed they were 500 yards away.?

?As soon as the elk got to the tank, all the cows waded into the water up to their necks. The biggest bull stayed on the ground, though, and didn't even take a drink. Darin looked at him through a spotting scope and told me he was a good one, with eight points on one side and nine on the other. I decided it was the bull I wanted to kill.?

When ***** made his decision, Collins quickly questioned it. ?Are you sure??

***** again confirmed it with, ?Yeah, I'm positive.?

Collins put the rangefinder on the bull. ?He?s just under 300 yards.?

***** rested his .30-06 rifle on a small bush and shot.

?The bull didn't even flinch, and we both thought I had missed cleanly. Neither of us had heard the bullet hit because it was so windy. Darin told me to shoot again. We knew the second 180-grain bullet hit him. The bull buckled, then ran off into the trees. By that time it was starting to get dark.?

***** and Collins worked their way to the spot where the bull had been standing when hit. They immediately found blood. They moved toward the place where the elk had disappeared into the trees.

?We hadn't gone 20 yards into the trees when the bull jumped up and started to run. By that time it was so dark, I couldn't even find him in the scope to get off a shot. We knew he was hurt bad, though, because he had laid down so quickly.?

Collins knew the best thing was to call it quits for the night and to come back early the next morning to track the wounded elk. He also knew they would likely find it already dead.

His hunch was correct.

*****?s hunt was over in three days. ?We got back to the spot just after daylight the next day. The bull was dead and less than 100 feet from where we had left his track the night before. When we dressed my bull, we found both bullet holes. They were less than two inches apart.?

*****?s bull grossed 383 6/8 Boone & Crockett (B&C) points.

The third day was also the lucky one for ***** and *****. The latter was the first to hang his tag on a bull.

?We began the day by watching a water hole and could hear bulls all around us. None of them ever came to the tank, though. My guide thought they were watering during the night because of the full moon. So we decided to move.?

?Once we got into the trees, Derek began bugling and getting lots of answers. We managed to walk up on at least three or four bulls, but Derek kept shaking his head ?no,? and later telling me they weren't the kind of quality I wanted. In one instance, though, it was a good bull. But a cow spotted us sneaking in on them and ran the herd off.?

?While we were hunting down low, we kept hearing lots of bugling from the hills. So we headed toward them. One bull was a lot closer to us than the others. So that's the one we decided to chase. And boy, did we chase. We probably followed him two to three miles. We?d get close; he'd run off. Derek would bugle; the bull would answer. We played hide and seek with him for two hours.?

?We finally got into real thick stuff, and when the bull bugled, he was only a couple hundred yards away. Then he bugled again, and we realized he was heading right for us. A minute later, he stepped out from behind a tree and into an opening. He stood about 12 feet away from us. We froze in place, but the startled bull jumped as soon as he figured out we were there. My guide used his cow call to stop him.?

?Derek had been running his video camera. As soon as he saw the bull, though, he put it on pause so he could tell me not to shot. He too late. When the bull stopped only yards away from me, I shot him. In fact, he was so close, I later told my dad that I had killed the bull in self-defense.?

Although ***** ***** had passed on several larger one over the first two days, he was still quite satisfied with the 353-point bull he tagged. ?Chasing that elk was one of the most exciting things I've ever done, and it certainly was the best hunt I've ever been on. I felt I earned my stripes in Arizona.

Later that day, ***** completed the Texas triple.

?We had packed out *****?s elk and began glassing again late that afternoon. We eventually spotted a bunch of elk meandering through the juniper trees. They were about 400 yards away when we first saw them, and Derek told me the bull was definitely a shooter. So I decided it was time to end my hunt.?

?We had been up on higher ground while glassing, so we had to drop down into the trees to get close to the elk. Once we did, though, it was really tough trying to see through the tree branches. Then we heard the bull bugle. He was close. We stayed put rather than risk spooking him and hoped he would show himself. Our wait was a short one.?

?About three minutes after we heard him bugle, we saw feet below the low hanging branches of a juniper. It was less than 150 yards or so. But we didn't know if the feet belonged to the bull or to a cow.?

When Derek saw the feet, he told 34-year old ***** to click off his safety and get ready. Then the tips of antlers appeared above a branch.

?When I saw the antlers, my heartbeat really went crazy. I had never hunted elk, much less shot at one. And here I was staring at the monstrous horn and getting ready to shoot what will probably be the bull of a lifetime for me. What happened over the next few seconds will undoubtedly be etched in my mind for years.?

The bull, walking broadside to *****, reached an opening, stopped and looked at him. The hunter?s .30-06 boomed and the elk dropped right where he had stopped. It scored 370 B&C points.

The three Texas hunters had killed three trophy bulls in three days.

***** ***** never thought such a thing would happen.

?When we applied, we were happy to just get drawn. We never figured we would all kill good bulls. Actually, we didn't think we would even all fill our tags. But obviously we're all happy with our tripleheader.?

TONY MANDILE
48e63dfa482a34a9.jpg

How To Hunt Coues Deer
 
RE: Way to go outdoor writer

Thanks Founder for not nuking the posts.

Thanks for telling the rest of the story Tony, the only thing you may be guilty of here is hijackiing but Im am glad you did.

The fact that Darin Collins delibrately lied to you for his own gain (at your expense) is BS!

You have every right to expose him for what he really is every chance you get.

There is NOTHING worse than a thief or a liar!
 
RE: Way to go outdoor writer

Tony,
I am glad you brought this to our attention.I doubt we will hear from bowhunter95 any more,at least not unless he changes his name.
 
RE: Way to go outdoor writer

It's funny how dismayed liars and/or their followers are when they may be actually telling the truth and are not believed. Their feelings are so fragile.

Exaggerations or a small tweeking isn't what is shown here. Keep the pics of the private land freak, who cares.

Kent
 
RE: Way to go outdoor writer

Bang that the lid coming down on this Case. I to believe it will be the last we hear of those guys, What a tool.

"I have found if you go the extra mile it's Never crowded".
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom