CritterStalker,
I understand that the hunt is much more difficult for an archery hunter. But, that is a choice the archer makes and I think it is why many hunters choose to hunt archery hunts. I respect their skills and determination. I choose not to hunt the archery hunts because I do not have the time to spend practicing and time in the field due to church commitments, coaching my kids in sports, boy scouting, and other family commitments. I don't think that makes me any less deserving of hunting the rut.
I also don't think that rifle hunters should be the ones that have exclusive rights to hunt the rut. Perhaps a rotating system would be fair (but maybe a nightmare to administer). I don't, however, see a whole lot of difference between rifle hunters and MLers given the quality of ML weapons. Now days it is hardly a primitive weapon.
While I've personally never had the opportunity to hunt the rut, I did help my dad out last year on a rifle hunt during the rut. It was an incredible experience to have bulls bugling all around, an experience that should not just be limited to bow hunters.
Further, given that archery spike hunting had been going on for several weeks prior to the hunt, the elk were hunkered down and not presenting themselves for 300 yard shots. So, the perception that the rifle hunt is like shooting ducks on the pond is not accurate from my perspective.
I think the reward for archery hunting, at least in Utah, is that you are likely to draw a tag one or two more times during your lifetime.