Which scores better?

[thebuckstopshere]

MagicMuleys posted a thread about his disdain for mags giving the gross scores only. It got me to thinking what the market cares about net or gross (I know the answer). I found these two on ebay. Not being a scorer, what are the gross and nets of these????

Typical mule deer horns for sale on ebay:

http://cgi.ebay.com/Large-Rack-of-T...ryZ71125QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Non typical mule deer horns for sale on ebay:

http://cgi.ebay.com/XXX-GIANT-NON-T...ryZ71125QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

May have to cut and paste links.

Its obvious that the non-typical has much more demand in the market. I like gross score. I will agree with magicmuleys though, I guess it would be good to know both.

 

[Califelkslayer]

Thats one of the ulgiest non-typical I've ever seen. Wouldn't pay $.10 for that rack. Wouldn't waste a reload on it either.

 

[fatrooster]

I'm guessing the typical will go high 180's. Nontypical=I don't know. fatrooster.

 

[Model_70_Guy]

I have to agree with elkslayer... That is one butt ugly non-typical rack.. I mean that deer was so ugly he was runied. That must have been one lonsome deer when he was alive because I don't think any other deer would hang out with him.

 

[thebuckstopshere]

I agree with all of you.

here is a nice rack sold on ebay by this same dude:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=300130951945

I guess my point is that it seems people actually paying for horns care a lot more about mass, cheaters, bone, gross stuff than a nice tight high scoring typical. I may be wrong - but it seems that way.