Deer Point Systems Merge in UT

Daxter

Very Active Member
Messages
1,425
I have enjoyed the ideas being tossed around about hunt management. Here is more on an idea that came up in one of the other threads about UT deer management.

The following are estimates for how long it would take to draw a guaranteed bonus tag for a LE deer unit in UT if you assume a guy started with 0 points in 2007. These estimates assume that applicant numbers stay the same (when in reality they are increasing every year), and that tag numbers stay the same. The low estimate is if every other successful applicant had more points than our sample guy, and the high estimate is if every successful applicant had less points than our sample guy. The real time it will take to draw a guaranteed bonus point tag is probably somewhere in the middle, unless you beat the 1% odds and draw early.

Henry Mtns. Rifle = 163.1 to 346.6 years
Pauns Muzzleloader = 42.2 to 88.1 years
Vernon Rifle = 29.8 to 59.7 years
Book Cliffs Rifle = 15.9 to 31.9 years
Diamond Mtn. Archery = 4.3 to 9.3 years

What if deer hunters in Utah had to choose between trophy and opportunity when they put in for the draw? What if there were not separate point systems for LE and General deer hunts?

In 2009 if UT goes to 25-30 general season deer hunts with set quotas for each hunt, it would be a perfect opportunity to change our current draw and merge the bonus and preference point systems.

This would benefit new hunters, and improve draw odds for both trophy hunters and opportunity hunters alike. It would make hunters choose what their top priority is, hunting every year, or hunting a trophy unit. No more having your cake and eating it too.

It could be done at least 3 different ways;
1. like NV where any time you get a deer tag, even a leftover OTC you loose all your deer points.
2. like we currently do in UT, where points are lost if you draw any of your choices but not if you buy a leftover OTC.
3. like CO or WY where you only loose points if you draw your first choice.

The guys that really want to hunt a trophy unit wouldn't have to compete with the opportunity crowd, and the opportunity guys would most likely be able to draw every year. It would be a huge help with point creep, and people just starting in the draws would have a realistic chance of drawing several trophy tags in their lifetime if that is what they desire.


Dax
 
Personnally I'd like to see the system copy what is in Nevada. All have a chance at drawing a tag whenever. Right now we are spending money with no chance to draw. Arizona is even worst. The 20% rule is so stupid, it has us investing in Arizona's future income. I figure that I have another 4 years (in Utah) before I draw an LE elk tag. Thankfully it cost $5 for years, now we have the license costs. My elk tag before this year was $45 invested. Still allot better than some states. But I'll stick it out til I draw, then?????? My 2 cents!
 
I like Nevada's system. It moves the points through quicker. You draw, you hunt, you spend your points. No loopholes.
 
I agree that Nevada is the year best in my opinion BUT I know I'm drawing a quality elk tag in Co this based on their system. If everyone was like Nevada, a guy could draw too many tags or go ) for the season. Still like Nv the best.

Dax, you stated the amount of applicants keeps increasing. See how that works out after having to buy a license this year.
 
Not a bad idea Daxter, here is an additional thought. If the economy keeps going the way it is the odds will get better as less people will be willing to pay the money.

T
 
Dax, thanks for the info. I think LE elk would be about the same situation. I think Nevada has a good system, for quality. However, many res only get to hunt every few years.
 
Califelkslayer,

I called the DWR licensing office and asked about application numbers for 2007 vs. 2008 with the license purchase requirement. In 2007 there were 242,595 applications, in 2008 there were 237,731 applications. So there was a slight decline of 4,864 or about 2%. They also said they were mostly non-residents.

Dax
 
Dax, you are full of good info. I did'nt think increasing the cost to buy a license would make much difference in Utah odds. Maybe some for Non res. Just like when wyoming started points for elk,deer and antalope. More money and about the same odds in most units.
 
Perhaps I'm missing something. I like the idea but I belive some states are already doing what is proposed. I don't know much about Nevada but in AZ a person can pretty much pick up a deer tag in many of the units. The more coveted tags are the ones that take many years to draw. To draw an elk tag is even tougher. The same goes for CO. How would merging make things any different than what AZ or CO does now? You would still have a point system & the more coveted tags would take a long time to draw. Once again perhaps I'm not understanding. Please clarify if I'm missing something.
nk
 
I believe this system could work, it seems like it is time to end Utah's split point system. This would raise several interesting questions for people with points to consider...I wouldnt envy them.

I am guessing there would be a lot of guys with 1-6 limited entry bonus points that would apply for one of the "general" units and burn all of their points. I would hate to be a guy with 5 points and have to decide whether to use them all to hunt a unit that takes 1 or 0 to draw, or decide to possibly not hunt in Utah for 10+ years until drawing a formerly "limited" area. I bet you would see a significant "point creep" for the general areas as guys with a handful of limited points applied for them, but over time there would certainly be significantly less applicants for the limited areas. I am glad I only have elk points.

Also another change that I believe that would have to be considered is letting people apply for both deer and elk. I don't want to be shut out from deer hunting at all just because I apply for an elk tag.

Lastly, if this happened, how many points would a person with 4 limited entry deer points and 4 general season deer points have...8? Perhaps all those people with 2+ general deer preference points are on to something (hoping for this merge). If those two people with 8 general points have at least 8 limited entry deer points as well they could be at the top of the pool and draw Henries in 09 if the systems merge and points are added together.

Good idea...I hope it happens.

-RPinenut
 
Dax how many points do you have now?

I have 9 I would like to see the system stay the same until I'm done.
 
I have 8 points, but wouldn't mind a merge now. I think it would help odds for LE applicants. Guys with lots of points would stick it out, but some of the guys with <5 points would just go for the general units. The hard part would be deciding what to do after drawing.

I know this would limit hunters choices to an extent, but the days of "same old same old" when it comes to mule deer managment are coming to a close, it is probably the right time to make some changes.

I don't want to see UT hunters loose tons of opportunity, but also realize that we are probably going to have to make some trade-offs as far as choosing season dates, weapon types, LE vs general hunts.

But, who knows what changes will be made? I don't have a clue what we are in store for.

Dax
 
That is one thing that bugs me about Utah. A deer point, elk point, moose point, or whatever should be just that. We have bonus, preference, antlerless, antlered points. That is a hell of a lot of points to keep track off. I like Nevada's system. It weighs heavy to those with lots of points. Anyone can draw though.
 
I like the differing points systems as I apply for all the great hunts in the west. I do like Nevada's system though. If Utah managed the game like Nevada there would definately be more trophies killed. As the population and demand increases Nevada's management plan may become mandatory. I hope Utah stays the same until I draw though as I have 15 points in next years deer draw. I'm almost there!
 
If utah goes to managing smaller hunt units for deer all on a quota, then what about giving say 3 choices then drawing the apps number and then going down the list of choices like nevada does? instead of only looking only at the first choice on the first draw, It would make it easer to draw for those that only wanted to hunt the very tough draw odds areas and it could help the other areas become better quality with better managment, but of course for that to happen something will have to give, everyone might not be able to hunt every year
 
Another idea I would like to see implemented is going away from the guaranteed NR tags. Many units give NR much better odds; one that I put in for, the NR have 8x the odds that I do. Now they have to buy a license, the odds will probably be even better for the NR. I would pay NR fees if I could transfer all my points over and get their odds, I would have guaranteed tags in some places.

Idaho and Arizona (and I'm sure others) give "up to 10%" so everybody goes into the same pool. Being a NR, I have the same odds they do, but I can be capped at 10%. It seems more fair.
 
I like it Dax!!! Know matter what hunt you apply for you will loose your points if you draw. Like the Colorado system, only in Utah they could not have the option of first choice will only take your points.

To bad it's only a dream. Utah will never do it when they crunch the #s and see how much $$$ there loosing. After all, no one with points would apply for the gen otc tags, there for no one would be buying all those tags!
 
The only way this proposal works in Utah is if it applied to any buck deer purchase, even OTC.

Otherwise, there would be no change in people applying for the LE tags, and overnight campout lines at the OTC sales (should all be online anyways).

The fact is - its a limited entry hunt. There is no right to hunt a limited entry hunt during your life, and some better get damn used to that idea because its going to take lifetimes unless you are lucky.

Could you imagine if they let all those trying for LE elk apply for LE deer, and vice versa, you could almost double the wait time.

Personally, I LIKE being able to apply for my "chance" at the LE tag, and still know I can hunt a general season every year or two. Call me crazy!!!
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom