fishon
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,052
Think of it this way.
If the DWR simply killed on average 3 more lions per deer unit we would save more deer than cutting 13,000 hunters and we would not lose revenue.
And I am not just talking bucks. We would save Bucks and doe's by killing 100 more lions state wide and those doe's would have fawns for years and years and those bucks could grow up to the trophy breeding bucks you all want. So the trickle down effect would be huge.
Then we could take the revenue that was not lost by cutting tags ($500,000) and put it into Coyote killing in the spring and save that many more fawns that will turn into bucks and breeding doe's.
This is how simple things could be and much more effective and popular than cutting the hunters and the opportunity.
100 lions killed would not be missed like 13,000 hunters will be.
100 lions killed would actually increase revenue for the dwr and opportunity for hunters unlike cutting 13,000 hunters which would reduce opportunity and revenue.
100 lions will come back 100 times easier than our deer herds.
This is just one simple way to look at other options to have no loss of hunters or revenue but still accomplish what EVERYONE wants which is more deer.
You would think that with all the people out there that are a lot smarter than me that they could see the logic in other options.
There is still time to correct the mistake. Lets all get behind this one and WE ALL WIN instead of we all lose.
Tony Abbott
www.myfreehunts.com
The next buck to have a fawn will be the
1st.
If the DWR simply killed on average 3 more lions per deer unit we would save more deer than cutting 13,000 hunters and we would not lose revenue.
And I am not just talking bucks. We would save Bucks and doe's by killing 100 more lions state wide and those doe's would have fawns for years and years and those bucks could grow up to the trophy breeding bucks you all want. So the trickle down effect would be huge.
Then we could take the revenue that was not lost by cutting tags ($500,000) and put it into Coyote killing in the spring and save that many more fawns that will turn into bucks and breeding doe's.
This is how simple things could be and much more effective and popular than cutting the hunters and the opportunity.
100 lions killed would not be missed like 13,000 hunters will be.
100 lions killed would actually increase revenue for the dwr and opportunity for hunters unlike cutting 13,000 hunters which would reduce opportunity and revenue.
100 lions will come back 100 times easier than our deer herds.
This is just one simple way to look at other options to have no loss of hunters or revenue but still accomplish what EVERYONE wants which is more deer.
You would think that with all the people out there that are a lot smarter than me that they could see the logic in other options.
There is still time to correct the mistake. Lets all get behind this one and WE ALL WIN instead of we all lose.
Tony Abbott
www.myfreehunts.com
The next buck to have a fawn will be the
1st.
