Velvet vs Hard

[never_catch]

I know he aint much but here's a buck I've got multiple times on a trail cam this year.

~Z~

 

[Roy]

I'd take him - pretty buck.

HOOK 'EM!
_______________________________________

Since I am frequently asked about my religion on this site and others, I have created a profile that explains my beliefs. If you are interested in finding out more about my faith, please visit the link below:

http://mormon.org/me/6RNQ/

 

[elkassassin]

I'll get him before you do ~Z~!

 

[never_catch]

If anyone wants to guess a score I'll probably be able to tell you soon. Dad will be muzz hunting him in a couple days. I'm guessing him at 161"...

~Z~

 

[monstermuleyhunter]

Im going to say 152....I sure like them hard!

 

[broadfork]

Im going to say 152....I sure like them hard!


"That's what she said"

 

[OldJake]

They always look way bigger in the velvet. He is still a nice buck though

 

[eldorado]

Pretty buck. I would prefer hard over velvet any day.

Eldorado

 

[2f350s]

Definitely take him, I also prefer hard horn over velvet mounts.

 

[completesportsman]

I like rutted up swollen necks and hard horns!

Shoot him, if you run a loose tape on him he might make 170"

 

[Wiszard]

Figure he's a 148" buck then after you tape him out you will be very happy with the 155 that he is.

Steve
Holder of a 2012 LE Utah Deer Tag!!

 

[Bonehead13]

Velvet for sure

 

[theox]

right around 150.