My experiences with long range shooters

Tristate

Long Time Member
Messages
8,854
Since there is a lot of speak on here lately I thought I would share the only three experiences I have with "long range" shooters.

Experience 1:

Mule deer hunt in New Mexico. One of the other hunters had purchased what he referred to as a "no stalk weapon" package from a well known supplier. He located a good buck, measured windage and range. He then did some type of calculations on a telephone and set up for the shot. The range was about 700 meters. He missed the target by close to eight feet. I will admit that I do not believe he practiced religiously with the weapon before going on the hunt. I think that practiced shooters would do better than he did. How much better I am unsure. Thankfully the deer was not wounded and lost.

Experience 2:

The outfitter that I guide antelope hunts for sold a pair of spots to two men which were investors/ part owners of a weapons company which specialize in "long range" weapon systems. I was not assigned to guide them but my friend was. We split up in the morning. That evening back at the skinning pole my friend returned with a perplexed and depressed expression on his face. He had located a good buck for the first shooter. The range was slightly over 300 meters. The shooter stated he wanted to back away from the lope to a range over 600 meters to shoot. My friend finally obliged him. The antelope was shot through the guts and never recovered. My friend learned a valuable lesson also that day. The customer is not always right.

Experience 3:

Guiding an antelope hunt I was paired with a couple of "long range" shooters. One is part owner of a well known "long range" weapon manufacturer. The other person was his friend and an enthusiast. I was assessing a buck that was about 1200 meters in one direction. One of the men noticed 2 coyotes eating grasshoppers about 120 degrees another direction. They asked if they could take a poke at them. I determined the buck was not going to make the hit list and told them to go ahead. They ranged the pair of dogs at around 900 meters. They took turns shooting and shot probably around 25 rounds between the two of them since the coyotes literally had no idea what was going on. Since I already had a scope set up I got to watch the show. Sometimes they would miss by a couple of inches and then the very next shot be five feet off.Finally the coyotes had enough and began to trot. Since they couldn't tell where the noises had come from they were trotting right at us. With one of the coyotes within 200 meters the expert blew it's left front leg off between the wrist and the elbow. Later when we located an antelope for him to shoot at he was offended when I stated I was going to get him in closer than 200 meters. I did and he killed the antelope, and I doubt I will ever here from him again.
 
Wind is not your friend and neither is lack of practice. Sounds like none of those guys had any business shooting as far as they did. 600 yards is as far as I have access to practice and if the wind picks up it is hard to place the first shot on the money even at that range. Practice and knowing your limitations in the current conditions are what puts meat in the freezer, not in a vulture's stomach.

NRA Life Member

www.swanspointoutfitters.com
www.lazybar-t.com

The critters have to win every time. I only have to win once.
 
Sambo I agree with your statement. The problem was all four men involved believed they were exceptional marksmen about to make exceptional shots.
 
Their problem (among other things) was the conversion from f-ing meter to imperial measurement (yards) which can account for huge errors! Those guys probably didn't know the difference between milrads and MOA let alone the not-so-little thing called wind drift!!!

Tri, This is hardly a cross-section of quality shooters and for every little story you can tell about the big bad LR shooters, I can tell 10 about the "dude" at 100 yards!!!!

BTW: Who actually "guides" in the USA and talks in METERS??? Is that to somehow sound "edumakated"?
"Here's yer sign"

Zeke
 
Didn't I Mention a GUT SHOT in the other Thread?









[Font][Font color = "blue"]Ah yes we have insider trading and computer dating but I never goin for that!
Ain't no machine pickin out my Queen cause it may not have all the facts!
I've got my own taste and my own ways I'd rather not talk about
and my private life is my private life and they ain't gonna find out!


90087hankjr.jpg
 
Story # 2 takes the cake: "He had located a good buck for the first shooter. The range was slightly over 300 meters. The shooter stated he wanted to back away from the lope to a range over 600 meters to shoot."

To pass up a quality shot opportunity at a big game animal for a longer more difficult shot? That is stupid and unethical. I am not against long range shooting if the hunter is confident in his equipment and abilities, and that is the best shot opportunity available. However, I believe that we owe it to the animal to work for the best, most lethal shot opportunity possible. That means each situation is different and each hunter needs to exercise judgment as to whether to shoot, pass or try to get closer.

-Hawkeye-
 
I am throwing the BS flag here! Fellow guide maybe but Tri is too douche baggy to have a "friend" like stated above.
 
Zeke,

You are right that I can tell you story after story of shots under 100 meters that went wrong. I don't think three experiences is enough to have a solid statistic that could be used logically against long range shooters. From all my experiences I would estimate that less than %10 of the shots I have seen taken under 200 meters either failed completely or turned into some type of wounded animal circus. However %100 of the three long range experiences I have witnessed have been embarrassing failures.

As for me discussing things in meters I apologize if you are uncomfortable with it. I spent a lot of time on other continents shooting and spent a lot of time with people from other continents shooting. I started to communicate with them in meters to cut down on confusion. I still have not gotten use to kilograms.
 
Let Me Re-Phrase this Situation!

The Loper is only 700 Yards!

Please back Me Out to 1,400 Yards!

That Way I'll Have BRAGGIN RIGHTS if I don't Miss Him or GUT SHOOT Him!

JUDAS!

F'N!

PRIEST!







[Font][Font color = "blue"]Ah yes we have insider trading and computer dating but I never goin for that!
Ain't no machine pickin out my Queen cause it may not have all the facts!
I've got my own taste and my own ways I'd rather not talk about
and my private life is my private life and they ain't gonna find out!


90087hankjr.jpg
 
>Zeke,

>
>As for me discussing things in
>meters I apologize if you
>are uncomfortable with it.

Were did I say I was uncomfortable with it? I was just poking fun at you for thinking you're superior and a more seasoned international traveler than some of us.

Meters-shmeters dude!

Still cracks me up.

Zeke
 
Don't know which is more of a long shot......the situations portrayed or the chances that they actually happened.
That being said, many people who hire guides do so because they are not very good at hunting/shooting. I know there are some exceptions but they are just that..... If you could hunt, spot, and shoot good, why would you want to pay some chump thousands of dollars to follow you around? Especially considering the fact that they will be getting on Internet forums and talking $hit about you after you give them a handsome tip and fly home?------SS
 
"I was just poking fun at you for thinking you're superior and a more seasoned international traveler than some of us."

Never said anything of the sort. I Can't help it if you make an assumption. Hopefully we can get our humor on the same track. I value your input.
 
Another question arises here.......where is the ethical responsibility of the guide to deny their clients the opportunity to take long shots that they consider unethical? If you feel that strongly, put your money where your mouth is and advertise that you do not allow any clients to shoot beyond a quarter kilometer. I don't have much respect for someone who is more than willing to keep their mouth shut and take the money, then complain for attention on the Internet.

This is some face-booky stuff.-----SS
 
"why would you want to pay some chump thousands of dollars to follow you around?"

Because you don't know where anything is on a 300,000 acre property you aren't allowed to be on without hired supervision.

I like how you question the honesty of the OP but expect the OP SHOULD be dishonest as long as he get's a "handsome tip". When I get hired to guide a hunt you get fed, kept safe, and opportunity on a better than average property for game. But your money doesn't buy my honesty or integrity, and you a morality bath.
 
Springvilleshooter,

I don't know if you have noticed but I don't advertise anything, so why am I going to start doing it because you have a personal issue. Second if you haven't noticed I am not here for your "respect". By the way if you want to go back up and read I never "took the money and kept my mouth shut". The one "long range" client I ever guided killed his antelope at a range I determined to be ethical and lethal. Truth doesn't matter to you I guess once you got some sand in your panties.
 
"BTW: Who actually "guides" in the USA and talks in METERS??? Is that to somehow sound "edumakated"?"

The same pudge who writes %100.
 
>"BTW: Who actually "guides" in the
>USA and talks in METERS???
>Is that to somehow sound
>"edumakated"?"
>
>The same pudge who writes %100.
>


Got a good laugh at that one!!! Yea, he's one smart Aggie dude!
 
>>"BTW: Who actually "guides" in the
>>USA and talks in METERS???
>>Is that to somehow sound
>>"edumakated"?"
>>
>>The same pudge who writes %100.
>>
>
>
>Got a good laugh at that
>one!!! Yea, he's one
>smart Aggie dude!

I laughed at that one too, Mike!!

Heck, I know it's yards and not meters and I'm an internet hunter!!
 
> "why would you want to
>pay some chump thousands of
>dollars to follow you around?"
>
>
>Because you don't know where anything
>is on a 300,000 acre
>property you aren't allowed to
>be on without hired supervision.
>
>
>I like how you question the
>honesty of the OP but
>expect the OP SHOULD be
>dishonest as long as he
>get's a "handsome tip".
>When I get hired to
>guide a hunt you get
>fed, kept safe, and opportunity
>on a better than
>average property for game.
>But your money doesn't buy
>my honesty or integrity, and
>you a morality bath.

Holy smokes!........when I made my comment about hiring a guide because you were a poor Hunter, spotter, shooter, I didn't even consider that folks hire a guide to feed them and keep them safe........LOFL! Why would we even trust someone with a firearm who needs to be 'kept safe' on a hunt? Let alone allow them to take unethical shots at game. As far as I'm concerned, you're like a day care provider who allows kids to play in the street. ---------SS
 
Deepcolor,

Having respect for a person or having it for an internet post are two different things. Just sayin'.
 
Hey we got it. You are a better hunter than people who hire a guide. I'll let all my customers know since they spend their money and time hunting so they hope to be as good as you.


Much like jm77 if you haven't been hunting and had some type of emergency in the woods or camp, you may not have near as much experience as you think you do.
 
LAST EDITED ON Jul-20-17 AT 05:45PM (MST)[p]Uhh, everyone has accidents and mishaps. Everyone gets turned around once in a while or gets stuck in the mud. The difference is being able to take care of business yourself, or needing to hire someone to help you so they can make fun of you behind your back to their buddies on the Internet.

I'm not saying I don't agree with the fact that there are folks who shoot beyond their ability. Why wouldn't they? People who profit greatly do a good job of promoting long range as the cool and easy way to go.

I just think you're being a little bit pious and disingenuous so I am poking fun at you.-------SS
 
all of your nonsense stories tell me is number one you are a piss poor guide and you and all your guide buddies let people wound animals. you sir are the lowest of the low in the hunting world. glad i will never be associated with you or any of youn operations.
would never use your low class taxidermy services would i ever recommend them.
 
Like I said you probably don't have near as much experience as you think you do.

And nobody was made fun of until you got here.
 
Accumark,

Have you noticed half the time you talk about me you bring up my work?

My success or failure in business won't change my hunting or ethics.

By the way I love your statement about I "let" clients wound animals. Are you familiar with how a firearm works? :D
 
Probably be a good idea to take these guys out to the shooting bench prior to taking them hunting to better determine their effective range.
 
LAST EDITED ON Jul-20-17 AT 06:41PM (MST)[p]Take some responsibility bro......You already told us that clients are 'required' to have a guide to hunt the 300,000 acres where you need a guide to be fed, safe, and find better-than-average animals. It's obvious that this is a pretty structured operation. Grow some teeth and force these guys to do what's right.......don't you have to take an oath of integrity or something when the give you your 'Guide n' chip'?-------SS
 
Dude what's the weather like in make believe land. The more you type the less I think you are a hunter. Not a very good reader for sure. :D
 
Make believe land is the 300,000 acres where you babysit unethical hunters. Then tell tall tales about it all on the Internet to be cool. Maybe I'm not much of a hunter, but I wouldn't stand for the crap you allow to happen.

Maybe you're not much of a real guide? I happen to know a few guides and they usually don't spout off about being a guide on the Internet. They surely don't speak ill of their clientele. And they are absolutely in control of the situation in the field. Your disdainful comments about those for whom you work speaks volumes.

When you are respectable, you have influence over others. My guess is that if you were half the 'guide' that you claim to be, you would make a kind suggestion on how to get into position for a better shot, your client would gladly follow your direction, they would be successful, and all would be happy.

I'm saying the tall tales lack truth, or the combination of unethical Hunter and poor guide is the cause of the problem.-----------SS
 
>Zeke,
>
>You are right that I can
>tell you story after story
>of shots under 100 meters
>that went wrong. I
>don't think three experiences is
>enough to have a solid
>statistic that could be used
>logically against long range shooters.
> From all my experiences
>I would estimate that less
>than %10 of the shots
>I have seen taken under
>200 meters either failed completely
>or turned into some type
>of wounded animal circus.
>However %100 of the three
>long range experiences I have
>witnessed have been embarrassing failures.
>
>
>As for me discussing things in
>meters I apologize if you
>are uncomfortable with it.
>I spent a lot of
>time on other continents shooting
>and spent a lot of
>time with people from other
>continents shooting. I started
>to communicate with them in
>meters to cut down on
>confusion. I still have
>not gotten use to kilograms.
>

Then perhaps you should use metres, like they do on this continents you frequent?


"The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun"
 
Tri-tip never fails. I am not sure if he is actually hunting or at the zoo with a nerf gun half the time.

?If men were angels, no government would be
necessary.? John Adams
 
>Since there is a lot of
>speak on here lately I
>thought I would share the
>only three experiences I have
>with "long range" shooters.
>
>Experience 1:
>
>Mule deer hunt in New Mexico.
> One of the other
>hunters had purchased what he
>referred to as a "no
>stalk weapon" package from a
>well known supplier. He
>located a good buck, measured
>windage and range. He
>then did some type of
>calculations on a telephone and
>set up for the shot.
> The range was about
>700 meters. He missed
>the target by close to
>eight feet. I will
>admit that I do not
>believe he practiced religiously with
>the weapon before going on
>the hunt. I think
>that practiced shooters would do
>better than he did.
>How much better I am
>unsure. Thankfully the deer
>was not wounded and lost.
>
>
>Experience 2:
>
>The outfitter that I guide antelope
>hunts for sold a pair
>of spots to two men
>which were investors/ part owners
>of a weapons company which
>specialize in "long range" weapon
>systems. I was not
>assigned to guide them but
>my friend was. We
>split up in the morning.
> That evening back at
>the skinning pole my friend
>returned with a perplexed and
>depressed expression on his face.
> He had located a
>good buck for the first
>shooter. The range was
>slightly over 300 meters.
>The shooter stated he wanted
>to back away from the
>lope to a range over
>600 meters to shoot.
>My friend finally obliged him.
> The antelope was shot
>through the guts and never
>recovered. My friend learned
>a valuable lesson also that
>day. The customer is
>not always right.
>
>Experience 3:
>
>Guiding an antelope hunt I was
>paired with a couple of
>"long range" shooters. One
>is part owner of a
>well known "long range" weapon
>manufacturer. The other person
>was his friend and an
>enthusiast. I was assessing
>a buck that was about
>1200 meters in one direction.
> One of the men
>noticed 2 coyotes eating grasshoppers
>about 120 degrees another direction.
> They asked if they
>could take a poke at
>them. I determined the
>buck was not going to
>make the hit list and
>told them to go ahead.
> They ranged the pair
>of dogs at around 900
>meters. They took turns
>shooting and shot probably around
>25 rounds between the two
>of them since the coyotes
>literally had no idea what
>was going on. Since
>I already had a scope
>set up I got to
>watch the show. Sometimes
>they would miss by a
>couple of inches and then
>the very next shot be
>five feet off.Finally the coyotes
>had enough and began to
>trot. Since they couldn't
>tell where the noises had
>come from they were trotting
>right at us. With
>one of the coyotes within
>200 meters the expert blew
>it's left front leg off
>between the wrist and the
>elbow. Later when we
>located an antelope for him
>to shoot at he was
>offended when I stated I
>was going to get him
>in closer than 200 meters.
> I did and he
>killed the antelope, and I
>doubt I will ever here
>from him again.


Jesus wept.

4abc76ff29b26fc1.jpg
 
I just got through making a long range ML. - FOR TARGET SHOOTING - THAT'S ALL!!

The biggest problem I see is that there are people who think they are long range shooters because they can afford a long range gun. I have seen many hunters over the years who said they would never take an un-ethical long range shot, when indeed the prey got really big they lobbed the ol' bullet at the animal.

Probably nine out of the ten who have these kind of guns only know how to set up on a range with a lead-sled. I'm here to tell you animals aren't paper targets - they move.

If you are going through a lot of ammo and can do it - Great. But, if you are one of the most long range shooters because you have the gun - You, my friend, are a detriment to the hunting society.
 
Home


about b&c club


B&C Position Statements


b&C partners


Frequently asked questions


site map


contact us










JOIN B&C























CONSERVATION
























































EDUCATION






























































BIG GAME RECORDS





































































































HUNTING ETHICS























NEWS















































B&C STORE
























































About the B & C Club

Advertiser Information


B&C Annual Reports


B&C Board of Directors


B&C Email Newsletter


B&C History


B&C Position Statements


Animal Welfare



Biological Diversity



Climate Change



Equal Access to Justice Act



Endangered Species Act



Predator Management



Private Property Rights



Sustainable Use



RECORDS COMMITTEE



Canned Shoots



Genetic Manipulation of Game



Second Ammendment Rights



Use of Science in the Management of Wildlife



Fair Chase



Defining Wildlife Conservation



Long Range Shooting



The North American Model



Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act



Big Game Records Eligibility



Deer Breeding and Shooting Operations



Governor's Tags



Big Game Trophies and Trophy Hunting



B&C Staff


B&C Strategic Plan


Contributing to B&C


Headquarters


The North American Model








boone and crockett club position statement


Long Range Shooting
First Adopted May 10, 2014


Situational Overview
Bullets fired from hunting rifles have had the capability of hitting targets at long distances for many decades. Regardless of these capabilities, sportsmen have historically held themselves to an ethical standard of not taking excessively long or risky shots at the big game animals they pursue. New shooting technologies now being developed and promoted for use in hunting are encouraging hunters to shoot at substantially increased distances. These new technologies, while not illegal, are tempting hunters into taking longer and longer shots, which is raising significant ethical questions, including those of fair chase and intent.


The distance at which a shot is considered ?long-range,? ethical, or unethical cannot be defined by specific yardages because this varies with each individual situation. It depends on equipment, shooting conditions, the species being hunted, the hunter?s experience and marksmanship skills, and other variables. It also depends on the commitment of every responsible hunter to avoid inflicting undue suffering, to make quick and humane kills, and to make every effort never to waste animals pursued as legal quarry. It is widely acknowledged that the likelihood of wounding, and the challenges of tracking, and recovering animals increase proportionally as shooting distances increase.


Hunting must involve the risk of detection and failure if there is to be any honor in having overcome the superior senses and survival instincts of the hunted. It is for this reason that sportsmen have embraced limitations so that technology does not fully overwhelm the natural capacities of the prey they pursue. This is a self-imposed trade-off that decreases the likelihood of a successful harvest, but heightens the hunting experience and shows respect for the animals being hunted. Combined, these values represent the intent and cherished traditions of hunting.

Position
The Boone and Crockett Club believes the term ?long-range? shooting is more defined by a hunter?s intent, than any specific distance at which a shot is taken. If the intent of the individual is to test equipment and determine how far one can shoot to hit a live target and if there is no motivation to risk engagement with the animal being hunted, this practice is not hunting and should not be accorded the same status as hunting.


The Boone and Crockett Club maintains that hunting, at its most fundamental level, is defined by a tenuous and unpredictable relationship between predator and prey. This is an intrinsic, irrefutable and intimate connection that cannot be compromised if the hunter is to maintain the sanctity of this relationship and any credible claim that hunting is challenging, rewarding, respectful of wild creatures, and in service to wildlife conservation. This connection is built upon many complex components that differentiate hunting from simply shooting or killing.


The Club finds that long-range shooting takes unfair advantage of the game animal, effectively eliminates the natural capacity of an animal to use its senses and instincts to detect danger, and demeans the hunter/prey relationship in a way that diminishes the importance and relevance of the animal and the hunt. The Club urges all hunters to think carefully of the consequences of long-range shooting, whether hunting with a rifle, bow, muzzleloader, crossbow, or handgun, and not confuse the purposes and intent of long-range shooting with fair chase hunting.





Home


About B&C Club


B&C partners


Frequently Asked Questions


Site Map


Contact Us



? 2017 Boone and Crockett Club ? | Acceptable Use and Privacy Policy
 
As a Guide you are 100% responsible for your hunters actions, failure to record/determine shooting skills before hand, backing-off to make the shot longer, allowing 25+shots at any game animal, without hits, show me you are NOT a Hunter with ethics and you should be BANNED from ever having a Guide licence...

Please tell us who you guide for, so they can be avoided...
But then again, you probably won't, cause you couldn't stand the fact that you are amoung the "Bad-Guides" of America...
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-07-17 AT 07:52AM (MST)[p]You claim to be Guide and don't know coyotes are game animals???Hafukinha...
So what outfitter do you guide for TriState???
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom