Another guess the score

ThunderImpulse4 · Jul 24, 2016

This is a general season buck that my wife is going to be after come the rifle hunt for her first buck.

What's your guess on score and width.

http://www.monstermuleys.info/photos/user_photos_2016/42991screenshot20160724213917zpsqedmtm8e.jpeg

http://www.monstermuleys.info/photos/user_photos_2016/65965screenshot20160724010620.jpeg

http://www.monstermuleys.info/photos/user_photos_2016/9066screenshot20160724010516.jpeg

fullthrottle · Jul 24, 2016

I'm going to say 170ish 27 wide.

mike111 · Jul 24, 2016

22-23" inside spread, 150-155" nice buck!

ICMDEER · Jul 24, 2016

I would also say about 170, and 27-28.

rmanwill · Jul 25, 2016

27" & 165-170

NPHunter · Jul 25, 2016

155-160" deer

He will only get about 21-22" spread credit

Main Beam - 22"
G1 - 1"
G2 - 15"
G3 - 7"
G4 - 7"
Mass 15"

67 x 2 = 134? + 22? 156?

The way his G3?s lay out from his main beams make him seem wider than he actually is. I also have a hard time believing his forks are even 7? deep and he doesn't look very heavy even though he is in full velvet. He does not have the tine length or mass to make a 170? deer IMO, another year and maybe he would make it there.

BlackBear53 · Jul 25, 2016

>155-160" deer
>
>He will only get about 21-22"
>spread credit
>
>Main Beam - 22"
>G1 - 1"
>G2 - 15"
>G3 - 7"
>G4 - 7"
>Mass 15"
>
>
>67 x 2 = 134? +
>22? 156?
>
>The way his G3?s lay out
>from his main beams make
>him seem wider than he
>actually is. I also have
>a hard time believing his
>forks are even 7? deep
>and he doesn't look very
>heavy even though he is
>in full velvet. He
>does not have the tine
>length or mass to make
>a 170? deer IMO, another
>year and maybe he would
>make it there.

I think you might have missed a mass measurement on the back fork (H-3). Hard to see 4 mass measurements come out at 15" on this deer.

2_Point · Jul 25, 2016

That buck hard horned will have less than 16" of mass per side. 160" buck. Inches suck anyway. If you like him then shoot him and leave the tape measure to the dudes with measurement issues.

NPHunter · Jul 25, 2016

>I think you might have missed
>a mass measurement on the
>back fork (H-3). Hard
>to see 4 mass measurements
>come out at 15" on
>this deer.
>

I am familiar with scoring mule deer and which measurements are required. The buck in the pictures below had 21" of mass per side and was very very heavy. Most bucks do not have close this kind of mass and the one in the pictures doesn't, not even if you count the velvet.

I was giving him

H1 - 4.5"
H2 - 4"
H3 - 3"
H4 - 3.5"

I don't see him being much heavier than that, some more pictures with some side views would help. Even with 17" per side which IMO is a little high he is still a 160" deer.