Best cal. for elk?????

N

nmhunter1975

Guest
Took my wife on an cow elk hunt and she was using a 30-06. She had to put 4 rounds in her to put her down for good. All 4 shots were good hits. A friend of mine went on a cow hunt also and was using a 270 and also had trouble putting down elk without shooting her up. So what would be the best cal. for elk?
 
Any caliber could take 5 shots to put an elk, just as any caliber can but an elk down in one shot. I have seen a .30/30 drop an elk in its tracks, and I have seen a .300 mag take 4 shots to put one down. Its not what caliber you shoot, its where you hit it.
 
There are so many variables to this. Distance, caliber, bullet construction...But most importantly, shot placement.

Elk are very tough animals with a strong will to live. A .416 Rigby can cleanly kill a cape buffalo with one shot, but it can also take many more to take it down and the buffalo can kill you in the process.

Don't forget this, a well placed double lung shot is a great hit, although if the animal just took a breath, that mixed with adrenaline, the animal is running dead. Doesn't mean the 30-06 didn't work.

Chef
"I Love Animals...They're Delicious!"
 
too much attention is payed to the physics of ballistics and not enough attention is payed to putting the bullet where it needs to go. there isn't a caliber out there that will take an elk of it's feet, unless it's a spine shot. they're fairly tough, good sized, and have huge lung and capillary capacity. it takes em a minute or 2, to expire. velocity, "knock down", bullet weight, bullet diameter, bullet type, penetration, etc., none of it means anything if you don't hit em right. a lung shot might take a minute or 2 for em to go down, but they are dead, no matter what. even if the bullet doesn't expand. lungs are real delicate tissue. you can rip them to shreds with your fingers. put a bullet from any modern day, center fire, hipower through an elks lungs, even a solid, and it will die and die pretty quick. something that is travelling at the speed a bullet does and is hard as a bullet is, is going to cause a devastating wound. sometimes, some elk, just run a little farther. as long as you retrieved it, ya did ok. this past Az. early bull hunt i saw some horrible shooting from some big guns. practice is what it takes.
 
Its really worth the time spent sighting and zeroing rifles in to almost pinpoint accuracy. Check out the balistics on your bullet grain, this will tell you how far the bullet will drop at 3 or 400 yards. I shoot a 7mm with 163 grain hornady bullets and have had great luck with this set up for deer and elk. I've shot a few different types of ammo, some of which were much more expensive but Hornady seems to be the most accurate out of the box.
 
I will have to agree with everyone. Bullet placement and bullet construction have more to do with getting one shot kills than caliber. Now, you don't want to shoot an elk with a 22-250 or a 223 but anything 7mm and up should do the job with the right bullet and correct placement. Sometimes animals just won't give it up, it's not always the shot that determines how fast they fall. Elk are tough and want to live so I'm sure the 30-06 did the job just fine.
 
Oh, and I shoot a 300 Weatherby Mag for Elk, however, I have taken one with my .308 and it did the job just fine.
 
Agreed Shot placment is the Key. I have used a 30-06 and a 270 to kill elk. The spike I shot with the 30-06 was a solid heart lung shot. The bull ran about 30 yards and dropped dead in his tracks. I was using a 165 grain spitzer bullet.

This year I shot my elk with a 270 150 grain bullet. I missed the heart shot and blasted the lower leg on the opposite side. Shot a little low. Put him down for good with a shot to the neck. Practice is the key.

Dont give up on either gun they are both excellent calibers for hunting big game.
 
With something as tough as elk can be, if you can handle it, its better to err on the large side. 338 caliber would be about my favorite. Its a pretty proven round with few failures to recount. Where as even with the 30 cal mags you still run into incomplete penetration with 180s at times.

But in the end you still have to put it where it counts.

There is another way to attempt it. Use a high velocity zippy round with a ballistic tip type bullet that will penetrate a bit, but blow up inside and expand all its energy, therefore normally taking the animal down almost instantly.

But I'd be scared as heck to take anything but a perfect shot with that setup.

Jeff
 
rost, sounds like you spent a lot of time reading elmer keith books. he liked a .338 for pronghorns and coues deer. nothing wrong with a .338 at all, but to say that a .300 mag is too small seems sorta odd. personally, i wouldn't be afraid to hunt elk with a .243. it's a little small, but i'm pretty sure i could get it done. and i've never seen a .300 fail on an elk. seen some hunters with .300's fail. but not the gun. i'm taking a real important client (my ol' man) on a very desirable Az. bull elk hunt next week. he's gonna use his 50 year old .270 with 130 gr. sierra bullets and i have all the confindence in the world in the setup. you talk a lot about bullet failure. i've been on hundreds of deer and elk kills. hundreds. i've never seen what i felt was a bullet failure. i've seen guy use the wrong bullets with crappy results and i've seen guys gutshoot stuff and claim it was the bullet's fault. but i've never seen a bullet fail to do what it was designed for. big bullets don't make up for crappy shooting. in my opinion, a .300 mag with a 165 or 180 gr bullet is about the optimum for elk. big guns are fine. in fact they're great. i really, really like em. the bigger the better. but they don't compensate for any of the other variables. if you're gonna kill an elk, you need to be able to shoot him in the chest with some real confidence in your marksmanship. gutshooting or blowing off a leg won't work. i can tell by other posts that you spend a lot of time at the range. i spend a lot of time in the mountains. saying that a .300 is too small, in my opinion, is a little irresponsible.
 
RLH

Glad you get time in the mountains. I'm very far away from them :-( I've spent lots of range time since I am a top ranked competitive shooter. I've also spent 3-4 months a year guiding hunters here. You know those endless days that blend into nites, guys with 300s that need 243s, kids with 7mags that can head shoot and everything in between. Remember my posts about being in on over 300 deer kills a year on the ranch we guided for? I've seen a lot. Probably not as much as someone experienced like you. But I can convert failures on Whitetail to come to expect that on larger animals need more horsepower. Heck when it comes down to it, my mentors killed most of their deer with 22lr. Just be careful. Its illegal here now though which is for the best.

FYI I absolutely hate Elmer Keith. I have a few of his books. I thought he was nuts for his big theory. But I've knocked down a lot of Nilgai with a 300 and 180 grain bonded bear claws, Partitions and normal bullets. I've seen failures in everyone of them. They are similar in size to an elk. They are extremely tough. Read that to say that a 7 rem mag with 175 partitions at anything over 250 yards will not totally penetrate -- even ribcage shots only.

I've come to my opinion with field experience. I've got a couple of 300s that I don't hesitate to use. Especially with Barnes bullets(the only ones we found to be reliable on Nilgai). I prefer that larger round due to its versatility.

Deer hunting I normally use 223 or 243. And I agree with ya, I'd have no problem with a 243 on elk. It just would limit me to specific ranges and shots. And thats what I don't want to be, I don't want to be limited when that special one steps out.

I think we'll both agree on this though. Bigger is not worse. But you have to be able to handle it. Bullet placement has to be correct. I suspect your dad will do fine because he knows where to stick the bullet, what the bullet will or will not do, limits his range of shot, and is totally comfortable with that rifle. That is a huge plus.

I suspect you'll always feel your rounds are best. I'll always feel larger is better. Maybe because Moose, brown bears etc... are on this list also.

Please don't call me Elmer Jr though.

Jeff
 
"Bullet failure" has different meanings to different folks. I guess if the animal dies, it did it's job...true. Although I tend to look at it this way...If whilst I'm gutting the animal, and the bullet is fragmented, un-expanded (on an expanding bullet), separated from it's jacket, etc, then the bullet did not perform the way it was supposed to...period. The worst I think is jacket separation. These bullets are constructed to stay together, when they don't, I consider that a failure.

Guess I'm more anal rententive than most and pay attention to these details with more scrutiny.

"Dead is dead" is another valid argument. The deer/elk/pronhorn/etc didn't care if it was a .270 or a .45-70, a 130 grainer or a 300 casted. I'm happy when the animal expires in sight, don't get me wrong, but there is something to be said when meat is jello because of bullet explosion/fragmentation and I end up having to throw that away.

Chef
"I Love Animals...They're Delicious!"
 
rost, i've read all kindsa stories by you about "bullet failure". you said in one that some guy shot a deer through the chest with a 165 gr. .30 cal bullet and it lived to be shot another day. to put it real blunt. i don't believe it. ain't no way. even if he shot a solid it'd kill the deer and fairly soon. it might get away, but no way it would survive a .30 cal throught the chest. not even in the guts. it's gonna die of infection if nothing else. you act like there's some magic potion on bullets that heal em up. lung tissue is a little stronger than wet toilet paper. any bullet, even an FMJ, in the lungs of any deer is gonna be fatal. it may take awhile, even a few hours, but they're gonna die. i read you touting barnes bullets a bunch. nothing wrong with em, but ain't neccessarily anything "righter" with them than other bullets either. seems to me like most of what i've read from you is a lot like a barnes commercial. are they paying you to shoot their bullets? you might be the greatest shot, guide, hunter, philospher ever, but i don't buy the story about the deer living with a .30 cal in the chest. and i don't buy the story that you hafta have a huge gun. a guy needs to be able to shoot under stressfull conditions. and i don't mean from an elevated stand looking down a road full of cracked corn. i ain't a target shooter. other than getting my rifle where i want it. but i can shoot game. when coyotes were a premuim price i used to feed my family shooting them. loaded a buncha FMJ's for my .243, .22/.250 and .223. didn't see any difference in what they did to a coyote than hollowpoints or SX's. if i hit em the chest they died almost instantly. only way they were better is if i made a bad shot they didn't explode on their butt. any animal that gets punched in the lungs with a hipower is gonna die. i've been reloading for over 40 years. shot every kinda the bullet that came down the pike in about every cartridge ever made. never seen one fail. not even one. seen some guys fail shooting, but not the bullet. and again, no deer, elk, moose, etc. can survive a .30 through the lungs.
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-12-04 AT 11:54AM (MST)[p]You know what. scratch my last post.

I've come on here as a new poster. I have little experience with Elk or Muleys. Only with Whitetail, Hogs and large exotics like Nilgai. Which probably don't react like your animals do.

I'm stepping on your toes. You've done this so much longer than I have and seen so much more, that you are correct and I'm wrong.Had I lived in the mountains and had that 40 years of experience I could speak.

No more elmer jr. I'm here to learn from you in the future. I sure hope I can re-learn all over again about the elk and deer and what they take to hunt and kill and I"ll be honored if you teach me.

Oh yeah, being totally polite here. The deer with the 165 in the lungs happened. There are witnesses to it. ITs hard to believe but it happened. Just like folks find broadheads encased in cartilagenous material in the lungs of elk. Shouldn't be possible, yet it happens. Go ask a combat surgery team what they see in the field. Things that should kill right away, yet soldiers survive. You just never know. Believe it or not.

Jeff
 
Damn, and I would have liked to read what post #15 said.

Rost, youre alright in my book.

Mike
at235.gif
 
good point boneaddict. i've shot just about everything the west has with my bow. no problem. bears, lions, elk, deer (muleys and coues), javelinas, turkeys, coyotes, foxes, bobcats, rabbits, squirrels, etc. and an arrow has no "knockdown". none. most of the time they don't even know they're hit. just go back to feeding and then die a few minutes later. i've also shot em with roundballs and maxiballs and buffalo bullets outta muzzleloaders. same thing. the boom spooks em and they watch the smoke cloud float off and don't even know their lungs just got poked. but they die real soon. the XTP's i've been shooting lately seem to have some serious smack when they hit tho. unlike the big slow lead slugs. i don't believe you can shoot a deer, any deer, even one with a big red "S" inside a shield on it's chest, through the lungs, with a .30 cal. projectile, in fact any .cal. projectile, and have it survive. one of several things happened, it ran off and died and somebody shot a deer that looked real similar later, or the guy missed. be as condescending and as smug as you want. i don't believe the story. it all sounds like a commercial to me. texas whitetails must be one tough sob of a deer. next time i hunt there i'll hafta make sure and use rigby or a .460.
 
A better question would be whats the best man for elk.

I would say it would be:

can quote his bullet ballistics every 50 yards out to his limit range.
knows his limits and that of his gun.
wont shoot when its not right.
can plant a bullet for a lung hit every time.
is humble enough to thank God for his ability to hunt a majestic animal in the most awesome country on earth, and will give that animal his most supreme respect.
 
RLH

Thanks for that idea. I've learned something again. I never thought there could be a deer that looked identical in a video and later in a picture.

And they say ignorance is bliss. Be blissful

}>
 
rosty, imagine me making a vee with my first 2 fingers. now ignore my index finger. your fulla crap and i ain't buyin' it. go sell your copper bullets someplace else. just watched the cheapest bullets on the market put down 3 nice coues with 3 shots this weekend. i know they ain't the super strong, lead impervious, self healing deer of texas, but they all died real quick. i'm done with this. and you for that matter. go lie someplace else.
 
UNIT 16C HAVE SOME PICS BUT NOT ON THE DIGITAL. NEED TO TAKE A PIC OF A PIC THEN SEND THEM TO SOME ONE TO POST FOR ME
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-19-04 AT 04:38PM (MST)[p]Your very question is why there are 1000 different calibers out there, and 5000 different bullets. NO ONE has the right answer, not Jack O'Conner, nor Elmer Keith. In 11 plus years of guiding elk hunters, i have seen it all, and i beleive it all comes down to this. Bullet placement, and bullet construction. That in itself opens up a whole other door, which one? You can't go wrong with any of the 30 caliber magnums in my opinion, but you've still got to hit 'em in the right spot, no matter WHAT you shoot. I am a fan of the 30-378 with 180 grain ballistic tips. That heavy slug has lot's of shock at closer to medium ranges, yet has the bulk to hold it together, even at those higher velocities. And at longer ranges, it performs flawlessly. I've seen that combo get the job done, and done right at any range. Remember, this caliber was built to make a long range weapon, not an "extreme" range weapon, and we owe it to the animals we hunt to not "test" it at hidiously long ranges. That rule should apply with ANY caliber though!
Slamdunk
 
Wow, a ballistic tip holding together enough for elk. I've had a partition not hold together enough to totally penetrate a whitetail neck . Broke the neck but went no further. That was a 180 partition at 3100 fps with a 100 yard shot(appx). After head shooting a few does with BT bullets and having basically nothing left there, they always acted more like HP bullets to me.

I'd be awful leary of trying to ram a 180 ballistic tip into a bull from anything but a perfect shot. An accubond might be a different story though. But since you've seen it work that sure means something anyway.

But anywhich way, gotta stick in the right place unless its something like 105........
 
I already know i'm gonna get crap for this one but i don't care.
i'm 28 years old and i was brought up shooting what ya had. there was know going and buying a new rifle cause i got drawn for elk..I have bought one rifle in my lifetime and have killed everything in the state of az except buffalo and sheep and bear.mostly cause i can't get drawn. anyways i shoot a remington 22-250 with 55 grain soft points. i have never had a problem with ruining meat.never had a problem with not bringing down a animal. including a 6x7 bull this year at 125 yards. here is my 2 cents on calibers and shooting.

1. shoot what you want and can afford that includes small calliber rifles.
2. if you can't shoot straght,and are reling on a higher caliber to compensate your poor shooting,stop hunting and pick up golf.
lol i like that one lol
3. shot placement is crucial hit them where ya supposed to.
4. practice,practice,practice
5. size of calibers in my opinion does'nt mean squat but that's me.

that's my 2 cents i'm sure i'm gonna get crap from most of you but oh well i kill what i shoot at and that's all that matters to me. everybodys got their preferance and is intitled to them.
please don't take this as me bragging as i am a very humbbling person that does not need to,just ask my friends that ask me every year for meat. lol
sincerley: jd
 
while the 22-250 isn't a legal caliber for big game here in wyoming, if it works for you, and is legal where you hunt-more power to ya. i've watched many elk fall to a 243 or 25-06. its all about shot placement. if they can kill them with pointy sticks(archery tackle), any old high power will do the job when pointed right. i think intelligent people with small bores probably wound alot less game than people who bought a big magnum to make up for poor shooting/shot selection.
 
i could'nt agree with u more saminwy. if a arrow can take um down why do people look down on small calibers. by the way what is the smallest cal. in wy you can use? az just states any centerfire rifle.
JD
 
I have 3 rifles that I use extensively here in NM.
1)a .223 for all varmits and an occasional antelope.
2)a .270 for deer and antelope
3)a .338 for elk and everything in Alaska
Granted a .338 is not the first choice by many for elk. However, over time I have learned to shoot this rifle. I always practice a bunch with the .223 to make sure I am squeezing. The .338 is sighted in and when I shoot a cow or bull, I never feel the recoil but I do note that the elk either way hurt or down. I just switched from the 210 gr nosler to a 225 grain barnes triple x. I will be getting better ballistics with 15 more grains of bullet, like an elk can tell the difference. I also put one of the new slide on Limbsaver recoil pads on my pre 64 .270. Its a dream to shoot. Recoil is gone. I'm getting one for the .338. As an outfitter, I've seen a lot of elk shot. I firmly believe shot placement is the key. However, a bull can absorb a bunch of energy. I believe they deserve to die as quickly and humanely as possible and I believe its the hunters responsibility to use the most weapon he or she can effectively shoot to harvest these magnificent animals. If thats a .270 fine. If its a .340 Weatherby even better as long as it hit the lungs or heart everytime.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom