I have the same bullets loaded up in my 300 Win (200 grain) and 338 Rum. (225 grain) They shoot better than any other bullet I have loaded up, and this includes, partitions, failsafes, X's (not triple shocks), A-frames, Scirroccos, and Hornadys. Unfornately, I have not taken any game with them yet. I have heard good things on this board and others. They expand more than the partition and don't retain quite as much mass, but I've heard penetration was satisfactory-to-good, and you do get the benefits of greater accuracy which is most imnportant in my book. I'm not so accuracy driven that i'll use a matchking, ballistic tip or even a gameking, but accuracy amongst the "tougher" bullets is very important to me.
The only thing that may pre-empt my using Accubonds on game this year is....obviously, - not getting a shot, or if I can get my hands on some Barnes MRX's for my 338 Rum for long range testing. I am interested to see how they perform. If the MRX's are what they are saying they are; well then they should be some very bad news on elk at close or longe range, the best of both worlds. However, until I get some to test...AND they perform better than the Accubonds in my 338 Rum, I will be using the Accubonds.
Regards
"Be a straight-shooter in all that you do."