" Empirical Evidence "

RE: " Empirical Evidence "

You know you've hit bottom when FAUX can't cover for the orange chit stain anymore. the minions are speechless . and that is priceless.


So who wants to argue with Dracula ? why is this a big nothing burger and nothing but a witch hunt ? I'm waiting.












Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

LAST EDITED ON Jul-14-17 AT 05:13PM (MST)[p]If Chelsea got an email from anyone saying they had dirt on Trump, she would have turned the email over to the FBI. Haha!
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Hillary and Bill would have ran a 4 minute mile to get to that attorney to get the goods on Trump and never spoke a word to the FBI. They would have used their fall people to leak the information.
RELH
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Funny, I thought Trump was president and we were talking about his ties to Russia. did Hillary win? somebody owes me $500 then.


We can talk about the documented special order 1966 Tiger Gold tri power 4spd GTO I just bought to if you like, I like to talk about it. and it has just as much to do with this as the Clintons do.














Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Democrats May Come To Regret Mueller Investigation Into Trump-Russia Ties



Russian Connection: The naming of former FBI head Robert Mueller to look into allegations of improper Russian influence on the last election should have a clarifying effect ? and not just for President Donald Trump, who is the main target of the probe. President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's Russian ties will come under the legal microscope, too.

Mueller, who was named by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to act as special counsel, has a reputation for being a competent straight shooter. After all, he was able to get along with both President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama. We hope and expect he'll produce a responsible investigation of what's taken place and do so as quickly as possible.

Yet, it's pretty clear to anyone being even a little bit honest that this whole thing is a political stink bomb set off by progressive Democrats and their far-left allies in the mainstream media.

We have still yet to see any damning evidence that Trump either "colluded" with the Russians or that he obstructed justice in handling the case with recently fired FBI Director James Comey. And remember, this "investigation" has been underway since last June.

Apart from numerous, entirely anonymously sourced news reports in the mainstream media, the evidence of any kind of misconduct by Trump is shockingly thin.

The Washington Post made its initial blockbuster revelation, that Trump gave Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russia's ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Kislyak, "highly classified" information, based entirely on "current and former officials" ? never speaking to, or as far as anyone can tell, even trying to speak to the three other government officials who attended the talks with the Russians: National Security Advisor H.R McMaster, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Senior Policy Advisor Dina Powell.

The breathless tone of the reporting suggested some major breach had occurred. And yet the Post, by its own admission, had nothing.

"As president, Trump has broad authority to declassify government secretes, making it unlikely that his disclosures broke the law," the Post wrote on May 16.

Now we're supposed to believe ? again, with no hard evidence, this time from a New York Times report ? that, one day after his national security advisor, Michael Flynn, resigned on Feb. 14, President Trump obstructed justice by asking Comey to find a way to drop the FBI's investigation into Flynn's ties with the Russians.

It's a serious charge, one that could lead to impeachment, potentially. It supposedly comes from notes that Comey has been keeping of his dealings with Trump ? notes the Times' reporter didn't even see.

And yet, on May 3, Comey himself told the Senate under oath that he had not been politically pressured to halt any investigation. But Rosenstein was politically stampeded into naming Mueller as special counsel by what could turn out to be an entirely spurious news report.

When you can have hearsay and anonymous rumor-mongering driving major legal investigations with potentially enormous ramifications for our government and election system, something has gone terribly wrong.

And the Democrats may come to regret their eagerness to take down Trump. Charged with doing a thorough investigation, Mueller should look not just into Trump's ties with the Russians, but former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's and former President Barack Obama's, as well. It's only fair.

As we've documented below and in links within this story, both Clinton and Obama have sketchy histories, to be generous, when it comes to Russia. Compared to them, Trump may look like Mr. Clean.
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Here we go again CLINTON OBAMA CLINTON OBAMA CLINTON OBAMA. we get it already. jesus Christ.



So , how about the empirical evidence of collusion? can we talk about that? no? then go hose yourself.

Now for the rest of you who aren't masters of deflection , are you going to toss dum dum jr and wonder boy under the bus and hope that gets dear leader can plead ignorance? or will they all go down together as the circle jerk of treason ?











Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Tweedie Dee Dude, please show us the evidence to support your wishful allegations. You are going to take it again in the rear just like you did saying that Hillary was going to win. It will go nowhere and the Dems will end up with egg on their face just like a certain drunk half-breed that we know.

RELH
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

They're building a case as we speak retired meter reader. don't argue with me argue with your Dracula. you've even lost the support of the FAUX news slantheads, there is your sign.


This is bad, really really bad. even you know that. you go ahead and attempt to retain your dignity as long as you can, it only makes you look more like the chump you are when the con blows up in your face.


The crime family is in " yuge " trouble that is an absolute fact. how much the GOP can and will protect them is what we're waiting to see.





https://www.yahoo.com/news/scandal-donald-trump-jr-apos-103704137.html








Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

LAST EDITED ON Jul-16-17 AT 09:13AM (MST)[p]tweedle nuts, here read this and try to gain some perspective on things.......It would seem your claims may eventually work against you........ One lone simple unflushed turd is far cleaner than the corruption in the democratic party.....a simpleton could reason enough to figure out all this hype is to hide something after all didn't the dems go to great lengths to deceive their own party in the last election ? wake up dumb azz......Trouble is the corruption in Washington runs deep why else would Hillary claim " if he gets elected we'll all hang".....There now go sit and ponder why her admission of guilt would be so dramatic.....Book deals, huge foreign donations, federal monies diverted to activist groups and a spiraling debt....Hmmm why isn't the media focused on the misdeeds of the dems....a far better case for collusion could be proven there......you simple minded fool. Here's a theory for you to ponder....politics is rarely what is playing out before your eyes it's the ultimate form of deception.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...-phone-during-trump-jr-meeting-russian-lawyer

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


Report: Lynch Tapped Manafort's Phone During Trump Jr. Meeting With Russian Lawyer

ZeroPointNow's picture
by ZeroPointNow
Jul 14, 2017 1:30 PM
2.3K
SHARES
TwitterFacebookReddit
According to a tweet by former Massachusetts Trump campaign official James Brower and first reported by independent journalist and author Jack Posobiec, former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort's phone was tapped by former Attorney General Loretta Lynch during the now infamous meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya - who was let into the United States under "extraordinary circumstances" by Obama's DOJ, headed by Lynch.

The meeting included Donald Trump Jr., Manafort, Jared Kushner, Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Fusion GPS associate Rinat Akhmetshin - a Russian-American lobbyist who confirmed today that he was present during the June 2016 sit-down.

Follow
James B @jbro_1776
Scoop: Manaforts phone was illegally bugged during meeting with Russian Lawyer, confirmed by multiple sources. Lynch ordered it.
7:28 AM - 14 Jul 2017
1,050 1,050 Retweets 1,155 1,155 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
The meeting was arranged by another Fusion GPS associate, Rob Goldstone - in what is looking more and more like a deep-state setup to justify FISA wiretapping warrants. Of note, Veselnitskaya is publicly anti-Trump.

Fusion GPS, the firm behind the discredited 35 page Trump-Russia 'dossier,' was co-founded by Glenn Simpson, who abruptly canceled his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee next week in light of recent events linking the democrat opposition research firm to a second attempt to take down the Trumps.

View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
Follow
Jack Posobiec ?? ✔ @JackPosobiec
Veselnitskaya and Akhmetshin seem part of a setup designed to create grounds for a FISA warrant on the Trump campaign
7:18 AM - 14 Jul 2017
1,488 1,488 Retweets 1,536 1,536 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Legal?

If Brower's tweet is proven correct and Paul Manafort's phone was being tapped during the meeting - it means Loretta Lynch's surveillance of Manafort, an American, was done without a FISA warrant - as the first FISA request by the Obama administration came in July, the same month as the meeting in Trump Tower.

This also calls into question the June 27th, 2016 "tarmac" meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton, which would have come after the meeting at Trump Tower. Was Lynch reporting the results of the alleged surveillence to Clinton?

FISA Timeline

As radio host Mark Levin detailed in March (via Breitbart):

Drawing on sources including the New York Times and the Washington Post, Levin described the case against Obama so far, based on what is already publicly known. The following is an expanded version of that case, including events that Levin did not mention specifically but are important to the overall timeline.

1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request, uncharacteristically, is denied.
2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton?s own missing emails, joking: ?Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing.? That remark becomes the basis for accusations by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.
3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton campaign blames Trump and the Russians.
4. October: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found ? but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National Review later notes. The Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.
Huge if true...
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Stop deflecting and making excuses retard. your heroes tried to collude and your FAUX heroes are admitting they did.

If Obama or Clinton ever get back in the whitehouse all your bullchit may be relevant. until then you're pizzing in the wind and Mueller is coming after you.



Read it again and STFU if you can't stay on topic. you're a low information voter with a low IQ nobody cares what your opinion is. stick to facts.


http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/op-ed/article161203988.html










Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Dude you are still a miserable piece of humanity that is so filled with hatred you can not accept any view but your own.

What happen to you in life that made you such a miserable piece of crap. Were you bullied in school, or were you molested that turn you so sour on everybody?

Do you resent your mixed blood to the point of hatred?


RELH
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

He's incapable of being able to discern an opposing point of view even with named and documented sources. He got duped by the pollsters, the democrats, his beloved fake news media and can't accept the fact he's the text book definition of a low information voter his parties ideal mark.

He's no different from the socialist youth antifa that claims to protest in peace, while destroying property and calling us racist's.......LOL He's right about one thing though, there's a cover up going on, he just hasn't figured out why and who has the most to lose from the exercise....... and who all is colluding...... Go have a drink dude since it's a lot more complex than your closed little mind will ever comprehend.....It's spy vs. spy. vs. spy and way to many pieces in a puzzle for him to grasp.

Here's a hint dude you have a better chance adopting religion than you do getting a fair shake from your own party... Donald Trump Jr. is a choir boy compared to the likes of today's politicians and what they did to try to control the election. Wake up and stop showing your azz
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

GEE! You mean the Democrats did what they are accusing Trump Jr. of doing. It can't be true, everyone knows that the Dems are far above that level!!!!
_______________________________________RELH_________________


The White House and Trump allies in recent days have pointed to a reported meeting last year between a Democratic National Committee consultant and officials at the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington. They spoke amid recent revelations about Trump campaign officials accepting a meeting in June 2016 with a Russian lawyer, on the possibility of potentially damaging information on Clinton.

?If you are looking for an example of a campaign coordinating with a foreign country or a foreign source, look no further than the DNC, which actually coordinated opposition research with the Ukrainian Embassy,? White House Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Monday. ?This is not an accusation. That is an on-the-record action that they took.?

Sanders was referring to a meeting that Politico first reported in January. The report cited a meeting between Ukrainian government officials who allegedly tried to help Clinton undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office and shared research and damaging information on Trump and his advisers with Clinton allies.

The Politico investigation exposed that a Ukrainian-American DNC operative -- Alexandra Chalupa, who worked in the Clinton White House -- met with officials in the Ukrainian Embassy to expose ties between Trump?s then-top campaign official Paul Manafort and Russia.



Manafort later resigned.

The Ukrainian Embassy suggests Sanders spoke without being fully informed.

?The Embassy of Ukraine in Washington did not coordinate with the DNC about opposition research,? the embassy said. ?While some politicians who are not part of the Ukrainian government might have taken sides during last year?s elections in the U.S., the government of Ukraine did not.?

While Schiff acknowledged that Democrats seeking such information on Trump from Ukrainian officials would be inappropriate, he said that doesn't compare to what Russia did in the 2016 White House race.

The U.S. intelligence community has largely concluded that Russia meddled to hurt Clinton?s bid, including hacking emails from the DNC and others related to her presidential campaign.

?I think to compare the two is a bit like comparing a bank robbery with writing a check with insufficient funds,? Schiff told ABC.
_________________________________________________________

Talk about downplaying it. Schiff is two face as they come. You can look for him to try and run for president in the future. That is if he does not get caught with his hand in cookie jar before then.
RELH
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

LAST EDITED ON Jul-17-17 AT 08:16AM (MST)[p]



Personal attacks and deflection aren't going to make this go away slurps.


Again, read what your heroes say. until you convince them your orange love is innocent you're not going to convince the majority of americans who know Trump is guilty.


I dearly love watching your desperation and ridiculous excuses. keep it coming please. justice is watching the guilty twist in the wind.


http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/op-ed/article161203988.html











Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Until you can admit the dems got caught playing their own foolish game on the American people you'll never see the light and actually realize who has more lose. You're the one that keeps deflecting and simply won't admit the democratic party got caught committing fraud in our last election. hell members of your own party are going after the party to get their donations back! Did Donald Jr. do something wrong.......Yes he made an error in judgement.

So let's look at reality how many hundreds more errors in judgement and laws did Obama, Hillary, Podesta, Wasserman Schultz, the media and the dems bend to commit fraud in our last election on their own party and the American people. Let's not lose sight of the fact more than one player in the dems got paid off by the Russians!

Trump was baited with dirt on one of the most corrupt political machines in our countries history.... The Clinton's... and by association the future of the democratic party who's leadership today is aligning with socialists.......and globalists......

Some of us have seen the rest of the world and how folks live and how they're controlled by corrupt governments. Wake up, that's exactly what was going on right under your nose.

It's not the GOP agenda that's dragging you down that path....it's a by product of the Clinton Foundation and the Obama administration and their evil benefactors......

You keep buying the tripe they're peddling, just like you did their fake polls, trouble is most Americans aren't buying what they're selling.

So you think the Trumps have more to hide than the Clinton's & Obama with Russia & our last election.......careful your single digit IQ is rearing it's ugly head again and pulling your skirt up exposing your azz. LOL
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Cash wager? sure. $500 says Trump will not be reelected.


Comrade, are you questioning Dracula's wisdom? or is he just a better American than to are ? what do you have to say to him ?












Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

You may need to brush up on your reading comprehension skills a bit.......LOL nice try......still incapable of seeing the big picture aren't you. There hasn't been this much attention to any 20 minute meeting in the history of this country in the last decade........Your ability to be able to use simple logic is showing your azz again.
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

There hasn't been a meeting to collude with a foreign adversary for the purpose of swaying our elections in the last decade. when was the last time that happened by the way? do you suppose that's why all the interest? um duh, ya think ?


I asked for one of you minions to argue with Dracula's statements . I'm waiting. comrade.












Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Im not arguing a danm thing. Ive got $1000 dollars that says nothing will become of it. When you and the rest of the bozo democrats realize you should be trying to better the country instead of being the crybaby tattle-tales this crap is only going to get more comical than it already is.

Billy pushed me!!! and, and, and, Susy laughed. Then Timmy took my frisbee.....and on and on and on....

A bunch of chicken$hit pu$$ies.....
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

DUH pretty well sums up your ability to weigh the gravity of the events..........and explains why you like tripe so much. If you are naive enough to believe this is the first and only time this has gone on in our nations history it only supports how foolish you really are about politics. It's politics stupid wake up this has gone on for decades it's only since the dems got exposed it's become fair game. If you knew half of what really goes on behind closed doors it would really open your eyes. Gee you think all this has managed to tarnish our nations reputation? Think Russia could have been playing both ends? Who benefits from that? Oops your azz is showing again
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Nothing will come of it? it's already a " yuge deal WTF is wrong with you ? collusion with Russia, obstruction of justice? nothing? heads have already rolled in case you forgot.

What constitutes " nothing " ? no firing squad ?

















Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

>
>
>Nothing will come of it?
>it's already a " yuge
>deal WTF is wrong
>with you ?
>collusion with Russia, obstruction
>of justice? nothing?
>heads have already rolled in
>case you forgot.
>
>What constitutes " nothing
>" ? no
>firing squad ?
>
>

>Stay Thirsty My Friends


What head rolled? Whose in prison for treason? Give me one name of the incarcerated?
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Just keep swingin that mallet, only 7 1/2 years to go little buddy!
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Now you're sniffing CNN and MSNBC panties! Their ratings are just as bad as yours. Keep dreaming cocopuff...maybe you could have a drunken pow wow and wish for something with substance.

I thought you were smarter than that, letting the dip$hit media brainwash you....
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Money where mouth is DimWit. A thousand that says Trump or a republican president doesn't make it the next 7 1/2 years, you in or just a bunch of your fake bravado as you set trusses in 100 degree heat with one hand.

We should all remember this treasonous bunch of MM big mouths.
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Get back on your rug and continue eating your boogers...I dont believe we were discussing the future of who holds the office. We are talking about the nothingness of this Russia "collusion" hoax....

Its ok though, mommy will make you a PB&J with no crust when you get home!
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

So Flynn isn't out? that was just the fake media? you're dumber than I figured, and I figured you as a mouthbreather.


Is Dracula fake media too ? we can't even trust FOX anymore ? the whole world is lying, we can only trust the orange sphincter? is that how you see it?


Just as well you won't take my bet. you'd never pay up anyway.













Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

You guys are a riot. So where was all the outrage when your parties candidate for president got exposed colluding to cheat you out of your own right to select your candidate? Where was your outrage when she and Obama colluded to sell Uranium to Russia? Where was the outrage when she got exposed getting paid for it?

So where was the outrage when Obama got caught giving hundreds of millions of dollars to a terrorist nation bypassing congress?

You little shills are as pathetic as they come......guess you forgot about the back up plan, while running around gleeful over your wet dream .....

If Trump goes down which will never happen, Pence will carry out the plan and keep appointing justices whose impact will be felt, long after most of you take your dirt nap. In which case Trump still wins....see tweedle dum you just can't seem to grasp the big picture.
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

LAST EDITED ON Jul-18-17 AT 01:39PM (MST)[p]http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...mp-recertified-the-iran-nuclear-deal-now-what

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...-trump-calls-400-million-payment-iran-ransom/

http://time.com/4441046/400-million-iran-hostage-history/

Why would anyone other than the mentally challenged waste time on fiction? If the Iran deal was so terrible why did it just get re-certified?

Why are you so invested in fake news and feeble attempts to bolster the Republicans, is that all you got..outrage over fairy tales?
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

LAST EDITED ON Jul-18-17 AT 02:57PM (MST)[p]you're missing the point if they were so concerned with Russia being our enemy why did they sell them the uranium? SEE how your hypocrisy works against you. LOL why all the hysteria over a 20 minute meeting relating to adoption. Get serious your left leaning education is showing...... Why did Obama go around Congress?

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/438804/iran-ransom-payment-barack-obama-tried-be-sneaky
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

I didn't say the kid did the right thing. In fact I said he was guilty of poor judgement but given the situation and watching your opponent & the media trash your father can you blame the kid given the bait. But if you think they impeach Trump over what the kid did you're dreaming. The fact you think you've got the goods is hysterical.............Trump has plausible deniability on this so Inspector Tweedle Dum go knock another one back you still don't have enough to be writing those articles of impeachment......
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

The kid? Minimize treasonous activity by calling him a kid how else could a 16 year old without experience have a moral compass. FAUX will be looking for new spin jockeys you should apply.

DimWit you can't be working not up to backing your bravado with your pocket book?
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

It does not matter what Jr did, he was not officially on the campaign. What matters is that Kushner and Manafort by yet again omitting any declaration of the meeting or the players on the SF86 declarations.

The fact that material was handed over and by witness account contained material on behalf of a foreign entity to aid in the campaign is also an issue.

You still have not addressed the fact that your grasp of the "Uranium Deal" is so misguided it is laughable. Why are you spreading fake news? Try 2 minutes of researching it and you will quickly discover how embarrassing it is to even parrot such remarks.

Nixon did not resign for the crime but for the cover-up.
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Corny, how's the indoctrination of our young minds going? Tell us have they removed all the references of the civil war from our texts yet. What was on the socialist agenda for you to mislead our youth on today? How many new signups do you have for your anti fa 101 class? I'm sure they can't wait to get in that class to disrupt society under the guise of promoting freedom. just how do you teach about reparations for our misdeeds to the slaves? Let's hear it from the professional view point that way we may change our minds.
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

LAST EDITED ON Jul-18-17 AT 05:18PM (MST)[p]

Why do we promote fake news for the same reasons you do because how can we trust anyone in the media today. You may want to bone up a bit yourself, shell corporations and straw buyers can be very misleading in many regards. Since you couldn't manage to figure out who reports to who in a corporate world when trying to blame Trump before I'll take my chances. what's wrong boy's are the wheels coming off? LOL

here maybe you can verify this and about 100 other articles may be wrong but given the fact the Clinton Foundation received monies it may be hard to do. You're not going to tell me the NY Times (a trusted liberal source) is wrong are you. Wait a minute It's the liberal bible.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Trump has already committed to tossing jr under the bus. in true Trump fashion his defense is ignorance and the inability to control his staff's actions on his behalf.


So how does it feel to be losing FOX as the state media ?








Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

So where exactly in this article is Hillary Clinton implicated in having any sole final authority when it came to the approval of Rosatom's purchase into Uranium One?

Just to note not a single ounce of the uranium ore has ever left our country.

You apparently have 100 or maybe 1,000 other articles so it should be quite easy to show she had sole authority to allow Rosatom's purchase into Uranium One.
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

Well now you're down to splitting hairs. I never said she had sole responsibility but I did state their foundation received funds from the parties concerned. Why don't you take a stab at trying to disprove why our diplomats aren't supposed to receive monies from foreign sources but it's Ok for Hillary who actually signed an agreement that stated she wouldn't do it? I guess that one was as binding as her safeguarding government document and security form. I don't think we've had too many former secretary's of state who actually received large foreign deposits let alone hide their servers and destroy government docs while serving in office. It's a conflict of interest and a violation of their agreement. But hey you seem to think you know about such things so prove me wrong.

Just to note on your note you don't have a clue in hell, what's rolled in and out of this country with a controlled substance and I can assure you you're kidding yourself if you think you do. If you think some damn liberal writer is privy to the information it only reinforces your ignorance. The reasons should be obvious..... but then I digress...LOL

The wisdom of you defending the gal that colluded to cost your party it's rightful candidate truly shows how ignorant you really are.........you're making tweedle dum look like he has a PHD. So how much did she send you? LOL
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

LAST EDITED ON Jul-18-17 AT 08:58PM (MST)[p]I have no love for Hillary, I just have zero patience for stupid. Do I think there was a Quid Pro Quo and Hillary abused her time in the State Dept.? Yes

Is it relevant to what is transpiring with Dear Leader? No.

Why? Because she is not an office holder and the Republicans had the Trifecta for 6 years under Obama. If they could have pinned anything on her they would have...they didn't. So I don't spend my time worrying about a retired Grandmother.

"Cost my party"? Interesting, I am non-partisan I do not have a "party". At the beginning of the election I said Kasich or Sanders would be best for the country and I would be happy under either.

As for free college, nothing is free. But the tax code has a special provision for Hedge Fund Managers which only taxes them at 15%. I am talking about the Soros' of the world who make billions.

"The cost of this $75 billion a year plan is fully paid for by imposing a tax of a fraction of a percent on Wall Street speculators who nearly destroyed the economy seven years ago. More than 1,000 economists have endorsed a tax on Wall Street speculation and today some 40 countries throughout the world have imposed a similar tax including Britain, Germany, France, Switzerland, and China. If the taxpayers of this country could bailout Wall Street in 2008, we can make public colleges and universities tuition free and debt free throughout the country."

https://berniesanders.com/issues/its-time-to-make-college-tuition-free-and-debt-free/

A .08% tax on Hedge Fund Managers doesn't sound too bad considering they have benefited for years with their very own special tax break. Yikes, they will pay a whooping 15.8% instead of 15% how will they ever afford a new yacht?

Then again, I forgot, most pinheads on the right think higher education is a bad thing, all those smarties ya know spouting off realistic facts.

When I attended college you could pretty much be self-funded if you had a decent part-time job. Tuition in the early 80's at a good school was $12K a year. Now a mediocre 4 year school costs $30K a year.
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

FTW when are you going to tell the truth about Hillary. The number one reason they did not get the goods on her was because that con man you voted twice for ran interference for her to prevent any criminal prosecution.

Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch both squashed any investigation with the help of Comey as Obama wanted. Even a liberal like you know there is enough information out there to support the fact that she was protected by the Obama administration. Yeah you helped to elect a president that protected crooks as long as they supported his socialist dreams for this country. You should be so damn proud of yourself.

RELH
 
RE: " Empirical Evidence "

LAST EDITED ON Jul-19-17 AT 01:42AM (MST)[p]7 Benghazi investigations and 7 million dollars later, but Republicans could not find her guilty. #sad

Yeah, I along with the rest of the leaders of the free world and most of the country miss Obama, how about you comrade? I don't think Putin or Trump miss Obama so your in good company there.

Good thing you voted for Bush twice and if you count this last election cycle it will be 3 times you won and America lost.

"On every major measurement, the Census Bureau report shows that the country lost ground during Bush's two terms. While Bush was in office, the median household income declined, poverty increased, childhood poverty increased even more, and the number of Americans without health insurance spiked. By contrast, the country's condition improved on each of those measures during Bill Clinton's two terms, often substantially."

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2009/09/closing-the-book-on-the-bush-legacy/26402/

I voted for Bill Clinton twice too.

Say, should I post some comparisons about how the country did under Obama vs Bush?

How's life at 36% and falling, how bout that new repeal and replace thing, good thing your guys got this! 7.5 years of complaining like little girls and with the trifecta, you still lost on healthcare. That's okay I'm sure Tax Reform and Infrastructure will all work just fine. Say did you catch Steve Bannon's remarks about your House Speaker Paul Ryan...I would have thought he was talking about the entire Republican Congress.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos

Member Gallery Photos and Videos!

Screenshot_20231104_211256_Gallery.jpg
DDA87A49-8666-4FDC-93A0-1595E560F25B.jpeg
IMG_0489.jpeg
48F0FC6E-DDDE-48A7-AA6C-9DC4A51FA977.jpeg
PXL_20231023_154252070.MP.jpg
bull.jpg
20230803_170323.jpg
5CEC956D-148C-4B3B-8A2D-F42705BB7A67.jpeg
2D5054E7-4022-42D2-A3C2-9495AA07707D.jpeg
Screenshot_20211110-071535_Gallery.jpg
DE370F66-0052-4462-B37B-1A35A5173C21.png
IMG_4394.png
Back
Top Bottom