Science Or Satan ?

RE: Science Or Satan ?

Lmao! No major hurricanes the past 12yrs back on you're perch after 1? TFF!


#livelikezac
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

I've asked you many times dude!

You never Answer though!

So it's getting Warmer!

WTF are you giving up to Help Cool it off?

I Hope TRUMP Confiscates your F'N STROKER!

Polluting SOB!






Back Me Off to 1,700 Yards,650 is a Little Close & I'm Not Comfortable with it!

A GUT SHOT at 1,700 Yards will Still Make Some Good BRAGGIN Rights so I Can Say I At Least Hit Him!


90087hankjr.jpg
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

It's neither. It is one of many events which will keep happening as the last days begin. Laugh or scoff if you are a non believer.
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

>Another Manny, just what we
>need. Nobody
>hopes you superstitious church freaks
>get beamed up more than
>I do. off
>you go the sooner the
>better..
>
>
>Back to reality, how many
>records do you have to
>set before there might be
>a chance something is changing?
>
>
>
>
>https://www.yahoo.com/gma/hurricane...caribbean-123104939--abc-news-topstories.html
>
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends

Still Yahoo lennie? What record was mentioned in your link? They got three days warning, hopefully they're smart enough to get the hell out the way!


#livelikezac
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

Dude you better hope we do not get another mini ice age as we have in the past as you may get a glacier covering your farm.
This earth has been going though cycles of cold and heat long before man contributed to so called climate change.
The Sacramento valley was once a inland ocean. L.A. and San Diego was once a tropical jungle. So was parts of Wyoming, Utah, and Colorado based on the animal and plant fossils found there. Later your ancestors came over the ice bridge from Siberia. That is Science also.

RELH
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

"The most powerful Atlantic Ocean hurricane in recorded history bore down on the islands of the northeast Caribbean late Tuesday"

Recorded history is like 100 years and the earth is like 7 billions years old. OMG! What ever shall we do? Oh I know, let's put the fear of God into the people and raise taxes!


97172deliverancebanjo.jpg
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

7 billion years old? WTF ? you better read your bible again. 6500 is more like it.


A record is a record. hurricanes are only a small part of the records we're breaking in the last few years. it's only going to get harder for you to maintain the flat earth story .


I farm in the high desert , if this warms the climate here bring it on maybe I can grow something profitable. but there's no room for Californians or texicans so you stay in the mess kit you chit in and suffer.


Still just a liberal conspiracy you retard Rush fans?


http://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/to...5-storm/ar-AArmLzU?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp



Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

LAST EDITED ON Sep-06-17 AT 11:17AM (MST)[p]https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2017/8/28/16211392/100-500-year-flood-meaning

It's difficult at best to point to an isolated weather event or even a handful and draw a direct correlation to climate change.

That being said, it easy to see consistent record breaking gains year after year in global temperatures. It easy to see consist year after year gains in global sea temperatures which provide the fuel to energize stronger and stronger hurricanes as we are seeing with Irma.

Your right RELH we could see an mini ice age and guess what? That would be a direct result of climate change/global warming. To the stupid global warming means everything gets hotter, not true. Global warming creates dramatic shift in normal weather patterns, such shifts could also easily create a mini ice age.
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

>Dude you better hope we do
>not get another mini ice
>age as we have in
>the past as you may
>get a glacier covering your
>farm.
> This earth
>has been going though cycles
>of cold and heat long
>before man contributed to so
>called climate change.
> The Sacramento valley
>was once a inland ocean.
>L.A. and San Diego was
>once a tropical jungle. So
>was parts of Wyoming, Utah,
>and Colorado based on the
>animal and plant fossils found
>there. Later your ancestors came
>over the ice bridge from
>Siberia. That is Science also.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> RELH
>
>
True RELH ,I just didn't figure on drunken baboons on crown could migrate.
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

How many times have you preached the "go where the food is" or "go where the jobs are"? They've had several days, why didn't they go where the sun would be shining and the winds would be calmer? 2 big hurricane the past 12 yrs. I dont see a pattern.


#livelikezac
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

Dude the liberal conspiracy is that it is "man made" in order to make money out of the faked science. It is normal cycle changes that has been happening for millions of years and the sun is the main culprit on when it gets hot or cold. This is backed by scientists that are not on the "climate change" welfare package with grant money.

RELH
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

LAST EDITED ON Sep-07-17 AT 08:22PM (MST)[p]Yeah yeah yeah. there is one thing you cannot escape no matter how much your bullchit your way though this. reality. neither you or the Koch brothers will escape it.

Well that's not entirely true, you're all old. you'll be over before it is.



Nothing to see here. science id fake. just god at work screwing humanity over. move along.


http://www.msn.com/en-us/weather/to...-before/ar-AArtxSw?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp




Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

By your own words the earth is billions of years old, how long have scientists been around?



#livelikezac
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

I'm still trying to figure out why scientists have to fake the data if GW is real? And... why retards still believe it? The dumb is deep in these forums I tell ya.
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

Dude I can not recall the name of the scientist that is considered the "Guru" of climate change that every liberal likes to quote his findings. I do know that the Science Institute has studied his findings and found that it had some very serious flaws and was wrong on many counts.
Here is another opinion about your fake beliefs on climate change.
RELH
___________________________________________________________

S. Fred Singer is a distinguished astrophysicist who has taken a hard, scientific look at the evidence. In this book, Dr. Singer explores the inaccuracies in historical climate data, the limitations of attempting to model climate on computers, solar variability and its impact on climate, the effects of clouds, ocean currents, and sea levels on global climate, and factors that could mitigate any human impacts on world climate.

Singer?s masterful analysis decisively shows that the pessimistic, and often alarming, global warming scenarios depicted in the media have no scientific basis. In fact, he finds that many aspects of any global warming, such as a longer growing season for food and a reduced need to use fossil fuels for heating, would actually have a positive impact on the human race. Further, Singer notes how many proposed ?solutions? to the global warming ?crisis? (like ?carbon? taxes) would have severe consequences for economically disadvantaged groups and nations.

Hot Talk, Cold Science is essential reading for anyone who wants to be fully informed about the global warming debate.
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

Holy mother of all that is desperate and pathetic, Fred Singer, really? This washed up old piece of crap makes a living as a science denier for both Big Tobacco and Big Oil. One would be hard pressed to find anyone in the science field that is not more biased or more of a gun-for-hire than that POS Fred Singer.

Look up SEPP or TASSC, look who funds them and once again do...oh I don't know..maybe 2 minutes of research on good Ol Fred.

Classic RELH hitching his wagon yet again to another known loser. #desperatetowin #consistentlylosing

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/S._Fred_Singer

https://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic_Fred_Singer.htm

Meet the scientific witch doctors who feed the America's most mentally challenged with information on climate change and who pays them.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/15/climate-sceptics-pai-heartland-institute

So who is the Heartland Institute? Gosh, the answer should comes as a real surprise.
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

The days of the flat earth party are about over. you just have to wonder are they really that stupid or are they simply narcissistic liars?


This one I don't get, the flat earth party claims to be the party of the religious right. but the top dog in Christianity is saying they're dead wrong . and they may be jusdged, but will they be forgiven because they're stupid?

You can't make this up it takes morons to pull it off.



https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/pope-blasts-climate-skeptics-cites-132310883.html











Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

FTW are you forgetting about what the Science Institute had to say on the subject and it's many scientists. You dumb piece of liberal crap will have this country penalize ourselves with higher costs and fewer jobs for your almighty non proven man caused climate change that will do didly squat to correct the problem.
This is due to countries like China, India, Mexico and many others that have told us to shove climate change up our rear as they will not jeopardize their industry with restrictions like we want.

RELH
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

I Still Gotta know where dude thinks He came From?

A F'N Monkey?

Or A SPLAT of Slime out of a Vulture that Evolved?






Back Me Off to 1,700 Yards,650 is a Little Close & I'm Not Comfortable with it!

A GUT SHOT at 1,700 Yards will Still Make Some Good BRAGGIN Rights so I Can Say I At Least Hit Him!


90087hankjr.jpg
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

LAST EDITED ON Sep-13-17 AT 10:59AM (MST)[p]What? You don't want talk about Fred Singer anymore?

Which "Science Institute"?

A basic difference between Neo-cons and standard old-school Conservatives is pretty simple. After all what is a Conservative but one who conserves? The only things Neo-cons want to conserve is white wealth and the military industrial complex.

Ronald Reagan, Teddy Roosevelt, George Bush Jr, and Nixon are some this nation's greatest conservationists. Somehow Republicans have lost sight of the fact that they are rooted as the original stewards of the environment. For the last 30 years factions within the GOP namely Neo-cons have polarized the environment as being a liberal issue.

If necessity is the mother of invention then serendipity maybe the father of even greater invention. Wouldn't it be nice if our country was the world leader of green technologies? Which position would you rather be in selling those technologies to countries like China and India or buying those technologies from China and India?

http://money.cnn.com/2016/07/01/technology/smog-free-tower-china/index.html

http://www.iflscience.com/technology/giant-wall-fans-sucks-carbon-dioxide-straight-out-air/

Higher costs, fewer jobs? Jobs are not being lost to environmental regulations as quickly as they are being lost to advances in automation.

As one outdoors man to another I am confused how you would argue for a more polluted world. Who cares what other countries do? They will reap what they sow as the health of their people suffer.

https://www.theatlantic.com/interna...nese-pollution-problem-in-perspective/360868/

I get it, this all a part of your new found love for all things Russian and Chinese. Apparently your argument is the US should be more like China, correct? If not, then what exactly is your argument?
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

FTW you are nothing but a ignorant liberal fool that has a total lack of plain old common sense. You are a liberal troll on a hunting site.

RELH
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

Whatsamatter Californians ? too busy trying to outrun the flames to tell us everything is just fine ?
















Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

With over 40 people dead, only a piece of crap like you would make that statement. You must be drunk again this morning.

RELH
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

150 years ago nobody lived there, and since the fires were human caused, it must be man made climate change. Brilliant.

97172deliverancebanjo.jpg
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

Dude's statement:

Whatsamatter Californians ? too busy trying to outrun the flames to tell us everything is just fine ?


Stay Thirsty My Friends
_________________________________________________________

Dude the more I think of it, that statement above by you is the most low down, "I don't give a crap", statement you could have ever made.
We have members on this forum who lost everything in that fire, other members who had family members flee their homes. It really takes a low down piece of crap like you to even say that. You are so miserable and hateful that nothing matters to you except for yourself. Who in Hades abused you as a child to make you so hateful.

RELH
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

RELH, GFYS.

58 people died in Vegas and you shrugged it off as " chit happens ". scores died in hurricanes. oh WTF ever chit happens. now it's close to home and " OH MY GOD " it's serious. you're a senile hypocrite.

The point of my last post was the effects of climate change NOT making fun of people dying and you know it. by denying the record natural disasters we see become more and more common you're the one pizzing on these people's graves . not me.


Save your fake outrage. when you're willing to discuss what we can do to minimize the chances of these types of events again you can have your seat on your high horse. until then let me say it again, GFYS.





Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

Hippies like FTW are the real problem. We had a million acres burn here and guess where it did not burn? On the Apache reservation where they have the last timber mill and have done selective logging forever. You stop all logging and now you see the result of that. Never had the superfires back when we allowed logging. Liberals are far worse for the climate than global warming.
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

So, we could have allowed logging to continue and prevented these superfires but we didn't. How much carbon do you think burning million of acres every year cause?
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

Dude not only are you a very poor excuse for a human being, you are a bald face liar on top of it. I never shrugged off the Vegas shooting as chit happens. It was a outright tragedy done by a mentally disturb poor excuse for a human being. Something that we will never be able to stop.

As for you it appears by your post that I hit some thin skin and may be right about your mental problems. You need to see a shrink and take care of your outrage against everyone and everything. Being a liar will only compound the problem. I will wait for some more of your "GFYS" as that seems to be the level of communication you now have.

RELH
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

Well looking at the mtns. in utah we could afford to do some logging all that timber invaded by beetles is a giant fire waiting to happen. Go to the north and south slope of the uintahs if you don't believe it. Once one of those fires makes it into the wilderness areas it will be difficult and expensive to fight. I don't think we need to log it all to nothing but we could do a bit more than we have done. The Brianhead fire was another example of the importance of logging that needed to be done.

"We don't have a gun problem we have prescription drug problem."
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

So there is nothing that could have been done to prevent what happened in Vegas huh? maybe it couldn't have been prevented that's true. but what if that same azzhat had had model 700's, model 99's and Ruger no 1 or two ? are you going to tell me the death toll would be the same ? or do you give a FF ? no you don't, you just said so.

Why don't you design a bump stock for my model 70's ? I'd like to see how well they sell . plus it would give you something to do so you don't go on the internet and make a fool of yourself.



Record temps lead to record fires. cutting every forest in the world won't lower the temperature . it's only going to get worse.




















Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

I believe that bump stocks should be regulated the same as legal full auto weapons by the Feds. There is no record of any registered legal full auto weapon ever being used in a crime. If you do not like it, blame Obama and the ATF under him for making it a legal alteration to semi auto firearms.

As for the record temps, that is a normal cycle that has been repeated though out time on this planet along with cycles of colder weather. Man made greenhouse gases is only a theory that has not been proven as fact according to many scientists. Pushing that theory has made Al Gore and many others rich making fools like you believing it.

RELH
 
RE: Science Or Satan ?

"So there is nothing that could have been done to prevent what happened in Vegas huh? maybe it couldn't have been prevented that's true. but what if that same azzhat had had model 700's, model 99's and Ruger no 1 or two ? are you going to tell me the death toll would be the same ? "

Bump Stocks.... I have no qualms about banning them, I have zero use for them and they seriously impede accuracy..
So if the idiot had 20 fully loaded, scoped & sighted in bolt action rifles and had time to fire, unabated for 9 minutes. Say he fires 12-15 rounds a minute, and is only 50% accurate......

All of this is bs....what number of casualties is acceptable simply cause he was firing a bolt action?
He only killed 12 but that's ok because he wasn't shooting a " BLACK RIFLE"?
Completely backward and dangerous thinking.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom