Utah Licence Fee Increase

M

MBM

Guest
Looks like residents and nonresidents will be paying more in 2005. The following was in yesterdays Deseret News.

Mark

Utah set to boost 500 fees in 2005
By Josh Loftin and Jerry Spangler
Deseret Morning News

Hunters, truckers and out-of-state outdoor enthusiasts are just a few of the people who will spend a little more for their jobs or hobbies next year.
More than 500 fees will increase next year, including more than 250 professional license fees in the Department of Commerce, adding an estimated $4.5 million to overall state revenues. For the most part, the fees will have only minimal financial impact on users and could even improve or expand services in various state agencies.
All of the fee increases are targeted to help the department, which charges the fees and will not help legislators looking for money to balance the budget, Sen. John Valentine, R-Orem, said. Along with other members of the Executive Appropriations Committee, he was concerned about the slew of increases in the Department of Commerce and has requested further explanation from department representatives Monday.
Legislative analysts told the Executive Appropriations Committee on Friday that the $2 and $3 increases are apparently being used to create an Internet registration system for the department's license applications. The vast majority of professional licenses, which range from dental hygienists to plumbers, are handled by the department.
Almost $2 million of the new revenue will come from increases on game-hunting licenses, practically all of which will increase at least $5 and as much as $505 for non-residents wanting to shoot bison, moose, bighorn sheep and goats. The only major increase above $5 for Utahns will be a $100 bump in resident limited-entry elk licenses, which allow the hunting of elk in a more desirable area, such as the Book Cliffs.
Nonresidents will shoulder a significant portion of the hunting license increases, especially those wanting limited entry or special hunt licenses. Among the largest increases are $312 for a limited-entry bull license, $110 increase for two-year dedicated hunter licenses and $165 for three-year dedicated hunter licenses.
Among other fees that will impact relatively large groups are an increase of $30 for all new and advanced teaching certificates, and an $85 increase for alternative teaching licenses. Commercial drivers' licenses will also get more costly in the coming year, as the Department of Public Safety creates a $100 annual fee for CDLs. To do that, a new license will increase by $20, and a renewal will double from $50.
Ambulance companies will pay an additional $25 for the annual inspection of their vehicles, while emergency medical technicians (EMTs) will now have to pay $30 for a basic certification practical re-test and $120 for a basic reciprocity practical test. Many medical service agencies, such as hospice care, birthing centers and home health providers, will face fees double what they currently pay, amounting to increases of between $200 and $1,000.
House Majority Leader Greg Curtis, R-Sandy, said that he also has unanswered questions about some of the fee increases, especially those with seemingly large jumps. "If there's a cost associated with the fee, that's when an increase is needed," he said. "I want to make sure that we aren't just raising fees as a way to raise money."
As the 2004 session nears its end, a number of tax increases and decreases remain unresolved, especially with a $4.5 million hole in the budget that needs filling by Wednesday. The largest of those is actually the repeal of the seven percent cable and satellite television sales tax, which has passed the House and waits on the Senate 3rd reading calender, although the $14 million in revenue could still tempt legislators.
 
Well, everyone elses odds for limited entry elk just got a little bit better 'cuz I'm out! I didn't understand the part about the dedicated hunter costs "...$110 increase for two-year dedicated hunter licenses and $165 for three-year dedicated hunter licenses." I didn't know there were 2 year dedicated hunter permits??
Thanks DWR!

Rut
 
Nothing we can do about it either......or quit hunting?? It aint Anti hunting groups taking away our hunting rights it is the different states raising fees so that it takes the next generation of hunters out of the participation pool. All states non-res. fees here in the Rocky Mnt. states are pure greed!!

Come on USO next court case on fee structures!
 
They lost me on the Dedicated Hunter thing as well Rutt. Anybody have any idea what they are talking about when they say 2 year dedicated hunter program?

NvrEnuf
 
I am not sure what they mean by a two year permit either. I think the $110 and $165 dollar increase are for Nonresidents joining the program. I would think a resident dedicated hunter fees would only go up $15 or so dollars to join the program as resident deer tag fees are only supossed to go up $5. Anybody in the know with more info?

Mark
 
LAST EDITED ON Mar-02-04 AT 02:50PM (MST)[p]I agree that the dedicated fees are for nonresidents. How many pts for elk do you have RuttCrazed? I can see jumping ship if your only carrying a few.
 
I don not mind the fee hike. I am a dedicated hunter and feel that this is the best hunting opprtunity ever invented. All I do is rifle and bow hunt and love every minute of it. I think that they shoud raise the price of hunting. I even think that they should raise the orice of deer tags another 20 $ . If te DWR can use the money for better habitat and other project,then why the heck not. I am all about better hunting opportunity for begger and better bucks and bulls. I would pay 50 to 75 bucks a year to hunt deer if it was like it was a few years back (20 years) to shoot or even see deer like my dad used to see.
 
I think it's Bullsh!t!!
The money for the tags is going to wind up in some other state funded project.

I dont even want to get started on the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ that hunting-has come to.


I feel bad for our younger generation!
 
I agree with DUVY! If I was seeing a direct result of my extra money when it came to big game it wouldn't be that hard to swallow the increase. What has the F&G done with all the increased revenue??? If you take 10,000 Dedicated Hunters donating 8 hours a year and assume the average wage of all of them is $12/hr, that is almost 1 million dollars in free labor!! Now they want to not only put a cap on the number of hunters in the program, but they also want to raise the price $15?? At 10,000 DH's that is in increase of $150,000, why not let more people join and get more free labor?? If they increased the cap to 11600 they would get the same return on funds without raising the price! Everything is computerized so it shouldn't be that much harder to manage 20,000 than it is to manage 10,000 DH's. If it is just let some DH's earn there hours entering data into the computer, instead of using them to pull weeds.

Rut
 
Good points all, I don't think the DWR gets all the $$$ from license sales ect. either???
Rut-ya would think that with ML300 gone that they might go to a Dedicated Elk Hunter program like the Dedicated Deer program and have another $1 million in more free labor!! That would be a great amount of free labor getting done by guys/gals that hunt in our state anyways......and they would have a locked up amount of revenue from the Deer/Elk Dedicated program participants...

I wonder how much the 25 units will affect the Deer Dedicated Hunter program??
 
I wonder how the deer hunt would have been if the system remained unchanged the past 10 years. I heard many ideas in the 80's of improving the herds by going to choose your weapon, subdividing the state into management areas, increasing license fees for habitat improvement, limiting tags, and adding more premium units. DWR caved to our requests. We have lived with all these changes for 10 years and the hunt is not one speck better. I don't think the DWR is to blame. As we become more urbanized and less agriculturally connected as a society, wildlife will decline as a whole. Not all is lost. We will have better years than we've seen during this drought, but each decade will get worse and worse. The end.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom