Wyoming G and H FYI

P

Prism

Guest
LAST EDITED ON Apr-23-04 AT 07:58AM (MST)[p]Got this email this morning, thought some of you'd like to read it.




"We outfitters, representing you non-residents, are in a major fight to keep
the G&F department, at the insistence of a vocal group of residents, from
slashing the number of deer permits available in Region G and Region
H. Last year there were 1,600 permits in G and 1,800 in H. G&F is under
pressure to cut those to 800 permits for each area. This will result in a
very poor draw for the non-residents. That will affect you and me
both. The deer season will also be shortened. Residents want it only two
weeks. Hopefully they will give us a season from Sept 15 until Oct 8, only
cutting one week.
This is prompted by a winter kill and wolf predation. This winter was
less than normal snow and warmer than normal temperatures overall, but in
late November we had a lot of heavy wet snow, then December was quite cold
which crusted the snow making it difficult for deer to access the sparse
feed on the winter range because of a dry summer. The extent of the winter
kill will not be known until the first week of May when they do their
mortality counts.
The G&F Commission will decide April 27 on the final numbers and
season length. Unfortunately there isn't much you can do to help at this
point. We outfitters have met with G&F officials explaining our position
(see my article below). We have personally contacted them. We have argued
with residents. I am pasting below a letter I had printed in the paper. I
got some hate mail and rebuttals from residents because of it.
Anyway, this is to let you know so you can prepare yourself for the
drawing odds. I had earlier predicted a near 100% draw for my clients
based on the greatly increased price of the permits. That won't help much
if we only have half as many permits. So the draw may be tough.
Jonesy

Editor,

Regarding last week's letter to the editor regarding concerns about our
mule deer herd;

The conclusions are correct for the most part and reflect the concerns of
most people who hunt the Greys River. Our deer herd definitely needs
improvement. What we really need is more rain in the summer, milder
winters, fewer predators, and less hunting pressure. All will agree with
those solutions. Unfortunately, the only one we can effectively control,
as pointed out in the article, is the hunting pressure.

The Star Valley Outfitters Association and our local Game & Fish
officials, Gary Fralick and Todd Graham, had a long meeting on March 25.
We discussed these issues at length and proposed possible solutions. We
agreed on several points which, if adopted, will help the situation.

(a) We agreed that a permit cut in the number of nonresidents will help.
Whatever is required and that G&F feels is necessary we will accept even
though it hits us right in the pocketbook and that reflects in the local
economy as we hire fewer guides, wranglers, and cooks and we have less
profits to spend locally. However, it is not proper management that non-
residents are further limited in numbers whereas every single resident deer
hunter in Wyoming can buy a permit across the counter and show up in Greys
River. The article appears to be incorrect in saying that 41% of deer
hunters are non-resident. One thousand six hundred (1,600) Region G
Nonresident Deer tags were issued last year. Five thousand (5,000)
resident deer hunters hunted Region G. That is 24% nonresident and 76%
resident hunters. (figures provided by Gary Fralick at our meeting)
Incidentally, the 1,600 nonresidents paid $384,000 to G&F coffers for their
licenses while the 5,000 residents paid $125,000 (total) for theirs. By
G&F figures, 79% of the money collected from license fees comes from non-
residents. So drastically reducing or eliminating non-residents is not the
solution. Number-wise we could eliminate the non-residents totally and we
would still have thousands of hunters in the area.

Nothing can be done about the numbers of resident hunters for this
upcoming season, but in the future some sort of limiting regulation must be
promulgated. At the meeting almost all agreed that the least painful way
would be to impose a Regional requirement on resident hunters. This is NOT
a limited quota with a drawing, but simply that residents would have to
designate on their resident deer license, purchased over the counter, the
Region for which their license is valid. The effect of this regulation
would be that those who come from Cheyenne, Casper, Laramie, and other
parts of the state would have to choose if they want to hunt close to home
(after work and on weekends) or if they prefer to hunt only far away across
the state in Greys River. The implementation of this alone would reduce
hunting pressure, perhaps significantly.

(b) We agreed that we should eliminate the antlerless deer seasons. With
the impact wolves are beginning to make we may also need to eliminate cow
elk seasons. Our doe deer and cow elk are needed to produce wolf food.

(c) Bringing back four point seasons to help reduce hunting pressure and
to preserve a few more bucks is a good idea and agreed to by most of us.
We would modify that a bit to allow youth hunters (age 17 and under) to
take any antlered deer. Many of them have not killed a deer and we would
not deny them the opportunity to "get their feet wet".

(d) We STRONGLY disagree with shortening the seasons. A shorter season
puts all hunters into a shorter time frame and they kill just as many or
more deer because of the concentrated pressure. Reducing numbers while
keeping the season length the same will best preserve the quality of the
experience. To accomplish this, and to alleviate the concerns of our game
biologist regarding the possibility of a heavy snowstorm toward the end of
the season, we all agreed that good season dates would be opening September
10 and closing October 8. The season would be shorter by one day, but
moved up a week so that there would be less likelihood of a heavy snowstorm
and the resulting slaughter of migrating deer.

We urge you to contact your game department officials and make your
feelings known. Implementation of the above will improve the quality of
the experience for all."


Maury Jones

Grover, Wyoming
 
LAST EDITED ON Apr-23-04 AT 08:55AM (MST)[p]Thanks for the information. I think most of it sounds pretty logical. It is not extactly difficult to understand why Jonsey would not want to cut the season. You just have to do the math. 8 hunters time $3,000. I wouldn't want it cut either. I'm not sure the Sept. 10th opener will go over to well with the bow hunters. They already hate the 15th opener. Moving up the date won't make many friends there.
As a resident, I think the solution is pretty easy although most won't like it. Area G should go to a draw. Maybe give a total of 4,000-5,000 permits. Keep the ratio about what it is for residents and non-residents, Maybe 75%-25%. While I love to hunt the Greys every year, I would love to see the area begin producing what it is capable of. If I could get a permit every other year, and have limited numbers with a great opprotunity at a good buck, I would defenitely be in favor of a draw. Maybe I am in the minority, but I would much rather hunt less often on a great hunt, than hunt every year on a mediocre hunt.
And for god's sake, get rid of the wilderness area in H to spread out non-residents a bit. If non-residents have an opprotunity to hunt in H without a guide, the odds would probably even out a bit with G.
Boomer
 
LAST EDITED ON Apr-23-04 AT 09:05AM (MST)[p]Sorry Prism... I disagree with you on this one

I am fighting to make sure Wyoming residents are never made to draw for there home state. Secondly I am also fighting to make sure they do cut the nonresident tags, which I might add is wayyyyyyyyyy over due. Nonresident hunters also need to realize that contrary to popular hunting magazines G&H are not the only units in Wyoming that can and do produce big mule deer
 
The tags in G & H were cut by 400 each not the 800 thatJonesy claims. Personally speaking, maybe the outfitters should concentrate on "quality" hunting instead of "quantity" hunting. Professionally speaking...we hope to only draw 6 deer hunters for our operation in Region H. (And that's for the whole season!) Wyoming residents will never settle for having to draw for a resident tag. That's part of the reward for busting your butt to make a living in this State. I've long felt sorry for Nevada residents who go many years before they are rewarded with a tag! Sorry Jonesy, this has more to do with your pocket book than proper Big game management.
 
It isn't just the number of tags in G&H that is the problem but the proportion of more "hard-core" mule deer hunters in that bunch. For years those units have been given press and pimped as "THE" spot to go in Wyoming for oversize mulies. The type of pressure the area recieves now is a more intense type of hunt pressure than most other areas recieve. Most guys who have seen the type of bucks the areas have produced over the last decade have also seen a distinct lack of top end bucks in the last 3 years. Sure there are still quite a few 180-200 gross bucks, but the real big ones are alomost non-existant now. I believe that those huge antlered gentetic freaks are evidence of surplus and health in a herd. The more mature bucks, the greater chance of the "freaks". We are hunting this herd's older age class bucks with a greater degree of intensity than ever and they are becoming more scarce than ever.

Bottom line.................The area needs limiting and in all fairness, it means you and me. The non-residents. It also is fair to suggest that some limitation of residents is in order until there is moderate recovery of the herds in those areas.

Now I know lots of you would give your collective left nuts to have what G&H have right now as even on a slight downturn, the herd has better deer hunting than about 90% of the West. But to me, G&H is special. Special set of circumstance combining genetics and habitat that produce amazing bucks. I would like to see it be managed to its full potential.

Of course thats just my opinion. I could be wrong.
 
BuckSpy- You are not wrong. Everything you said is the truth.

On a side note, the G & H herds are at 50% of the objective for population. The major factor being the drought, which has reduced the carrying capacity of the winter range. Hopefully, with some decent spring/summer storms the drought will be broken one of these years. A lot of guys show up on the winter range and say how impressed they are with the bucks, but it does not even compare to what was there just 4-5 years ago.
 
I know that most wyoming hunters dont like us Utah hunters(because we are better hunters lol) but anyway I put in for wyoming reg g or h every year and have had the privilege of drawing in the past.However I do support lowering the total number of tags for nonresidents and residents, with the nonresidents taking the bigger hit. We have very few quality deer units left in the west. Whatever we can do to preserve the opportunity of taking a trophy muley even if it is only a couple times in a lifetime, all measures should be weighed and considered. I for one hope they do something in wyo soon, so that their may always be a place and an opportunity to take a trophy muley. Look what happened to the paunsagaunt in Utah. Wyoming still has a couple good deer units left, lets do whatever it takes to make sure it always will be a quality place to hunt mule deer. Kill the predators, keep tag numbers low and join the SFW in wyoming (I had to throw that last one in their) Do whatever it takes before it is to late.
Muleynuts
 
I agree with both of these subsequent replies. A reduction in hunting pressure overall will ceratinly help the hunting. However, the real issue is impriving the habitat for this same deer herd. These deer winter on primarily on the Mesa. The forage has been horrible the past few years. This is why the deer succumbed to the winter this past year. It wasn't that we experienced an unusual amount of snow. (I can tell you that the winter was very windy, very cold and really long). These factors combined with a poor forage supply was a death sentence. If something is not done to improve the quality of winter range habitat for these deer, residents and non residents alike, we all can look forward to fewer and fewer tags being available in the coming years. I'm currently working with some conservation groups to get some more dollars allocated on the ground for this deer herd. Lets face it, this is the premiere hot spot for mule deer trophy hunters. We all need to chip in and do our part. Join organizations such as the Mule Deer Foundation and get some projects funded. Mother nature can't do it all. As far as the "press" this area is getting for trophy potential....Let the outfitters know how you feel. Like I said before, we personally have chose to limit the number of hunters for our permit area simply because I think the areas are already overhunted by those who MUST make a living by the "numbers". Yes, we do make a living in the outfitting business, but we have shifted gears more towards summer activities and lodging rather than run a bunch of hunters through in the fall. If more outfitters would do the same, this alone would make a difference in the pressure on Trophy game. the real hard core public hunters, are a rarity. Most do not venture far of fthe road. I personally have been in the greys river for a few weeks at a time, and have only run into a handful of non outfitted hunters.
 
a two week season! mine here in casper has never been more than two weeks. bow is a month though so grab your sticks and go for it. how many more days tell bowseason?i can't wait
 
The non residents have had it pretty good in the past in Wyoming. I get to hunt for 7 days here in Utah. There are 2 reasons you would want to keep a 30 day season open in Wyoming. First, if the herd is strong then you need to harvest the rest. This is not the case anymore in G & H so it must be reason number 2. Reason number two is that you can charge $3,500 per hunter for 4 weeks at 7 hunters per week. That means Jackson Hole Outfitters revenue is $98,000 for deer hunts in one month of deer hunting. Sounds like a pretty good reason to keep the season open for 4 weeks instead of 2 doesn't it? Want to see bigger bucks? Kill the wolves. Kill the cougars. Kill the cyotees. Cut your season down to 2 weeks. And limit the ammount of hunters to the point that you get some serious bucks. No secrets here.
 
Most of the posts here have made good sense. I am an outfitter in eastern Wyoming and have long advocated for limited quota areas throughout Wyoming. The residents will all still get to hunt, but it will be in a smaller area. We need QUALITY in our management. The seasons should be shorter, but multiple. Like other states have done, Wyoming needs to have a muzzleloader season and early/late rifle seasons to distribute pressure more evenly.

I have met with Game and Fish folks several times and always go to the public meetings. The are very firm in their resistence to limiting residents to a particular area, but it needs to happen.

If we want to keep people involved in hunting and keep their support of Wyoming wildlife, we need to provide a quality experience. We are not getting that right now, and that's the exact reason I quit going to the Grey's/Hoback country. Wyoming could have some super hunts and monster bucks with a few changes.

I'll help with this effort. If anyone wants to do something to help bring the quality back to Wyoming's deer herds, let me know.
 
Here is Jonesy's latest mailing.

Dear deer hunters, (no, I'm not stuttering)
The G&F, at insistence of local hunters, has thrown us a curve for this season. This will affect deer hunters who plan on hunting with me, and we will work around it as best we can. Over-reacting to some winter kill on the deer and some wolf predation, and a perceived shortage of deer last season (my hunters will vouch for the fact that we had lots of deer,
not a shortage) the locals went on a crusade. They have a small faction who is very anti-nonresident and very anti-outfitter. They circulated some petitions and were so vocal at the G&F Commission meetings that they succeeded in getting the following changes. The number of nonresident permits available in Region G (my area) was reduced by 400. Last year there were 1,600 nonres tags available. This year only 1,200. That will result in a worse draw. So the previous I told you about all of you drawing a permit (because of the changes made last year) will not be correct. This will hurt you individually if you don't draw. It will also hurt me as I didn't over-book as usual (expecting 100% draw). I'm now wishing I hadn't turned down so many hunters, who have undoubtedly booked elsewhere. The other change they succeeded in making is reducing the season length by a week. So the deer season will close Oct 8 instead of Oct 14. That means those who were previously booked in my camp for Oct 8-14 will have to change their schedule, assuming you draw. I will try and balance out each hunt following the draw, which should take place early July. This shorter season makes no sense whatsoever, a fact I argued long
and loud about. The same number of people will come hunting Greys River, regardless of season length. So if you have a shorter season it just increases the hunting pressure. Anyway, I thought I better let you know so you can plan accordingly. This situation proves that emotion beats logic and facts when
arguing with locals and with the G&F. Some of the residents, in our meetings, argued strongly against ANY restrictions on the number of resident hunters as far as where they could hunt and how many of them could hunt. This alone proves that they are just anti-nonresident rather than honestly concerned about the deer herd. It is another proof that our deer herd is not really in trouble. They just used the winter and wolves as an
excuse to eliminate some of you from hunting. Well, take care and we will see how the draw comes out.

I'm just glad to see that "his hunters" will vouch for the fact that they saw lots of deer last year, not a shortage. I wonder if any of the deer "his hunters" saw were mature bucks? The funny thing is that the deer didn't die before last hunting season. They died a couple months after "his hunters" had gone home. I myself saw plenty of winter killed animals this year in Western WY. Much worse than it's been years previous, that's for sure. I'm a non-resident and hunt in region G. I want to draw as bad as anyone else but I also agree that WY should limit the number of hunters for G and H. Shortening the hunt doesn't seem all bad to me either. If the G&F go out and do their mortality counts and agree that the tags need to be cut then I say more power to them. At least they are looking at the situation and taking actions to help improve things. I also think they need to take it 1 step further next year and limit the number of tags for non-residents. The numbers of die hard hunters in both G and H have greatly increased over the last few years. We can't just continue to increase the hunting pressure in these areas and expect to have the same numbers of good bucks walking the hills. Too many people out trying to accomplish the same thing will end up being trouble. I also agree with the post above that talks about predator control. Limiting the tags and shortening the season will help the situation but won't solve the problem entirely.

Have a good one and good luck this year,

NvrEnuf
 
Makes sense to me. As far as the wolves that Jonesy is claiming to have killed his hunters deer...I live in the area that the majority of G&H deer winter on. There were no wolves on the winter range on the mesa. (At least non e that I have heard about, and that kind of news tends to come full circle) I've seen them in our area during the summer months, but they quickly head to easy hunting on the nearby Elk feedgrounds as soon as the snow flies. Yes, Wyoming has a serious Wolf problem going on in other parts of the state and something needs to be done sooner than later as the problem is only going to expand. I think it's unfair of Jonesy to claim that the reduced number of tags in his area has been caused in part by a "small group of locals". I would certainly put more stock in what a "local" has to say about the "local" deer herd than that a handful of guided hunters who were here several months before the winter die off took place. But lets remember..... it's all about booking hunts. Might not be good for business if the hunting dosen't look good in the press and an abundance of tags to sell to non residents! There are still some good pockets of the Greys that haven't been overrun with hunters. However...along the Greys River road there is loads of hunters and camps. I jokingly have said the past couple of years that Utah hunters must have an "IN" with the wyoming game & Fish Department! Seems like thats all the plates you see anymore! Whats up with that????
 
I got a guess for you. It's probably because us Utahn's are pretty close to those units and Idaho has their own deer to hunt! :)

NvrEnuf
 
Shaun I think it's a good thing to reduce the #of out of state tag. What concerns me is the # of in state hunters that will increase to that area. If I'm a instater (is that a word?) and haven't liked hunting G and H because of high pressure, thats where I'd go back and try it again. Russ The outfitters are acting like there working for us, they just want our $, the deer situation is second on there priorites.
 
I agree that the number of resident hunters will increase after the non-resident tags are cut. In my previous post I meant to say "I also think the G&F need to take it 1 step further next year and limit the number of tags for residents." It won't do a bit of good to cut the number of non-resident tags if the number or resident hunters increase. I hope the G&F realize that and make the whole area a draw next year for both resident and non resident hunters alike.

NvrEnuf
 
The G&F Department listened to Sportsmen and agreed that perhaps some reduction of licenses was in order due to the severity of the winter losses. G&F estimates that this die-off was similar to that which occurred in 92-93. Furthermore, G&F also agreed to further reduce deer licenses if deemed necessary after this year. I anticipate that we are far from over the necessary changes that Regions G&H will ultimately face. During the last G&F commission meeting it was suggested that perhaps some areas within the state need to be more intensively managed. Since the mule deer herd in these regions are financially significant to the G&F Department, as well as the Sportsmen (both local and abroad) I would propose that they are managed more intensively.

Some have talked about instituting the four-point restrictions, while others have talked about manditory harvest reporting, specific age related harvest data collected, etc. It has also been mentioned that residents may also need to be limited or restricted in some way as well.

I do believe that it is imperative that we all attempt to put this treasured resource above our own selfish interests. Hopefully, we can break this drought cycle. Mother Nature can probably do more to help than anything else we can do; however, we must continue to press the Federal Land Management Agencies to play a more aggressive role in habitat manipulation to benefit not just livestock but wildlife as well.

You will also see more pressure brought to bare on the Department to increase predator management to benefit wildlife. Last week Wy G&F Director Terry Cleveland admitted that current reductions of ungulate populations can should be attributed to predation, not just the drought. Several with the G&F Department continue to blame current losses (in some instances significant losses) to the drought. Hopefully, with their new director leading the way, more of their biologists will once again speak freely regarding the impacts predators are having on Wyoming's once abundant game herds.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom