Me crowing

LAST EDITED ON Jun-01-18 AT 01:19PM (MST)[p]Meanwhile in a growing economy our government is borrowing record amounts. Makes perfect sense to Trump's Dumb Stooges, people who have not outsourced their conservatives convictions are highly frustrated.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/mone...y-borrowing-set-record-488-billion/567166002/

U.S. Treasury says first-quarter borrowing set record of $488 billion


Fairly easy to grow economy on borrowed money.




Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
"U.S. hiring rose more than forecast in May, wages picked up and the unemployment rate matched the lowest in almost five decades, indicating the strong labor market will keep powering economic growth."

Almost makes me wish I wasn't retired sucking up all my grandkids Social Security. Those young kids better get off the couch and get a job while the getting is good.

97172deliverancebanjo.jpg
 
>"U.S. hiring rose more than forecast
>in May, wages picked up
>and the unemployment rate matched
>the lowest in almost five
>decades, indicating the strong labor
>market will keep powering economic
>growth."
>
>Almost makes me wish I wasn't
>retired sucking up all my
>grandkids Social Security. Those young
>kids better get off the
>couch and get a job
>while the getting is good.
>
>
>
97172deliverancebanjo.jpg
?
 
>LAST EDITED ON Jun-01-18
>AT 01:19?PM (MST)
>
>Meanwhile in a growing economy our
>government is borrowing record amounts.
> Makes perfect sense to
>Trump's Dumb Stooges, people who
>have not outsourced their conservatives
>convictions are highly frustrated.
>
>
>https://www.usatoday.com/story/mone...y-borrowing-set-record-488-billion/567166002/
>
>U.S. Treasury says first-quarter borrowing set
>record of $488 billion
>
>
>Fairly easy to grow economy on
>borrowed money.
>
>
>
>
>Government is like a baby. An
>alimentary canal with a big
>appetite at one end and
>no responsibility at the other.
>

Newmont....

Weren't you one of the ones telling us, when Obama was borrowing and using the borrowed money to "bolster" the economy through quantitative easing, that it was a smart plan and to borrow while interest rates were low?
 
>>LAST EDITED ON Jun-01-18
>>AT 01:19?PM (MST)
>>
>>Meanwhile in a growing economy our
>>government is borrowing record amounts.
>> Makes perfect sense to
>>Trump's Dumb Stooges, people who
>>have not outsourced their conservatives
>>convictions are highly frustrated.
>>
>>
>>https://www.usatoday.com/story/mone...y-borrowing-set-record-488-billion/567166002/
>>
>>U.S. Treasury says first-quarter borrowing set
>>record of $488 billion
>>
>>
>>Fairly easy to grow economy on
>>borrowed money.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Government is like a baby. An
>>alimentary canal with a big
>>appetite at one end and
>>no responsibility at the other.
>>
>
>Newmont....
>
>Weren't you one of the ones
>telling us, when Obama was
>borrowing and using the borrowed
>money to "bolster" the economy
>through quantitative easing, that it
>was a smart plan and
>to borrow while interest rates
>were low?

Uh no that was not me. I have been a debt hawk forever.

I opposed almost all of Obama's spending including the auto bailout.

I believe anyone who opposed Obama running up the debt but supports Trump should never ever whine again about spending and debt. Just admit you simply don't hold any hard convictions on fiscal policy.


Nemont

Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
>>>LAST EDITED ON Jun-01-18
>>>AT 01:19?PM (MST)
>>>
>>>Meanwhile in a growing economy our
>>>government is borrowing record amounts.
>>> Makes perfect sense to
>>>Trump's Dumb Stooges, people who
>>>have not outsourced their conservatives
>>>convictions are highly frustrated.
>>>
>>>
>>>https://www.usatoday.com/story/mone...y-borrowing-set-record-488-billion/567166002/
>>>
>>>U.S. Treasury says first-quarter borrowing set
>>>record of $488 billion
>>>
>>>
>>>Fairly easy to grow economy on
>>>borrowed money.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Government is like a baby. An
>>>alimentary canal with a big
>>>appetite at one end and
>>>no responsibility at the other.
>>>
>>
>>Newmont....
>>
>>Weren't you one of the ones
>>telling us, when Obama was
>>borrowing and using the borrowed
>>money to "bolster" the economy
>>through quantitative easing, that it
>>was a smart plan and
>>to borrow while interest rates
>>were low?
>
>Uh no that was not me.
> I have been a
>debt hawk forever.
>
>I opposed almost all of Obama's
>spending including the auto bailout.
>
>
>I believe anyone who opposed Obama
>running up the debt but
>supports Trump should never ever
>whine again about spending and
>debt. Just admit you
>simply don't hold any hard
>convictions on fiscal policy.
>
>
>Nemont
>
>Government is like a baby. An
>alimentary canal with a big
>appetite at one end and
>no responsibility at the other.
>

Newmont,

Sorry I was thinking of Ocho. I looked back through the threads.

I don't agree with spending, I think they should cut spending in almost all areas, until they can get this under control. Could you imagine if you ran a business or a household the way the last multiple administrations have?
 
>>>>LAST EDITED ON Jun-01-18
>>>>AT 01:19?PM (MST)
>>>>
>>>>Meanwhile in a growing economy our
>>>>government is borrowing record amounts.
>>>> Makes perfect sense to
>>>>Trump's Dumb Stooges, people who
>>>>have not outsourced their conservatives
>>>>convictions are highly frustrated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>https://www.usatoday.com/story/mone...y-borrowing-set-record-488-billion/567166002/
>>>>
>>>>U.S. Treasury says first-quarter borrowing set
>>>>record of $488 billion
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Fairly easy to grow economy on
>>>>borrowed money.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Government is like a baby. An
>>>>alimentary canal with a big
>>>>appetite at one end and
>>>>no responsibility at the other.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Newmont....
>>>
>>>Weren't you one of the ones
>>>telling us, when Obama was
>>>borrowing and using the borrowed
>>>money to "bolster" the economy
>>>through quantitative easing, that it
>>>was a smart plan and
>>>to borrow while interest rates
>>>were low?
>>
>>Uh no that was not me.
>> I have been a
>>debt hawk forever.
>>
>>I opposed almost all of Obama's
>>spending including the auto bailout.
>>
>>
>>I believe anyone who opposed Obama
>>running up the debt but
>>supports Trump should never ever
>>whine again about spending and
>>debt. Just admit you
>>simply don't hold any hard
>>convictions on fiscal policy.
>>
>>
>>Nemont
>>
>>Government is like a baby. An
>>alimentary canal with a big
>>appetite at one end and
>>no responsibility at the other.
>>
>
>Newmont,
>
>Sorry I was thinking of Ocho.
>I looked back through the
>threads.
>
>I don't agree with spending, I
>think they should cut spending
>in almost all areas, until
>they can get this under
>control. Could you imagine if
>you ran a business or
>a household the way the
>last multiple administrations have?
LMAOF !
 
>>>>LAST EDITED ON Jun-01-18
>>>>AT 01:19?PM (MST)
>>>>
>>>>Meanwhile in a growing economy our
>>>>government is borrowing record amounts.
>>>> Makes perfect sense to
>>>>Trump's Dumb Stooges, people who
>>>>have not outsourced their conservatives
>>>>convictions are highly frustrated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>https://www.usatoday.com/story/mone...y-borrowing-set-record-488-billion/567166002/
>>>>
>>>>U.S. Treasury says first-quarter borrowing set
>>>>record of $488 billion
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Fairly easy to grow economy on
>>>>borrowed money.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Government is like a baby. An
>>>>alimentary canal with a big
>>>>appetite at one end and
>>>>no responsibility at the other.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Newmont....
>>>
>>>Weren't you one of the ones
>>>telling us, when Obama was
>>>borrowing and using the borrowed
>>>money to "bolster" the economy
>>>through quantitative easing, that it
>>>was a smart plan and
>>>to borrow while interest rates
>>>were low?
>>
>>Uh no that was not me.
>> I have been a
>>debt hawk forever.
>>
>>I opposed almost all of Obama's
>>spending including the auto bailout.
>>
>>
>>I believe anyone who opposed Obama
>>running up the debt but
>>supports Trump should never ever
>>whine again about spending and
>>debt. Just admit you
>>simply don't hold any hard
>>convictions on fiscal policy.
>>
>>
>>Nemont
>>
>>Government is like a baby. An
>>alimentary canal with a big
>>appetite at one end and
>>no responsibility at the other.
>>
>
>Newmont,
>
>Sorry I was thinking of Ocho.
>I looked back through the
>threads.
>
>I don't agree with spending, I
>think they should cut spending
>in almost all areas, until
>they can get this under
>control. Could you imagine if
>you ran a business or
>a household the way the
>last multiple administrations have?

That's the thing DBG nemont thinks letting taxpayers keep their money is spending!


#livelikezac
 
>>>>>LAST EDITED ON Jun-01-18
>>>>>AT 01:19?PM (MST)
>>>>>
>>>>>Meanwhile in a growing economy our
>>>>>government is borrowing record amounts.
>>>>> Makes perfect sense to
>>>>>Trump's Dumb Stooges, people who
>>>>>have not outsourced their conservatives
>>>>>convictions are highly frustrated.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>https://www.usatoday.com/story/mone...y-borrowing-set-record-488-billion/567166002/
>>>>>
>>>>>U.S. Treasury says first-quarter borrowing set
>>>>>record of $488 billion
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Fairly easy to grow economy on
>>>>>borrowed money.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Government is like a baby. An
>>>>>alimentary canal with a big
>>>>>appetite at one end and
>>>>>no responsibility at the other.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Newmont....
>>>>
>>>>Weren't you one of the ones
>>>>telling us, when Obama was
>>>>borrowing and using the borrowed
>>>>money to "bolster" the economy
>>>>through quantitative easing, that it
>>>>was a smart plan and
>>>>to borrow while interest rates
>>>>were low?
>>>
>>>Uh no that was not me.
>>> I have been a
>>>debt hawk forever.
>>>
>>>I opposed almost all of Obama's
>>>spending including the auto bailout.
>>>
>>>
>>>I believe anyone who opposed Obama
>>>running up the debt but
>>>supports Trump should never ever
>>>whine again about spending and
>>>debt. Just admit you
>>>simply don't hold any hard
>>>convictions on fiscal policy.
>>>
>>>
>>>Nemont
>>>
>>>Government is like a baby. An
>>>alimentary canal with a big
>>>appetite at one end and
>>>no responsibility at the other.
>>>
>>
>>Newmont,
>>
>>Sorry I was thinking of Ocho.
>>I looked back through the
>>threads.
>>
>>I don't agree with spending, I
>>think they should cut spending
>>in almost all areas, until
>>they can get this under
>>control. Could you imagine if
>>you ran a business or
>>a household the way the
>>last multiple administrations have?
>
>That's the thing DBG nemont thinks
>letting taxpayers keep their money
>is spending!
>
>
>#livelikezac

?
 
DW

I know you can't comprhend that spending through the tax codes adds trillions to the debt. IOU simply do not actually care at all. Yours is fake concern if you don't understand how our debt is affected by tax breaks, credits and other tax expenditures.

Nemont

Nemont

Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
Seems like the president would have the ability to influence spending if he wanted to. is that not correct ?









Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
Dude spending is more determine by Congress. The President can try to influence them and they can tell him to go take a flying leap. We know that just about every single Democrat will tell him to take a flying leap and there is some GOP that will go along with the Dems.
So quit looking at the donkey's mouth trying to blame Trump and start looking the donkey's a$$ and blame Congress on the bills they write and pass on. Do not bring on the veto action that Trump has, we all know that the Dems would use him for a scapegoat for his veto on other issues that is attached to funding bill.

RELH
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-03-18 AT 09:34AM (MST)[p]So Obama didn't drive spending and we can blame the Republicans who went along? just wondering why the change in blame game from one president to the next?

2010 The Republicans took the House. A simple majority rules there. All spending bills must originate in the House. So for 6 of Obama's years no spending bill could have gotten to the floor of the House without the speaker allowing a vote.

Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
>DW
>
>I know you can't comprhend that
>spending through the tax codes
>adds trillions to the debt.
> IOU simply do not
>actually care at all.
>Yours is fake concern if
>you don't understand how our
>debt is affected by tax
>breaks, credits and other tax
>expenditures.
>
>Nemont
>
>Nemont
>
>Government is like a baby. An
>alimentary canal with a big
>appetite at one end and
>no responsibility at the other.
>

You see DBG if you'd just give up that 50-70% they let you keep they'd be out of debt for 5 minutes until they started spending more than they took in again. Congress controls the purse strings but Trump could have vetoed it rather than just squeal about it for 5 minutes like he did. Both parties love spending and the day we get a true conservative in office who takes our debt seriously his life expectancy will get extremely short!


#livelikezac
 
>>DW
>>
>>I know you can't comprhend that
>>spending through the tax codes
>>adds trillions to the debt.
>> IOU simply do not
>>actually care at all.
>>Yours is fake concern if
>>you don't understand how our
>>debt is affected by tax
>>breaks, credits and other tax
>>expenditures.
>>
>>Nemont
>>
>>Nemont
>>
>>Government is like a baby. An
>>alimentary canal with a big
>>appetite at one end and
>>no responsibility at the other.
>>
>
>You see DBG if you'd just
>give up that 50-70% they
>let you keep they'd be
>out of debt for 5
>minutes until they started spending
>more than they took in
>again. Congress controls the purse
>strings but Trump could have
>vetoed it rather than just
>squeal about it for 5
>minutes like he did. Both
>parties love spending and the
>day we get a true
>conservative in office who takes
>our debt seriously his life
>expectancy will get extremely short!
>
>
>
>#livelikezac

That is such a BS and cowardly argument that is devoid of the simplest of math and lacking both truth and honesty.

The fake conservatives always spend through the tax code because simpletons don't understand their own welfare costs future Americans. Don?t pretend you give a Shyt about the debt if you refuse to admit spending through the tax code adds Trillions to our debt. Not a single time have I ever said take 70% or that spending isn't part of the problem. Trump livers and faker conservatives who support the current government have forfeited any pretense that they are for fiscal responsibility.

Nemont


Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
Even though you didnt say it, I assume whoever you voted for would be spending less and making the economy bigger and better?
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-04-18 AT 08:35AM (MST)[p] Putting an economy on the VISA card is winning obviously.

But it's all good. I owe no money and I'm owed lots of money. interest rates are climbing and maybe in the Trump recession I'll get land back like I did in the Bush recession. ca-ching.


Clock still look like it's gong up ? kinda does.....

http://www.usdebtclock.org/cbo-omb-gop-budget-estimates.html






Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
>Even though you didnt say it,
>I assume whoever you voted
>for would be spending less
>and making the economy bigger
>and better?

I stated I voted for and if the standard is that spending less is important you should be cringing at what the guy you voted is actually doing.

Trump lovers who claim to be fiscal conservatives need to go get to their therapist to figure out they are being dishonest about their values.

Nemont

Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
http://www.nber.org/chapters/c12563.pdf

Here is some homework for the self proclaimed fiscal conservatives who don't understand how our debt is actually affected by spending through the tax code.

I doubt any of the actual fiscal conservatives need it explained to them. There is a contingent of fake conservatives who don't understand how spending through the tax code leads to trillions on our debt. It isn't about letting people keep their own money like is put forth by the people who pretend to care about the debt.

Nemont


Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-04-18 AT 10:27AM (MST)[p]Anybody that thinks raising taxes will fix this problem, doesn't understand the problem.


#livelikezac
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-04-18 AT 11:18AM (MST)[p]It isn't about raising taxes, it is spending through the tax code. Whining about a spending problem while ignoring the spending through the tax code is being either willfully ignorant of facts or intellectually dishonest.

Spending is spending and care to tell me whose signature was on the last raise in Federal Spending?

Nemont

Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
NeMont, that looks like a pro man caused global warming propaganda. Razzle dazzle them with BS.

If somebody owes you money every year and you look at their books and you see that they will soon be broke, or will soon move their company to a foreign country, the best course of action is:

1. Raise their yearly payment.
2. Tell them they can cut their yearly payment if they invest that money so they can make even larger payments to you in the future and provide more people who pay yearly.
3. Only government creates jobs and owns money, so option 2. does not apply.

97172deliverancebanjo.jpg
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-04-18 AT 01:18PM (MST)[p]

>NeMont, that looks like a pro
>man caused global warming propaganda.
>Razzle dazzle them with BS.

You shouldn't wade into a discussion you don't comprehend.

Other than it is a fact that tax expenditures add trillions to our debt and are usually inefficient government spending it does share one thing with global warming: Trumpettes simply refuse to give a Shyt facts and reality.

>
>
97172deliverancebanjo.jpg



Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
In your blue sky theory allowing the people to keep anything is a tax expenditure.

#livelikezac
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-04-18 AT 03:35PM (MST)[p]Eel,

If you want to have an informed debate about the consequence of tax expenditures you have to first be willing to become informed.

Congressional Testimony from the Head of the CBO:

-Like conventional spending, tax expenditures contribute to the federal budget deficit. They also influence people?s choices about working, saving, and investing, and they affect the distribution of income among people. Tax expenditures are more similar to mandatory programs such as Social Security than they are to discretionary spending programs: They are not subject to annual appropriations, and any person or entity that meets the legal requirements can receive the benefits. Because of their budgetary treatment, however, tax expenditures are much less transparent than spending on benefit programs.

Anyone who refuses to understand the implications and cost of spending via tax expenditures is not truly worried about spending, is willing to ignore a massive and growing problem and isn't serious about any solution to spending. That is a fact.



Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
>In your blue sky theory allowing
>the people to keep anything
>is a tax expenditure.
>
>#livelikezac


Again total BS argument. First of all it isn't a theory, Tax expenditures are fact.

Second of all nobody is arguing what you claim. The truth is that tax expenditures do some good but they do things no conservative would ever support if they stopped and spent a single minute about what is actually happening.

Quote:
What are the Effects of Tax Expenditures?
Tax expenditures are generally designed to further societal goals. For example, the tax expenditures for health insurance costs, pension contributions, and mortgage interest payments may help to promote a healthier population, adequate financial resources for retirement and greater national saving, and stable communities of homeowners. However, tax expenditures have a broad range of effects that do not always further societal goals.

First, tax expenditures may lead to an inefficient allocation of economic resources by encouraging more consumption of goods and services receiving preferential treatment; they also may subsidize activity that would have taken place without the tax incentives. For example, the tax expenditures mentioned above may prompt people to be less cost-conscious in their use of health care services than they would be in the absence of the tax expenditure for health insurance costs; to reallocate existing savings from accounts that are not tax-preferred to retirement accounts, rather than add to their savings; and to purchase more expensive homes, investing too much in housing and too little elsewhere relative to what they would do if all investments were treated equally.

Second, by providing benefits to specific activities, entities, or groups of people, tax expenditures increase the size and scope of federal involvement in the economy. Indeed, adding tax expenditures to conventional federal outlays makes the federal government appear notably larger relative to GDP.

Third, tax expenditures reduce the amount of revenue that is collected for any given set of statutory tax rates?and thereby require higher rates to collect any chosen amount of revenue. All else being equal, those higher tax rates lessen people?s incentives to work and save and therefore decrease output and income. At the same time, some tax expenditures more directly affect output and income. For example, the preferential rate on capital gains and dividends raises the after-tax return on some forms of saving, which tends to increase saving and boost future output. As another example, the increase in take-home pay arising from the earned income tax credit appears to encourage work effort by some people.

Fourth, tax expenditures have mixed effects on the societal goal of limiting the complexity of the tax code. On the one hand, most tax expenditures, such as itemized deductions and tax credits, require that taxpayers keep additional records and make additional calculations, increasing the complexity of the tax code. On the other hand, some exclusions from taxable income simplify the tax code by eliminating recordkeeping requirements and the need for certain calculations. For example, in the absence of the exclusion for capital gains on assets transferred at death, taxpayers would need to calculate the appreciation in the value of their assets since the original purchase?a calculation that would require records of the purchase of assets acquired by deceased benefactors, perhaps many decades earlier.

Fifth, tax expenditures affect the distribution of the tax burden in ways that may not always be recognized, both among people at different income levels and among people who have similar income but differ in other ways.




if you truly cared about getting spending under control you would demand an accounting of what is spent on these items but you don't really care at all about debt or spending. You are only interested in cutting everyone but yourself.

Nemont


Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
>..we ARE educated beyond our intelligence....
>
>
>
>
497fc2397b939f19.jpg


I would argue that our intelligence is lacking due to most being unwilling to be educated.


Nemont

Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
Maybe get that educator you live with to educate you on the difference between fact and opinion. If you're willing of course.


#livelikezac
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-04-18 AT 05:48PM (MST)[p]Intelligence has nothing to do with educated....

That crap you posted is just lots of words from a person with more education than intelligence.....

497fc2397b939f19.jpg
 
If you cannot grasp the basics of how our debt is added to then you should not pretend that you actually care about it.

The only people needing an education is the clowns who believe that the tax code isn't a way to waste vast amounts of borrowed money that goes on our debt.

That is not a theory nor an opinion, it is a probable fact using 2nd grade math.

Nemont


Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
>Anyone who refuses to understand the
>implications and cost of
>spending via tax expenditures is
>not truly worried about spending,
>is willing to ignore a
>massive and growing problem and
>isn't serious about any solution
>to spending. That
>is a fact.
>
>
>
>

This is mostly opinion not fact.

#livelikezac
 
A long time ago to make a few extra bucks in collage I graded Econ 101 papers.
I often got papers back where the student could have answered the question with a few sentences but instead they spent way to much time on something similar to the twisted words above
Those students fell into two categories. Students that didn't know the answer and hoped to baffle you with BS or students that knew the answer but didn't like it for personal or political reasons.
 
I understand how government accounting works.......you and I would go to prison for it if we accounted a public corporation the same way......

Two numbers matter....income and the expense numbers....regardless of how you get to either number, the income number needs to be bigger than the expense number


497fc2397b939f19.jpg
 
>I understand how government accounting works.......you
>and I would go to
>prison for it if we
>accounted a public corporation the
>same way......
>
>Two numbers matter....income and the
>expense numbers....regardless of how you
>get to either number, the
>income number needs to be
>bigger than the expense number
>
>
>
>
497fc2397b939f19.jpg



Really? If that is true then go look at the Clinton years when there was a budget "surplus" yet the debt continued to grow.

I really give a shy if the Trump lovers don't admit facts.


Trump Conservatives pretend to care about the debt, that is a fact.

Nemont

Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
>>I understand how government accounting works.......you
>>and I would go to
>>prison for it if we
>>accounted a public corporation the
>>same way......
>>
>>Two numbers matter....income and the
>>expense numbers....regardless of how you
>>get to either number, the
>>income number needs to be
>>bigger than the expense number
>>
>>
>>
>>
497fc2397b939f19.jpg

>
>
>Really? If that is true
>then go look at the
>Clinton years when there was
>a budget "surplus" yet the
>debt continued to grow.
>
>I really give a shy if
>the Trump lovers don't admit
>facts.
>
>
>Trump Conservatives pretend to care about
>the debt, that is a
>fact.
>
>Nemont
>
>Government is like a baby. An
>alimentary canal with a big
>appetite at one end and
>no responsibility at the other.
>
Nemont maybe moving to Mexico City would be a great start for you.
 
Figures you are too big of a coward to post anything of value. What a waste of carbon.

Nemont


Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
 
>>I understand how government accounting works.......you
>>and I would go to
>>prison for it if we
>>accounted a public corporation the
>>same way......
>>
>>Two numbers matter....income and the
>>expense numbers....regardless of how you
>>get to either number, the
>>income number needs to be
>>bigger than the expense number
>>
>>
>>
>>
497fc2397b939f19.jpg

>
>
>Really? If that is true
>then go look at the
>Clinton years when there was
>a budget "surplus" yet the
>debt continued to grow.
>
>I really give a shy if
>the Trump lovers don't admit
>facts.
>
>
>Trump Conservatives pretend to care about
>the debt, that is a
>fact.
>
>Nemont
>
>Government is like a baby. An
>alimentary canal with a big
>appetite at one end and
>no responsibility at the other.
>
I'm not denying any facts......I understand fully that the income number hasn't been bigger than the expense number in at least a hundred years.......probably more.

I have no Idea how to fix the mess we're in.....because NO ONE will stop the spending............

IF......by some magic wand wave....all "welfare" spending were to stop tomorrow...by the weekend we'd be a flaming burning screaming riot of a country.......

497fc2397b939f19.jpg
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-05-18 AT 07:33PM (MST)[p]https://www.wsj.com/articles/social-security-expected-to-dip-into-its-reserves-this-year-1528223245

....like there is really a big sack full of reserve cash....lol




497fc2397b939f19.jpg
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos

Member Gallery Photos and Videos!

0C0702BE-FADF-493C-BD39-F8825B75B359.jpeg
A2A1C403-7785-428F-8EE3-E2396C876093.jpeg
CF5737F3-A5FD-4C20-8D37-3584775B7EF3.jpeg
86D33F99-7B8F-436E-8FB7-6C15F6594B23.jpeg
20230729_173647.jpg
IMG_0842.jpeg
75281A5E-A6A2-4BBD-9AC6-D193365587A0.jpeg
IMG_8377.JPG
IMG_1777.jpg
High Country Wyoming Buck
nm bull.jpg
0104F41A-CFF1-4738-AFDD-9520C663C686.jpeg
Back
Top Bottom