It's just Awful

This may be a stupid question but, where is the outrage and media coverage of US citizen children being seperated from their parents on a daily basis because the parents committed crimes? This happens many times a day all over the US.

I guess that doesnt fit the agenda, or at least they havent figured out a way to make that the fault of republicans...
 
CPS has seperated more families than iCE.....for lots of questionable reasons.....


497fc2397b939f19.jpg
 
Nary a word from the media when obama wrapped them in tinfoil like baked potatoes and put them in cages. And they wonder why no one trusts the media
 
>Nary a word from the media
>when obama wrapped them in
>tinfoil like baked potatoes and
>put them in cages. And
>they wonder why no one
>trusts the media

Yep......and clowns like ocho has only seen that side of the news.....that's all yahoo offers...




497fc2397b939f19.jpg
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-20-18 AT 10:25PM (MST)[p]Could not agree more let's get those impeachment proceedings started!

Looked through the pictures, which one has the all crying and drama in it? Everything clearly appears organized and calm outside of being overcrowded, these are pictures from early 2009 shortly after Obama took office.

Indeed Obama took measures by expanding the system capacity should a future wave of asylum seekers arrive from Central America to avoid the above linked pictures of over crowding. At the time Obama took office there were only 90 beds available at detention centers. Obama like past POTUS holders just did not get involved with separating children from their parents.

I know, you don't believe me, but there is a reason that border crossing by Mexicans had dramatically declined under the Obama Administration.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-despite-slowing-influx-idUSKCN0I10F120141012

So Trump decided to soak up some airwaves away from Cohen flipping and Manafort's arrest by backing Miller and Kelly in their psyop Shock & I'll take your children away with no legal recourse for you to get them back program.

Why are these waves of asylum seekers coming? Once again Uncle Sam reaps the seeds sewn a century ago in Central and South American countries. Some have been converted into narco states like Columbia, while others have supported corrupt governments beholden to companies like United Fruits for decades. In the meantime Venezuela is no longer a functioning country as it's currency is less than toilet paper causing millions to flea to Columbia...good luck there.

So the choices for you and your family are pimp, be pimped, die or leave.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/venezuela/article213372814.html

Thank goodness Obama expanded the system to absorb the future influx of refugees, and they are refugees, so they can be processed accordingly. There are changes that could be implemented like expanding the holding period to 45 days from 20 for proper processing. When waves of humans arrive the system becomes overloaded to run background checks and process asylum seekers.

There are several legislative ways to handle this situation but utilizing Kelly and Miller's plan is unacceptable and completely unAmerican at best, children should not be separated from their family other than for expected periods of time to receive medical services. Using children as political pawns may now backfire with lawsuits outside of the Flores Act framework...nice.

I don't believe most Americans travel to other countries. Nor are they really interested to learn just how bad life is among some of our southern neighbors, it's not pretty. It's basically Trump's wet dream of how countries should be run.

As mentioned, let's all be thankful that President "Anything but Russia" rescinded his prior order...Yay! What"s the next trick, let's see, attack Mueller, our intelligence communities, allies, create chaos in the markets starting a trade war, all while rolling over on Crimea and propping 2 of the world's most corrupt leaders? Indeed, great again!

Burn the house down is the new motto, throw everything under the bus to soak up any investigation headlines, this should be good.

We are a consumer nation, we need affordable labor until automation becomes more available. A christian belief system, first and foremost these asylum seekers are people, men, women and children willing to walk, ride, or travel for months by foot with literally only their shirts on their backs and their children to come here. Who better would you like as citizens? Ask the Cuban community in Florida known for their conservative and patriotic fervor given their own history. Hispanics represent 12% of our military and that number is expected to grow.

So all those here that want the son of a wealthy Saudi businessman, a son who is a devout Waahabi believer, to "legally" pay his way through attorneys to come to become a citizen by all means raise their hand? How about some Chinese nationals, what about them, Jared could hook you up for a half million? Would you rather have those guys?

Maybe, just maybe if we actually stopped supporting puppet regimes in the affected countries our southern neighbors might actually be able to clean up the corruption. They live in a tropical paradise, economies cannot flourish if the government is corrupt. Solve one issue and you might have a reverse immigration issue, you may need to build a wall to keep Americans in.

It is not even an if, if it just when at this point when it comes to Dear Leader, witnesses don't flip unless they have something to offer. If there is no crime, there is nothing to offer, pretty simple. Enjoy jail Roger say Hi to Paul while you are there. I hope Russia's interference gets categorized as an act of cyber warfare so I can just refer to all the Trump rats as traitors doing Putin's bidding. Reaching out to Russia to gather the stolen goods of cyber crime as "Oppo" is completely illegal, lying about it to the FBI is as well. Trump stated on national TV he wanted Russia's help, so of course he and the rest of his team considered it priority #1.
 
FTW Your bullsh!t bloody brilliance is baffling! How about manning up and show us either your big game mounts or your Geo Soros pay stub. First class ATDS.
 
Yeah they're refugees alright, fleeing gang violence. You betcha. Fine. Ship them to Chicago, they'll feel right at home.
 
LMAO, FTW you better get your checkbook ready. Can you at least be honest and agree that the OIG report exonerates Trump of obstruction of justice? So now you're back to collusion which is a crap shoot at best. After a year, we still have zero evidence that Trump engaged in collusion with Russia to steal the election.

For months and months you have claimed that certain people and certain things were going to happen that simply haven't come to fruition and now you're hanging your hat on Cohen. I remember when Manafort was going to flip too and that would be the end of Trump but I'm still waiting for that to happen. Time will tell but the odds are very much in my favor that Trump won't be impeached for collusion with Russia so I hope you're saving your can money.
 
If Hillary would have won we never would have heard about Obama torturing children and ripping them form their mommys arms.
 
If Hillary won FTW and cocopuff kid would be sitting on the beach drinking mint julips giving each other handies....
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-21-18 AT 09:15PM (MST)[p]Forkie you embarrass yourself regularly with your replies. Facts are you are clueless about honesty, intellectual or otherwise.

This is why I offered RELH the bet, say what you want I know RELH is no Stoney or worse a Forkie. A simple bet, a very similar bet to our past bet, without the whole assassination aspect RELH loved so much. Our bet is plain as day and here for all to read. So by all means Mr. Honesty, Mr. Integrity, tell us all exactly what the bet is?

My past writings clearly illustrate that I posted a subject over a year ago stating that the impeachment process is a long one and the house/judge are stacked in Trump's political favor. So why would I bet about impeachment?

I have also clearly noted that "Collusion" is only a crime under divorce proceeding, outside of that the act of colluding had been grabbed by the media, not me, as having elements of a criminal act. Collusion is what one does when committing Conspiracy Against the United States, a crime only second to Treason.

Man, I even went as far as noting in the bet don't be spineless and try to weasel out of it or change it. No changing "this" or "that", the bet is clear and it has nothing to do with impeachment or collusion. Just one more thing that was easily predictable when you enter a bet with a person that lacks a shred of integrity, they will always weasel later.

As a gentleman I offered RELH a chance to win back some something (money/whatever) after losing a bet to me years past. Like a 13 year old girl with a drama complex Forkie started dogging me, smelling those farts, begging and prodding me to let him take the bet if RELH declined.

After I gave RELH first dibs, he passed, no shock his betting record is worse than his voting record. After repeated whining I agreed to bet Forkie easily predicting something like this would happen.

I gave you a chance to avoid embarrassing yourself Forkie when I clearly told you months ago in a friendly manner to simply check the link, check the bet. I did not light you up, nor did I take advantage of your offer to raise the stakes. I should have sealed the $500 as the new mark, then posted the link, and spent the rest of my week laughing. But I didn't do it because I was not going to take advantage of your high volume ignorance. You really don't even know what the bet is outside of Trump and $100.00. Why such ignorance? Not sure, but I blame the water.

Be "honest"...what is the bet? You should know it verbatim or are you a grown azz man that now does not even know what he bet on? Yet like Trump it sure hasn't stopped your posturing or your penchants for spreading fake news.

I believe after I told you what the bet was your reply was something to the effect of, "I would have to be an idiot, or a complete moron to take that bet".

Agreed 100%, yet here we are, so congratulations on such keen observations!

Give us all you got Forkie, you've been embarrassing yourself for years on here smelling my farts, by all means the floor is yours. Give me 10,000 words, feed my never ending intellectually sadistic hunger.

Quick responses now Mr Honesty, after all it could take days or weeks to find that link, don't tell me you were too stupid to at least bookmark a bet. Never mind, pretty much answered that question when I asked it.

When you would like me to share it with everyone let me know and I will gladly post the link here. Then you can apologize for making an axx out of yourself for the last 20 years, but I will settle for the last 6 months.
 
I get the feeling foreskin is one of those people that likes to hear himself talk


#livelikezac
 
Do you ever notice how the intellectually dishonest never can answer a question directly? Their brain goes into overdrive to divert the question by asking more questions in hopes that you will be impressed with their bullchit bloody brilliance. Yes, they love to not only hear themselves talk, but love to hear themselves think.

Show us your mounts or your Soros pay stub.
 
It wouldn't surprise me one bit if some progressive organization funded by Democrats is financing these kids and their guardians to make their way to the border.

I won't say anything bad about FTW even though I might disagree. I have an inseparable bond with him and his father.
 
Thank you FTW for your comments. That tells me that I am able to get under your thin liberal hide and prick you as you deserve with your anti American views.


RELH
 
Eel are you related to FTW? Does he have any big game mounts that he use to brag about? Have you seen his Geo Soros pay stub?
 
>It wouldn't surprise me one bit
>if some progressive organization funded
>by Democrats is financing these
>kids and their guardians to
>make their way to the
>border.
>
>I won't say anything bad about
>FTW even though I might
>disagree. I have an inseparable
>bond with him and his
>father.
are you FTW'S UNCLE ?
 
Right back at ya Eel! Wouldn't bother explaining they would not understand.

RELH you need to go check your calendar, then check your 7-day pill organizer, now take your pill organizer and hold it up next to the calendar. Yes RELH, put your glasses on. Getting me worried there big fella your reply makes no sense.

You lost the bet RELH, yet I just complimented your integrity...how is that an "under your skin" response?

RELH can you ever remember either of us goating each other during that 4 year period our bet was in play? I think we mentioned it twice, maybe, as a reminder we still had a bet. I think I got busy for awhile back then but checked back in before the election. I don't remember either of us changing the bet or the amount of the bet, I think it was more of a "We're still on?" Yes, we're still on.

If I had lost to RELH I would of have been happy to do so, outside of the dark nature of the bet, I would not have been happy about that.

Keep checking in Forkie, I'll be counting the days, maybe even weeks, thinking of you spending time pouring through the archives.

Homer's been around a long enough, ask him how much I bluff.
 
FTW and I aren't blood related. It's actually closer than that in some ways. I don't know many of you personally, but I'd be willing to bet he's one of the better, most successful hunters around here.
 
He might be a successful hunter, but his liberal politics suck. His voting liberal Democrat helped to screw up CA. then he bails out to Idaho to continue his liberal ways to screw up that state. You would think that any man with a lick of intelligence would have learned a lesson while living in CA.

RELH
 
Homer, not cozy....snug yes, although we've never shared a boat.

RELH, I never said he had common sense.
 
FTW,


http://www.monstermuleys.info/cgi-b..._thread&om=6638&forum=DCForumID46&archive=yes


So, BFD if I said that the bet was Trump being impeached or him finishing his term. You're a ##### retard being so dramatic with your earlier post. Smelling farts? WTF are you even talking about? Embarrassing myself?

Here's a good thread where you embarrassed yourself.

http://www.monstermuleys.info/cgi-b..._thread&om=6377&forum=DCForumID46&archive=yes


I'm not sure why your dumbass would think it would take me days or weeks to find our bet thread. In case you missed it, I'm pretty good at searching the archives just ask Nemont. In fact, when I have more time, I think I will post up a few more of your embarrassing threads/posts. You've been wrong a lot douchebag.

Either way, so the bet is that Trump will finish his first term. What a crybaby asshat you are for the semantics. My sincere apologies for saying the bet was that he won't be impeached when in reality the bet is that he will finish his first term. HUGE difference I know. I was probably confused with all of the other libtards calling for his impeachment that I forgot that the bet was WAY more than that. What was I thinking? He could die and you would win the bet or he could resign. Those are much more likely scenarios than him being impeached I know.

Regardless, I'm going to win and you know it. Now you've gone off the deep end like Nemont and post stupid shyt like I've been embarrassing myself for years so now I have to show your stupidity too. The Hillary Will Be Indicted thread is a classic!! Moron!!
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-23-18 AT 05:34PM (MST)[p]WOW....that looks like a simple $100 bet that Trump does or doesn't finish his 4 year term....ftw offered it...forkie took it...and ftw accepted it....


that steaming page long pile of propaganda ftw posted the other day really stinks now.

God bless you eel...


....and on the RECORD even...lmao

"Going on the record folks, Hillsy is going down. We will see multiple indictments announced before July 25th.

When Bernie announced his candidacy and was trailing Hillsy by 100 pts, I supported Bernie. I stated multiple times that Hillary will lose the nomination and I still believe that today.

Many here himmed and hawed at first but as time progressed we have all witnessed his popularity grow. He is still running and I still believe he will be our next President. I think we will see a Sanders/Warren ticket.

Bernie has not conceded, Biden does not want the job, and Trump will either drop out or lose by a massive landslide. I have danced around this for some time always leaving a little room to not fully commit, not anymore she's going down."


497fc2397b939f19.jpg
 
I hope the Democrats are stupid enough to put up Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren on their ticket for President/Vice President.
Both are too liberal to be elected now and both have baggage that will be hard to overcome. Sanders with his wife being investigated for outright fraud and Warren being a liar on her Indian blood. Next she will claim African blood to get their votes.

RELH
 
> I love to watch people
>lie to themselves .
>go on.....
>
>
>
>
>
lol....you're the best...






497fc2397b939f19.jpg
 
Gotta love those compassionate open minded liberals that call the Demacratic party Home.. Such an inspiration to the American people .
 
>I think you and I have
>a hundred on if Trump
>will be re-elected in 2020.
>Looking good for me so
>far.

Looking good for me also
 
What if the mother who is separated from her child is pregnant and wants an abortion? Will the left fight for her rights to be permanently separated from her child? Just curious.
 
"So, BFD if I said that the bet was Trump being impeached or him finishing his term."

Lies and more lies...wrong again!

Wow, okay here we go. Keep in mind more read than post in here.

Here on Earth when you claim the bet was Trump being impeached that is called a lie. No where in the bet does the word impeachment even exist. Adding insult to intellectual injury the, "or him finishing his term", is simply another lie added as a juvenile pathetic attempt to cover the first lie yet by indirectly acknowledging what the bet actually is.

I clearly and quite calmly told you, "No, you are incorrect, that is not the bet, this is the bet so perhaps you should check for yourself before further embarrassing yourself" this was your reply..

"Bullshyt FTW, I mean Stoney. The bet is that Trump won't be impeached over the Russian collusion thing and you know it. When I have time I will find the thread to prove it. There's not a chance in hell I would have bet on a second term so stop trying to welch out of our bet already."

Now keep in mind this was after you decided you needed some attention by calling me out, only to embarrass yourself by not only clearly and predictably weaseling, bur belligerently ranting to raise the bet to $500. Again, it's all here and it only corroborates my earlier reply. Must be a generational thing or the water but I was always taught a man is only as good as his word. Maybe that is a local thing?

RELH understands this apparent foreign concept, it is called Integrity. What is your word worth? If you agree to a bet, you agree to a bet, that's it.

Like I stated before, what do you know about honesty, intellectual or otherwise? It is rather clear exactly who has decided to change the entire parameters of the bet, then not only doubles down but increasing some fictional or what I believe you call alternative facts bet by 500%.

My farts refer to all the time you have now invested pouring through my replies along with putting together that predictable and pathetic defense/attack post as you shadow me on this forum. Awesome title very witty, I stand by every single one of those replies, I did then, I do now, would you like to discuss them?

Your words mean nothing...and this is an example of why. If you are trying to gain a shred of credibility just stop, save yourself. You are going on a downhill road others have unsuccessfully gone before, again ask Homer, it's not pretty. I know what you are thinking D, but this is really me trying my best to play nice, I'm not setting him up, it's partially my fault for getting involved in this bet.

Man-up, own it and move on. I'll give you a pass, after all there is a certain level of acceptance that should be extended to all long term members of this board, consider it a courtesy you and most others would never extend to me.

"There's not a chance in hell I would have bet on a second term so stop trying to welch out of our bet already."

(Caforkedhorn Circa 2018)

The Bet: Trump will not be on the ballot for 2020.

This just might make for a great tagline what do you think boyz?

And that RELH is how you get under someone's skin. The truth hurts, lies and alternative facts mean nothing when it comes to credibility, honesty or integrity.

So yeah, when it comes to honesty and integrity your word especially when you break it actually is a BFD. My advice avoid putting up some distraction attack post, too Trumpian, too juvenile, too predictable, and apparently also too late.

How embarrassing and sad is that?

Be glad, in my eyes I absolutely have the option after the last few months of your pedantic pleas to secure the wager at $500, why shouldn't I? Apparently if there is not a chance in hell you would have bet on a second term, then why did you do exactly that? Are you stupid or something? Never mind, I don't have all day the answer lies in the question. Like I said before, I will pass on that option, that would be weasel-like within itself so the bet is $100.

Stoney: A man known for being a weasel, talking big about a bet, then disappearing when he lost. A man of absolutely zero integrity.
 
>"So, BFD if I said that
>the bet was Trump being
>impeached or him finishing his
>term."
>
>Lies and more lies...wrong again!
>
>Wow, okay here we go. Keep
>in mind more read than
>post in here.
>
>Here on Earth when you claim
>the bet was Trump being
>impeached that is called a
>lie. No where in the
>bet does the word impeachment
>even exist. Adding insult to
>intellectual injury the, "or him
>finishing his term", is simply
>another lie added as a
>juvenile pathetic attempt to cover
>the first lie yet by
>indirectly acknowledging what the bet
>actually is.
>
>I clearly and quite calmly told
>you, "No, you are incorrect,
>that is not the bet,
>this is the bet so
>perhaps you should check for
>yourself before further embarrassing yourself"
>this was your reply..
>
>"Bullshyt FTW, I mean Stoney. The
>bet is that Trump won't
>be impeached over the Russian
>collusion thing and you know
>it. When I have time
>I will find the thread
>to prove it. There's not
>a chance in hell I
>would have bet on a
>second term so stop trying
>to welch out of our
>bet already."
>
>Now keep in mind this was
>after you decided you needed
>some attention by calling me
>out, only to embarrass yourself
>by not only clearly and
>predictably weaseling, bur belligerently ranting
>to raise the bet to
>$500. Again, it's all here
>and it only corroborates my
>earlier reply. Must be a
>generational thing or the water
>but I was always taught
>a man is only as
>good as his word. Maybe
>that is a local thing?
>
>
>RELH understands this apparent foreign concept,
>it is called Integrity. What
>is your word worth? If
>you agree to a bet,
>you agree to a bet,
>that's it.
>
>Like I stated before, what do
>you know about honesty, intellectual
>or otherwise? It is rather
>clear exactly who has decided
>to change the entire parameters
>of the bet, then not
>only doubles down but increasing
>some fictional or what I
>believe you call alternative facts
>bet by 500%.
>
>My farts refer to all the
>time you have now invested
>pouring through my replies along
>with putting together that predictable
>and pathetic defense/attack post as
>you shadow me on this
>forum. Awesome title very witty,
>I stand by every single
>one of those replies, I
>did then, I do now,
>would you like to discuss
>them?
>
>Your words mean nothing...and this is
>an example of why. If
>you are trying to gain
>a shred of credibility just
>stop, save yourself. You are
>going on a downhill road
>others have unsuccessfully gone
>before, again ask Homer, it's
>not pretty. I know what
>you are thinking D, but
>this is really me trying
>my best to play nice,
>I'm not setting him up,
>it's partially my fault for
>getting involved in this bet.
>
>
>Man-up, own it and move on.
>I'll give you a pass,
>after all there is a
>certain level of acceptance that
>should be extended to all
>long term members of this
>board, consider it a courtesy
>you and most others would
>never extend to me.
>
>"There's not a chance in hell
>I would have bet on
>a second term so stop
>trying to welch out of
>our bet already."
>
>(Caforkedhorn Circa 2018)
>
>The Bet: Trump will not be
>on the ballot for 2020.
>
>
>This just might make for a
>great tagline what do you
>think boyz?
>
>And that RELH is how you
>get under someone's skin. The
>truth hurts, lies and alternative
>facts mean nothing when it
>comes to credibility, honesty or
>integrity.
>
>So yeah, when it comes to
>honesty and integrity your word
>especially when you break it
>actually is a BFD. My
>advice avoid putting up some
>distraction attack post, too Trumpian,
>too juvenile, too predictable, and
>apparently also too late.
>
>How embarrassing and sad is that?
>
>
>Be glad, in my eyes I
>absolutely have the option after
>the last few months of
>your pedantic pleas to secure
>the wager at $500, why
>shouldn't I? Apparently if there
>is not a chance in
>hell you would have bet
>on a second term, then
>why did you do exactly
>that? Are you stupid or
>something? Never mind, I don't
>have all day the answer
>lies in the question. Like
>I said before, I will
>pass on that option, that
>would be weasel-like within itself
>so the bet is $100.
>
>
>Stoney: A man known for being
>a weasel, talking big about
>a bet, then disappearing when
>he lost. A man of
>absolutely zero integrity.
Easy there little fella you been drinking that giant juice again.
 
LMAO!! These libtards have gone batshit crazy! I'm not even going to waste much time responding to that drunken load of crap. I posted the thread along with your retarded "on the record" Hillsy thread. I think we'll let the audience be the judge of who the ******** idiot is.
 
This is the thread,


http://www.monstermuleys.info/cgi-b..._thread&om=6638&forum=DCForumID46&archive=yes


The post is # 9 where the proposal is made.

Post # 28 is where you accept the bet. You even say payment within 48 hours last day of office. You also go on (much like Trump I might add) to self aggrandize about being responsible for the existence of this forum.

All of this craziness is indicative of a mental disorder. I believe it is narcissism. You should seek help.

You're absolutely right, I did attempt to up the bet to $500 at some point after the original bet was made but you didn't take it. Whether I said impeachment or whatever else doesn't change what the bet is. It isn't a lie, it is semantics.

Regardless, here is the proof. I encourage other forum members to weigh in on which one of us is correct. I have provided proof and you have rambled on some pot induced post about ridiculousness. I know you're worried about losing a hundred because you're not sure how you're going to pay your rent but it is what it is.
 
He's not worried about paying his rent since section 8 pays for 95% of it. Show us your mounts or your GEO SOROS pay stub.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom