What makes their system so great is you get a point if you are not drawn for your FIRST choice. You can still be drawn and hunt in your second choice area AND accumulate a point. Granted, AZ would have a hard time doing this since they do not have any where near the number of tags CO does, but allocating tags based on points instead of the joke they currently have would be more equitable.
I guess the debate is really about would you perfer an equitable system or true lottery system? If you perfer the lottery system, which you have stated that you do, then lets get rid of the whole point process and just draw applicants names each year. Everyone has the same opportunity. Get rid of the administrative costs of maintaining the point system. If you are like me and would prefer a more equitable system then keep the point system issue tags based on applicants with the most points not on a random number generated by who knows who. Frankly, I would be ok with either of the two alternate systems I mentioned. Anything would be better than what they have.
Every year there are stories of "I had 10 points going in and now I have 11, but a co-worker decided he wanted to try hunting this year and got a tag with no points". No justice in that, yet it happens a lot. Then, to top it off, the guy who got the tag, most likely has no idea what he has and probably only hunts on the week-end(s) during the season cause he has other things to do.
The fact is though, I am just P in the wind since the AZGFD will not change their system any time soon. To quinch my thirst for hunting, I will just continue to hunt in Colorado.
I must add just in case you were wondering, I had no expectations of drawing an AZ elk tag this year since I only applied for the most difficult hunts, first and second choise for early rifle bull hunts. With 5 points going in and only 25 and 50 tags available, I basically just applied for the point and gave AZGFD $121 to hold for a while just in case I was wrong.
264X300