>Why does your group continue to
>say canadian wolf? The
>ones reintroduced are one and
>the same as the wolves
>that were historically in Idaho.
> Also wolves are out
>of federal hands and are
>now being managed by the
>state, the feds are not
>telling Idaho what to do
>in any way.
what the crap???? not even close!!! so when we run out of moose in Idaho, we transplant canadian moose because they are one in the same????? is a canadian white tail the same size as a lemhi white tail? there are no 300 lbs whitetail in Idaho. 4 yrs ago my father and I went fishing in Alaska, on the flight, this little gal had to sit next to us two butt heads, during the flight we learned she worked for the Alaskan game and fish dept. and so the subject of wolves came up. she personaly worked with black bears, but she told us the wolves transplanted were not even close to the same animal, 30to 50lbs larger.. but the feds dont care, those that call the shots dont listen to real sceince. and what does historically mean, 100yrs ago. why not go 200 yrs ago, lewis and clark only saw 1 group of about 16 elk while in Idaho, they spent alot of time between north fork and tendoy, the Indians ate fish,speed goats and bison. so I would bet there was no 1600 wolves in Idaho then.
