Thanks Longun.
Sorry boys, this has nothing to do with Fenn's treasure chest.
I've alway had a long fascination with the Eskimo people and have recently been looking at some of the larger boats they used back before they acquired modern water craft.
According information I've read it is 55 miles from the Siberian Coast to the Coast of Alaska, with a couple of small island in between.
Apparently there is strong consensus among the archeological community that people crossed the Bering Sea during the last ice age, when a corridor between Siberia and Alaska opened up, due to much of the ocean waters in the world being lock in glaciers, which made it possible for the Siberian people to walk across a land bridge, between the two continents. The timing of the migration is somewhat consistent with the age the very few bodies that have been discovered and dated to around 12,600 BC in North America, which is about when they think the land bridge was in place or a few thousand years after.
Also, it is apparent that Australia and the islands in the Pacific were populated by people using some kind of boats/watercraft to get from Europe, Asia or African to get there.
It seems that numerous migrations could have come across, by way of the ocean, through the narrow 55 mile Bering straight, on many different occasions. If other locations around the world, which are hundreds and even thousands of miles apart, were populated by way of boat/watercraft, it seems inconsistent that the Siberians did not.
As comfortable as the pre-modern Eskimo seemed to be with ocean travel, they would have naturally travel back and forth between the two land masses, long before and long afer the land bridge fromed during the ice age.
So my question is this:
Why, if every other location has been populated with people using boats/water craft, do archeologists believe that the Siberian/Eskimo "only" came by way of the land bridge and only came during that single period of time?
Thanks
DC