Kautz entered his no contest plea to two misdemeanors + a $5,000 fine. "WHAT A JOKE".
Pirtle told Kautz ?to make sure the deer did not disappear from Reno as I needed to see the deer,? according to his report. To which Kautz replied, ??Yes, no problem.??
Pirtle wrote that soon after he hung up, he called his counterparts in Nevada and asked for a state game warden to head over to the taxidermy shop to pick up the deer?s head.
-----------------------------
MY WISH = Either Pirtle or the Nevada State counterpart would have contacted the Taxidermist and explained that such Deer is under Felony investigation(s) and order it to be held, not released. Either could have requested an outside assist to the Local Sheriff to go seize the Deer. An honest licensed Taxidermist would have been happy to help.
----------------------------
By the time the Nevada warden arrived at the shop the next afternoon, Kautz had already called the shop and paid the balance he owed. Someone had been by and to pick up the trophy mount. No one had picked up the deer?s tail, which Kautz had left with the shop.
IMO not all is lost. Nevada COULD open its own Felony investigation insofar as Transporting Illegal Contraband across State lines then, each individuals acts, in further concealing such evidence while in the State of Nevada or via Telecommunications. This is not double jeopardy. Its a new Nevada Case independent of whatever California did/didn't do.
Pirtle did an exceptional investigation. When other Law Enforcement folks see how a District Attorney down graded the case and ignored all other actors, it may and could make LE Admin say no to overtime on Investigations and degrade Moral.
This is simply the Public seeing how frustrating a case can be.
Jagerdad :-(