Matched it UP!!!

sheeprocks

Active Member
Messages
104
Found this giant 3 point that scores 85 inches and finally found the other side!!
8778dscn4545.jpg


2477img_0157.jpg


4268dscn4733.jpg


2243dscn4735.jpg


The set scores 180. And is an incredible 2x3 set. It is around 32-33 inches wide and is crazy heavy..

another shed from the day.....glassed it up...

3452img_0155.jpg


1299img_0156.jpg
 
That's a heck of a nice set. Gotta love that feeling when you finally find the match. Almost as good as walkin' up on that big buck or bull laying on the ground during hunting season.
 
That's a big 2 X 3 set but you might be confused on how to score. And giving the set a spread credit of 32-33 inches is incorrect for a set of sheds...20-22 would be appropriate.

Now get back to doing something productive young man...
 
You might want to re-read his post. He never mentioned inside spread credit, just width.

Yelum

Theres logic, and theres women. They don't go together.
 
LAST EDITED ON Jul-26-13 AT 07:04PM (MST)[p]Very nice set but I do not think 180 nice. I dont see more than about 67" in the 2 point side (which is huge for a 2 point side btw), maybe 77" in the 3 point side. Gave them both 20" of mass, 2" eyeguards, 24" main beams, and 20" G2's; all generous estimates. 20-24" inside spread puts it in the mid 160's. VERY nice for a 2x3 buck.
 
I have had multiple people score these sheds...All come out at 180. The three point is 85, the two point 72, with a 24-25 inch inside. Pics do NO justice to this set. On the mtn. mikes this set sits around 30-31 wide. A true monster.
 
Your not this young man and his Dad dont screw around with boastful numbers just to make themselves look good. If he and his family says 180 its 180. This set is the biggest 2 by 3 set I've ever seen thats for sure. Keep up the good work and keep posting those finds.
 
sorry but holding those sheds as a set as far out as your arms can reach gets you no credit, where i grew up in alaska we had a special word for people that did that with fish. And either you have the biggest 2x3 set ever recorded or something else. statistically speaking i think that narrows it down a little.
 
One out of four pictures as you described and you try to claim this kid gets no credit - come on man open those eyes. Look at the third picture down with the two point side right next to him and tell me that is not the biggest two point shed with the most mass at the peticle you have ever seen. Put all scores aside, look at that set man - its huge no matter what way he holds it.
 
Actually, its not the biggest two point I have ever seen.

It is a nice set of antlers, but lets be realistic here about score.
 
Score is just a number. And why would i lie about the score??? So much easier to not say anything about the score at all. Believe me if it was 150, i would say it was, but it isn't.
 
It's just hard to reach a score like that when the rack is missing 3 of the main points. People post on websites day in and out incorrect numbers. People are just skeptical, regardless it's a cool set of antlers. It looks good on the wall.
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-05-13 AT 07:00PM (MST)[p]>It's just hard to reach a
>score like that when the
>rack is missing 3 of
>the main points. People post
>on websites day in and
>out incorrect numbers. People are
>just skeptical, regardless it's a
>cool set of antlers. It
>looks good on the wall.
>

exactly. Still dont see it in the main frame. Mass looks big but above average mass really does not add much to the score over a set with normal mass; at least not enough to make up for 3 missing points. Im not questioning the intentions just wondering where the inches are. How many of those little burrs near the base are there and how many are score able? What are some of the mass measurements? beams? G2? Prove us skeptics wrong ;) I dont want to seem like I am down playing your find, they are a very nice set of antlers for sure and look good on your wall.

Here is the biggest 3 point set I have found. It scores 177 giving it a 24" inside spread, which is probably too much.

IMG_3462.jpg
 
>Here is the biggest 3 point
>set I have found. It
>scores 177 giving it a
>24" inside spread, which is
>probably too much.
>
>
IMG_3462.jpg



No way does that 3pt score 177! :7
 
Im 15, all i wanted to do was show all you guys my biggest set. whether you guys believe the score, thats up to you. But, i thought you were supposed to give positive comments, not put down others by saying there finds are dinks, small, etc.....Again, pictures dont do justice. Do the math, 85 inch 3 point + 72 inch 2 point + 24inch inside spread = 181. Scores dont matter to me, but i wanted to share my pics of my biggest set to you guys, and some of you guys just dont have anything positive to say about it. I dont care if it scored 150, i would tell it how it is, i dont wanna lie to make me look good. Its the biggest 2x3 ive ever seen/picked up.
By the way, nice set CrabClaw.
 
well i have a hard time believing either of those scores and hey, get real this is monstermuleys nobodys gonna sugar coat anything
 
sheeprocks,
Don't let the negative comments get ya down. Those are a monster pair of sheds. I've picked up a ton of sheds over the years but I've never found a 2 point shed or a 3 point shed that big. Keep on hitting the hills and finding the tine. I love seeing your excitement for our hobby.

For everyone with the negative comments, why don't you guys keep your mouths shut and just let sleeping dogs lie. You are not the shed saviours of the world correcting evil scores where ever you see them. Fact is, it is negative comments like these that keep this forum dead all spring because too many shed nuts are tired of being attacked. I know I'm not alone in my thinking. I love seeing sheds posted up. Especially the big ones. So bite your tongues and let the rest of us enjoy the pictures that are posted here.
 
Nice set of sheds. The score seems a little high to me too, but I know pictures can be deceiving sometimes. Here is a monster 3x that I killed in 2009. He measures right around 77" on each side (almost perfectly symmetrical...grossed 176 netted 174). G3s are about 12", and I think about 18" of mass per side. The sheds here have a little better main beams and more mass down low. So even though it may not look 180 in the pictures, after comparing them to my buck I don't doubt it. The pics can easily conceal a few inches here and there which is all it takes to go from 160 to 180.

-El
CodyBuckSide.jpg
CodyBuck.jpg
 
>Well, i learned my lesson. Don't
>post scores....UNLESS, Yelum BCBOY or
>Founder scores it;) Haha

keep posting your scores :)

could you post up your measurements on your set? I am very curious and would like to see them. Could be useful info sometime if I see a big 2x3 out there to have some notes on what to look for if it has a chance at 180.

Like I said above, that is a sweet set regardless of score, thanks for letting us see um.
 
Well if you guys would look it up you would know that you "ALWAYS" get 4 mass measurments, on the 2 point side you measure the length of the G2 and divided it in half and measure it right there. you then do the same thing with the MB from the G2 to the Tip of the beam.

It amazes me how many people dont know this.

Again, you always get 4 mass measurments, even a spike gets 4 mass measurments.




Jake H. SHED OR DEAD IT DONT MATTER TO ME!!!
458738e374dfcb10.jpg
 
This has me curious now, let's do a little math. Let us take the big side. I know pictures are deceiving but bear with me.

G2- 18in probably giving it more than it is
G3- 10
MB- 26in which is a very very big rail
C1- 6in
C2- 5in
C3- 5 in
C4- have to take at narrowest point between tines, since there is not G4 that would be at the tip, so just give it 2in.
Brow- 2 in.

All that adds up to 74 inches, which is a crazy big 3 point, maybe there are some extras I'm not seeing? What an awesome find Sheeprocks! I admire your passion. I would be curious what the actual measurements are.
 
Dragonshed,

You would not measure the tip, you would take the length of the beam from where the G2 splits off to the tip "say it is 12inchs" so you would measure 6inchs from the tip of the beam and take your mass measurment right there.

If the G2 does not fork, you take the length of the G2 and divide it in half, (say 18inchs) so measure 9inchs from the tip and that is where you get the mass from.

If a buck does not have a brow tine, you measure length between the burr and G2 and divide it in half and add that score 2 times.

You would never measure the tip.

I came up with 80.5 on the 3 point horn, and 67 on the 2 point, but that is without holding the horns Im not going to bash the kid either way, its a hell of a buck.





Jake H. SHED OR DEAD IT DONT MATTER TO ME!!!
458738e374dfcb10.jpg
 
That a awesome looking set, score is great to know, BUT It doesn't matter much in the long run, You found a awesome set of sheds. I believe you have scored them pretty good. Hope you find some more monster sheds this season.

"I have found if you go the extra mile it's Never crowded".
>[Font][Font color = "green"]Life member of
>the MM green signature club.[font/]
 
Sheeprocks,

That is a giant set. I love the mass. As far as score goes they are a lot bigger than than these sheds I found. Way bigger mass, longer length, and bigger inside spread. These two are not a matched set. They score 50.75" and 53.25". I'm just throwing the pic up for reference.

43732_point_sheds.jpg
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom