TAGS

backstrap · Jun 30, 2018

Anybody get their tag in the mail yet? Not me

DW · Jun 30, 2018

http://www.monstermuleys.info/dcforum/DCForumID32/5469.html

#livelikezac

Wiszard · Jul 1, 2018

Not yet...

Cancer doesn't discriminate...don't take your good health for granted because it can be gone in a heartbeat. Please go back and read the last line. This time really understand what it says.

FrontRange · Jul 1, 2018

I heard they messed up the draw again and are re-doing it. Once they have it right, they will update all the web site draw links and send tags. I'm hearing they should be sending tags by the 3rd week in July.

Wiszard · Jul 1, 2018

Re-doing the draw? Is that a joke or are you serious?

Cancer doesn't discriminate...don't take your good health for granted because it can be gone in a heartbeat. Please go back and read the last line. This time really understand what it says.

swampokie · Jul 1, 2018

>I heard they messed up the
>draw again and are re-doing
>it. Once they have it
>right, they will update all
>the web site draw links
>and send tags. I'm hearing
>they should be sending tags
>by the 3rd week in
>July.

Best news ive heard all day. Maybe I wont draw this time and wont have to go to the trouble of turning in my tag due to CLOSED forest!

dangj · Jul 2, 2018

I was hoping someone who has a good grasp on the recaps can answer a question for me...

Hunt code: EM062O1R

285 tags, no landowner tags. 65% should be the resident allocation which would be 186 tags rounding up. 137 adult resident and 11 youth put in for first choice for a total of 148, however only 127 were awarded tags. The non resident first choice awarded licenses were 158 or 56% of the licenses.

What am I missing?, shouldn't all of the residents who put in first choice been awarded licenses up to the 65% allocation?

DW · Jul 2, 2018

Could have applied as a group and someone in the group had fewer points. The lowest point holder in the group is the level the group is entered as.

#livelikezac

dangj · Jul 2, 2018

I don't think that is the case since on both the resident and non resident side it took 0 points

DW · Jul 2, 2018

You're right dangj. Ineligible for one reason or another?

#livelikezac

FrontRange · Jul 2, 2018

Bad humor. I now how tense it can be waiting for a tag in hand

born_2_hunt · Jul 3, 2018

>I was hoping someone who has
>a good grasp on the
>recaps can answer a question
>for me...
>
>Hunt code: EM062O1R
>
>285 tags, no landowner tags. 65%
>should be the resident allocation
>which would be 186 tags
>rounding up. 137 adult resident
>and 11 youth put in
>for first choice for a
>total of 148, however only
>127 were awarded tags. The
>non resident first choice awarded
>licenses were 158 or 56%
>of the licenses.
>
>What am I missing?, shouldn't all
>of the residents who put
>in first choice been awarded
>licenses up to the 65%
>allocation?

They screwed up the draw for sure. The COW tag we all applied for had the same problem. There were 3 of us that applied for the tag all separately. I drew and the other two did not. Looking at the draw stats, they are showing 30 tags as being leftover. So this should mean that everyone that applied should have drawn a tag and the licences were under subscribed leaving 30 leftover tags. I wander how many other people got screwed...

nripepi · Jul 3, 2018

I think 21 credit cards were declined! They all should have drawn before the non-residents.

FrontRange · Jul 3, 2018

>I was hoping someone who has
>a good grasp on the
>recaps can answer a question
>for me...
>
>Hunt code: EM062O1R
>
>285 tags, no landowner tags. 65%
>should be the resident allocation
>which would be 186 tags
>rounding up. 137 adult resident
>and 11 youth put in
>for first choice for a
>total of 148, however only
>127 were awarded tags. The
>non resident first choice awarded
>licenses were 158 or 56%
>of the licenses.
>
>What am I missing?, shouldn't all
>of the residents who put
>in first choice been awarded
>licenses up to the 65%
>allocation?

Per the Regs;
Unless there is an insufficient number of resident applications,
nonresident hunters shall receive no more than 35% of available deer and elk licenses for hunt codes requiring fewer than six preference points for resident hunters to draw in the regular drawing, and no more than 20% of available deer and elk licenses for hunt codes requiring six or more preference points for resident hunters to draw in the regular drawing as calculated using a three-year average for the 2007, 2008,and 2009 limited license draws.

Not enough residents applied with their 1st choice to meet the 65% allotment so the 65/35 split is not applicable. Draw was based strictly on PP regardless of resident or non-resident and those that drew with 0 PP was just luck based.

nripepi · Jul 5, 2018

LAST EDITED ON Jul-05-18 AT 10:34PM (MST)[p]That is one stupid loophole rule, I would be pissed if I was a resident who didn't get a tag!

dangj · Jul 6, 2018

I did call the division and that is the logic Born2hunt. If I understood correctly... it is a soft cap and since the first choice demand for residents was not greater than the 65% of Quota, then resident/nonresident allocation is thrown out and a pure draw. Some of the residents may not have drawn if they put in as a group and the other group members had the same hunt code but cow license rather than male.

Thanks for the reply. I am with you Nripepi and would think that all first choice residents not in a group should have drawn up to the quota and then the remainder of the licenses been given to first choice non residents.