Speak out against the RED FLAG LAWS!!!

elks96 · Feb 21, 2019

I encourage everyone to speak out against this push. I saw online chatter where anti hunters were discussing using this process to "swatt" hunters making them miss a season.

Take it further imagine drawing unit 2 rifle elk tag and having your ex file and get you rifle taken just before season.

I know both of these are little bit extreme, but do not underestimate the lengths they will go to when they are willing to ignore the Bill o Right and the fact that these laws are completely in violation of the constitution.

tailchasers · Feb 21, 2019

This is just a small but critical piece of this legislations gun control agenda. Absolutely call and raise helI.

"Courage is being scared to death but
saddling up anyway."

jhibbs · Feb 21, 2019

I agree, these types of laws are far to easily abused once there in place.

Jody

tailchasers · Feb 27, 2019

Good read and solutions to the so called Red Flag Law. Talk with your county commissioners.

http://www.rallyforourrights.com/fr...tfb8jouhd7YYenYFfrNms3WEWK6Rs6XEULBYVrDUgm2Po

"Courage is being scared to death but
saddling up anyway."

BluffGruff · Feb 27, 2019

LAST EDITED ON Feb-28-19 AT 01:35AM (MST)[p]Constitutional law on this is still in flux. Your (and my) interpretation has limited value unless you're litigating or sitting on a bench. I still think the NRA is just protecting gun manufacturers, and their unwavering stance will ultimately doom gun rights in this country. The one constant is change, so change or die. Time to accept that some people should never have been allowed to own guns in the first place.

Also, someone's life is more important than the inconvenience of missing a hunt, maybe yours if your ex files for divorce bc you were running around...

MrDoe · Feb 28, 2019

BluffGruff have you read the bill as it's written? I'd encourage you to if you live in Colorado.

Cohntr62 · Mar 1, 2019

>LAST EDITED ON Feb-28-19
>AT 01:35?AM (MST)
>
>Constitutional law on this is still
>in flux. Your (and my)
>interpretation has limited value unless
>you're litigating or sitting on
>a bench. I still think
>the NRA is just
>protecting gun manufacturers, and their
>unwavering stance will ultimately doom
>gun rights in this country.
>The one constant is change,
>so change or die. Time
>to accept that some people
>should never have been allowed
>to own guns in the
>first place.
>
>Also, someone's life is more important
>than the inconvenience of missing
>a hunt, maybe yours if
>your ex files for divorce
>bc you were running around...
>
The NRA is representing their membership of about 5 million, plus other gunowners.

BluffGruff · Mar 1, 2019

>BluffGruff have you read the bill
>as it's written? I'd
>encourage you to if you
>live in Colorado.

I did, and have been following these things for years.

BluffGruff · Mar 1, 2019

>The NRA is representing their membership
>of about 5 million, plus
>other gunowners.

In an ideal world, you'd be right, but I don't agree. They repeatedly fight anything the might infringe on profits, and promote fear of seizure of every gun to further an agenda that hasn't been updated with the changes in our society.

Cohntr62 · Mar 2, 2019

>
>>The NRA is representing their membership
>>of about 5 million, plus
>>other gunowners.
>
>In an ideal world, you'd be
>right, but I don't agree.
>They repeatedly fight anything the
>might infringe on profits, and
>promote fear of seizure of
>every gun to further an
>agenda that hasn't been updated
>with the changes in our
>society.

They do fight just about any and all gun control measures, but profits in the gun industry is not their motive. There is a lot of concern over the slippery slope, meaning when the anti-gun people get one thing passed, they immediately move on to the next restriction. Each new law is only a stepping stone to their ultimate goals.

DW · Mar 2, 2019

>
>>The NRA is representing their membership
>>of about 5 million, plus
>>other gunowners.
>
>In an ideal world, you'd be
>right, but I don't agree.
>They repeatedly fight anything the
>might infringe on profits, and
>promote fear of seizure of
>every gun to further an
>agenda that hasn't been updated
>with the changes in our
>society.

I'd agree with you if it had never happened anywhere in history, but it has, in a lot of countries. You can say so what it's just bumpstocks, so what it's just black rifles, so what it's just handguns, until all that's left is us duck and deer hunters and we'll easily be overrun! It doesnt happen all at once overnight, it's just a piece at a time till it's all gone. You can just sit in that lukewarm water with the rest of the frogs if you want, but someday you'll have to answer to your great grandkids when they ask how did we become Venezuela? I'll wait for you to belittle and disregard my comment without logic or facts to validate your response.

#livelikezac

BluffGruff · Mar 2, 2019

Slippery slope fallacy. Based on fear and not facts. Trump is the closest thing to maduro we've had in some time. He hires his unqualified buddies, tries to suppress the opposition, profits from his office. So why aren't the gun owners raising an armed resistance to this dictator?