>Foolish? How about having principles? Anyways,
>as a max points nonresident
>deer applicant holding for 13B,
>I would not want to
>miss a single year of
>trying to draw the tag
>as it is maybe a
>50:50 thing that I'll draw
>under the new allocation before
>old man time gets the
>best of me. I would
>never sell and give up
>my chance for a single
>year.
Agreed...but you have a ton of Folks out there that are just a few short of max points and, knowing they most likely wouldn't draw anyways, they can sell those points. Then you have some of the max point holders that might have already drawn a conflicting tag in another state. How much would a "one less that max" point holder pay to go in with someone like that? As it is now, that max point holder can turn the tag back in and will still have max points the next year and also have a ton of $$$ in his/her back pocket. Their points added together, and then averaged up, would give the lesser point holder max points. How about the Folks that just don't hunt, but have been building points for family members or friends....they would be smart to sell those points the one time. And there would certainly be a line of Folks looking to buy them!
I don't like it at all and IMO it's unethical as well! It is VERY unfair to those of us that don't have the funds to buy the points needed every year. Again, I like the point guard system...BUT, to stop the abuse, they need to stop giving that additional point!