Gorsuch it is !
- Thread starter 264mag
- Start date
NeMont
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 12,632
LAST EDITED ON Apr-03-17 AT 10:11AM (MST)[p]Be careful for what you cheer lead for, it won't be long when a wack job liberal judge, or two, whom hates the 2nd Amendment is put through a Senate with a Democrat majority.
What ever you are willing to let your side do will also be done to you.
The Democrats shouldn't filibuster this move, I know they are butt hurt over the way Merrick Garland was treated but two wrongs don't make a right.
Wait for when the nuclear option is used on legislation when you are no longer in the majority. You can cheer all you want but you will regret this day at some point.
Gorsuch shouldn't even be a question, he is highly qualified and has the right stuff to be a Justice.
Nemont
What ever you are willing to let your side do will also be done to you.
The Democrats shouldn't filibuster this move, I know they are butt hurt over the way Merrick Garland was treated but two wrongs don't make a right.
Wait for when the nuclear option is used on legislation when you are no longer in the majority. You can cheer all you want but you will regret this day at some point.
Gorsuch shouldn't even be a question, he is highly qualified and has the right stuff to be a Justice.
Nemont
>LAST EDITED ON Apr-03-17
>AT 10:11?AM (MST)
>
>Be careful for what you cheer
>lead for, it won't be
>long when a wack job
>liberal judge, or two, whom
>hates the 2nd Amendment is
>put through a Senate with
>a Democrat majority.
>
>What ever you are willing to
>let your side do will
>also be done to you.
>
>
>The Democrats shouldn't filibuster this move,
>I know they are butt
>hurt over the way Merrick
>Garland was treated but two
>wrongs don't make a right.
>
>
>Wait for when the nuclear option
>is used on legislation when
>you are no longer in
>the majority. You can
>cheer all you want but
>you will regret this day
>at some point.
>
>Gorsuch shouldn't even be a question,
>he is highly qualified and
>has the right stuff to
>be a Justice.
>
>Nemont
I agree
>AT 10:11?AM (MST)
>
>Be careful for what you cheer
>lead for, it won't be
>long when a wack job
>liberal judge, or two, whom
>hates the 2nd Amendment is
>put through a Senate with
>a Democrat majority.
>
>What ever you are willing to
>let your side do will
>also be done to you.
>
>
>The Democrats shouldn't filibuster this move,
>I know they are butt
>hurt over the way Merrick
>Garland was treated but two
>wrongs don't make a right.
>
>
>Wait for when the nuclear option
>is used on legislation when
>you are no longer in
>the majority. You can
>cheer all you want but
>you will regret this day
>at some point.
>
>Gorsuch shouldn't even be a question,
>he is highly qualified and
>has the right stuff to
>be a Justice.
>
>Nemont
I agree
eelgrass
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 31,433
Baring some kind of catastrophe like a nuclear attack (and they'll still get that wrong), I don't ever see R's and D's working together. Their core values are too far apart.
Democrats will eventually win because they're not afraid to "burn that ##### down", and Republicans are more meek. Trump is just a minor setback.
Democrats will eventually win because they're not afraid to "burn that ##### down", and Republicans are more meek. Trump is just a minor setback.
Agreed.
When you have to change the rules to win it's going to bite you in the azz at some point. and Gorsuch is qualified, so was Garland. 100% partisan is how it goes from here forward, considering who holds a growing majority it's easy to see how this plays out long term.
So we have a president who lost the vote by the population of a half dozen states and we have a justice confirmed by changing the rules to reach the required votes. anyone see a pattern here?
Stay Thirsty My Friends
When you have to change the rules to win it's going to bite you in the azz at some point. and Gorsuch is qualified, so was Garland. 100% partisan is how it goes from here forward, considering who holds a growing majority it's easy to see how this plays out long term.
So we have a president who lost the vote by the population of a half dozen states and we have a justice confirmed by changing the rules to reach the required votes. anyone see a pattern here?
Stay Thirsty My Friends
>
>
>Agreed.
>
> When you have to change
>the rules to win
>it's going to bite you
>in the azz at some
>point. and Gorsuch is qualified,
>so was Garland. 100%
>partisan is how it goes
>from here forward, considering who
>holds a growing majority it's
>easy to see how this
>plays out long term.
>
>
>So we have a president who
>lost the vote by the
>population of a half dozen
>states and we have a
>justice confirmed by changing the
>rules to reach the required
>votes. anyone see a
>pattern here?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends
Then we have melting snowflakes ,,,get over it!
>
>Agreed.
>
> When you have to change
>the rules to win
>it's going to bite you
>in the azz at some
>point. and Gorsuch is qualified,
>so was Garland. 100%
>partisan is how it goes
>from here forward, considering who
>holds a growing majority it's
>easy to see how this
>plays out long term.
>
>
>So we have a president who
>lost the vote by the
>population of a half dozen
>states and we have a
>justice confirmed by changing the
>rules to reach the required
>votes. anyone see a
>pattern here?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends
Then we have melting snowflakes ,,,get over it!
Anaconda
Very Active Member
- Messages
- 1,443
Nemont, I agree
Tog, remember it was Harry and the Dems that changed the rules first, McConnel is just following Harrys leed.
So, just to play devils advocate, what if Trump gets two or three SCOTUS picks, then the Republicans move to end the nuclear option ?
What would happen.
The Dems are going to spend the next few years screaming about how unfair it is, how would they vote ?
Just a thought.
Tog, remember it was Harry and the Dems that changed the rules first, McConnel is just following Harrys leed.
So, just to play devils advocate, what if Trump gets two or three SCOTUS picks, then the Republicans move to end the nuclear option ?
What would happen.
The Dems are going to spend the next few years screaming about how unfair it is, how would they vote ?
Just a thought.
