Comrade Nunes Steps Down

Better watch out. Gowdy will have Susan Rice and Obama jumping like a fart in a skillet soon. This was a good move for the GOP and will shut Schiff up for a while.
 
Wait until an independent prosecutor is appointed an Trump loses control of the whole thing. Imagine what skeletons are in the closet that can be exposed by that.

Nunes sold out and he knew it when he did it. Carrying the heavy water for Trump always comes with price. Ask General Flynn or President Bannon or anybody whose last name isn't Trump.

Now we have an ongoing ethics investigation over the possibility that Nunes leaked classified information but hey we all know that a Tweet is coming that will exonerate Nunes. #terrible#sad

Nemont
 
POS #1 exits, POS #2 enters. Rumors were Bannon was going to resign until the real power behind the throne Rebekkah Mercer told him not to.
 
Anyone find any evidence Rice leaked those names? maybe it's next to the proof Trump was wire tapped by Obama and that check from Mexico we've been looking for.


Lies lies and more lies. at least Trump's missiles in Syria are a legitimate diversion.













Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
Rice didn't leak the names herself.
She un-masked the names, then made sure everybody from Obama to the Whitehouse janitor had a copy of the document.
So, effectively, Rice made sure the leak would happen.
It's like locking a housecat and a large angry pit bull in a small room together, then saying ?it's not my fault the cat is dead?.

By the way, any real evidence Trump colluded with the Russians yet ????
 
How many people in our country have the power to request surveillance on an individual? What is the criteria to have the request granted? What is the criteria to start an FBI investigation? How many people have the authority to request an unmasking of intelligence materials?

The analogy of cat/dogs whatever does not apply to this matter. To dispel the simple fact that FISA warrants or FBI investigation are based on a feeling or intuition is beyond the realm of intellectual honesty. It's called an investigation which means at some point evidence will have to provided.

We have already discovered that illegal actions on behalf of Manafort, Flynn and Page have taken place, that's a given.

If Rice had wanted she could have held a press conference during the election like Comey. We already know there is evidence of campaign staffers with ties as undeclared Foreign Agents of Russia. We also happen to have the ex CEO of Exxon that lobbied against sanctions on Russia. Yeah, uh, and Russia is our enemy, they empower are enemies with nuclear technology like N. Korea.

If you are asking for a video tape Vladimir and the Donald talking about how Vlad has the goods on Hillsy that will ensure the Donald a win, forget it. Doesn't work that way, everything is done through surrogates.

C'mon Anaconda you're smarter than this.
 
>How many people in our country
>have the power to request
>surveillance on an individual? What
>is the criteria to have
>the request granted? What is
>the criteria to start an
>FBI investigation? How many people
>have the authority to request
>an unmasking of intelligence materials?
>
>
>The analogy of cat/dogs whatever does
>not apply to this matter.
>To dispel the simple fact
>that FISA warrants or FBI
>investigation are based on a
>feeling or intuition is beyond
>the realm of intellectual honesty.
>It's called an investigation which
>means at some point evidence
>will have to provided.
>
>We have already discovered that illegal
>actions on behalf of Manafort,
>Flynn and Page have taken
>place, that's a given.
>
>If Rice had wanted she could
>have held a press conference
>during the election like Comey.
>We already know there is
>evidence of campaign staffers with
>ties as undeclared Foreign Agents
>of Russia. We also happen
>to have the ex CEO
>of Exxon that lobbied against
>sanctions on Russia. Yeah, uh,
>and Russia is our enemy,
>they empower are enemies with
>nuclear technology like N. Korea.
>
>
>If you are asking for a
>video tape Vladimir and the
>Donald talking about how Vlad
>has the goods on Hillsy
>that will ensure the Donald
>a win, forget it. Doesn't
>work that way, everything is
>done through surrogates.
>
>C'mon Anaconda you're smarter than this.
>

But we have tape foreskin.


https://youtu.be/XsFR8DbSRQE

Oops that was Barry. My bad.
 
>
>3 hours ago is old news
>to old californians?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends

That Same BS Story was out months ago!

Pay a F'N Tention!








[Font][Font color = "blue"]I Changed My Signature Just for NVB!
Like 6 Damn Times Now!
 
You clowns don't get it? or you just don't want to hear it?

The story is there were MULTIPLE FISA warrants. which means they were finding something good enough they could get another 90 days each time they made their case for the warrant.


You can pretend this is no big deal but it damn sure is. we don't know what the fallout will be but just the fact the investigation exists and is still ongoing is " yuge " .


















Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
Will Adam Schiff follow Nunes' example and excuse himself from the investigation committee since he made public statements supporting Susan Rice and she is not guilty of any wrong doing. I DO NOT THINK SO. DEMOCRAT DOUBLE STANDARD AT PLAY AGAIN.

RELH
 
Nemont I find it somewhat disturbing that a person who likes to promote himself as a patriotic American would even ask that question.

I am sure you are aware that Schiff has made public statements not only defending Susan Rice, but also stating what she did on the unmasking was legal. In other words he has confirmed he has a preconceived belief that she is innocent of any wrongdoing before the investigation is completed.

If a federal court jury member would make those statements prior to selection as a jury member, that jury member would be excused for "just cause" of not being able to deliver their verdict on the given facts of the case.

As a "patriotic American" do you not want the investigation committee to be un-bias and deliver a just decision based on facts and the law, and not party politics?

RELH
 
Dude there is a big difference between talking out of my AZZ and having your head up your AZZ as you seem to have a very big problem doing. Have a nice day and another snort of rotgut so you can sleep at night.

RELH
 
LAST EDITED ON Apr-13-17 AT 09:03AM (MST)[p]>Nemont I find it somewhat disturbing
>that a person who likes
>to promote himself as a
>patriotic American would even ask
>that question.
>
>I am sure you are aware
>that Schiff has made public
>statements not only defending Susan
>Rice, but also stating what
>she did on the unmasking
>was legal. In other words
>he has confirmed he has
>a preconceived belief that she
>is innocent of any wrongdoing
>before the investigation is completed.
>
>
> If a federal court jury
>member would make those statements
>prior to selection as a
>jury member, that jury member
>would be excused for "just
>cause" of not being able
>to deliver their verdict on
>the given facts of the
>case.
>
> As a
>"patriotic American" do you not
>want the investigation committee to
>be un-bias and deliver a
>just decision based on facts
>and the law, and not
>party politics?
>
>
>
>
>
> RELH
>

What is disturbing is that you don't seem to grasp how this thing is being played out. Why did Nunes step down, after saying he wouldn't? Why does everyone on the Trump team that touches the Russian collusion deal end up recusing themselves? If you are as patriotic as you claim you would be asking those questions as well.

Have you bothered to read what Nunes had to say about how the intel Rice was reviewing was gathered? Nunes said there was nothing illegal done either, he simply had concerns for the President to look at, which is interesting given that the intel came from the White House and Trump could review it at any time.

If all is this is made up then how come the Republicans don't go to the ethics committee and lodge a complaint against Schiff, like there was lodged against Nunes?

It is too bad your patriotism is clouded by being a partisan hack and not really giving a crap about what actually happens. Partisan Patriots are about the worst form of voter in America. They are bad for the country and bad for the future generations who have to deal with this phony two party system that you believe represents the American public.

Nemont
 
Nemont you are the partisan hack due to your extreme hate of Trump. Your so called patriotism only goes so far.

Nunes did the right thing about stepping down and Schiff should also do the right thing, but will not.

RELH
 
I don't hate Trump, I think he is a joke but I don't hate him. When he has done things that are not stupid, I said I support him. Unlike you I don't just give up my right to form an opinion based on a letter after some jokers name. That orange glow from your Trump poster must be making your memory go.

Be specific why there haven't been any ethics investigations of Schiff, like there are of Nunes, which is why Nunes stepped down. Also was Nunes stepping down really a win for the Dems? Trey Gowdy takes his place and from I have observed Gowdy is tougher than Nunes on almost everything.


Do facts matter to you any more? Or once you retire from being an officer of the law you are free to make up what ever fits your partisan agenda?

Nemont
 
You are the one with the partisan agenda and it is very oblivious that you do not like Trump no matter what lame excuse you give.
As for Trey Gowdy. He is known for being a hard nose, get to the facts prosecutor that will be a welcome breath of fresh air to the investigation committee. The democrats will not be able to push him around like they did Nunes.

If the GOP members would have a bigger pair of brass ones, they would push back and get Schiff off the committee. They instead lie down and allow the Democrat truck run over them.

RELH
 
LAST EDITED ON Apr-13-17 AT 03:14PM (MST)[p]What ever, I am for good policy and good leadership. Trump has put no work in on understanding policy and his leadership style does little to lead anyone to believe he thinks of the consequences. That isn't partisan it is just fact. For a president to say nobody ever told him how complicated health care was shows the lack of depth of understanding he has of the major issues he campaigned on.

You didn't like Obama but I have to like Trump that is the stupid world the Trump leg humpers live in. I didn't like Obama but that doesn't mean I have to like Trump either. Trump could earn some respect by showing he has an ounce of impulse control but when he gets near his twitter app he controls himself about like a shyt flinging chimp.

You still haven't explained why there are no ethics investigations against Schiff like there are against Nunes.

Nemont
 
Very simple, the GOP is not pushing the issue with Schiff over his preconceived statements about Rice to disqualify him from the committee.

With Trump and his people, the Democrats demand a ethics investigation if one of them go to the bathroom and shakes it twice after using the urinal. Part of their agenda program to cause disruption with the administration.

RELH
 
A bipartisan panel said she was just doing her job. explain how you plan to turn this into anything more credible than the wiretapping lie.











Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
Now you are speaking out of the wrong side of your mouth Dude. The investigation is not completed and you do not know if she used the intelligence reports for political reasons by targeting only Trump's people. Just like the IRS did with non profit conservative groups.

RELH
 
>Very simple, the GOP is not
>pushing the issue with Schiff
>over his preconceived statements about
>Rice to disqualify him from
>the committee.
>

Then why don't the Republican members file an ethics complaint against him? Why do would they not do that? If preconceived ideas disqualify members from being on this committee then every Republican would have had to recuse themselves with the Benghazi hearings.

> With Trump and
>his people, the Democrats demand
>a ethics investigation if one
>of them go to the
>bathroom and shakes it twice
>after using the urinal. Part
>of their agenda program to
>cause disruption with the administration.


While I agree, isn't that the same game the Republicans played with the previous administration? You don't remember McConnell obstructing anything and everything? To whine about as unfair is hypocritical.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> RELH
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos

Member Gallery Photos and Videos!

Buck Huntin' Fun
20240309_160830.jpg
Utah Muzzleloader Muley
Huge Buck
Deer finished.jpg
draft_31826652_1686693057_1b43ad0c-93e5-480b-b508-cdeeec75a4e6.mp4
Deer 2022 1.jpg
EA60A32E-0829-40D4-877C-F44CF1265048.jpeg
20200915_135424.jpg
IMG_20240415_132809.jpg
IMG_20211027_183932_454.jpg
20240403_180809.jpg
Back
Top Bottom