Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

I thought you said it's none of our business what takes place else where? Typical TOG two faced chit there. Bet you are still hung over huh ?
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

It's over your head mouthbreather.

Where did the 9/11 bombers come from? no, it wasn't Iraq. who supports ISIS ? why would we be butt buds with a regime that has these human rights issues? or am I right and you don't see this as an issue?

If any nation should be banned in Trump's muslim ban it's Saudi Arabia. and they're not.

















Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

Haha you are still hung over!! Not a shock. I am starting think you are an alcohol fetal syndrome kid. Maybe I should give you a break for being so stupid. No you deserve what you get. How much whiskey have you chugged this morning and how much peyote have you puffed ?
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

Notags,

Do you have an explanation as to why Trump didn't include Saudi Arabia in his EO banning travel from Muslim nations? Last checked the Kingdom was Muslim and a funder of terrorist.

Nemont
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

>Notags,
>
> Do you have an explanation
>as to why Trump didn't
>include Saudi Arabia in his
>EO banning travel from Muslim
>nations? Last checked the
>Kingdom was Muslim and a
>funder of terrorist.
>
>Nemont

The answer is out there if you want to look it up. Besides, some judge would have blocked it anyway.
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

because Trump aint the answer like I said before. Some people cant read and comprehend. I dont like politicians. One day someone will figure that out. I just think he is FAR better than hilly hag. But AGAIN do I think Trump is all that ? NO !!!
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

So Saudi Muslims are okay as long as Trump isn't Hillary? Are Saudi Muslims better than Syrian Muslims?
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

>So Saudi Muslims are okay as
>long as Trump isn't Hillary?
> Are Saudi Muslims better
>than Syrian Muslims?

Those darn Christian at it again...oh wait...

you liberals can't have it both ways, you cabitch when Trump try's to ban muslim extremists now you are cabitchen cause he didn't ban the right group of muslims...

How in the heck can anyone take you two seriously...wow don't you get dizzy flip flopping so much....

Dude' how's it feel to have your religion discriminated against hah...


18993imagarants.jpg
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

Manny Phelps, why are the Saudis not in the muslim ban? I understand you're fine with chopping of atheist's heads but are you stupid enough to think they wouldn't lop yours off too? a screaming mexican unchrist like zealot who hates muslims has nothing to fear from the Saudies? you'd go before the atheists.

Other than supporting ISIS , gross human rights violations and giving us 9/11 what is there about the Saudies Trump likes enough to welcome them here? be specific.


If this is a christian nation why did the founding fathers say it isn't? and why did they give the church ZERO power in governing it? prove you're not a mouthbreather and answer .














Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Manny Phelps, why
>are the Saudis not in
>the muslim ban?
>I understand you're fine with
>chopping of atheist's heads but
>are you stupid enough to
>think they wouldn't lop yours
>off too? a screaming
>mexican unchrist like zealot who
>hates muslims has nothing to
>fear from the Saudies?
>you'd go before the atheists.
>
>
> Other than supporting ISIS ,
>gross human rights violations and
>giving us 9/11 what is
>there about the Saudies Trump
>likes enough to welcome them
>here? be
>specific.
>
>
> If this is a christian
>nation why did the founding
>fathers say it isn't?
> and why did they
>give the church ZERO power
>in governing it? prove
>you're not a mouthbreather and
>answer .
>
>---------------------------------->


47644img1559.jpg



It seems to me that our founding fathers were very wise yes smarter then you dude, they knew by this time there were far to many schism in the organized church system to give credence to a particular denomination thus the separation of church n state, this is a waste of time with you but here it is believe it or not....

One week after the First Amendment was approved by the U.S. Congress, President George Washington issued the first national day of thanksgiving and prayer to Almighty God on Oct 3, 1789.

From the U.S. Capitol in New York City, the First Session of the United States Congress successfully placed ten ?handcuffs? or limitations on the power of the new federal government. These limitations were called the first Ten Amendments or Bill of Rights.

The Bill of Rights have two signatures on them ? that of Vice President John Adams, president of the Senate, and that of Frederick Augustus Muhlenberg ? an ordained Lutheran minster who was elected the first speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives.

The preamble to the Bill of Rights explained the states? concerns the federal government might abuse its power: ?The Conventions of a number of the states, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added ? as amendments to the Constitution of the United States.?

The first of the Ten Amendments restricting the federal government began: ?Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

In his national proclamation of prayer and thanksgiving, President George Washington stated Oct. 3, 1789:

Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the Providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favor; and Whereas both Houses of Congress have by their joint Committee requested me ?to recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness;?

Now, therefore, I do recommend and assign Thursday, the twenty-sixth day of November next, to be devoted by the People of these United States to the service of that Great and Glorious Being, who is the Beneficient Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; That we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks, for His kind care and protection of the People of this country previous to their becoming a Nation; for the signal and manifold mercies, and the favorable interpositions of His Providence, which we experienced in the course and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty, which we have since enjoyed, for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enabled to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now lately institution for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and in general for all the great and various favors which He hath been pleased to confer upon us. And also that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the Great Lord and Ruler of nations, and beseech Him to pardon our national and other transgressions, to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually; to render our national government a blessing to all the People, by constantly being a government of wise, just and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed;

to protect and guide all Sovereigns and Nations (especially such as have shown kindness unto us) and to bless them with good government, peace, and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and us; and generally to grant unto all Mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as He alone knows to be best.

Given under my hand, at the city of New York, the 3rd of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty-nine. ? George Washington.
Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Earl Burger stated in the case of Marsh v. Chambers (675 F. 2d 228, 233; 8th Cir. 1982; review allowed, 463 U.S. 783; 1982): ?The men who wrote the First Amendment religion clause did not view paid legislative chaplains and opening prayers as a violation of that amendment. ? The practice of opening sessions with prayer has continued without interruption ever since that early session of Congress. ? It can hardly be thought that in the same week the members of the first Congress voted to appoint and pay a chaplain for each House and also voted to approved the draft of the First Amendment ? (that) they intended to forbid what they had just declared acceptable.?
Brought to you by AmericanMinute.com.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/yet-more-proof-america-founded-as-christian-nation/#TcmIZxwCIKOHSFSA.99
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

So is God in control of this country or is he not? Is God's law above the U.S. Constitution? If you claim it is then your little diatribe above is kind of meaningless.

Nemont
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

NEMO I am starting to think you really are as stupid as TOG. Where in the HE.. did I say Saudi anything is OK ? Have ever tried reading comprehension ? If it was up to me ban them all.
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

Manny the mediterranean Mexican, read article 11 and tell me what it doesn't mean.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bar1796t.asp





When " god " is referenced which god are they speaking of? they never say jesus. maybe they mean Allah ? Wakantanka? maybe the purple people eater? I find nothing in the word " god " that proves this is a Christian nation. and if it is they made sure god didn't have enough power to light a piss ant's porch . doesn't sound to me like they were too dedicated to the cause.









Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

>NEMO I am starting to think
>you really are as stupid
>as TOG. Where in
>the HE.. did I say
>Saudi anything is OK ?
> Have ever tried reading
>comprehension ? If it
>was up to me ban
>them all.

I can read fine and understand even better. I asked you simple question.

You want to jump all over TOG for asking the same question, I thought if you want to jump in, it must mean you have a reason for replying to TOG's question. Unless the only reason you post is to be an annoying whiner and add no value to the discussion. I thought that the role of being a useless poster was already filled by 264. We don't really need another poster on here who never adds anything to the discussion. I just thought you were a tad better than that, I guess I was wrong.

Nemont
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

Tog Jesus was the son of God you Retarded inbred idiot try not to get the 2 confused while your in moms basement. Go water your sheep moron.
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

Oh and NEMO I have posted some very interesting posts on here but you dont respond to them. I am not sure if you are to stupid to understand them or maybe you only respond when the post fits YOUR ideals.
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

define very interesting?

So you are proud that you contribute nothing? I am rarely wrong.

Nemont
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

hahaha well in your eyes and your little world I guess. Seems like plenty on here think you are WRONG ALOT ! And I agree with them. Go back to reading your little articles and sitting on your sorry ARSE !!! I am sure that is what you do best.
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

LAST EDITED ON May-02-17 AT 01:40PM (MST)[p]I see. And you know what I do best because? I could give two Shyts about what you think of me but remember the only one here thinking about another dude's "arse" is you.

Nemont
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

Again funny, Find the first dude to mention another guy's "arse" then look in the mirror.

I have a question if you hate politics why post on a political forum and post nothing about politics? Or is that you get your jollies following around TOG and worrying about his drug and alcohol intake? You sound more like Manny every time you post.

Nemont
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

Thats OK by me. I have no problems with Manny. If he draws a Utah tag I will help him anytime. Again your reading comprehension sucks. I hate politicians. Politics are part of our lives we have to deal with. Try reading and then comprehending instead of trying to interpret in your own little head. Doubt it will help you though.
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

You hate politicians but like politics. That would explain why you would willing hang out with Manny. It is good see father and son spending time together I guess.

I read can read and comprehend. You still have posted zero of value unless you want to count replying to every post TOG makes with a comment about Peyote and Booze.

I have some advice for you. If you go with Manny, don't let him around your wife and children. He is a half a bubble off plumb. Also don't take any of his cancer curing baking soda, sure fire way to end up dead from cancer.


Nemont
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

Tog where are you? Still fact checking to make sure Jesus was the son of god. Is there a CNN link you can post to prove me wrong. You won't find it in your karan. I'll give you a hint it's in the bible.
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

I don't read the bible, the koran, Dr Suess or any other fictional story books.


I asked you questions and all you came back with is jesus was the son of god. or a sheepherder I suspect is more likely.


I am aware that jesus is the son of god, as the fable goes. and I have to assume he wasn't very important to the founding fathers or they would have mentioned him now and then.

For sake of argument, I'm all about that, with no evidence let's say you're right and the founding fathers were talking about god, jesus's deadbeat dad . why didn't they give him any representation in the new government whatsoever? not even as much as a spot behind the dumpster to set up an office.

Can you answer that?


Oh and by the way, what is your response to artcle 11 of the treaty of Tripoli ? were they just screwing with the ragheads? I bet that was it right?







Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

NEMO you have now truly proven to me how stupid you are. Where did I say I like politics. Read and comprehend u moron. I said politics are part of life. NEVER said I like them. Stop thinking you are so god dang smart ! Read and comprehend ! Go back to grade school !
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

Hahaha look who is talking. Let me guess you like the idea of legalizing marijuana. Smoke some peyote with your buddy TOG and tell each other how much you all know. And on that subject TOG is a TARD just like you. You bash bobcat because of his posts. He is 1000 times the man you claim to be. So keep entertaining and tell me how much you know. How ever I know you have no chance of reading and comprehending this.
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

Sure I guess crack does rot the brain. Utards are a special breed. Mostly inbred but special all the same. Don't you have an anti public lands rally to attend?
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

I don't attend rallies. I leave that up to liberal obama loving clowns like you and your illegitimate off spring.
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

No balls

Do this find a single post of me supporting Obama. If you can then I will delete my account. If you can't then admit you are a pile of lying Shyt. I can bet what the outcome will be. Utards are the enemy of every public land hunter in America,

Put up or shut up
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

>No balls
>
>Do this find a single post
>of me supporting Obama.
>If you can then I
>will delete my account. If
>you can't then admit you
>are a pile of lying
>Shyt. I can bet
>what the outcome will be.
> Utards are the enemy
>of every public land hunter
>in America,
>
>Put up or shut up
as in President or his dealings ?
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

He Can Say He Didn't Vote For Hillary too!

But He Did!









[Font][Font color = "blue"]I Changed My Signature Just for NVB!
Like 6 Damn Times Now!
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

As we both know bobcat NEMO is beyond any help. He talks about pyles of chit. The biggest pyle he will ever see is in his mirror in the morning. And I see his twin brother every morning when I flush.
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

LAST EDITED ON May-03-17 AT 08:45AM (MST)[p]So no posts? As expected the Utards and Californicators are either too stupid to use the search function or can't man up and admit they are just liars. Typical, very typical.

It is no wonder we get those politicians from Utah that hate public land hunters across the west, look at the level of smarts from Utah's voters.

Nemont
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

>LAST EDITED ON May-03-17
>AT 08:45?AM (MST)

>
>So no posts? As expected
>the Utards and Californicators are
>either too stupid to use
>the search function or can't
>man up and admit they
>are just liars. Typical,
>very typical.
>
>It is no wonder we get
>those politicians from Utah that
>hate public land hunters across
>the west, look at the
>level of smarts from Utah's
>voters.
>
>Nemont
Bravo Bravo Eleven Bravo !
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

LAST EDITED ON May-03-17 AT 09:27AM (MST)[p]Mouth where does your economy growth rank nation wide. Nowhere near utah. So there must be some really smart business owners in Utah based on Statistics. As for the Politicians I can't stand our governor or representatives. So Utah has the 2nd hottest economy as of last year and isn't slowing down. Tell me how did so many stupid people make so much money? Usually there is some smarts behind getting wealthy and staying wealthy. Do explain in an argument you again can't win. By the way dipsh!t all I hunt is public land diy. Never been on a private ranch or had a guide. So tell me how i'm an enemy to public land.
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

LAST EDITED ON May-03-17 AT 10:42AM (MST)[p]



In 2016 Montana's economic growth rate beat Utah's. Just saying that you may want to think before you make claims about something. I realize you are young but when you get more experience in life you will realize, money is only a way of keeping score. I make plenty and have plenty right here in Montana.

I guess the entire Utah congressional delegation got elected by magic. Every Utard Republican on here claims they don't support public lands transfer but every single member of the Utah delegation does. How is that?

Are you telling me that you didn't vote for anyone in your congressional delegation.

If I had to live in Utah I would have make a lot more money just so I could get away from there enough to stand it. In Utah there is an elephant in the room that controls everything and if you don't belong you are treated like a second class citizen. Plus Utah has 3 million people vs. Montana at a million. I would rather live in Montana every day of the week and twice on Sunday's before I moved to Utah.


There is a reason they call Montana "The Last Best Place".
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

No I voted against Herbert his opponent had a much better vision on public lands and keeping them away from the transfer to the state. I do not disagree on Montana being a great place, finding work is the battle though. I like the fact how your archery elk hunt is structured. And the fact that I could go buy a license otc as a non resident and still hunt some quality bulls. But Utah has far better mule deer hunting from what I have seen. Our elk hunting for LE is awesome if I can ever get a tag. As far as being a second class citizen I could care less I don't want to hang out with politicians or there cronies never have never will I say the F word to much to be in there circle. I also wrote Herbert an email this election cycle couldn't even get a response from the dirtbag. So between public land issues and him being to good to write me back my vote was pretty simple.
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

LAST EDITED ON May-03-17 AT 11:21AM (MST)[p]


It wasn't politicians I was referring to as being the elephant in the room. It was the LDS church which controls Utah, and if you are not LDS, you are not shyt in Utah. I have personal experience with that.

I travel through Utah at least a couple of times a year. Beautiful scenery, dumbest laws in the nation when it comes to letting adults enjoy life. The Church has it's talons into everything.

If Utah residents are opposed to public lands transfer then can you explain how every single member of the Utah congressional delegation is pro public lands transfer? Who is voting for them? Who represents your district?

Nemont
 
RE: Why Saudis Weren't Banned ?

LAST EDITED ON May-03-17 AT 11:14AM (MST)[p]The LDS church is very powerful. And most of the political officials in utah are LDS. I get along great with mormons and non mormons. The bishop is welcome at my house any day. I have some strict guidlines he hunts and I hunt that's all we discuss. I don't go to church and he doesn't try to get me their. Laws for adults having fun yeah they suck but I don't hang out in SLC much I spend my time in the mtns. I think there is a huge misinformation on public land transfer to the public in utah and there are alot of people with deep pockets pushing for transfer. I have seen alot more interest in the topic the last couple of years. I believe there will be a shift where more people will be for keeping public lands in fed. hands. I think the biggest thing that has kept utah from swinging toward that is alot of the Dem. that utah puts up are for no land transfer. But their other ideas do not go well with the LDS community. But the gap on non lds vs lds is becoming alot closer in population. On the (D) side it's Susan Duckworth. (R) it is Daniel Thatcher. And in the House it's Craig Hall (R) and on the senate side Karen Mayne (D).
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom