Trump's budget plan

RELH

Long Time Member
Messages
17,480
This is one person's opinion on Trump's budget plan.

RELH
___________________________________________________________

Most presidents? budgets are ?dead on arrival? in Congress. It happened to Obama and Bush, and there are those who hope it happens to President Donald Trump.


That would be a huge mistake.

President Trump is submitting a budget that balances in ten years, making many of the tough choices to get the nation?s finances back on track without touching Social Security or making changes to Medicare beyond rooting out fraud.

Every GOP Member of Congress ran on limiting the size and scope of government, and bemoaning the ever-increasing national debt and the impact it will have on our children?s economic future must be part of Republican candidate training schools.

The truth is that in spite of all the political rhetoric, the Obama presidency, with the agreement of Congress, has left our nation $20 trillion in debt with $500 billion-plus annual deficits for as far as the eye can see. Interest due on the $20 trillion amounts to almost $500 billion annually in interest payments alone, and if left unchecked, those payments are projected to top $1 trillion within the next ten years.

Our nation must get our fiscal house in order now, or else we may never have another opportunity, and President Trump has provided a pathway to bring our nation back from the brink of insolvency. The GOP Congress should work closely with him to bring their joint visions of our nation?s economic priorities into law.


The truth is that in spite of all the political rhetoric, the Obama presidency, with the agreement of Congress, has left our nation $20 trillion in debt with $500 billion-plus annual deficits for as far as the eye can see.



The hard fact is that the past decade?s $10 trillion in deficit spending has produced the worst economic growth as measured by Gross Domestic Product in our nation?s history. You read that right, in the past decade our nation?s economy grew slower than even during the Great Depression. This stagnant, new normal, low-growth economy is leaving millions of working age people behind who have given up even trying to participate, and has led to a malaise where many doubt that the American dream is attainable.

President Trump?s vision restores economic growth to a three percent rate on average ? a rate that has not been reached since 2005 ? through a combination of regulatory and tax reform, revamped trade policies, and a downsized effective federal government focusing on job growth priorities.

The White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Mick Mulvaney described this shift in government spending focus in an on-the-record conference call Monday as, ?looking through the lens of the taxpayer.?

On education spending, Trump focuses on school choice funding to empower parents to make choices for their kids rather than leaving children trapped in bad schools just because they live in the wrong part of town. And to help re-engage people who have dropped out of the workforce or who are trapped in low-wage jobs, the President expands funding for apprenticeship programs that have proven successful in increasing opportunities for those who want to work.

Border security, including funding the wall on the southern border, and national defense spending are also increased so that our nation can be secure allowing the economy to grow. And the President demonstrates his commitment to veterans by upping dollars to the Department of Veterans Affairs coupled with a renewed commitment to wring out corruption and incompetency from the system. Mulvaney specifically focused on the ?taxpayer lens? test when mentioning the President's commitment to ensure that disabled veterans get the assistance they need.

The Trump budget takes the bold step of ending funding for any program not currently authorized by Congress. By recognizing the basic Constitutional principle that Congress sets the programmatic priorities and it is not only irresponsible, but illegal to continue to fund programs that are not authorized to exist.

It is imperative that the GOP Congress work with the President using this budget as a guidepost, and together create a coherent spending plan which meets their joint priorities. After that agreement is reached, they should join shields and bring Senate Democrats into the negotiations, making necessary compromises to get Democratic votes without sacrificing GOP spending priorities.

Unlike the recently completed government funding debacle where Senate Minority Leader Schumer successfully institutionalized another six months of funding for Obama?s agenda, President Trump and Congressional Republican leaders must call Schumer?s bluff that he will shut the government down. But they can only do this if they are in alignment before those negotiations begin.

The President and OMB Director Mulvaney have crafted a remarkable starting point for this process, and the GOP Congress needs to embrace it and work with them to create a spending plan that restores America?s economic growth and sets the stage for the renewal of hope for millions of Americans who believe that opportunity has been outsourced overseas.

President Trump has lit the path to restore the American dream and get our economy moving again. Now it is up to Congress to join him on that path, turning away from our current direction and the fiscal abyss that looms ahead.





Richard Manning is president of Americans for Limited Government. Follow Americans for Limited Government on Twitter@LimitGovt, find them on Facebook and visit their website.
 
I am optimistic Trump will make the cuts needed on budget and we'll start progressing. What the dems are doing crying for investigation after investigation is only punishing future generation after generation. I like trumps mentality where they actually dig into finances like the f-35 project and find ways to make things cheaper. As for career politicians they just want to hurry and swipe the card without looking for ways to make things cheaper. Just remember if you vote (D) you're voting for poverty. Dems always cry out they support the little guy they don't want the little guy to turn into the big guy is what they really mean.
 
Wsterntines,

Honest question, no gotcha, no name calling.

Where would the needed cuts on the budget be from in your opinion? I have my opinion of where they could start but nobody would be happy with them.


Nemont
 
Nemont fair deal. Govt. employees is a great start it's time to trim the fat especially in the govt offices and higher up the chain. There are alot of useless positions just to save someones job keeping them on the payroll. Govt. construction would be another govt. work which I'm sure you already have a knowledge of this costs way to much. Some of these facilities being built are nothing more than architectual monuments the budgets on them are astronomical. So working in the supply end of construction my solution I try to achieve is to bring the cost down on my end to try to eliminate tax dollars spent on state or federal jobs that come out of taxpayers pockets. Educational facility budgets are enormous. Also Nemont we have got to go in and get govt. welfare send it back to the religious organizations where it began. So your local bishop, preist, ect. can sit down with the person and get directly involved there are too many layers and not enough questions get asked by govt. in welfare situations they just sign the check without diving far enough into the person in needs situation. The local religious group will sit down eliminate 4 out of the six cell phones in a household things like that. Which aren't needs more or so wants. And make that person rethink how much assistance they need where as the govt. they use it as leverage for votes stealing from me and you in tax dollars. We need to also cut back foreign aid in some areas. Make countries in regions that aren't in our end of the globe take care of threats by their neighbors that we cant afford to keep sending troops to die. We can cut spending there. The biggest problem I see is we have too many people willing to express unhappiness. But they put no effort into solutions to fix unhappiness. Which then our govt. thinks they have all the answers because they are in charge of reckless spending. There's my 2 cents of what we could do it won't be fixed overnight or entirely by the POTUS. I'd be interested to hear some solutions you may have Nemont.
 
I view it like AA, first admit there is a problem with the spending.

I would be gun shy about giving tax dollars to any religion and here is why. Would you be comfortable if your tax dollars were working through an Imam or Mullah in Detroit?

I would address the mandatory side of the budget to make cuts because about 56% of spending is on auto pilot. In addition that side is growing and will continue to grow just due to the aging population.

We can cut all of those areas you have pointed out but just a two percent increase in borrowing costs will eat every dollar saved. We HAVE start reducing the debt or create massive inflation to pay it back with cheaper dollars.

I just do not have any optimistic hope that the current make up of our government is up to such a task.

Nemont
 
Yes like AA you need to admit a problem agreed. No I would not be in favor of the tax dollars going to Imam or Mullah. We have got to get people off of welfare and use it the way it was designed So on the borrowing increase we need to cut deeper in the budget throw the trillion dollar boondoggle infastructure plan out the window. The last part you stated is the biggest issue these people need to start taking accountability for screwing the people they claim to represent and believe me Nemont I'm not happy with the senators and congressman or governor of Tardville. They've made it very hard to show them any respect.
 
Would you be in favor of means testing Social Security? Also gradually increasing the medicare age from 65 to 70? It would require keeping all current medicare beneficiaries on but move future beneficiaries to a higher age.

Infrastructure is an interesting one because for every dollar invested in better, faster and more modern roads, bridges, rail lines, water systems, dams, canals, irrigation projects, sea ports and airports, it returns $5 to $10 to the economy. If properly structured in a way that doesn't increase our debt a massive new infrastructure plan is needed. A revolving permanent infrastructure account with a dedicated funding source could be set up that doesn't go to our bottom line debt.

I am not happy with almost everyone in our congressional delegation either and they hear from me almost weekly.

Nemont
 
We have a federal highway fund that the states can use to deal with infastructure issues. Peoples hands just keep going into that jar and putting it in silk pockets it wasn't meant to be in. Yeah social security can go to 70. I'm not counting on social security to help me guys like Orrin Hatch can't keep out of the cookie jar so they can play golf with their buddies to win over some favors. I'm gonna invest in some other things for reassurance of my finances for my older years.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom