Tapped, Taped, Trumped

Forthewall

Long Time Member
Messages
3,327
Obama is not a U.S. citizen! Yes he is. Obama wire tapped me! No he did not. Comey better hope I do not have tapes! He won't you don't have any tapes. Russia didn't interfere with election! Yes..they did.

I can see why some around here are so attracted to Dear Leader. He really does represent his constituents.
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-22-17 AT 10:34PM (MST)[p]Not even worth a reply to a Obama lover.

RELH

Following Democrat Jon Ossoff's defeat in Georgia's special election, many Democrat lawmakers are placing the blame on House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.

Pelosi, however, is insisting that she's ?worth the trouble? as the party?s leader in the House.

"I'm a master legislator. I am a strategic, politically astute leader," Pelosi said at a press conference on Thursday. "My leadership is recognized by many around the country, and that is why I'm able to attract the support that I do."

She's also attracting "support" from a very unlikely source, President Donald Trump:
__________________________________________________________


If you really want to talk about a party being out of touch, that is the Democrat party today. there is a upsurge of Democrat politicians wanting to dump Pelosi as their minority leader. Of course Pelosi feels she is best for the party and she states it as said above.

I liked the part where Trump stated he did not want the Democrats to get rid of her and also to keep Schummer as they made it good news for the GOP party.
I do not think there is enough moderates or level headed Democrats in Congress with enough clout to get rid of Pelosi and the far left socialists that run the Democrat party. They are FW's pride and joy.
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-22-17 AT 11:41PM (MST)[p]There is no upsurge, check their stance on Pelosi 5 months ago and it is the same players. They are just using the special elections for political gain, like you did with the shooting of Scalese. Opportunist, nothing more.

So where are the Tapes RELH?
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-23-17 AT 00:36AM (MST)[p]Trump is really surprising me ....in a good way . He is Teflon and the methods the MSM ( aka DNC ) has used with tremendous success to destroy opposition ( to The Dems) does not work with this guy .He is in the 5th month of his 96th and the marked unmasking of politics as normal is being exposed , the Demarcates lie and the MSM sing Kumbaya . Dispised Trump initially but now see the possibility for massive needed change our nation must complete in order to survive . We are @20,000 BILLION Dollors in debt guys . P
 
FW it appears you have a case of short term memory lost with all your other ailments.

Over a week ago I posted that Trump did not tape his conversation with Comey. Instead Trump ran a bluff on him to insure that he did not tell a bunch of lies for vindictive reasons after being fired.

If your memory gets any worse, just ask and we will be happy to tell you how to put your pants on in the morning after getting up. Or would that be your panties.

RELH
 
I could give two chits about FTWs yarn spinning, but I want to see a picture of the 265" buck on FTWs wall. Or, at least a story and in the field kill shot. How big is the frame? Outsid width? Main beam length. Mass? Give us something.
 
For those of you who do not follow him on Twitter here is the incoherent message he left yesterday ;

...whether there are "tapes" or recordings of my conversations with James Comey, but I did not make, and do not have, any such recordings.
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-23-17 AT 09:43AM (MST)[p]Slurpshim is impressed that Trump can lie and not be held accountable. how Christian.


Why would Trump lie to intimidate Comey? the same reason he lies about everything I suppose. he's a liar.


So Trump bluffed to keep Comey honest. brilliant, bluff a man into telling the truth then call him a liar. but Trump can't produce evidence to support Comey is a liar. so is Comey an honest liar? now what does that make Trump ?


https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-bluffed-comey-tapes-keep-honest-141757625.html










Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
It made Comey admit to the fact he told Trump 3 times that Trump was not under any investigation.

Comey also admitting that Loretta Lynch got him to not refer to the Clinton investigation as a "investigation" but as a "matter" indicates to me that was discussed with Trump and he may have feared it was on tape and did not lie to Congress about it.

RELH
 
>LAST EDITED ON Jun-23-17
>AT 09:43?AM (MST)

>
>Slurpshim is impressed that Trump can
>lie and not be held
>accountable. how Christian.
>
>
>Why would Trump lie to intimidate
>Comey? the same
>reason he lies about everything
>I suppose. he's a
>liar.
>
>
>So Trump bluffed to keep Comey
>honest. brilliant, bluff a man
>into telling the truth
> then call him a
>liar. but Trump
>can't produce evidence to support
>Comey is a liar.
>so is Comey an honest
>liar? now what does
>that make Trump ?
>
>
>https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-bluffed-comey-tapes-keep-honest-141757625.html
>
>
>why Dude are you fixated on distorting what I say? Is your hate of people of faith twisted your thinking so much that you get tunnel vision? I don't approve of anyone lieing , I stated Trump was Teflon i.e. None of the liberal MSM lies about him are sticking . Get it right ! Trump has you libs so frightened it's about time to make the call to the guys in the white jackets . I'm thirsty and finally getting a cup of cold water thanks to Trump .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
My best life long friends are people of faith. and they don't respect or admire lying puzzy grabbers, though most did vote for him . they held their nose, you love the smell. that's the difference between people of faith and drop'n flops.


Who is scared of Trump? he hasn't accomplished chit. and he's not going to. it's just a national embarrassment until he's gone and you own it.













Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
>
>My best life long friends are
>people of faith. and they
>don't respect or admire
>lying puzzy grabbers,
>though most did vote for
>him . they held
>their nose, you love the
>smell. that's the difference
>between people of faith and
>drop'n flops.
>
>
>Who is scared of Trump?

Who was Scared of Obama?

He Didn't Accomplish Sshhhiittt!


>he hasn't accomplished chit.
> and he's not going
>to.

He Was An Embarrassment From Day One until the Day He Left!

And Still Is!



it's just
>a national embarrassment until he's
>gone and you own it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends










[Font][Font color = "blue"]Ah yes we have insider trading and computer dating but I never goin for that!
Ain't no machine pickin out my Queen cause it may not have all the facts!
I've got my own taste and my own ways I'd rather not talk about
and my private life is my private life and they ain't gonna find out!


90087hankjr.jpg
 
>
>My best life long friends are
>people of faith. and they
>don't respect or admire
>lying puzzy grabbers,
>though most did vote for
>him . they held
>their nose, you love the
>smell. that's the difference
>between people of faith and
>drop'n flops.
>
>
>Who is scared of Trump?
>he hasn't accomplished chit.
> and he's not going
>to. it's just
>a national embarrassment until he's
>gone and you own it.
>

>Stay Thirsty My Friends


Its been fun listening to you piss and moan about Trump getting nothing done. Its gonna be even more fun when he starts to get it done. Did you see the grizzly was delisted? Nemonts epa man. Just a little victory.
 
Attorney and Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz said on "America's Newsroom" that Special Counsel Robert Mueller made a mistake with some of the hirings for his legal team in the Russia investigation.

President Trump said in an interview on "Fox & Friends" that the hirings are "bothersome." Reports in recent days have pointed out that lawyers working on the probe have donated to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama's campaigns.


Dershowitz suggested the hirings cast some suspicion on the neutrality of the investigation, noting the close friendship between Mueller and former FBI Director James Comey.

"When you're having a criminal prosecution that's political, you have to be Caesar's wife. You can't give the other side any opportunity to accuse you of political partisanship, which is why I think it was a mistake for Mueller to hire, essentially, people who have been large contributors to the [Clinton] campaign," said Dershowitz.

He also said Trump's "bluff" toward Comey - in which he tweeted about the possible existence of tapes of their conversations - was "perfectly legal."

Dershowitz said he once used a similar tactic in a case he was working on, suggesting to a police officer on the witness stand that he possessed a transcript of a key recording.

"It [was entrapment] in the interest of justice," he recalled.

Dershowitz said, however, that he's not sure Trump's tweet was a good idea because it led Comey to leak his memos and it prompted Mueller to be appointed as special counsel.
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-23-17 AT 09:09PM (MST)[p]Grizzly delisted? Thank Obama Dimwit...

http://www.hcn.org/articles/delisting-grizzles-should-be-a-point-of-pride

"Now the Obama administration has proposed removing grizzlies from federal protection and returning management to state wildlife agencies."

http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-pedophile-billio-1681039971

"Epstein's predatory past, and his now-inconvenient relationships with a Who's Who of the Davos set, hit the front pages again earlier this month when one of his victims, Virginia Roberts, claimed in a federal court filing that Epstein recruited her as a "sex slave" at the age of 15 and "sexually trafficked [her] to politically-connected and financially-powerful people," including Prince Andrew and attorney Alan Dershowitz. (The latter, the filing claimed, had sex with the victim "on private planes"; Dershowitz vigorously denies the charges, as does Prince Andrew.)"

Who was Epstein's Defense Attorney? Alan Dershowitz
 
>
>My best life long friends are
>people of faith. and they
>don't respect or admire
>lying puzzy grabbers,
>though most did vote for
>him . they held
>their nose, you love the
>smell. that's the difference
>between people of faith and
>drop'n flops.
>
>
>Who is scared of Trump?
>he hasn't accomplished chit.
> and he's not going
>to. it's just
>a national embarrassment until he's
>gone and you own it.
>
>
>pretty sad 6pack....when you are exposed for being a scandalous liar , you don't address someone calling you out on your LIES. You simply move on to your next talking points AGAIN Full of lies. On a point I've addresses numerous times ( again you and your selective .. Bias ....memory overlooks) I along with many of your "friends of Faith" held my nose in pulling the lever for Trump. He was last on the list of 17 for me initially BUT he was better than Hillary . How many times do I need to ask you to Get it Right. ???? The leftys in our nation ARE scared to death.... The MSM ( aka DNC) are being exposed and hence the mind control of non engaged Americans is slowly being diminished . Just the truth Dude .. Sleep well as this ultimatly will benifit our once Great Nation . MAGA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
Is that all you can post as a reply. Bill Clinton was another that flew on the Lolita express. Also one of his many escapades involved Clinton putting on his lover's baby doll pajamas and dancing around the bedroom playing his saxophone before screwing her. I am sure a liberal of your caliber will consider that was ok and normal behavior.

As for your girlfriend, Hillary, at times she can be very cunning getting away with crimes and other times she is as dumb as FW.

She should not be shooting her mouth off about the GOP and the attempt to do away with Obamacare. Information is coming out that they are going to look into her past and Loretta Lynch's interference with the FBI investigation of the Clintons. Not a good time for her to piss off the current administration, when she should be keeping a low profile.

I will tell you the same thing as I told Nemont. You are not going to be happy when this investigation is over with as it will show just how dirty and deceitful and crooked some big Democrats have been while screwing the citizens of this country.

RELH
 
So RELH tell me exactly why Alan Derschowitz is not a scumbag or why you think he is credible? He lost you know, when representing Epstein, a now convicted pedophile, Derschowitz lost, which means he defended a pedophile yet you revere him why? What gives him credibility?
 
Slurpshim that is your opinion. and what is the opinion of a man who believes in talking snakes worth?


Nothing in my book.














Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
So FW you are saying that any attorney that defends a pedophile or even a murderer has no credibility. Boy! that is a far reach on your part.
Derschowitz is recognized by many as a very good attorney and law scholar. As for revering him, you forget that I was a cop for 30 years. Cops normally do not like lawyers and would give their left testicle to arrest one. That still does not mean the lawyer does not have credibility. His opinion on the subject matter posted is far far more valuable then your layman opinion.
You defending what the Democrats did in the last election goes towards how little scruples you have and your credibility is in the cesspool along with your morals.
I am hoping that certain Democrats get arrested out of this investigation and that includes any GOP members that are dirty. Just maybe it will serve as a lesson to others in the future not to do it again.

RELH
 
No. What I am saying is that flight logs show that Alan Derschowitz flew on the Lolita Express.

"Virginia Roberts, claimed in a federal court filing that Epstein recruited her as a "sex slave" at the age of 15 and "sexually trafficked [her] to politically-connected and financially-powerful people," including Prince Andrew and attorney Alan Dershowitz."

"He has reportedly settled lawsuits from more than 30 "Jane Doe" victims since 2008; the youngest alleged victim was 12 years old at the time of her abuse."

Specifically given Derschowitz's friendship, flight involvement, and subsequent representation of Epstein speaks volumes about his Derschowitz's character.

However as you said he is a noted attorney and Harvard legal scholar. So I guess what you are saying is he that even you a former attorney hating cop will give him credibility, is that correct?
 
What I am saying is that I give his legal opinions on the law credibility due to his background as a lawyer and legal scholar. Outside of that he could be a Adam Henry of the first order.

Does it brother you that a lot of these deceitful persons showed up more during the Bill Clinton administration and increased more under Hillary Clinton and her bid for the Whitehouse with the Obama administration sweeping it under the rug.

RELH
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-24-17 AT 06:05PM (MST)[p]"Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe has identified the specific law which Trump broke in the process.

Professor Tribe, one of the foremost experts on the Constitution and the law, initially posted this first reaction after Trump admitted there were no tapes."

?Trump?s failed bluff ?endeavored to impede the due administration of justice? in criminal violation of 18 USC 1503.?

According to the Cornell University law database, 18 USC 1503 is defined in the following manner:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing magistrate, in the discharge of his duty, or injures any such grand or petit juror in his person or property on account of any verdict or indictment assented to by him, or on account of his being or having been such juror, or injures any such officer, magistrate judge, or other committing magistrate in his person or property on account of the performance of his official duties, or corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, and the act in violation of this section involves the threat of physical force or physical force, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case."

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...itz_case_that_trump_hasnt_broken_the_law.html

By all means, now that I have laid out foundation on credibility, thank you for your contribution, do the RELH wiggle to get out of this.

As I said, Trump's bluffing comments about the tapes are a violation of law and do conform to "Witness Intimidation" via an "endeavored to impede the due administration of justice." Not my opinion but the opinion of a credible lawyer and fellow Harvard legal scholar.

Harvard University's Laurence Tribe says Alan Dershowitz is wrong.

In short, me = right, again and you = wrong, again. Thanks for playing!
 
But, but, but---he is still President and Hillary is not. How does that feel to you? Anyone heard about charges being pressed or is this just old lady gossip?
 
Thanks for the laugh FW. It the end it will not be a violation on Trumps part about bluffing Comey. The end product of the bluff was to make Comey being truthful and not to make him lie or fail to show up as a witness. How do you think the Supreme Court will rule on the matter if it got that far???

You are still dumb as ever and keep eating the manure like a mushroom that the libs feed you.

RELH
 
FW, I expected a stupid reply by now. Seems you must be doing some frantic searching to prove your point about whose legal opinion is right.

I will give you a hint, it is called "case law". There is several prior case law decisions applying to 18 USC 1503.

You better find another route if you want to harpoon Trump.

RELH
 
>LAST EDITED ON Jun-24-17
>AT 06:05?PM (MST)

>
>"Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe has
>identified the specific law which
>Trump broke in the process.
>
>
>Professor Tribe, one of the foremost
>experts on the Constitution and
>the law, initially posted this
>first reaction after Trump admitted
>there were no tapes."
>
>?Trump?s failed bluff ?endeavored to impede
>the due administration of justice?
>in criminal violation of 18
>USC 1503.?
>
>According to the Cornell University law
>database, 18 USC 1503 is
>defined in the following manner:
>
>
> Whoever corruptly,
>or by threats or force,
>or by any threatening letter
>or communication, endeavors to influence,
>intimidate, or impede any grand
>or petit juror, or officer
>in or of any court
>of the United States, or
>officer who may be serving
>at any examination or other
>proceeding before any United States
>magistrate judge or other committing
>magistrate, in the discharge of
>his duty, or injures any
>such grand or petit juror
>in his person or property
>on account of any verdict
>or indictment assented to by
>him, or on account of
>his being or having been
>such juror, or injures any
>such officer, magistrate judge, or
>other committing magistrate in his
>person or property on account
>of the performance of his
>official duties, or corruptly or
>by threats or force, or
>by any threatening letter or
>communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes,
>or endeavors to influence, obstruct,
>or impede, the due administration
>of justice, shall be punished
>as provided in subsection (b).
>If the offense under this
>section occurs in connection with
>a trial of a criminal
>case, and the act in
>violation of this section involves
>the threat of physical force
>or physical force, the maximum
>term of imprisonment which may
>be imposed for the offense
>shall be the higher of
>that otherwise provided by law
>or the maximum term that
>could have been imposed for
>any offense charged in such
>case."
>
>https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...itz_case_that_trump_hasnt_broken_the_law.html
>
>By all means, now that I
>have laid out foundation on
>credibility, thank you for your
>contribution, do the RELH wiggle
>to get out of this.
>
>
>As I said, Trump's bluffing comments
>about the tapes are a
>violation of law and do
>conform to "Witness Intimidation" via
>an "endeavored to impede the
>due administration of justice." Not
>my opinion but the opinion
>of a credible lawyer and
>fellow Harvard legal scholar.
>
>Harvard University's Laurence Tribe says Alan
>Dershowitz is wrong.
>
>In short, me = right, again
>and you = wrong, again.
>Thanks for playing!


Hahahahahahahahahagaha!!!!!

Did you actually watch the video or look for reference to what they stated?

If you did and still think you are right, there is no hope for you.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom