Ochocinco mus be getting tired of winning. The highest court in the land ruled in favor of Trump and said that his campaign comments had nothing to do with the law. Now he can do whatever he wants to halt immigration from certain countries. Must get old being such a winner.
Trump wins in SC!
- Thread starter gleninaz
- Start date
tailchasers
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 5,299
More importantly than the SC win is the issues Trump has exposed within our juditial system. The previous judges absolutely were swayed by liberal personal belief/pressures rather than what the laws state. Be impossible to prove but non the less...
"Courage is being scared to death but
saddling up anyway."
"Courage is being scared to death but
saddling up anyway."
LAST EDITED ON Jun-26-17 AT 06:51PM (MST)[p]
Won big? he won half way. it is not what he asked for and it's only for now. and who gives a FF ? I wish they'd ban all immigration we don't need anymore people.
It's easy to see how important this is , I mean considering how many americans have been killed by refugees since the time Trump urgently demanded this ban.
The Russia investigation is crumbling? that's funny have another joint beach boy. the dipchit in chief admitted he tried to intimidate a witness, but the witness called his bluff. you gotta love it.
http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-russia-investigation-scared-2017-6
Speaking of winning.... SC says GFYS .
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/su...-appeal/ar-BBDgmPy?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
Stay Thirsty My Friends
Won big? he won half way. it is not what he asked for and it's only for now. and who gives a FF ? I wish they'd ban all immigration we don't need anymore people.
It's easy to see how important this is , I mean considering how many americans have been killed by refugees since the time Trump urgently demanded this ban.
The Russia investigation is crumbling? that's funny have another joint beach boy. the dipchit in chief admitted he tried to intimidate a witness, but the witness called his bluff. you gotta love it.
http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-russia-investigation-scared-2017-6
Speaking of winning.... SC says GFYS .
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/su...-appeal/ar-BBDgmPy?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp
Stay Thirsty My Friends
RELH
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 17,480
LAST EDITED ON Jun-26-17 AT 08:40PM (MST)[p]Dude you are still our best dumbf##K on this forum. Was it not you that stated you do not need the NRA to protect your gun rights because the supreme court would protect your constitutional rights to firearms.
Yet you post a link showing the SC rejecting to hear a possible violation of the 2nd. amendment. They have been rejecting to hear any case on the 2nd. amendment for the past 7 years. By doing this they are allowing violations of the 2nd. amendment to become law at the lower levels and citizens can not get any redress on their rights being violated.
yeah! you are our best or worse dumbf##k and will always be.
RELH
As for the slanted piece on Muller that you linked too, I started laughing and quit reading it when it stated that Mueller was beyond being bought off. Try to convince Loretta Lynch of that. She knew how to buy his loyalty.
Yet you post a link showing the SC rejecting to hear a possible violation of the 2nd. amendment. They have been rejecting to hear any case on the 2nd. amendment for the past 7 years. By doing this they are allowing violations of the 2nd. amendment to become law at the lower levels and citizens can not get any redress on their rights being violated.
yeah! you are our best or worse dumbf##k and will always be.
RELH
As for the slanted piece on Muller that you linked too, I started laughing and quit reading it when it stated that Mueller was beyond being bought off. Try to convince Loretta Lynch of that. She knew how to buy his loyalty.
