Breitbart vs Drudge

Forthewall

Long Time Member
Messages
3,327
The Battle Royale of Losers. In one corner we have the walking contradiction, Hollywood's finest gay conservative Matt Drudge and in the other corner we have 275 lbs of feces wrapped in a liver spotted sausage casing the hero of the Alt-Right Steve Bannon of Breitbart.

This should be amusing, especially since they both no longer have the man-love they once did for Dear Leader. #MAGA
 
Someone should put you in the middle of them and we would up with a threesome of losers in a feces throwing contest.

RELH
 
RELH doesn't even try to defend his heroes anymore.

How many ways can you fix crow RELH ? you're going to be eating a ton of it.













Stay Thirsty My Friends
 
Dude the only one eating crow on this forum has been a half breed drunk Indian that I know that gets about everything wrong and gets bashed for it.

RELH
 
Trump and Pence are crapping themselves trying to kiss Bannon wrinkled azz. Bannon will unleash the very same rabid uneducated white under class the put Trump over the top in the primaries to further damage him in office.

Making deals with the devil, hilarious.
 
Keep on hoping you liberal. It is the only thing you have left. I am betting that Julian Assange and Awan are going to place a hangman's noose around your liberal Democrats.
With Trump in office getting tired of you liberals taking potshots at him, he will instruct the Attorney General to accept any deal they offer to put the coffin nails into the Russian conspiracy and to hang Debbi Wasserman-Schultz and any other Democrat that gets caught in the cross hairs of a federal investigation.
If Wasserman-Schultz gets hammered, she will backflip and hang Hildebeast and fellow Democrats for a lighter sentence. That will discredit the Democrats even further with the voters.
We got a little over a year before the next general election for Congress seats. Plenty of time to do a lot of damage.
Assange reaching out to a GOP member of Congress and saying he has the evidence to dispell the Russian conspiracy only means one thing. He is willing to deal and Trump will have A.G. Sessions to deal to get back at the Democrats and get his revenge for their outright lies.
Just the fact the DNC refused the FBI on their request to do a forensic examination on the DNC computer to determine if they were hacked will convince many voters that they were lying about the Russian hack or had incriminating information on the DNC computer. No different then a possible suspect refusing to take a lie detector in order to clear their name.
But you are too much of a liberal troll to even recognize that or admit to it.

Another thing you are failing to consider. Why has Mueller expanded his investigation beyond the Russian hacking and Trump's team being in collusion with the Russians. Very simple, he has failed to show their was any collusion and that it was the Russians that hacked the DNC computer and John Podesta"s emails. So now they are going fishing hoping to find something else.

RELH
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-20-17 AT 10:17AM (MST)[p]Hey everybody look over there! Sad#

What is your attraction to Russians agents RELH?

"More recently, Assange made his alliance with Russia?s totalitarian regime crystal clear by meeting on Wednesday with Republican Rep. Dana Rohrabacher of California. Rohrabacher, you may recall, has earned the nickname ?Putin?s favorite congressman? due to his bizarre fixation with and support of the Russian authoritarian regime. In case you think this story is all about Russia, take a look at the other person who attended the Assange-Rohrabacher meeting: Charles C. Johnson, a notorious white supremacist, who claims he helped arrange the meeting. Johnson was banned from Twitter for encouraging his supporters for help in ?taking out? a civil rights activist."

http://www.salon.com/2017/08/19/cal...ohrabachers-meeting-with-julian-assange-grow/
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-20-17 AT 05:13PM (MST)[p]FTW I do not have any attraction to Russian agents. Bottom line the big lie by the Democrats may be exposed to the tune it will do severe damage to the creditability of the Democrat party.
The so called sexual charges against Assange have been dropped and if he can get clear of any charges by the U.S. he is on his way to his freedom from that embassy he staying at.
The Democrats pushed this big line to undermine Trump and his administration and they will deserve to have it shoved up their A$$ to the point it hurts.

Hillary had more connections with Russians then Trump as long as they were feeding money to her foundation.

RELH

P.S. Showing your stupidity again concerning Assange's meeting with that particular GOP member. Are you stupid enough to expect him to meet with Pelosi, Schumer, or anyone else that would not give him the time of day, let along forward his message.
Assange is not a stupid man, in fact he is very intelligent and should be high up in the gifted section of a I.Q. test. If he can show for a fact it was not the Russians that gave up the Wilikleaks emails, he would be doing the Russians a big favor concerning their relationship with the U.S. If that GOP member loves the Russians as you accuse him of doing, he would be the perfect person to carry Assange's message to the White house for a possible deal on his behalf.
 
Find me a U.S. intelligence agency that does not consider Assange a pro-Russian and Wikileaks a hostile anti-U.S. intelligence service.

You always double down on the wrong horse.
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-20-17 AT 08:54PM (MST)[p]Show me a intelligence agency that did not make that assessment of Assange while under the Obama administration.
The bottom line will be how strong his evidence will be that the emails were the product of a insider DNC person who became upset over the election being rigged by the DNC.

You give yourself away as being nothing but a liberal left wing troll due to your parroting the liberal Russian collusion to throw the election to Trump away from Hillary.
Yet not one word of disgust about the DNC conspiracy to throw the primary election to Hillary over the other Democrat candidates. There is far more facts to back the fact the DNC and Hillary were engaged in a conspiracy to throw the election her way and it may even go all the way to the White house due to that meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch that no one was to supposed to know about on that airport tarmac. If you were a true American, you would be up in arms concerning what the Democrats did, your credibility sucks at best.

Bottom line your word is no better then Hillary or Wasserman-Schultz since you choose to parrot the big lie and not condemn the DNC and some of Obama's people for what they did to fool the voters. Again your double standard is at play.

RELH

P.S. FTW you choose to believe the Democrat story about Russian collusion, I feel that this has as much merit or maybe even more then the Russian collusion story forced on us by Hillary and the Democrats. The below article I pasted is only part of the complete article.
__________________________________________________________


Murdered DNC Staffer Seth Rich Shared 44,053 Democrat Emails With WikiLeaks: Report


Courtesy of ZeroHedge. View original post here.


For the past several months, Democrats have based their ?Resist 45″ movement on unsubstantiated assertions that the Trump campaign coordinated with Russian intelligence officials to undermine the 2016 Presidential Election thereby ?stealing? the White House from Hillary Clinton. Day after day we've all suffered through one anonymously sourced, ?shock? story after another from the New York Times and/or The Washington Post with new allegations of the ?wrongdoing?.

But, new evidence surfacing in the Seth Rich murder investigation may just quash the ?Russian hacking? conspiracy theory. According to a new report from Fox News, it was former DNC staffer Seth Rich who supplied 44,000 DNC emails to WikiLeaks and not some random Russian cyber terrorist, as we've all been led to believe.

According to Fox News, though admittedly via yet another anonymous FBI source, Rich made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, an American investigative reporter and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time. According to Fox News sources, federal law enforcement investigators found 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments sent between DNC leaders from January 2015 to May 2016 that Rich shared with WikiLeaks before he was gunned down on July 10, 2016.


The Democratic National Committee staffer who was gunned down on July 10 on a Washington, D.C., street just steps from his home had leaked thousands of internal emails to WikiLeaks, law enforcement sources told Fox News.

A federal investigator who reviewed an FBI forensic report detailing the contents of DNC staffer Seth Rich?s computer generated within 96 hours after his murder, said Rich made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, a now-deceased American investigative reporter, documentary filmmaker, and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time.

?I have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and Wikileaks,? the federal investigator told Fox News, confirming the MacFadyen connection. He said the emails are in possession of the FBI, while the stalled case is in the hands of the Washington Police Department.

Then, on July 22, just 12 days after Rich was killed, WikiLeaks published internal DNC emails that appeared to show top party officials conspiring to stop Bernie Sanders from becoming the party?s presidential nominee. As we've noted before, the DNC?s efforts to block Sanders resulted in Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigning as DNC chairperson.
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-20-17 AT 09:03PM (MST)[p]Isn't it funny how the liberal democrats like foreskin hate Assange, but love Chelsea Manning. Hell i bet foreskin even gave money to help with his or her little bananna peeling party.
 
https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...r-calls-wikileaks-hostile-intelligence-agency

"WASHINGTON (AP) ? CIA Director Mike Pompeo denounced the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks on Thursday as a "hostile intelligence service" and a threat to U.S. national security, a condemnation that differed sharply from President Donald Trump's past praise of the organization."

http://www.businessinsider.com/assa...lated-to-russian-government-corruption-2017-8

"The Justice Department has been deliberating over whether to bring criminal charges against WikiLeaks, which leaked top-secret diplomatic cables and military documents in 2010 and disclosed CIA hacking tools in March.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/03/08/wikileaks-has-joined-the-trump-administration/

"The CIA, FBI, and NSA concluded in January that WikiLeaks had "actively collaborated" with Russia's "principal international propaganda outlet RT" as the DNC emails were leaked throughout last summer. Assange hosted a show on RT in 2012."

In the second place, WikiLeaks, which has often leaked American but never Russian secrets, has been identified by the U.S. intelligence community as a front for Russian intelligence. In January, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a declassified estimate that found ?with high confidence that Russian military intelligence ? relayed material to WikiLeaks.?


I will happily stand by the U.S. Intelligence Community, while you can stand with your comrades Hannity, Rohrabacher, Dear Leader, and Putin.
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-20-17 AT 09:42PM (MST)[p]Obviously, you meant to say you will stand behind the intelligence community. Like several rows back. We all know you are a coward and have let other Americans serve, while you ##### and whine how it should be done.
 
Not sure I am buying the Seth Rich stuff yet, but boy would that be interesting if it was even partially true.
I an not convinced yet that Putin leaked the DNC emails. Just don't see how he would benefit by leaking. It is likely that Russia did hack the DNC and Hillary's servers.It would be in Russia interest to get dirt on the likely next President. I doubt the Russians were the only ones hacking. With the apparent lack of security it is likely the democrat's computers were penetrated more often than a low rent street walker.
I just don't see Putin releasing the info he had before the election unless he has stuff far more damming than the stuff WikiLeaks published.Just not in Russia best interest. Far better to let Clinton know about after she won for maximum leverage. I don't think for a minute that Russia thought that they had a chance to swing the election to Trump nor am I convinced that Putin preferred Trump over Clinton. I have always viewed Putin as cold and calculating, Not the kind of guy to drop the goods prematurely. I can't see Clinton being able to make him or anyone release prematurely.
 
Of course stupid the U.S. finds Wilikleaks a Hostile intelligence service because THEY HAVE LEAKED U.S. SECRETES GIVEN TO THEM BY U.S. CITIZENS. Did you forget about Snowdon?

Yes the U.S. has been considering filing criminal charges against Assange. Idiot why do you think he is reaching out in order to cut a deal to avoid those charges. Gee!!! where is your common sense, in the barn with the manure.

Where is your proof that those agencies says Wilikleaks joined "RT" in January. Do you not remember the FBI"s famous quote. " we do not comment on ongoing investigations"

In January was the director of National Intelligence still one of Obama's appointees. Assange has leaked U.S. intelligence due to our mome grown insiders that decide to leak stuff to him. They do not do that in Russia as they will be shot ASAP. Also Russia may also have a better intelligence service that is better at preventing intrusions then we did. Remember ours is so lack luster the Russians and everyone else is able to hack it any time they want to. That is what your liberal Democrats are suggesting about out inferior protection on our secretes. You can not have it both ways even with your double standard.

Thank you for the laughter, I really enjoyed dealing with a dumbkoff with no common sense.

RELH
 
Talk about diverting the discussion. If you are going to change the subject matter, find better facts and not asinine opinions. Why don't you just close your $hit spewing trap and wait and see what transpires in the near future.
If Trump turns out to be a liar, there will be a lot of us that will disavow him in a New York minute. If the Democrats are shown to be the outright liars, we will not count on you to disavow them. You will just crawl into your hole and come back later with more B.S.

RELH
 
Trump might be mentally unstable! That has been apparent for well over a year and he still won. Since the election it has become apparent that a big percentage of the democratic party is also unstable and or corrupt. Democrats will not win the next election by attacking Trump or by championing crazy left wing ideas. Time for the democrats to quit playing on the foul ground in left field and make a move towards center field.
 
> If Trump turns
>out to be a liar,
>there will be a lot
>of us that will disavow
>him in a New York
>minute. If the Democrats are
>shown to be the outright
>liars, we will not count
>on you to disavow them.
>You will just crawl into
>your hole and come back
>later with more B.S.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> RELH

What do you mean "If" Trump turns out to be a liar? He is as big of a liar as Obama was and much dumber about the lies he tells. Even an 90 year old with a dial up connection on a MAC II can find Trump's lies in less then a minute.

If that is the standard you claim then you should have disavowed him prior to ever voting for him. Once a liar, always a liar and Trump has told lies for years. He is a con man, period and apparently a dumb one at that.

Nemont
 
When I refer to him as a liar, I mean if he fails to carry out a good portion of his promises to improve our country. I do not expect him or any president to be able to complete 100% of their promises as that is almost impossible dealing with Congress and the voters.

You are right about one thing, comparing Trump to Obama. Obama was the far better liar and con man and was able to convince a majority in his "hope and change" that never took place.

Bottom line, I and many others had only two choices, Trump or crooked Hillary. Hillary was not only crooked, she was by far a bigger liar then Trump. My choice was simple on the ballot.

RELH
 
> Bottom line,
>I and many others had
>only two choices, Trump or
>crooked Hillary. Hillary was not
>only crooked, she was by
>far a bigger liar then
>Trump. My choice was simple
>on the ballot.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> RELH

See that is wrong. You could have voted for anyone else. Those two liars were the choice of the major political parties and the majority of Americans vote as if they only have two choices. As long as you allow the parties to give you POS choices you will be stuck defend a dud like the talking Yams.

You had a choice, you just didn't want to exercise your right to demand better candidates, just like the rest of the blind Trump supporters. You all are as loyal to Trump as the left was to Obama and try to pretend you are better. You ain't

Trump is not a good President. It has zero to do with Hillary, she lost. You should be demanding that your guy be better than you are allowing him to be. Remember what ever you allow him to get away with will be used against when the other side returns to power.

Nemont
 
I see it far different then you do. In my opinion you voting for a third party just threw half your vote away to Hillary. That is what happens when a third party candidate jumps into the mix with no chance in Hades of winning. The election normally goes to the front candidate, which was Hillary except for this time.

Right now Trump not getting anywhere is due to the Democrats stone walling along with a few career GOP congressmen that want the old status quo. McCain is one of them and needs to be kicked out with a few other GOP.
As for the Democrats, according to E.Warren the left wing progressives are now in command of that party.

RELH
 
LAST EDITED ON Aug-22-17 AT 10:31AM (MST)[p]Yeah and the definition of crazy is always doing the same thing and expecting different results. If and until the voters hold the parties accountable for who they put forward you will continue to get these Sh!tty choices.

The party counts on you voting for the one with the R because of it and as long as you continue nothing changes. If you are proud of how Trump is doing then great, you will reap what you have sown and I hope you are man enough to own it when the train completely derails.

That has zero to do with the Democrats running a rigged election that put Hillary on their ticket. It is a mystery why anyone with a firing brain cell would have voted for either of these two but here we are.

I get it, Trump was better than Hillary. He is still a terrible President who is doing real harm to the conservative movement and energizing the opposition. Name something that he has gotten done. One Supreme Court Justice is not much of legacy.

Nemont
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom