10 worse crime ridden cities.

RELH · Oct 1, 2017

The below U.S. cities have shown by FBI stats to be the worse crime ridden cities that you would not want to move to. I will list them with the worse being first and the amount of VIOLENT CRIME committed per 100,000 in population.
Violent crimes will consist of crimes for homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault and a few other felony crimes involving violence.

1. Detroit--2,137 crimes per 100,000
2. St. Louis 1,857 per 100,000
3. Oakland---1,683 per 100,000
4. Memphis---1,583 per 100,000
5. Birmingham--1,483 per 100,000
6. Atlanta---1,433 per 100,000
7. Baltimore-1,417 per 100,000
8. Stockton--1,408 per 100,000
9. Cleveland-1,363 per 100,000
10. Buffalo--1,238 per 100,000

What do all these cities have in common beside a extreme high rate of violent crime? Every single one of them have a Democrat mayor in office with Democrats being the major party in control.
Stockton has had both Democrat and Republican mayors in the past 20 years. The rest of the cities have been under Democrat control with a Democrat mayor for the past 30 years or more. Atlanta has had only Democrat mayors since 1885.

It seems the Democrat policies are not working to curb crime and keep the good citizens safe. All they get from their Democrat leaders is lip service and soft on crime policies. Some of our stupid liberal Democrats in CA. have even brought up the ideal of paying gangbangers money if they promise not to use firearms.

RELH

Cornhusker · Oct 1, 2017

Were you absent when they taught cause and effect relationships in school. If so find a resource teacher to help you learn it. I think your kids are resource/special Ed teachers ask them for help it's never too late to learn.

DW · Oct 1, 2017

It's trumps fault.

#livelikezac

RELH · Oct 1, 2017

No, it the fault of every bent wrist liberal that vote in bent wrist liberals that are soft on crime and refuse to face reality. Only problem, just like Cornhusker and FTW they do not have the ball$ to admit it.

RELH

OchocoKid · Oct 2, 2017

5 of them are in red states, how can that be? oh yeah, it's the mayor's fault his citizens are culls.

You must be torn. you want to say these cities are a chithole because they're mostly either black or Mexican and you're right. but you'd rather pin it on liberals because you're still trying to pretend you're not racist.

Racist is saying cops can shoot blacks because they're black. honest is saying blacks are more likely to put themselves in a position to be shot by a cop.

You're a dishonest racist. when red states have less crime than blue states you can brag. until then you're peeing on your feet again.

Stay Thirsty My Friends

RELH · Oct 2, 2017

Dude your argument is like you. Just so much dog crap. The people in those cities vote BLUE not RED and this is what they got for voting in liberal city fathers.

You say five of them are RED states. Why don't you compare the crime rate in that city to the rest of the state and you may see a big difference in reported crimes.

RELH

OchocoKid · Oct 2, 2017

I was unaware mayors are dictators. all those states have republican governors. don't they give a FF about the crime or are they just incompetent like Trump ?

Stay Thirsty My Friends

RELH · Oct 2, 2017

Dude for a long time I figured for a Adam Henry that just liked to stir the pot to tick people off. After seeing the above comment, I no longer think that.

You are really one dumb ignorant pea brain that has no idea how city, state, and federal governments are operated by the politicians that are in power in those agencies.

Stick to dirt farming because you would fail at anything else.

RELH

OchocoKid · Oct 2, 2017

You're not going to get off that easy old timer.

Prove red state crime is 100% on the head of the city mayors. the state and feds are powerless ? nothing they can do huh ? funding, assistance it's all off limits huh? if a mayor wants to turn his city into Gotham and let the Penguin run it everyone else has to look the other way is that right?

Stay Thirsty My Friends

RELH · Oct 2, 2017

Sorry Dude, I am not at your beck and call. You can do your own research and show otherwise if you want to try. I already know the answer and since you are too stupid to believe me, find the facts your self and hopefully you will STFU and find another liberal cause to champion and blow it out your butt again.

RELH

OchocoKid · Oct 3, 2017

I already looked, that's why I called you out dum dum. thank you for the confirmation.

Stay Thirsty My Friends

RELH · Oct 3, 2017

Then you found out that it is almost never that a state steps in and overrules a city on how they rule their justice program.

RELH

OchocoKid · Oct 3, 2017

Maybe true if the governor has no balls.

So the governor has no control of state funding to a city ? he's totally helpless on all levels to enforce state law ?

Stay Thirsty My Friends

RELH · Oct 3, 2017

I will put it to you this way. Gov. Jerry Brown is going to find out when he signs the bill making CA. a sanctuary state. He is going to do nothing when all those northern Ca. sheriffs will ignore that law and continue to work with ICE as they said they will do.

RELH

notags2 · Oct 3, 2017

Ok TOG I know this will be useless because you can not read and comprehend at all but I have said this before. I would write it in crayon for you if I could so maybe that would help. Cities all over this country fund a huge part of their police force with FEDERAL FUNDS ! Cities DONT have the money to hire the cops they need. The Feds have programs where they pay the sale rise for cops for a certain time frame. Example retard the Feds will pay a cops first year of pay completely then a certain portion for say the next four years. After the time frame they have funded the cities have to start paying 100 percent for that officer. The way this helps and works is in that way five years older officers retire or move on one way or another. What I am trying to explain to you is cities and even states can not foot the bill for all the cops that are needed. That is where the Feds help out. I am sure you will have no clue what I just attempted to explain to you.

OchocoKid · Oct 3, 2017

So, you're saying Trump is weak on crime for not withholding federal funds to cities who won't enforce the law. don't blame the governor huh? well that may be true.

How sure are you all federal funds flow directly to the mayor and bypass the state?

Stay Thirsty My Friends

RELH · Oct 3, 2017

Dude the feds pays millions directly to law enforcement agencies via "grants". Most departments have a person that is delegated the job of writing the grant request and submitting it to the Federal Dept. of Justice.
If granted, money goes directly to the agency in the form of a check.
This is the money Trump wanted to uphold to agencies that would be defying federal law and not working with ICE to remove and deport criminal illegal immigrants.
Any department that lost their grant money would then have to depend on local and state taxes 100% to fund their department. Unless the state made up the difference, those departments would face layoffs and no longer responding to certain calls for service due to manpower shortage.
RELH