Texting
- Thread starter 264mag
- Start date
NeMont
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 12,632
Tell me how many people will Jeff Session's DOJ prosecute over this? If the answer is zero then all you clowns are doing is sitting in the dark and mentally masturbating over something that won't see the court room.
Throw them all in jail, I don't care. From Hillary to James Comey, none of that absolved team Trump of anything, yet.
Like I said there is no smoking gun that will bring Trump down on this whole thing. It will go the way of the Benghazi investigation, all smoke and no fire.
If you think this is bigger than bankrupting your own offspring then that shows the priorities of the fakers.
So how many of the people accused will see the inside of a prison cell or pay any price at all and who will hold the accountable? If Trump's DOJ doesn't do it then what do you Trumpettes do?
Nemont
Throw them all in jail, I don't care. From Hillary to James Comey, none of that absolved team Trump of anything, yet.
Like I said there is no smoking gun that will bring Trump down on this whole thing. It will go the way of the Benghazi investigation, all smoke and no fire.
If you think this is bigger than bankrupting your own offspring then that shows the priorities of the fakers.
So how many of the people accused will see the inside of a prison cell or pay any price at all and who will hold the accountable? If Trump's DOJ doesn't do it then what do you Trumpettes do?
Nemont
Homer
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 14,208
>Tell me how many people will
>Jeff Session's DOJ prosecute over
>this? If the answer
>is zero then all you
>clowns are doing is sitting
>in the dark and mentally
>masturbating over something that won't
>see the court room.
>
>Throw them all in jail, I
>don't care. From
>Hillary to James Comey, none
>of that absolved team Trump
>of anything, yet.
>
>Like I said there is no
>smoking gun that will bring
>Trump down on this whole
>thing. It will go
>the way of the Benghazi
>investigation, all smoke and no
>fire.
>
>If you think this is bigger
>than bankrupting your own offspring
>then that shows the priorities
>of the fakers.
>
>So how many of the people
>accused will see the inside
>of a prison cell or
>pay any price at all
>and who will hold the
>accountable? If Trump's
>DOJ doesn't do it then
>what do you Trumpettes do?
>
>
>Nemont
....none of them...when good patriots like you stick your head in the sand and don't care....
public pressure on Jeff Sessions would work....
you're too busy blaming us "fakers" for the debt....and expecting us to pressure 535 representitives to stop spending money....
>Jeff Session's DOJ prosecute over
>this? If the answer
>is zero then all you
>clowns are doing is sitting
>in the dark and mentally
>masturbating over something that won't
>see the court room.
>
>Throw them all in jail, I
>don't care. From
>Hillary to James Comey, none
>of that absolved team Trump
>of anything, yet.
>
>Like I said there is no
>smoking gun that will bring
>Trump down on this whole
>thing. It will go
>the way of the Benghazi
>investigation, all smoke and no
>fire.
>
>If you think this is bigger
>than bankrupting your own offspring
>then that shows the priorities
>of the fakers.
>
>So how many of the people
>accused will see the inside
>of a prison cell or
>pay any price at all
>and who will hold the
>accountable? If Trump's
>DOJ doesn't do it then
>what do you Trumpettes do?
>
>
>Nemont
....none of them...when good patriots like you stick your head in the sand and don't care....
public pressure on Jeff Sessions would work....
you're too busy blaming us "fakers" for the debt....and expecting us to pressure 535 representitives to stop spending money....
NeMont
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 12,632
I see public pressure on Sessions, a political appointee,would work but public pressure on elected members of Congress won't. That is some magic thinking.
I don't blame the fakers for the debt. I blame them for cheering on the guy adding trillions more to it.
Nemont
I don't blame the fakers for the debt. I blame them for cheering on the guy adding trillions more to it.
Nemont
elkassassin
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 36,928
>I see public pressure on Sessions,
>a political appointee,would work but
>public pressure on elected members
>of Congress won't. That
>is some magic thinking.
>
>I don't blame the fakers for
>the debt. I blame them
>for cheering on the guy
>adding trillions more to it.
>
>
>Nemont
And a couple Hundred years later You Think you're gonna Fix it?
Get Real!
Just Once!
>a political appointee,would work but
>public pressure on elected members
>of Congress won't. That
>is some magic thinking.
>
>I don't blame the fakers for
>the debt. I blame them
>for cheering on the guy
>adding trillions more to it.
>
>
>Nemont
And a couple Hundred years later You Think you're gonna Fix it?
Get Real!
Just Once!
Homer
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 14,208
>I see public pressure on Sessions,
>a political appointee,would work but
>public pressure on elected members
>of Congress won't. That
>is some magic thinking.
>
>I don't blame the fakers for
>the debt. I blame them
>for cheering on the guy
>adding trillions more to it.
>
>
>Nemont
....you don't care...do you?
>a political appointee,would work but
>public pressure on elected members
>of Congress won't. That
>is some magic thinking.
>
>I don't blame the fakers for
>the debt. I blame them
>for cheering on the guy
>adding trillions more to it.
>
>
>Nemont
....you don't care...do you?
NVBighorn
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 9,458
www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/poli...36265c-05eb-11e8-94e8-e8b8600ade23_story.html
Ethics training reminds White House staff not to use encrypted messages for government business
By?Carol D. Leonnig,?Josh Dawsey,?Ashley Parker
February 5, 2018 at 5:43 PM
White House staffers have been attending mandatory ethics training sessions in recent weeks. (Jabin Botsford/Washington, D.C.)
White House lawyers have been reminding President Trump's staff not to use encrypted messaging apps for official government business as the administration seeks to dismiss a lawsuit accusing it of violating federal records laws.
The warnings were issued during mandatory ethics training sessions held for White House personnel in the past several weeks. During the hour-long briefings, deputy counsel Stefan C. Passantino told staffers to use only White House email for work communications and not any unofficial platforms such as smartphone apps, texts and private emails, according to several people in attendance.
Using such messaging services for official government business could violate the Presidential Records Act, which requires that nearly all official White House correspondence be preserved.
Some participants at the ethics sessions in the Old Executive Office Building said Passantino suggested that there had been inappropriate use of smartphone apps such as WhatsApp.
"He did focus on WhatsApp ? said that people were using it, and it wasn't appropriate," said one staffer who attended a recent briefing and requested anonymity to describe the discussion. "He said, 'All those apps are a big problem.' "
Passantino declined to comment, but White House officials disputed that description of his remarks. Although he noted that executive branch employees should not use such platforms for official business, they said, he did not assert that officials had been relying on them in the past.
"Regular ethics briefings are a critically important part of a much larger initiative designed to ensure that all White House personnel hold themselves to the highest possible ethical standards," White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters said. "It's disheartening to see the false accusations of anonymous sources outweigh the truth of what was actually said in the briefing."
Passantino instructed anyone who received work-related communications on unofficial platforms to forward them to their White House email so official administration business could be preserved, according to people in attendance. A White House official said Passantino used the example of a staffer who receives a work-related question on a private Gmail account, saying that employee should reply and copy his or her government email to ensure that communications are steered to official accounts.
In addition, he reminded aides to preserve White House records and not conduct political activities that could violate the Hatch Act, these people said.
The reminder came as the White House contends with a lawsuit filed in June by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), which alleges that the administration is failing to comply with records laws because of past reports that aides have used messaging apps to communicate.
The Trump administration has argued that the case should be dismissed because courts do not have authority to review the executive branch's compliance with the law.
CREW lawyer Anne Weismann said the White House ethics sessions reinforce her group's case.
"They know that these apps are being used; they know the requirements of the Presidential Records Act are not being met," she said. "I guess I will claim some victory. . . . If they are in fact now training people and monitoring compliance, that's a good thing."
The recent focus on appropriate communication channels came as part of mandatory ethics training sessions the White House Counsel's Office has been leading for all executive staff since early January.
Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, attended a session last month, according to people familiar with his participation. Last year, an attorney for Kushner?confirmed?that he used a private email account to discuss official White House business during his first nine months in government service. Those messages were forwarded to his official email account for preservation, the attorney said.
Other administration officials seen in the recent ethics briefings were White House lawyer Ty Cobb, national security adviser H.R. McMaster, homeland security adviser Tom Bossert and several members of the White House press office.
The sessions coincide with a ban on use of personal cellphones inside the White House, a policy that administration officials said was directed by White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly to improve security and was fully implemented last month. Staffers said that when they arrive for work each morning, they are instructed to deposit their personal phones in lockers installed at White House entrances. A senior White House official said all messaging apps have been deactivated on government phones.
In February 2017, The Washington Post?reported, staffers were using Confide to discuss internal White House operations out of fear of being accused of leaking information to the media. The Confide app deletes messages as soon as they are read.
The following month, then-House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R.-Utah) and ranking Democrat Elijah E. Cummings of Maryland sent a letter to the White House seeking assurances that the Trump administration was complying with the presidential records law.
In response, White House legislative affairs chief Marc Short wrote that the administration was "committed" to retaining work records.
"It is the policy of the White House to comply with the preservation requirements of the [Presidential Records Act]," Short wrote. "All White House personnel have received or will receive mandatory in-person training on their obligations under the PRA."
Ethics training reminds White House staff not to use encrypted messages for government business
By?Carol D. Leonnig,?Josh Dawsey,?Ashley Parker
February 5, 2018 at 5:43 PM
White House staffers have been attending mandatory ethics training sessions in recent weeks. (Jabin Botsford/Washington, D.C.)
White House lawyers have been reminding President Trump's staff not to use encrypted messaging apps for official government business as the administration seeks to dismiss a lawsuit accusing it of violating federal records laws.
The warnings were issued during mandatory ethics training sessions held for White House personnel in the past several weeks. During the hour-long briefings, deputy counsel Stefan C. Passantino told staffers to use only White House email for work communications and not any unofficial platforms such as smartphone apps, texts and private emails, according to several people in attendance.
Using such messaging services for official government business could violate the Presidential Records Act, which requires that nearly all official White House correspondence be preserved.
Some participants at the ethics sessions in the Old Executive Office Building said Passantino suggested that there had been inappropriate use of smartphone apps such as WhatsApp.
"He did focus on WhatsApp ? said that people were using it, and it wasn't appropriate," said one staffer who attended a recent briefing and requested anonymity to describe the discussion. "He said, 'All those apps are a big problem.' "
Passantino declined to comment, but White House officials disputed that description of his remarks. Although he noted that executive branch employees should not use such platforms for official business, they said, he did not assert that officials had been relying on them in the past.
"Regular ethics briefings are a critically important part of a much larger initiative designed to ensure that all White House personnel hold themselves to the highest possible ethical standards," White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters said. "It's disheartening to see the false accusations of anonymous sources outweigh the truth of what was actually said in the briefing."
Passantino instructed anyone who received work-related communications on unofficial platforms to forward them to their White House email so official administration business could be preserved, according to people in attendance. A White House official said Passantino used the example of a staffer who receives a work-related question on a private Gmail account, saying that employee should reply and copy his or her government email to ensure that communications are steered to official accounts.
In addition, he reminded aides to preserve White House records and not conduct political activities that could violate the Hatch Act, these people said.
The reminder came as the White House contends with a lawsuit filed in June by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), which alleges that the administration is failing to comply with records laws because of past reports that aides have used messaging apps to communicate.
The Trump administration has argued that the case should be dismissed because courts do not have authority to review the executive branch's compliance with the law.
CREW lawyer Anne Weismann said the White House ethics sessions reinforce her group's case.
"They know that these apps are being used; they know the requirements of the Presidential Records Act are not being met," she said. "I guess I will claim some victory. . . . If they are in fact now training people and monitoring compliance, that's a good thing."
The recent focus on appropriate communication channels came as part of mandatory ethics training sessions the White House Counsel's Office has been leading for all executive staff since early January.
Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, attended a session last month, according to people familiar with his participation. Last year, an attorney for Kushner?confirmed?that he used a private email account to discuss official White House business during his first nine months in government service. Those messages were forwarded to his official email account for preservation, the attorney said.
Other administration officials seen in the recent ethics briefings were White House lawyer Ty Cobb, national security adviser H.R. McMaster, homeland security adviser Tom Bossert and several members of the White House press office.
The sessions coincide with a ban on use of personal cellphones inside the White House, a policy that administration officials said was directed by White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly to improve security and was fully implemented last month. Staffers said that when they arrive for work each morning, they are instructed to deposit their personal phones in lockers installed at White House entrances. A senior White House official said all messaging apps have been deactivated on government phones.
In February 2017, The Washington Post?reported, staffers were using Confide to discuss internal White House operations out of fear of being accused of leaking information to the media. The Confide app deletes messages as soon as they are read.
The following month, then-House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R.-Utah) and ranking Democrat Elijah E. Cummings of Maryland sent a letter to the White House seeking assurances that the Trump administration was complying with the presidential records law.
In response, White House legislative affairs chief Marc Short wrote that the administration was "committed" to retaining work records.
"It is the policy of the White House to comply with the preservation requirements of the [Presidential Records Act]," Short wrote. "All White House personnel have received or will receive mandatory in-person training on their obligations under the PRA."
NVBighorn
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 9,458
I thought it was a sign of being intelligent if you quoted long articles.
But for you...
Trumps people are being trained in ethics (that poor teacher has his work cut out for him)
There were obviously people in the Whitehouse suspected of using either encrypted messaging apps or private email.
People in glass houses should not start rock fights.
But for you...
Trumps people are being trained in ethics (that poor teacher has his work cut out for him)
There were obviously people in the Whitehouse suspected of using either encrypted messaging apps or private email.
People in glass houses should not start rock fights.
>www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/poli...36265c-05eb-11e8-94e8-e8b8600ade23_story.html
>
>
>Ethics training reminds White House staff
>not to use encrypted messages
>for government business
>
>By?Carol D. Leonnig,?Josh Dawsey,?Ashley Parker
>
>February 5, 2018 at 5:43 PM
>
>
>White House staffers have been attending
>mandatory ethics training sessions in
>recent weeks. (Jabin Botsford/Washington, D.C.)
>
>
>White House lawyers have been reminding
>President Trump's staff not to
>use encrypted messaging apps for
>official government business as the
>administration seeks to dismiss a
>lawsuit accusing it of violating
>federal records laws.
>
>The warnings were issued during mandatory
>ethics training sessions held for
>White House personnel in the
>past several weeks. During the
>hour-long briefings, deputy counsel Stefan
>C. Passantino told staffers to
>use only White House email
>for work communications and not
>any unofficial platforms such as
>smartphone apps, texts and private
>emails, according to several people
>in attendance.
>
>Using such messaging services for official
>government business could violate the
>Presidential Records Act, which requires
>that nearly all official White
>House correspondence be preserved.
>
>Some participants at the ethics sessions
>in the Old Executive Office
>Building said Passantino suggested that
>there had been inappropriate use
>of smartphone apps such as
>WhatsApp.
>
>"He did focus on WhatsApp ?
>said that people were using
>it, and it wasn't appropriate,"
>said one staffer who attended
>a recent briefing and requested
>anonymity to describe the discussion.
>"He said, 'All those apps
>are a big problem.' "
>
>Passantino declined to comment, but White
>House officials disputed that description
>of his remarks. Although he
>noted that executive branch employees
>should not use such platforms
>for official business, they said,
>he did not assert that
>officials had been relying on
>them in the past.
>
>"Regular ethics briefings are a critically
>important part of a much
>larger initiative designed to ensure
>that all White House personnel
>hold themselves to the highest
>possible ethical standards," White House
>spokeswoman Lindsay Walters said. "It's
>disheartening to see the false
>accusations of anonymous sources outweigh
>the truth of what was
>actually said in the briefing."
>
>
>Passantino instructed anyone who received work-related
>communications on unofficial platforms to
>forward them to their White
>House email so official administration
>business could be preserved, according
>to people in attendance. A
>White House official said Passantino
>used the example of a
>staffer who receives a work-related
>question on a private Gmail
>account, saying that employee should
>reply and copy his or
>her government email to ensure
>that communications are steered to
>official accounts.
>
>In addition, he reminded aides to
>preserve White House records and
>not conduct political activities that
>could violate the Hatch Act,
>these people said.
>
>The reminder came as the White
>House contends with a lawsuit
>filed in June by the
>watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility
>and Ethics in Washington (CREW),
>which alleges that the administration
>is failing to comply with
>records laws because of past
>reports that aides have used
>messaging apps to communicate.
>
>The Trump administration has argued that
>the case should be dismissed
>because courts do not have
>authority to review the executive
>branch's compliance with the law.
>
>
>CREW lawyer Anne Weismann said the
>White House ethics sessions reinforce
>her group's case.
>
>"They know that these apps are
>being used; they know the
>requirements of the Presidential Records
>Act are not being met,"
>she said. "I guess I
>will claim some victory. . . .
>If they are in fact
>now training people and monitoring
>compliance, that's a good thing."
>
>
>The recent focus on appropriate communication
>channels came as part of
>mandatory ethics training sessions the
>White House Counsel's Office has
>been leading for all executive
>staff since early January.
>
>Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared
>Kushner, attended a session last
>month, according to people familiar
>with his participation. Last year,
>an attorney for Kushner?confirmed?that he
>used a private email account
>to discuss official White House
>business during his first nine
>months in government service. Those
>messages were forwarded to his
>official email account for preservation,
>the attorney said.
>
>Other administration officials seen in the
>recent ethics briefings were White
>House lawyer Ty Cobb, national
>security adviser H.R. McMaster, homeland
>security adviser Tom Bossert and
>several members of the White
>House press office.
>
>The sessions coincide with a ban
>on use of personal cellphones
>inside the White House, a
>policy that administration officials said
>was directed by White House
>Chief of Staff John F.
>Kelly to improve security and
>was fully implemented last month.
>Staffers said that when they
>arrive for work each morning,
>they are instructed to deposit
>their personal phones in lockers
>installed at White House entrances.
>A senior White House official
>said all messaging apps have
>been deactivated on government phones.
>
>
>In February 2017, The Washington Post?reported,
>staffers were using Confide to
>discuss internal White House operations
>out of fear of being
>accused of leaking information to
>the media. The Confide app
>deletes messages as soon as
>they are read.
>
>The following month, then-House Oversight Committee
>Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R.-Utah) and
>ranking Democrat Elijah E. Cummings
>of Maryland sent a letter
>to the White House seeking
>assurances that the Trump administration
>was complying with the presidential
>records law.
>
>In response, White House legislative affairs
>chief Marc Short wrote that
>the administration was "committed" to
>retaining work records.
>
>"It is the policy of the
>White House to comply with
>the preservation requirements of the
>[Presidential Records Act]," Short wrote.
>"All White House personnel have
>received or will receive mandatory
>in-person training on their obligations
>under the PRA."
Geezus boskee!
#livelikezac
>
>
>Ethics training reminds White House staff
>not to use encrypted messages
>for government business
>
>By?Carol D. Leonnig,?Josh Dawsey,?Ashley Parker
>
>February 5, 2018 at 5:43 PM
>
>
>White House staffers have been attending
>mandatory ethics training sessions in
>recent weeks. (Jabin Botsford/Washington, D.C.)
>
>
>White House lawyers have been reminding
>President Trump's staff not to
>use encrypted messaging apps for
>official government business as the
>administration seeks to dismiss a
>lawsuit accusing it of violating
>federal records laws.
>
>The warnings were issued during mandatory
>ethics training sessions held for
>White House personnel in the
>past several weeks. During the
>hour-long briefings, deputy counsel Stefan
>C. Passantino told staffers to
>use only White House email
>for work communications and not
>any unofficial platforms such as
>smartphone apps, texts and private
>emails, according to several people
>in attendance.
>
>Using such messaging services for official
>government business could violate the
>Presidential Records Act, which requires
>that nearly all official White
>House correspondence be preserved.
>
>Some participants at the ethics sessions
>in the Old Executive Office
>Building said Passantino suggested that
>there had been inappropriate use
>of smartphone apps such as
>WhatsApp.
>
>"He did focus on WhatsApp ?
>said that people were using
>it, and it wasn't appropriate,"
>said one staffer who attended
>a recent briefing and requested
>anonymity to describe the discussion.
>"He said, 'All those apps
>are a big problem.' "
>
>Passantino declined to comment, but White
>House officials disputed that description
>of his remarks. Although he
>noted that executive branch employees
>should not use such platforms
>for official business, they said,
>he did not assert that
>officials had been relying on
>them in the past.
>
>"Regular ethics briefings are a critically
>important part of a much
>larger initiative designed to ensure
>that all White House personnel
>hold themselves to the highest
>possible ethical standards," White House
>spokeswoman Lindsay Walters said. "It's
>disheartening to see the false
>accusations of anonymous sources outweigh
>the truth of what was
>actually said in the briefing."
>
>
>Passantino instructed anyone who received work-related
>communications on unofficial platforms to
>forward them to their White
>House email so official administration
>business could be preserved, according
>to people in attendance. A
>White House official said Passantino
>used the example of a
>staffer who receives a work-related
>question on a private Gmail
>account, saying that employee should
>reply and copy his or
>her government email to ensure
>that communications are steered to
>official accounts.
>
>In addition, he reminded aides to
>preserve White House records and
>not conduct political activities that
>could violate the Hatch Act,
>these people said.
>
>The reminder came as the White
>House contends with a lawsuit
>filed in June by the
>watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility
>and Ethics in Washington (CREW),
>which alleges that the administration
>is failing to comply with
>records laws because of past
>reports that aides have used
>messaging apps to communicate.
>
>The Trump administration has argued that
>the case should be dismissed
>because courts do not have
>authority to review the executive
>branch's compliance with the law.
>
>
>CREW lawyer Anne Weismann said the
>White House ethics sessions reinforce
>her group's case.
>
>"They know that these apps are
>being used; they know the
>requirements of the Presidential Records
>Act are not being met,"
>she said. "I guess I
>will claim some victory. . . .
>If they are in fact
>now training people and monitoring
>compliance, that's a good thing."
>
>
>The recent focus on appropriate communication
>channels came as part of
>mandatory ethics training sessions the
>White House Counsel's Office has
>been leading for all executive
>staff since early January.
>
>Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared
>Kushner, attended a session last
>month, according to people familiar
>with his participation. Last year,
>an attorney for Kushner?confirmed?that he
>used a private email account
>to discuss official White House
>business during his first nine
>months in government service. Those
>messages were forwarded to his
>official email account for preservation,
>the attorney said.
>
>Other administration officials seen in the
>recent ethics briefings were White
>House lawyer Ty Cobb, national
>security adviser H.R. McMaster, homeland
>security adviser Tom Bossert and
>several members of the White
>House press office.
>
>The sessions coincide with a ban
>on use of personal cellphones
>inside the White House, a
>policy that administration officials said
>was directed by White House
>Chief of Staff John F.
>Kelly to improve security and
>was fully implemented last month.
>Staffers said that when they
>arrive for work each morning,
>they are instructed to deposit
>their personal phones in lockers
>installed at White House entrances.
>A senior White House official
>said all messaging apps have
>been deactivated on government phones.
>
>
>In February 2017, The Washington Post?reported,
>staffers were using Confide to
>discuss internal White House operations
>out of fear of being
>accused of leaking information to
>the media. The Confide app
>deletes messages as soon as
>they are read.
>
>The following month, then-House Oversight Committee
>Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R.-Utah) and
>ranking Democrat Elijah E. Cummings
>of Maryland sent a letter
>to the White House seeking
>assurances that the Trump administration
>was complying with the presidential
>records law.
>
>In response, White House legislative affairs
>chief Marc Short wrote that
>the administration was "committed" to
>retaining work records.
>
>"It is the policy of the
>White House to comply with
>the preservation requirements of the
>[Presidential Records Act]," Short wrote.
>"All White House personnel have
>received or will receive mandatory
>in-person training on their obligations
>under the PRA."
Geezus boskee!
#livelikezac
CAforkedhorn
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 3,529
The really big problem I have with all of this is that like myself, not many people have any confidence that there will be any kind of justice for all of this. I think people have been numbed by watching Hillary skate on everything when we all knew she was guilty as shyt. I think Jeff Sessions has too much pride to initiate a special prosecutor to investigate his own department but I think he should do it immediately.
It's crazy to me that we have a special prosecutor investigating Trump and Russia based on little or no evidence yet no special prosecutor into the corruption of the FBI with smoking guns everywhere. It's very obvious that there was some shady shyt going down in the FBI and Americans have the right to know if the agency that has the power to take our freedom away is corrupted, especially if that corruption is at the top.
At this point, the only thing I've heard that raised any eyebrows about Russia Russia Russia is that Don Jr had a meeting. So... I'm supposed to be beside myself and demand Trump's impeachment because Don Jr had a meeting while at the same time I'm supposed to look past the obvious clusterfuck of corruption at the top of the FBI and possibly even higher up the chain of command? Bullshyt libtards!!!
I have absolutely zero confidence now in the FBI. I imagine when the IG report comes out we will find out even more goodies. For now I have my popcorn and beer but dammit I want heads to roll if all of this is true.
It's crazy to me that we have a special prosecutor investigating Trump and Russia based on little or no evidence yet no special prosecutor into the corruption of the FBI with smoking guns everywhere. It's very obvious that there was some shady shyt going down in the FBI and Americans have the right to know if the agency that has the power to take our freedom away is corrupted, especially if that corruption is at the top.
At this point, the only thing I've heard that raised any eyebrows about Russia Russia Russia is that Don Jr had a meeting. So... I'm supposed to be beside myself and demand Trump's impeachment because Don Jr had a meeting while at the same time I'm supposed to look past the obvious clusterfuck of corruption at the top of the FBI and possibly even higher up the chain of command? Bullshyt libtards!!!
I have absolutely zero confidence now in the FBI. I imagine when the IG report comes out we will find out even more goodies. For now I have my popcorn and beer but dammit I want heads to roll if all of this is true.
RELH
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 17,479
It seems that Obama was made aware of the investigation even before he is on video that he stated he was not aware of any of the FBI investigations that was going on and did not take part in any of the investigations.
One of the lover FBI agents texted his/her lover and stated that they were advised by FBI director Comey that the "POTUS" wanted to be briefed on how the investigation was going, referring to the investigation on Hillary.
Wait a minute, this can't be. Obama was the great savior of FTW and Cornhusker that they voted for. To think he is involved in another coverup by his administration is unthinkable because he was a great president according to the two liberal fools on this forum.
Now who are the biggest fools of all when it comes to voting for a President. FTW and Cornhusker for a con man riddled with scandals and deceit while in office, and then turned around and voted for a outright lying crook in the likes of Hillary Clinton. Maybe the third time will be a charm for their voting.
OOPS! I forgot they voted twice for Obama and once for Hillary, third time is up and gone for them.
RELH
One of the lover FBI agents texted his/her lover and stated that they were advised by FBI director Comey that the "POTUS" wanted to be briefed on how the investigation was going, referring to the investigation on Hillary.
Wait a minute, this can't be. Obama was the great savior of FTW and Cornhusker that they voted for. To think he is involved in another coverup by his administration is unthinkable because he was a great president according to the two liberal fools on this forum.
Now who are the biggest fools of all when it comes to voting for a President. FTW and Cornhusker for a con man riddled with scandals and deceit while in office, and then turned around and voted for a outright lying crook in the likes of Hillary Clinton. Maybe the third time will be a charm for their voting.
OOPS! I forgot they voted twice for Obama and once for Hillary, third time is up and gone for them.
RELH
>The really big problem I have
>with all of this is
>that like myself, not many
>people have any confidence that
>there will be any kind
>of justice for all of
>this. I think people
>have been numbed by watching
>Hillary skate on everything when
>we all knew she was
>guilty as shyt. I
>think Jeff Sessions has too
>much pride to initiate a
>special prosecutor to investigate his
>own department but I think
>he should do it immediately.
>
>
>It's crazy to me that we
>have a special prosecutor investigating
>Trump and Russia based on
>little or no evidence yet
>no special prosecutor into the
>corruption of the FBI with
>smoking guns everywhere. It's
>very obvious that there was
>some shady shyt going down
>in the FBI and Americans
>have the right to know
>if the agency that has
>the power to take our
>freedom away is corrupted, especially
>if that corruption is at
>the top.
>
>At this point, the only thing
>I've heard that raised any
>eyebrows about Russia Russia Russia
>is that Don Jr had
>a meeting. So... I'm
>supposed to be beside myself
>and demand Trump's impeachment because
>Don Jr had a meeting
>while at the same time
>I'm supposed to look past
>the obvious clusterfuck of corruption
>at the top of the
>FBI and possibly even higher
>up the chain of command?
> Bullshyt libtards!!!
>
>I have absolutely zero confidence now
>in the FBI. I
>imagine when the IG report
>comes out we will find
>out even more goodies.
>For now I have my
>popcorn and beer but dammit
>I want heads to roll
>if all of this is
>true.
+1...the Clinton are very good at ruining our institutions!
>with all of this is
>that like myself, not many
>people have any confidence that
>there will be any kind
>of justice for all of
>this. I think people
>have been numbed by watching
>Hillary skate on everything when
>we all knew she was
>guilty as shyt. I
>think Jeff Sessions has too
>much pride to initiate a
>special prosecutor to investigate his
>own department but I think
>he should do it immediately.
>
>
>It's crazy to me that we
>have a special prosecutor investigating
>Trump and Russia based on
>little or no evidence yet
>no special prosecutor into the
>corruption of the FBI with
>smoking guns everywhere. It's
>very obvious that there was
>some shady shyt going down
>in the FBI and Americans
>have the right to know
>if the agency that has
>the power to take our
>freedom away is corrupted, especially
>if that corruption is at
>the top.
>
>At this point, the only thing
>I've heard that raised any
>eyebrows about Russia Russia Russia
>is that Don Jr had
>a meeting. So... I'm
>supposed to be beside myself
>and demand Trump's impeachment because
>Don Jr had a meeting
>while at the same time
>I'm supposed to look past
>the obvious clusterfuck of corruption
>at the top of the
>FBI and possibly even higher
>up the chain of command?
> Bullshyt libtards!!!
>
>I have absolutely zero confidence now
>in the FBI. I
>imagine when the IG report
>comes out we will find
>out even more goodies.
>For now I have my
>popcorn and beer but dammit
>I want heads to roll
>if all of this is
>true.
+1...the Clinton are very good at ruining our institutions!
NeMont
Long Time Member
- Messages
- 12,632
LAST EDITED ON Feb-08-18 AT 09:02AM (MST)[p]>>I see public pressure on Sessions,
>>a political appointee,would work but
>>public pressure on elected members
>>of Congress won't. That
>>is some magic thinking.
>>
>>I don't blame the fakers for
>>the debt. I blame them
>>for cheering on the guy
>>adding trillions more to it.
>>
>>
>>Nemont
>
>....you don't care...do you?
>
>
>
>
ii
I care deeply about it. That is why I don't trust the clown car driver to ever get the right people in the right places to make it right.
I didn't believe Sessions was ever the right guy for Attorney General, but Trump values loyalty.
If even half of the allegations against Hillary and the leadership of the FBI are accurate then it should be investigates by all congressional committees with oversight powers, the IG and a special prosecutor to bring it all to the light of day. So far I am highly underwhelmed by all of Sessions work.
I do believe that the national debt is a bigger danger to our future and nobody seems willing, able or even cares much about it to demand change.
Nemont
>>a political appointee,would work but
>>public pressure on elected members
>>of Congress won't. That
>>is some magic thinking.
>>
>>I don't blame the fakers for
>>the debt. I blame them
>>for cheering on the guy
>>adding trillions more to it.
>>
>>
>>Nemont
>
>....you don't care...do you?
>
>
>
>
I care deeply about it. That is why I don't trust the clown car driver to ever get the right people in the right places to make it right.
I didn't believe Sessions was ever the right guy for Attorney General, but Trump values loyalty.
If even half of the allegations against Hillary and the leadership of the FBI are accurate then it should be investigates by all congressional committees with oversight powers, the IG and a special prosecutor to bring it all to the light of day. So far I am highly underwhelmed by all of Sessions work.
I do believe that the national debt is a bigger danger to our future and nobody seems willing, able or even cares much about it to demand change.
Nemont
