NO AR'S HERE OCHO!!!

The serial bomber was a computer tech and I am willing to bet that he got his bomb making expertise off the internet.

Now are we going to ban internet threads that teach how to make bombs, and black gunpowder. You can bet that if it is bought up to ban those internet threads, that liberals will scream to high heaven that it is a violation of the 1st. amendment and will oppose it.

I would also recommend that any of you do not try to look up bomb making on a internet search. Big Brother is possibly monitoring those sites and you might get a visit from the FBI after this incident.

RELH
 
Ya!

If I Punched in 'BOMB MAKING' I Don't Know if the FBI or NVB would turn me in First!









It Ain't Easy being Me!:D:D:D
 
So? You're point is what? Do you believe that it is okay to be too young to drink yet old enough to buy an AR? The point is you never have a point Bessie, you're just being silly and ornery.

As for RELH, classic, picks the liberal point of view and embraces it. Hilarious, let's start banning internet sites but why stop there? He could have had a copy of the Anarchist Bible in circulation since 1971 so let start us some book burning.

Give it a rest RELH Nunes

Your 1st amendment scenario is no different then the 2nd amendment and NRA supporters. Only this time it is you pleading to change the 1st amendment. I thought the constitution was not a living a document or did Trump tweet something about it today?

Why are you warning people to avoid their searches RELH? Why would you do that especially if law enforcement is scanning for such searches?
 
>So? You're point is what? Do
>you believe that it is
>okay to be too young
>to drink yet old enough
>to buy an AR? The
>point is you never have
>a point Bessie, you're just
>being silly and ornery.
>
>As for RELH, classic, picks the
>liberal point of view and
>embraces it. Hilarious, let's start
>banning internet sites but why
>stop there? He could have
>had a copy of the
>Anarchist Bible in circulation since
>1971 so let start us
>some book burning.
>
>Give it a rest RELH Nunes
>
>
>Your 1st amendment scenario is no
>different then the 2nd amendment
>and NRA supporters. Only this
>time it is you pleading
>to change the 1st amendment.
>I thought the constitution was
>not a living a document
>or did Trump tweet something
>about it today?
>
>Why are you warning people to
>avoid their searches RELH? Why
>would you do that especially
>if law enforcement is scanning
>for such searches?

Sarcasm is lost on the simpletons......



#livelikezac
 
LAST EDITED ON Mar-21-18 AT 08:47PM (MST)[p]FTEW the typical dumb liberal that slants everything that is not to his liberal standards.
FTW are you saying that there is members here on this forum that might research bomb making in order to make bombs to blow up people. Sure sounds like it with your slant. As for me I do not think so.

You liberals scream bloody murder about anything that appears to attack the first amendment, but will sell the second amendment down the drain in a heart beat. I prefer to keep intact all of our amendments and not be selective like you are. The most dangerous thing in this country to destroy it is liberals like you FTW.

RELH

FTW here is an example how liberals violate first amendment rights when it does not fit their agenda.
_________________________________________________________

Outcry from gun advocates after YouTube blocks videos on firearms assembly, sale
_________________________________________________________
 
My Point is This:

Guess I'll Have to SPLAIN it!

You Could Ban All BLACK/RAMBO Guns & You'd have the Same JOKERS doing as they Please with either Illegal Guns or other ways of Killing people!

You Understand that F'N Part?

I Had a Gal a couple weeks ago say:

You Sure are an Ornery SOB!

I Said:You wouldn't wanna See me when I'm Ornery!



>So? You're point is what? Do
>you believe that it is
>okay to be too young
>to drink yet old enough
>to buy an AR? The
>point is you never have
>a point Bessie, you're just
>being silly and ornery.
>
>As for RELH, classic, picks the
>liberal point of view and
>embraces it. Hilarious, let's start
>banning internet sites but why
>stop there? He could have
>had a copy of the
>Anarchist Bible in circulation since
>1971 so let start us
>some book burning.
>
>Give it a rest RELH Nunes
>
>
>Your 1st amendment scenario is no
>different then the 2nd amendment
>and NRA supporters. Only this
>time it is you pleading
>to change the 1st amendment.
>I thought the constitution was
>not a living a document
>or did Trump tweet something
>about it today?
>
>Why are you warning people to
>avoid their searches RELH? Why
>would you do that especially
>if law enforcement is scanning
>for such searches?












It Ain't Easy being Me!:D:D:D
 
One More Thing:

No Guns involved & Not one F'N word from Ocho!

That's what I Be Saying!








It Ain't Easy being Me!:D:D:D
 
He wasn't very effective was he? what did he kill a few people ?

Hell with a 10 round clip a bad shot should kill 8 . that will teach the next terrorist not to waste huis time with firecrackers .














Stay Thirsty My Friends
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom