Search results

>I have a feeling theres lots >of them stacked under trees. > Or marked with a GPS.

Nice buck! The one behind him doesn't look too bad either.

To each their own. I'm more a lone wolf when it comes to hunting. I get family/friends pissed at me all the time because I don't invite them on my hunts. I just get more satisfaction out of the hunt when I do it by myself and I've yet to feel the need to high five a tree, a bush or even a...

I've use them on a few hunts here in AZ and they worked out great. Never really used them to radio a hunter in on an animal though. We just used them to let the hunter know if the buck was still there while they were getting closer to him.

heffe, These animals that are being shot at year after year from these extreme distances belong to everyone and not to any one hunter. Not until an animal is mortally hit does it then belong to one hunter(technically not until it's tagged). This conversation would be a bit different if...

Muley73, I agree that there are irresponsible hunters in pretty much all styles of hunting but I still think you might be missing the point I was trying to make. In one scenario the buck has the ability to detect the hunter because the hunter was only 14 yards away whereas in the 2nd scenario...

>>BeDawg commented that the animal doesn't >>even know you're there at >>600( or was it 800?) >>yds. The last buck I >>killed with my bow didn't >>know I was there, either. >>14 yds. >> >>Marley says it best. Go hunt. >>Quitcherbitchin'. >> >>You can sure tell it's not >>hunting...

Seems like more and more hunters are speaking up and voicing their concerns about the possible negative effects long range hunting will have on the sport. If I remember correctly I even think B&C just recently release a statement where they expressed their views against long range hunting...

>>I think some of you are >>falsely assuming that if a >>person is anti-long range then >>they must also be anti-technology. >> I for one am >>not a fan of long >>range hunting but I am >>fine with technological advances in >>hunting. It all depends >>on what and how new >>hunting...

I think some of you are falsely assuming that if a person is anti-long range then they must also be anti-technology. I for one am not a fan of long range hunting but I am fine with technological advances in hunting. It all depends on what and how new hunting technology is use. Anti-long range...

Muley73, Just so I'm clear are you saying that there is not really a difference between getting multiple shots at an animal at 800 yards with a rifle compared to getting multiple shots at an animal with a bow at 80 yards? Where in one situation the animal has no chance to hear, see or smell the...

Oh no looks like we need to ban any negative talk about long range hunting because it's hurting someones feelings. That's the way it works now days right? While some may consider the original post trolling and a bit rude it was actually still kind of funny. No need for some of you longrangers...

LAST EDITED ON Jun-18-15 AT 02:11PM (MST)[p]Yep some people just don't care about anything but themselves. I had a conversation about long range hunting with a couple of former hunting buddies a few year ago. I asked them both what effect do they think long range hunting will have on hunting...

I can't believe I missed this thread back when it first got started. Some good points made against L.R. hunting. Not too many good points made that were pro L.R. hunting though. The hunters with disabilities that physically prohibit them from getting close to an animal is the only good point...

Thanks guys! This thread has got me even more excited to draw my strip tag this year.

Good to hear there are still some water sources not under 24/7 photo surveillance.

Very interesting....Wonder who this guy is?

A recent post about the Strip got me thinking about the possible trail cams numbers currently on the Strip. I don't know the strip very well but from what I've read it would appear that there are multiple cams on every available water source. With that being said I have a couple questions for...

Never thought of it like that. So what your saying is if there ever was a 1/4 rule put in place that instead of a guy putting one T.C. at a water he would be putting multiple cams all around the water. Yea this could happen but seems highly unlikely that it would cause anymore problems than...

>I don't think cameras should be >banned. They are such a >useful and fun tool. My >kids and I love seeing >what game has been in >the mountains near our home >and in the units I >hunt when we aren't around. >98% of the state has >no problems with cameras, why >pull a real Big...

BTW cool idea TGRschank. Looking forward to seeing how this plays out.

Just ban the damn things! And I say this while owning a few cams myself. They are completely out of control and it's only getting worse. Anything other than a complete ban would be nothing but a band-aid solution. The only thing I can see being a viable solution other than a complete ban...

For all you doubters(whoops I mean haters) check out the shot he made on this goat at 600 yards on the RUN!!!

RE: Hunting Show -"Extreme Outer Limits" You bring up a good point Heffe. Who decides how far the max range is and at what distance should that be. I must admit I don't have a solid answer for this question but I can't imagine this being a very big issue. I feel 500 is a good number that...

RE: Hunting Show -"Extreme Outer Limits" LAST EDITED ON Oct-27-14 AT 12:18PM (MST)[p]LAST EDITED ON Oct-27-14 AT 12:17?PM (MST) >OMG, are you serious. You actually >want the govt to tell >you how far you can >shoot? You sound like a >bunch of fricken Obama lovin >libtards. Do you have...

RE: Hunting Show -"Extreme Outer Limits" NvBighorn I hate to interrupt the fun you and Tristate are having but to go back to your hypothetical question in post 130 I'd have to say in that particular incident no you would not be done hunting if someone else tags the animal. Even if you are the...

LAST EDITED ON Oct-22-14 AT 09:28AM (MST)[p]I don't think the unenforceable law logic is a viable reason for not putting a law into effect. Pretty sure majority of the hunters will follow a law even if it's unenforceable.

This is one of those topics that hunters will never ever EVER agree on. The worst part is that they only divide the hunting community. Just look at what is been said between Tristate and a few others. No good boys and it's only going to get worse with the advent of new and so called better...

I also think they are getting a bit out of control and that the current state of trailcam use needs to change. A trailcam season might help in conjunction with a no trailcams used within 1/4 mile of water rule. I feel limiting the # of trailcams a person could have out at a given time would be...

Hell all I posted was "I think the deer was hit by a car and not killed by a hunter" and my post still got deleted and I've been blocked. What a load of crap!

Don't know if this has been posted yet but just wanted to see what some of you thought about this. http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57604113-76/now-youre-a-sharpshooter-the-smart-rifle-arrives/

Check out this huge AZ non-strip/Kiabab buck. Didn't know they made them this big south of the ditch.

DANG! I didn't know mule deer knew how to grow eye guards like that. Killer buck!

Hey greatwestern just curious as to why you think this guides your talking about are self-indulgent, coattail ridin' blowhards? Is this from first hand experience? Does the guide(s) your talking about happen to be in this list Colburn-Scott, Nichols or Wards?

Looks like a good hit to me. A bull can live a very long time on one lung if that is all that was hit. These pics look like they are stills from video footage correct? If so why not post the video on monstermuleyclips it will make it a lot easy to see where the bull was hit. One things for...

LAST EDITED ON Nov-10-11 AT 10:42AM (MST)[p]cbryant11 take it easy hoss no need for name calling here bro. If you take some time to go back and re-read my post you'll see the reason I thought he was affiliated with Hoyt was because of the info on his blog not because of what hat he was wearing...

No CSI investigation needed on this one. Just pointing out the obvious. I can see why Sneaky Man wouldn't want to post a video of him taking 3 shots at a deer with a bow if that's what really happened. After looking at his website/blog it look like he is or is trying to be sponsored by Hoyt...

Sorry Mr. Sneeky your story just doesn't match up with the video. You say that you used one arrow to mark the shot position and one to mark the first blood. Well at 5:35 in your video you say lets go check for the blood trail at that time you can clearly see your missing 3 arrows and yet you...

Nice call Smoktem! How about posting up the whole hunt including what happened to your other arrows?

LAST EDITED ON Nov-02-11 AT 09:28AM (MST)[p]Once again great video! A couple times in this thread people have mentioned that this kind of stuff only gives fuel for the antis. Well sorry to break it to you boys a video of a perfect 100 yard shot to the heart is fuel for the antis let alone this...