>
LAST EDITED ON Sep-30-09
>AT 12:24?PM (MST)
>
>I think that getting half the
>bonus points back is not
>a big deal. It is
>not like they are getting
>all back, and will probably
>take them a long long
>time to draw! There
>will probably be people who
>would take advantage of that,
>but not many...who would in
>their right mind slack on
>their hunt knowing they will
>only get half their bonus
>points back if they turn
>their tag in. I
>also think it is ridiculous
>for a 5 year waiting
>period. The odds with no
>points are that you wont
>draw anyway...yet the fish and
>game could be collecting the
>money for 5 years. Also
>not being able to put
>in for deer, elk, and
>antelope at the same time.
>If money is the game,
>which I am sure it
>is...then why don't they allow
>applications for all, not just
>one.
One person taking advantage of what you are proposing is to many!
having the 5 year waiting period is also a must. this gets rid of some of the people that have drawn one of these once in a lifetime tags and helps some of the ones that will never draw.
allowing you to put in for multiple species will screw your chances even more and cost you way more money in the end. Bad Idea
IMHO you sound like someone that is new to the game of utah elk and the bonus point system.
if you want to ever have a chance to hunt elk in a le area in utah again then come to the rac meeting this fall and vote yes on the divisions proposal they will be pushing.
If Utah got rid of these gay spike tags they could also give out more big bull tags. you simply cannot kill spikes and expect to keep giving out more big bull tags. The new spike hunts are creating a larger butt plug in the bonus point system.
Archery is a year round commitment!!