Potential New BC Record (pics)

B

BCBOY

Long Time Member
Messages
5,100
Looks like the 3rd year in a row where the BC typical record is challenged. Last years new BC record just might fall. This buck is said to gross over 220 and net 212. One hell of a Whopper of a Buck!!!!
big_buck11.jpg


bigbuck2.jpg
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-23-06 AT 07:32PM (MST)[p]DAMN! How do I get to hunt BC?

Drum
 
WOW!! i love that dropper. hell of a buck

BadAzzArcher

Take your kids hunting so you don't have to hunt for you kids.
 
Great looking buck. Definatly a pig. Anyword on where it was shot? Or the lucky shooter?

Kirby

When in doubt, floor it.

Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggy" until you find a big stick.
 
DON'T INSULT HIM Manny!!!

THATS A NICE BUCK BUT IT AIN'T NO PISS-CUTTER!!!

THE ONLY bobcat THINKING SOME PEOPLE JUST DON'T LEARN,THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL PISS-CUTTER LESSONS!!! :D :D :D :D
 
Maybe his face is blocked out so he doesn't become the "next" internet legend. Not to mention, it wasn't him that actually posted the picture.

Unbelievable buck! Gotta love that typical frame with that little dropper. Would like to hear more about it.
 
If the rough scores are correct, that buck could go #2 or #3 in the world, without the dropper. Incredible Buck regardless.


:( Somebody didn't like bouncing betty :(
 
Now this is when ethics becomes an issue. Do you accidentally bust off the dropper then have a super score.....nah.....Awesome!
Its nice to see such a heavy antlered monster, and to know there are more out there like that. I haven't seen any BC boy camp shots this year. Did I miss them, or are they to come. I'm looking forward to more pics of our northern neighbors great bucks.
 
>Great Muley! Thanks for the photos
>BCBOY!
>
>
>Hiker
>
>Proverbs 3:5-6


Please don't leave out verse #7....
 
HEY TUFF BUFF!!!

IS HE BIGGER THAN THE PISSCUTTERS YOU SEEN IN THE N.E. REGION???

THE ONLY bobcat WONDERING??? :D :D :D :D
 
Thanks Manny, That's a good one too.

v.7 "Be not wise in your own eyes; fear the LORD, and turn away from evil."



Hiker

Proverbs 3:5-6
 
This buck is deceptive because the guy with the face bloched out is Anthony Robbins- the 8 foot tall guy who wrote the Book "Awaken the giant within".

Sweet buck though-looks to be a 195ish main frame then a cheater deduct. Could easily make book with the great mass, symmetry & eye guards though.

Classic look. I'd love to see that one with a legal tag. Whoever scored it needs to score the buck hanging over my computer though...heheh
 
Been told the pics don't do it justice. I recall a few years back I posted up a pic of a 270 inch buck from Sask and everyone on here jumped on the bandwagon saying there was no way it was over 240. When the final B&C score came in, it was indeed a 270 buck. So.... I'll wait until the final score comes in on this one and I won't throw my 2 bits in on what I think it scores. ;)
 
Looks like a big-time stud to me. And I won't speculate on score either. But he shows another reason I'd like to live north of the border. Thanks again for sharing.
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-27-06 AT 06:07PM (MST)[p]I dunno, I love trying to guess/estimate scores. Here's one from Alberta (should be about same body and head size, both older bucks from up north) that netted 205 3/8 for a comparison. I can't really see it netting 7 inches more than the Alberta buck. If it does, I want the official scorer's name so I can get some animals scored! -Shaner
456b88237c097604.jpg
 
Doesn't look like it will top the Provincial Record. Word is a wellknown official measurer green scored it at 200 net. Still one whopper of a buck, but ain't no record breaker.
 
That is an excellent buck. one of the reasons he looks "smaller" is that the shooter is not kneeling 5 feet behind the deer trying to create the optical illusion of something else. Good to see another canadian muley on the ground and that thge shooter had to work to get him out of the bush.
 
Score?????? Though I love to talk it, in this case who cares...what a whopper. I had to come back for another look. Thanks again for rummaging up the pics BC. Oh yeah, I'm guessing 192 and an 1/8. : }
 
Already posted up the score. Official measurer green scored it right at 200 net. That dropper was a pretty big deduction. It won't challenge the #1 spot in the BC Provincial Record Book but still a Whopper any way you slice it.
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-28-06 AT 10:08PM (MST)[p]LAST EDITED ON Nov-28-06 AT 10:07?PM (MST)

LAST EDITED ON Nov-28-06 AT 10:05?PM (MST)

I don't wanna harp too much but are you sure it isn't just "word is 200net"? It looks like it needs about 8" bases and 7" h-2 circumferences hiding behind his hands, because everything else shows about a 190-194 net deer.

The picture does it justice just fine. It's a Whopper of a deer and should make low book net. But it doesn't appear in any way to be a omfg 200" net behemoth. Look at the picture lined up to a 205 net slick typical that I posted. It would have to match or exceed it's main frame in every way, which I just don't see happening. The story they gave you came down 12 inches, how about 6-8 more?

Maybe "about 200 net mainframe green" and 5 or so inches of cheaters to deduct(there's two that I see)? I'd believe that.

A great buck though none the less and thanks for sharing it with us.
 
You've gotta remember mainbeams can be very tough to judge. Alot of BC bucks have mainbeams 28"-30" and that adds a ton to the score!
 
I don't doubt the score since the official scorer that has put the tape to it green knows what he is doing.
I don't see why a guy would post on this several times thinkin he is the king at photo scoring either. ;)
 
>I don't doubt the score since
>the official scorer that has
>put the tape to it
>green knows what he is
>doing.
>I don't see why a guy
>would post on this several
>times thinkin he is the
>king at photo scoring either.
>;)


LOL.....
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-29-06 AT 10:49AM (MST)[p]LAST EDITED ON Nov-29-06 AT 10:46?AM (MST)

>the official scorer that has
>put the tape to it
>green knows what he is
>doing.
>I don't see why a guy
>would post on this several
>times thinkin he is the
>king at photo scoring either.
>;)


I dunno, maybe my pet peeve is exaggerated scores on deer and elk, which this thread has already shown. It didn't take a "king at photo scoring" to see that.

You were defending these guy's story when it was 212 net.

Are you sure they didn't give you the net score without the cheaters deducted? Stories get stretched alot nowadays with everyone infatuated with gross scores, and leaving out minor details when doing net. I'm sure the number 200 was in there somewhere though. Gross, net mainframe, if this main beam was longer, if this fork matched that. Same old story to me, just a different buck.

Shaner
 
Shaner,
Who give's a rat's a$$ if 'you' think the score is inflated by 5 inches? I posted up these pics because the buck is a SLAMMER. It's obvious that it is a net book buck. The hunter obviously was rather excited and messed up the score when he and his buddies taped it. I never once defended that score. I actually commented how I wouldn't say what 'I' thought it scored. Now, it has been taped by a very well known and respected official B&C scorer. This scorer has a ton of experience putting the tape on giant muleys. He is the same guy that taped the famous Bannister buck. I have no doubts that when he tapes the green score at 200 net, then it is 200 net. If you feel he's wrong because you are an expert photo scorer, then that is your right. But by posting again and again about what 'you' think the score is, you are just making yourself look like an idiot. Sorry if that is harsh but that is how it looks to me. ;)
 
>LAST EDITED ON Nov-29-06
>AT 10:49?AM (MST)
>
>LAST EDITED ON Nov-29-06
>AT 10:46?AM (MST)
>
>>the official scorer that has
>>put the tape to it
>>green knows what he is
>>doing.
>>I don't see why a guy
>>would post on this several
>>times thinkin he is the
>>king at photo scoring either.
>>;)
>
>
>I dunno, maybe my pet
>peeve is exaggerated scores on
>deer and elk, which this
>thread has already shown. It
>didn't take a "king at
>photo scoring" to see that.
>
>
>You were defending these guy's story
>when it was 212 net.
>
>
>Are you sure they didn't give
>you the net score without
>the cheaters deducted? Stories get
>stretched alot nowadays with everyone
>infatuated with gross scores, and
>leaving out minor details when
>doing net. I'm sure the
>number 200 was in there
>somewhere though. Gross, net mainframe,
>if this main beam was
>longer, if this fork matched
>that. Same old story to
>me, just a different buck.
>
>
>Shaner
>
>

BLAH BLAH....Freggin nice Buck Bottom Line!
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-30-06 AT 11:39AM (MST)[p]Hey, I have no problem with you insinuating I'm an idiot in this case, fire away. I take my chances when I throw out opinions. I recall someone posting "Potential new BC Record" as the title of this thread. Touche ;) I also wasn't trying to belittle the hunter or the buck, It's a great trophy. Score always gets in the way.

So you got me more than curious...
I went over to the huntingBC.ca site that was on the picture and got the numbers rundown as they had it so far.

26" inside spread, 24" and 26" main beams, 5 3/4 inch bases with "the rest of the masses being 6" or more" , 21" g2's for a gross score of 214,--- 3" of deduct on mainframe total,

So a 214 gross, 211 net mainframe with 11 inches of cheaters( a 1 " and the dropper) for final of 200 net green (which was written by someone on the huntingbc board)
-------which would make the dropper 10 inches-------,
and makes the commonly used gross score go right back up to 225.

So maybe they meant gross typical 214, gross nontypical 225 for a net 200 typical.

Also they mentioned they thought they messed up the first time with 220 gross 212 net by measuring outside spread instead.
-------which would make the dropper 4- 7 inches?-------

Or maybe they meant 214 gross nontypical and forgot to take the 14 inches of deduct from a 203 gross typical frame with a 200 inch net mainframe and net 189.

Or maybe they meant 214 gross nontypical, 208 1/2 gross typical, making a net typical frame of 205 1/2 , and which makes 5 1/2 inches of cheaters,
-------making the dropper 4 1/2 inches long------. And thus making the final score 200 net green.

Here's the thread
http://www.huntingbc.ca/forum/showthread.php?t=8553

Officially green scored, I'm an idiot, whatever you want, but one thing is for sure the numbers coming out don't all match. The dropper alone varies from 4 1/2 to 10 inches!
 
This damn internet has spread more hot air and false stories than anything invented by man!
 
Shaner,
Do you know what the current BC typical record is? Now I know some are slow here, but BC doesn't stand for B&C, instead it stands for British Columbia. So when a slammer typical like this is rumored to beat the current provincial record, it is pretty exciting stuff. Notice I threw the word 'potential' in the title? I'm sorry that this buck doesn't live up to your preconceived notion of what a 200 inch net typical should look like. Next time I'll make sure when I post up scores I'll get you to varify it first as you obviously are a Master Photo Scorer. I'm humbled to be in your presence.
 
LAST EDITED ON Dec-01-06 AT 12:51PM (MST)[p]Do you even bother to read my posts? or do you just focus on one sentence of it and respond? Read the whole post.



Edit for the jist of things: So is the total bone coming out it's head 225" or 214" ?
 
Shaner -

I personally know the Boone and Crockett scorer who scored the buck.

It nets 200 and change.

Its a super buck.

Your photo scoring just plain sucks ....I would hate to see how bad you are when you actually see a big buck live.
 
Wow, you guys are brutal here to anybody that asks questions.

Let me make more clear what I've been getting at, and waiting for the answer for--

"Gus" over Huntingbc.ca Wrote:

"Net 200........had only 3" deductions between the main frame. If it wasn't for that big drop tine and the inch long kicker on his left side, he would have netted 211"


So unless it really grosses 225, or unless he got mixed up when he wrote the statement ( he was apparently there when they scored it), then the score is messed up.

You see that statement makes the the dropper 10inches long. Now read carefully- 203"gross +11"cheaters ==214 gross.
203gross -3" deduct -11"cheaters =189"

Maybe Gus just got messed up when he posted it, or maybe it really does gross 225.

Clear this up so I can quit posting here. And reread this post carefully before slamming me.
 
It's been cleared... the buck NETS 200". Stop trying to justify your photo-scoring skills.

Michael
"What I could do, I was doing, and that was simply putting my butt on the line for my country, the country that I loved, so that all the protestors and the academics and the liberal intelligentsia back home could enjoy the right to protest against people like me, the hated middleclass." --Gary R. Smith, US Special Forces
 
>>I don't doubt the score since
>>the official scorer that has
>>put the tape to it
>>green knows what he is
>>doing.
>>I don't see why a guy
>>would post on this several
>>times thinkin he is the
>>king at photo scoring either.
>>;)
>
>
>LOL.....
 
>>LAST EDITED ON Nov-29-06
>>AT 10:49?AM (MST)
>>
>>LAST EDITED ON Nov-29-06
>>AT 10:46?AM (MST)
>>
>>>the official scorer that has
>>>put the tape to it
>>>green knows what he is
>>>doing.
>>>I don't see why a guy
>>>would post on this several
>>>times thinkin he is the
>>>king at photo scoring either.
>>>;)
>>
>>
>>I dunno, maybe my pet
>>peeve is exaggerated scores on
>>deer and elk, which this
>>thread has already shown. It
>>didn't take a "king at
>>photo scoring" to see that.
>>
>>
>>You were defending these guy's story
>>when it was 212 net.
>>
>>
>>Are you sure they didn't give
>>you the net score without
>>the cheaters deducted? Stories get
>>stretched alot nowadays with everyone
>>infatuated with gross scores, and
>>leaving out minor details when
>>doing net. I'm sure the
>>number 200 was in there
>>somewhere though. Gross, net mainframe,
>>if this main beam was
>>longer, if this fork matched
>>that. Same old story to
>>me, just a different buck.
>>
>>
>>Shaner
>>
>>
>
>BLAH BLAH....Freggin nice Buck Bottom Line!
>
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos

Member Gallery Photos and Videos!

Big Bull Trail Camera Photo
08271E18-BE85-44E1-A292-91D34D4C6024.jpeg
_AAV1000.jpg
Euro Mounts
IMG_20201023_121247_449.jpg
WOW!
F812C890-A1C1-4E97-87CD-F1E92B335F8E.jpeg
20210403_133243.jpg
12F032E9-C66E-4612-9F3C-6E43B080E76F.jpeg
39512F6D-4A98-4D63-9C5B-3C8A7B89AD21.jpeg
1000007895.jpg
AC035CB2-6F42-46F0-8FA3-F6A95F03FEE9.jpeg
Back
Top Bottom