Buck on the Run

T

tufferthandug

Guest
Here's one of them shake your head videos, these guy's are something else! What a way to embarass yourself on the internet.

 
WOW. Terrible camera work, horrible shots, and trigger happy.
Other than that I don't see anything wrong with it. :)

Lien2
 
They couldn't even hit the deer standing still, why in the heck are they shooting when they are running. The deer had a better chance of living if it just would hold still, the deer had to run into the bullet. What a bunch of crap,idiots.
 
What an embarrassment for all of us ethical hunting Canadian?.fricking idiots
 
i dont take that many rounds with me out in the field! i couldnt afford to shoot that many times at every small buck i see! its very disapointing to see such a crappy hunt edited with sound,music, and text, you know these guys are proud of their "hunt."
 
If these two guys are members here on MM's I would like to let them know that they are a couple jackasses. Talk about some bad shots and bad video work. I can't believe they would actually post that on the internet.
 
Unfortunately, I think that kind of shooting is closer to the norm than the exception...
 
Remember that post about Long range shooting, and is it ethical or not. I'll bet all those shots were under 300 yds and those clowns couldn't connect. This proves my point that we have far more to worry about with guys like this than we Do with LR shooters

Mike
 
The sad thing is they felt that the video was internet worthy, that others should see their behavior. I would be so embarassed I wouldnt want anyone to know how poor of a shot I am and the risk of lost/wounded deer.... Allen Taylor......
 
I saw before and was going to post but...........
I thought why!
just plain stupid people!
I often check out the guys waterfowl hunting geese and ducks in Canada!
(if you can stand the noise or music!).
jack
 
Ok, not to defend these guys or to pick an argument but I have witnessed worse in the field. (a truck load of road warriors emptying guns at a 2 point at 300 yards). It is interesting that they did so much editing, and left in what they did. That being said, at least they did not pretend to take one shot and pat themselves on the back for the perfect shot like most of the TV shows do.

On that note, when did it become unethical to take a followup shot? I guess I am old enough, and was taught that it was ethical to not let the animal go down slowly, but take a follow up. At least it seems to me that a 2nd shot has become frowned upon.

Congrats to those of you that have never missed and only take one bullet on your hunting trip. It is too late for me to join that club.
 
I think the worst part was when the shooter asked the camera guy "where am I hitting?" If the shooter doesn't have a clue where his bullets are going, he shouldn't be shooting at all. Please, go out and sight in your rifle at a usable range, and practice. If you anticipate a 300 yard shot, go out and find out what your gun does at that distance. You need to know where your bullets hit, and make sure they hit where you aim. Take your time and think. I feel like I'm preaching to the choir here, but evidently there are a few "hunters" out there that have no clue when it comes to ethical behavior.
 
Wow! Canadiens really rock the blaze orange! Gotta love the old red pants and suit. But my god what a terrible thing to post on the internet! Here lets portray hunting as go out and blast the hill to pieces and get your trophy. Pretty sick!
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom