NM PIG 212 7/8!!

J

JimmyAZ

Guest
A good friend of mine took this buck the last day of the muzzy hunt. Have to give him credit. He hunted by himself and passed on smaller bucks, to finally be rewarded with this toad! 32" wides and awesome mass! Has 8-10 scorable points around the bases and the length carries through on all! He had an official scorer run a preliminary score and came back at 212 7/8"!! Congrats Jarrod!

deer2007j2.jpg

newmexicodeer2007007.jpg
 
Wow!!! That's a monster. I'm sure that preliminary score is gross, but holy cow, that's got to be one of the best scoring three point frames I've ever heard of. The G1's are good, the G2's are good, the short G3 on his left side doesn't count (not even for a NT) because it doesn't have a matching point on the other side, the mass looks good, and some of those little extras around the base might count for a few inches. All these "negatives" give me an even greater respect for this buck if it really scores that high. Congrats to the hunter, you were rewarded for your patience.
 
If that is 212 I guess I better score my Spike with a Cheater i got last year
 
Nice buck for sure. No way I could pass him up but no matter how much I try to put a 212 score on him, I can't. But I'm not there with a tape measure either.

Nice buck for sure. Love the junk.
 
Congrats on a hell of a buck but.....if that scores 212 gross, I'll donate my left nard to science to further educate Stanley Tool employees on how to correctly manufacture tape measures. Wait....they come from China. Maybe thats the problem.
 
Like RM, and the gentleman above....

Darned nice buck.......but....

Not wagering my nad's on it.

lrv
 
You gotta love when people arm chair their balls online over something like my deer. They stripped the velvet off the other day and I asked Craig to gross score it before they shipped it off to have the velvet re-done. I had thrashed the velvet during during all the excitement. Craig has scored countless entries and I'm not one to second guess him. He did indeed gross scored it at 212 with four other people there. Thanks for all of your thoughts. -J
 
Like I said in my first post - that thing is a MONSTER. I'll bet he looked like he had a rocking chair on his head when you first saw him. He looks like an older deer, so I'm sure his head is bigger than average too. I love the velvet "webbing" between some of his points. That make him look really massive from the side. Again, congrats on a rare monster.
 
Love the buck....Hate the visor! LOL just razzin ya, like other members told me....Who cares what it scores, more about the personal achievment..JMO
 
Everyone's an expert here!?!?!?!? Who cares what you THINK he scores. Sweet buck! I'd drill him in any unit. Congrats!
 
Awesome buck for sure and a shooter in a blink any day. 212 just seems high based on the photos then again they are only photos. If you say it's 212 then that is all that should matter to you.
 
Nice buck! Did he shoot it earlier in the hunt & then find it on the last day? Looks a little beat up. Not that it matters, just curious.
 
I'm with everyone else here.
That's a very fine deer, but if he goes 212" i'll eat you hat.

I can't even see an honest 170" there, he's missing WAY too much!




Skull Krazy
"No Bones About It"
 
I just learned how to score from another post so let me try here. 172 5/8
10 self guided hunt
10 awesome width
20 muzzle loader buck
-----
212 5/8 total I love this scoring system myself !!!
 
Who cares what it scores, thats a beautiful buck! Sounds like a very memorable hunt and very well deserved deer! I hope it brings a smile to your face every time you look up on the wall and remember your hunt.

Drum


dan-henderson_wanderlei-silva.gif
 
sorry but no way thats 212 unless you scored one side twice or unless you are using the mil. rather than inches on your tape i dunno?
 
First off, I am unable to see the picture of the buck, but just reading all these posts is unbelievable, as with a bunch on other threads.
How many of you are offical B&C Score'ers and put a tape on him? ZERO, just what I thought.
Don't criticize the score, take it or leave it.

I'm sure it's a great buck! Congrats.

Mntman

"Hunting is where you prove yourself"
 
Wut unit if i might ask? Im thinking up north because of the velvet... earlier hunts. I know in the southern half of the state, by the time the hunt comes around, they are out of velvet already. Great buck none the less. Awesome he did it by himself too. Congrats.
 
Exactly right ! It is a gorgeous buck but dont bs me and say its something it isnt. I dont need to be an official b&c scorer to know when Im being bs'd. If ya cant score then leave the numbers off and let people appreciate it for what it is, a great buck.
 
Nice buck and you should be happy. Does the score really matter to you?? So what if it is 175? Does it make it any less of a buck? Go to the Big Buck Contest post on this page to see a 200+ mule deer.
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-07-07 AT 09:43PM (MST)[p]I acually came out with around 208 just by looking at it. I think alot of people are over looking the 28 to 29 inch MB, and 18" to 19" G2s. 4" G1s.

Here is the numbers I came up with.

L, R
MB 29 , 29

G1 4 , 4

G2 18 , 18

G3 13 , 0

G4 11 , 11

H1 5.5 , 5.5

H2 4.5 , 4.5

H3 4 , 4

H4 4.5 , 3

total , total
93.5 , 79

Extras . 8

He said there were 8 to 10 scorable points on the bases.

Spread , 27

Gross score 207.5



Jake H. MM Member since 1999.
458738e374dfcb10.jpg
 
People are blowing up score's on deer in these forums like B&C doesnt exist any more. If that deer is 212 i'd love to have that tape. I'd re-write the record books with some of my deer. I'll give you a $212.00 for that tape measure.

timberline_shedfreak24
 
I was asked by the taker of the buck to not reply anymore on the link. But I can't let people take jabs, when they can't back it up. It's because of people (not all) that have replied on this post that bit by bit, keep people from posting things at all. I'm sorry for even putting this picture up. I know I love to see pics and stories so I try to do the same. Sometimes, I may not always aggree, but I don't call BS on something that I can't BACKUP!!!!!

Have you ever taken a pic, that just doesn't do justice, doesn't show a deer for what he's worth? Maybe a little tough to guage from a picture, or wait, I forgot, we're all film editors on this site...

I didn't shoot this deer, and wasn't there for the scoring. this was a good family friend. A family that has taken their fair share of monster muleys in Northern Arizona, to Southern Utah, to New Mexico. I have a 212 4/8" (pictured below)on my wall that like the one above was scored by an OFFICIAL scorer. Are you going to tell me that he isn't 212" either? Although the deer above is about 4 inches wider, longer main beams,longer G2's which makes up for missing 4th on the one side. The trash on the base makes up for the trash on mine below. you know what...doesn't matter, I know a good buck and I know myself and friend have the experience and accomplishments in hunting to not have to "BS" a score. I've scored numerous deer myself, but what do I know right...anyway, again, sorry for posting the pics, maybe we can just let this die, and those of you that can't seem to just appreciate a good deer, can move on to somebodies post to flame.

It's funny how I've lived off this site for 6 years, and find myself coming back less and less...those that don't believe, keep on critisizing from your lazy boy, I'm heading out in the morning to go bow hunting. Took a 152" whitetail earlier in the season (after taking a 170" typical muley with a muzzy a week before) and looking to follow up with another, but I guess if I say 152", he's only 120"....

For those of you that appreciated, thank you for the kind words, and see you in the woods! :)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v649/jimmyaz/IMG_0026.jpg[/IMG]
 
If that buck even scores 212 then I'm the Pope. Hell I aint even Catholic. Great deer regardless of score, congrats.
 
I'm not going to post scores any more, because
I'm not a very big guy and i dont like getting my
@$$ kicked.
Who cares what it scores! You guys bagging on it
probably did'nt shoot one that big this year. For
hell sakes I shot an 18" 2x3.
 
Whats your numbers then since your so good.
Jake H. MM Member since 1999.

Hey Jake, Here is my numbers. I spent like 30 minutes looking at this deer and called some of my most knowledgable friends/guides and we cant get over 190". Here is my measurements:

Right Side Left Side
H1: 5 4/8 5 0/8
H2: 4 3/8 4 3/8
H3: 4 1/8 4 1/8
H4: 4 0/8 4 0/8
G1: 4 4/8 4 2/8
G2: 15 2/8 14 2/8
G3: 0 9 4/8
G4: 8 2/8 7 0/8
MB: 26 4/8 27 0/9
IS: 27 0/8
Extras: 10

that comes up to 189 7/8 gross non-typical and that is giving him ALOT. I was very conservative on the measurements and on some gave him up to an inch more than I had just to not be bias and please everyone and I cant get him over 190", letalone 212". I can add twenty inches to my measurements and still not get what they have him at and I can add almost 20" to mine and still not get what you got. That deer is not that big. Hell ofa deer dont get me wrong. Good G1's, mass and beams but not freakin 212" good. Im not sayin I am the best at judging a deer, but there is no way that deer is over 200, no way. People are constantly blowin up scores on here and somethin has to be said. Go look at that book cliffs buck from Utah that the kid shot. Now that thing is 200, and you mean to tell me this deer out scores that buck? You might wanna break out your tape and measure it again because this buck dont hold a candle to that buck. Argue with me after looking at these pictures and anyone that knows anything about mule deer will laugh you out of this forum.

4733e57c61db4095.jpg



NOW THIS IS 200.

Tell me the NM buck is bigger than this buck and I'll quit hunting for the rest of my life, and leave you and your magic tape alone.

timberline_shedfreak24
 
>I'm not going to post scores
>any more, because
>I'm not a very big guy
>and i dont like getting
>my
>@$$ kicked.
>Who cares what it scores! You
>guys bagging on it
>probably did'nt shoot one that big
>this year. For
>hell sakes I shot an 18"
>2x3.
 
212 i am with my brother on scoring this deer and not to brag or anything but we arent 3 inches off of anything. I have this deer almost right at 190 being good and maybe giving him an inch or two. There is no way this buck is over 210 even adding twenty inches to what i gaot gives him 210, 212 i mean come on go look at the book cliffs buck now thats a deer and your trying to say this deer is bigger, Dont get me wrong great buck wouldnt walk by me but not over 200 no way
 
Again, don't know how else to say this folks, but I DID NOT SCORE THE BUCK!!! IT WAS GREEN SCORED BY A SCORER.

So before anybody else tells me to take my "magic tape", etc, or attacks me or my experience as an individual or a hunter, take a look at some of my other posts, meet me in person, go on a hunting trip with me, and I'll show you an individual that knows his Sh*t. Than if you still want to attack me, come to me personally and we can figure out a way to take care of it.

I just passed the word down from the shooters mouth, and he has no reason to lie to me. If you don't believe it, fine, I admit, it's hard to see in those pics. However, put your hands on that rack and you may think otherwise, but until you do, back off! Feel free to express your opinion, but when you start throwing deragotory comments in with your posts, thinks aren't fun anymore. You might as well be roading hunting at night with a spotlight in one hand and a beer in the other, because you don't have much more tact if you can't critisize without attacking.

Anyway, I'm done here, it's been fun, but I have other places I can go to get my fix....

By the way Timberline/Muleycrazy, you're already short 5" right off the bat on just one measurement alone, but I guess if you had read the initial post you would have seen it was 32" wide. But wait, I forgot, you're not "3 inches off of anything..." Kind of strange how you're already 5" off and we only looked at one measurement...add 1" to your numbers and what do you know, your right at 212", but no chance in he** that you could be off, especially based off a picture....

I apologize to all for the rude comments but I've had enough. For those that have enjoyed the deer, thank you and maybe one day we'll share a fire...For the others, get out in the woods, and try and enjoy it. We're here to come together as individuals that partake in a pastime that isn't just about killing the biggest buck, but to enjoy what life has to give, spectacular views, etc. The serenity of sitting on a cliff overlooking miles of wilderness without a soul around, and making memories with your friends and family. Maybe when you realize that, things such as scores won't quite mean as much to you, and you can enjoy it for what it is worth. And I'd still share the fire with you as well. :)
 
WOW, I must have missed my E-Vite to this E-Fight. I'm glad that I have better things to do than fight with strangers on the internet! Great unique buck

}}-SLIVER-->
 
I will admit that at first glance at the pics it dosent look like 212, but after a closer look I can defently see were it could be 212. I will say this I dont think they are lieing, they have no reason to. The bookcliffs buck is everything you would exspect a 206 buck to be, and is an awsome buck this buck isnt your typical 200"er but I bet it is.

You are shorting him on his mainbeams, G2s, G3, and G4s by a few inchs on almost every tine. This buck is 32" wide while the Bookcliffs buck is probly only 28 or 29. The NM buck has much longer MB's G2s ISS and more mass, as well as a few more inchs of trash witch makes up for the extra tine and little bit of length that the bookcliffs has witch puts them really close in score.

So I guess everyone can start laughin, and you can hang up your rifle/bow or whatever it is you hunt with cause thats what I see, maybe I need glasses I dont know.

I will tell you this I will take the word of the guy that has seen and held the buck over the guy that thinks he and his knowledgable friends/guides know how to score a photo really well, anyday.

How do you like them apples.

Jake H. MM Member since 1999.
458738e374dfcb10.jpg
 
First of all there is no way its 212 no way. I never took any credit away from the hunter or the deer. Not once. My first post I congradulater him and said it was a hell of a deer. Never took any credit away there. But your gonna sit here and tell me I am twenty inches off? There is no way in he**. No way. Maybe you do need glasses. I will admit yet this buck does have better G1's G2's mass and IS but if you knew how to score you dont get 32" for an inside spread. Even if he does have 29" main beams. Your IS cannot exceed the main beam length and last time I checked 32 is greater than 29. And your one to questtion me about misjudging a deer when the supposed 28" buck you killed this year was only twenty four, and you got to see that buck on the hoof? Ye thats a real creditable source when you admit on here to misjudged a deer in the field. Not to mention the deductions you have to take of for the velvet. Bet you didnt know that either. And as far as AZJIMMY goes I said it was a great deer, wouldnt walk passed me, anytime anywhere I never took credit away from the deer or the hunter. I just simply said that there is no way its 212. I agree with you however its not all about the kill or the numbers its the pursuit that makes hunting what it is. I've never been a guy to bash another guy about his ethics hunting or anything of that nature but when you say find me somewhere and we'll figure it out fine. Time and place buddy. The same goes for my brother. I did not think simply stating that that buck is not 212 would ever cause an "E-Fight" but you know what it is America and I as well as my brother, friends and family are entitled to an opinion. And as far as the rude comments go, I apologize. I do I'm with you on that. It should have never been brought up. I am just fed up with people posting animals on here and stating that they hit the 200" or 400" mark. Thats bull sh**. A couple years back there was an article in monster muleys about people stating they had killed 200" deer with no plausible evidence. One particular hunter even lied about Ryan Hatch saying it was 200" just so he would have a plausible source. And ever since I read that article I cant just let people post stuff like this. Everyone on here is concerned about people disrespecting other people, and you know I agree it is b/s. But I'm not gonna stand around and let other people disrepect those who have killed true 200" deer with deer that are not 200. The 200" mark with deer and the 400" mark with elk even the 80" mark with antelope is not what it use to be. Numbers on animals are blown up alot on this site and I'm just one individual that has the courage to state what I believe. But dont just single out me and my brother about our posts when others are simply stating what they believe to. Im done with this deer, this post and these people who want to tell me its 200. Its simply not. And as far as I go with you jake...you can take your apples and shove em.

Happy Hunting!
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-12-07 AT 04:26PM (MST)[p]have it officially scored and let us know .It is damn fine velvet buck .I think there is a lil confusion on whats scorable and whats not .I personally think its an awesome deer ,however ,when you start talking scores well above 200 you should have youre ##### together first .Congrats on a fine buck .Really curious if it will go above 170 though.
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-12-07 AT 04:45PM (MST)[p]Shed freak ,I am with you that this buck is not as big as posted.I am just really curious how you got so good at scoring ,that you can score to an 1/8 of an inch from a photo .I personally have harvested my share of bucks ,All archery ,I have never even came close when feild judging let alone from a 2 dimensional picture .Whats youre secret?And as well ,Since youre the defender of hunters who have been fortunate enough to harvest bucks,bulls and lopes over the magic # mark lets see youre 200" buck ,youre 400" bull and youre 80" antelope .I by no meens can put up when it comes to these accomplishments after 20 plus years in the feild .But, by youre tone ,you can .WELL?
 
>LAST EDITED ON Nov-12-07
>AT 04:45?PM (MST)

>
>Shed freak ,I am with you
>that this buck is not
>as big as posted.I am
>just really curious how you
>got so good at scoring
>,that you can score to
>an 1/8 of an inch
>from a photo .I personally
>have harvested my share of
>bucks ,All archery ,I have
>never even came close when
>feild judging let alone from
>a 2 dimensional picture .Whats
>youre secret?And as well ,Since
>youre the defender of hunters
>who have been fortunate enough
>to harvest bucks,bulls and lopes
>over the magic # mark
>lets see youre 200" buck
>,youre 400" bull and youre
>80" antelope .I by no
>meens can put up when
>it comes to these accomplishments
>after 20 plus years in
>the feild .But, by youre
>tone ,you can .WELL?


Trying to get withing an 1/8" on a field photo is about as rediculous as calling that deer 212"!

Internet fighting is kind of like running a race in the special olympics, you might win but your still retarted.

Drum


dan-henderson_wanderlei-silva.gif
 
I was going to stay out of this one but there is something to be said about an honest post, having said that; It's a shame that a decent buck, NOT a pig, would have to be brought under scrutiny by posting a bogus score. My advice, post your deer for the simple reason of sharing them with guys that like deer. If you're tempted to post a score then post an honest score. This thread would have been totally different had you just posted it saying something like ?Nice NM 3X4? or ?175 NM 3X4? etc.

Son
 
huntsonora, your a bad @$$ dude. Finally someone with some brains in this forum. Perhaps some time we could get together, have a beer and discuss true 200" deer. Thanks for the support and I look forward to hearing from you. As for you drum, I may not have a 200" deer, or a 400" bull or even an 80" speed goat but I sure as he** know one when I see one. I never said I was within an 1/8 of an inch in the first place. Turns out your about as good at reading as you are at field judging. Good luck with your special olympics.



timberline_shedfreak24
 
Same for you son of the south, its nice to see that someone knows what they're talkin about on here.


timberline_shedfreak24
 
***as for you fldrw22 I may not have a 200" deer, or a 400" bull or even an 80" speed goat but I sure as he** know one when I see one. I never said I was within an 1/8 of an inch in the first place. Turns out your about as good at reading as you are at field judging. Good luck with your special olympics.

timberline_shedfreak24
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-12-07 AT 11:22PM (MST)[p]Back to what really matter guys, thats a beautiful buck that not many people would pass up.

Congrats again on a fine trophy REGARDLESS of score!

Drum
 
I dont know were to start with this post, I singled you out because you were the first one to respond after my post saying that people were blowing up scores on this site, witch I assumed you were refering to me inperticular maybe i was wrong, but ether way here we are.

Secondly, you question my scoreing capabiltys and point out two areas inperticular, the inside spread and mass, but you failed to see that BOTH you and me gave the buck the same scores in those areas. Maybe you should check your facts next time. (accually maybe you didnt know this but if a deer is only a 3 point and dose not fork, you have to take the length of the tine and divide it in half and then take your mass measurment there, note: I only gave the buck 3"s on his G2 mass measurment where you gave him 4...thats ok though not alot of people know that, its ok.)

You then point out how I miss judged my buck I killed this year spread by 4 inchs, well I did miss judge him and he is only 25"s wide not 27-28 like I thought, you got me there.....Darn it.

I also read the artical you did and agree with it totally, but I have yet to strech the tape on any of my deer that I have held in my hands, as my post about my buck shows.

Do I know for a fact that this buck is as big as they say it is, no I dont, I can merely just speculate I very well could be wrong, that being said when a guy comes on here and says that an offical scorer scored it twice, and he seems like a good guy and defends what he says the way AZJIMMY has then I will belive him.

If I unfairly singled you out and hurt your feelings I'm sorry, I hope we can all be friends. :)




Jake H. MM Member since 1999.
458738e374dfcb10.jpg
 
"huntsonora, your a bad @$$ dude. Finally someone with some brains in this forum. Perhaps some time we could get together, have a beer and discuss true 200" deer. Thanks for the support and I look forward to hearing from you. As for you drum, I may not have a 200" deer, or a 400" bull or even an 80" speed goat but I sure as he** know one when I see one. I never said I was within an 1/8 of an inch in the first place. Turns out your about as good at reading as you are at field judging. Good luck with your special olympics.

timberline_shedfreak2"


Hey timber, I think they are the same guy. . .
 
> "huntsonora, your a bad @$$
>dude. Finally someone with some
>brains in this forum. Perhaps
>some time we could get
>together, have a beer and
>discuss true 200" deer. Thanks
>for the support and I
>look forward to hearing from
>you. As for you drum,
>I may not have a
>200" deer, or a 400"
>bull or even an 80"
>speed goat but I sure
>as he** know one when
>I see one. I never
>said I was within an
>1/8 of an inch in
>the first place. Turns out
>your about as good at
>reading as you are at
>field judging. Good luck with
>your special olympics.
>
>timberline_shedfreak2"
>
>
>Hey timber, I think they are
>the same guy. . .
>

Thanks T! I didnt have the heart to tell him! LMAO! I guess he has a love/hate relationship with me....

Drum


dan-henderson_wanderlei-silva.gif
 
"Internet fighting is kind of like running a race in the special olympics, you might win but your still retarted."
Drum

LMAO
Drum, I know this but it can be entertaining at times.:)

ILiKe FrEncH fRYs.....




Jake H. MM Member since 1999.
458738e374dfcb10.jpg
 
Jake, I dont know whether your serious or not with the whole friends thing but I simply can't be friends with someone that questions my scoring ability, and I wouldnt blame you if you feel the same way. I simply just atated my opiion, I dont think the deer is 212. I cant just let another post go by without anyone saying anything. Its not fair to the people I mentioned earlier. What is truly sad is that this post got all this attention becauase it was mistakenly labeled 212 monster, not because it was in fact a NM 3X4 or some other, more valid thread, but like I said before, congrats to the hunter, and regardless another MM has fallen, thast what's really important. I'm sorry if I have offended anyone, and please go look at the NON NM PIG, posted by son, that truly deserves some attention.


Timberline_shed
 
LAST EDITED ON Nov-25-07 AT 06:27PM (MST)[p]>>I was asked by the taker
>>of the buck to not
>>reply anymore on the link.
>> But I can't let
>>people take jabs, when they
>>can't back it up.
>>It's because of people (not
>>all) that have replied on
>>this post that bit by
>>bit, keep people from posting
>>things at all. I'm
>>sorry for even putting this
>>picture up. I know
>>I love to see pics
>>and stories so I try
>>to do the same.
>>Sometimes, I may not always
>>aggree, but I don't call
>>BS on something that I
>>can't BACKUP!!!!!
>>
>>Have you ever taken a pic,
>>that just doesn't do justice,
>>doesn't show a deer for
>>what he's worth? Maybe
>>a little tough to guage
>>from a picture, or wait,
>>I forgot, we're all film
>>editors on this site...
>>
>>I didn't shoot this deer, and
>>wasn't there for the scoring.
>> this was a good
>>family friend. A family
>>that has taken their fair
>>share of monster muleys in
>>Northern Arizona, to Southern Utah,
>>to New Mexico. I
>>have a 212 4/8" (pictured
>>below)on my wall that like
>>the one above was scored
>>by an OFFICIAL scorer.
>>Are you going to tell
>>me that he isn't 212"
>>either? Although the deer
>>above is about 4 inches
>>wider, longer main beams,longer G2's
>>which makes up for missing
>>4th on the one side.
>> The trash on the
>>base makes up for the
>>trash on mine below.
>>you know what...doesn't matter, I
>>know a good buck and
>>I know myself and friend
>>have the experience and accomplishments
>>in hunting to not have
>>to "BS" a score.
>>I've scored numerous deer myself,
>>but what do I know
>>right...anyway, again, sorry for posting
>>the pics, maybe we can
>>just let this die, and
>>those of you that can't
>>seem to just appreciate a
>>good deer, can move on
>>to somebodies post to flame.
>>
>>
>>It's funny how I've lived off
>>this site for 6 years,
>>and find myself coming back
>>less and less...those that don't
>>believe, keep on critisizing from
>>your lazy boy, I'm heading
>>out in the morning to
>>go bow hunting. Took
>>a 152" whitetail earlier in
>>the season (after taking a
>>170" typical muley with a
>>muzzy a week before) and
>>looking to follow up with
>>another, but I guess if
>>I say 152", he's only
>>120"....
>>
>>For those of you that appreciated,
>>thank you for the kind
>>words, and see you in
>>the woods! :)
>>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v649/jimmyaz/IMG_0026.jpg[/IMG]
>
>Yes I will tell you that
>neither one of this bucks
>is 200. On a
>side note who "officially" scores
>your bucks because I want
>to take my pickup bed
>full of 165-180 class bucks
>and have them magically turned
>into 200 bucks.
nm
 
Yes I will tell you that neither one of this bucks is 200. On a side note who "officially" scores your bucks because I want to take my pickup bed full of 165-180 class bucks and have them magically turned into 200 bucks.
 
>No way this thing is 212"!!!!
>

You have got to be kidding me! Dude, this has been dead, FINALLY, for 2 or 3 weeks! Why bring it to the top? Great buck that 98% of hunters would shoot regardless of score.

Drum


dan-henderson_wanderlei-silva.gif
 
>I'm with everyone else here.
>That's a very fine deer, but
>if he goes 212" i'll
>eat you hat.
>
>I can't even see an honest
>170" there, he's missing WAY
>too much!
>
>
>
>
> Skull Krazy
>"No Bones About It"

Be careful, Looks like someone else has taken a bite outa that gentelmans hat.. Put your tapes away and enjoy the critter.
 
LAST EDITED ON Mar-03-08 AT 00:52AM (MST)[p]What a great buck!

"I simply can't be friends with someone that questions my scoring ability" limberpine-douchbag24 What a homo!
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom