For or Against?

W

WRJ

Guest
With all the discussions here on MM about the Board's decision. I am just curious how many are for it and how many are against it.
Are you For or Against the board's decision?

Please just reply with a For or Against. This will make it easier for all of us to see where the MM members stand.
 
LAST EDITED ON Dec-08-10 AT 09:43PM (MST)[p]Against + 28 family members +17 friends
 
For it..

4aec49a65c565954.jpg
 
For. But it doesnt matter the deer in this state would have been, and are DOOMED with any option, no option, or their current mule deer plan.
 
Against it , fyi, it's 13,000 less buck tags which equals about 3,000 bucks a year. You won't notice a difference.

Tony Abbott
www.myfreehunts.com
The next buck to have a fawn will be the
1st.
 
Against.

Post this same thread in five years and it will be 99% against.
 
The hunting is still going to be marginal in Utah at best so why everyone is debating about Utah I will be hunting big bucks in Colorado.
 
FOR. Atleast they seem to be trying to do something! (I wonder if alot of the against just don't trust DOW and would be against any proposal they had)
 
LAST EDITED ON Dec-11-10 AT 09:45PM (MST)[p]

for, current system is not working. time for a change
 
I am for fixing the deer herd. Can any of you that are for the change that took place explain to me how this will fix the deer herd?

Tony Abbott
www.myfreehunts.com
The next buck to have a fawn will be the
1st.
 
Tell me first how Option #1 was gonna fix the deer problem? Then I will tell you option #2 won't fix it, but anything that will help I am for
 
Option 1 would not fix it either. That has been my point all along. All you guys are for is kicking 13,000 hunters out and costing the DWR and this state millions in revenue.

Let's fix the problem, we need more does and fawns not bucks.

Tony Abbott
www.myfreehunts.com
The next buck to have a fawn will be the
1st.
 
Tony
See that is where I am against you. We need more does, fawns, AND BUCKS. These numbers the dwr spewed out for deer numbers are so unrealistic. I don't know of a good way to count deer/elk, but I will tell you their system is not working and at least in the region I spend most of my time in....our habitat WILL sustain way more deer as it has done so in the past and the habitat has not got any worse. Until we know REALISTIC deer numbers....REALISTIC BUCK/DOE ratios there is no system that is going to work.
 
>Against, along with 4 family members
>and 8-10 coworkers.


for along with my dog and a bird in my backyard
 
I'm against the plan, if that is all they do. It won't help the deer herd numbers. They need to do a few things to make a difference.

I'm for the change, if they manage better with the 29 units.

Time will tell.
 
For, if the manage the units differently, primitive weapons, 3 point or better, early hunts, etc.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom