T
TheElitehornhunter
Guest
LAST EDITED ON Dec-14-11 AT 05:12PM (MST)[p]Who here is in favor of seeing tags taken from SFW and letting new groups like UWC having an equal share?
There is no reason SFW should get the majority of the Conservation tags. They use these tags to operate their business so if UWC wanted to compete with SFW they would need their share of conservation tags, therefore; SFW would need to share part of the pie because there are more groups coming to the table. I believe UWC should lobby to get part of the SFW tags because they don't have any ownership over these tags. Just saying I don't know how you can lose that argument. Then all hunters are represented equally If each group can use the money how they see fit.
UWC could also be incharge of the 200 Hunting Expo tags every other year because SFW doesn't have a contract that these tags can only be given to them.
There is no reason why SFW cannot make up for their lost revenue by doing other fundraising projects like other non-profit organizations do.
There is no reason SFW should get the majority of the Conservation tags. They use these tags to operate their business so if UWC wanted to compete with SFW they would need their share of conservation tags, therefore; SFW would need to share part of the pie because there are more groups coming to the table. I believe UWC should lobby to get part of the SFW tags because they don't have any ownership over these tags. Just saying I don't know how you can lose that argument. Then all hunters are represented equally If each group can use the money how they see fit.
UWC could also be incharge of the 200 Hunting Expo tags every other year because SFW doesn't have a contract that these tags can only be given to them.
There is no reason why SFW cannot make up for their lost revenue by doing other fundraising projects like other non-profit organizations do.