180 gr interbonds

buckshot

Active Member
Messages
382
LAST EDITED ON Jun-10-05 AT 04:24AM (MST)[p]Has anyone tried Hornady interbonds or the other manufactures copy of the swift sirocco?
 
The Hornady InterBond is an outstanding round and so is Nosler's AccuBond, which is more aerodynamic. I.E. 30 caliber 180-gr. AccuBond has a BC of .509 versus .480, enabling more downrange energy on target.

Moreover, a Nosler Technician recently reported that in comparison to the InterBond, the AccuBond not only expands more than the InterBond (providing more shock), it also penetrates more by shedding shrapnel along the way to the point where the slightly smaller bullet actually penetrates more than the larger mushroom on the InterBond.

Average AccuBond retained weight is confirmed at about 66% and Hornady claims the InterBond averages around 92% - 94% with results from hunters reported at around 85%.

The AccuBond's design took 4 1/2 years in the making.

I like this bullet because it provides excellent expansion and its unique ability to slowly shed weight enables it to penetrate more than the competition, so you get the best of both worlds.

With that said, both bullets holdup and penetrate better than their Swift counterpart; I wouldn't feel inferior with using either one on Big Game.

Steve
 
325-sequences.gif


accubondcut.jpg


http://www.nosler.com/accubond.html
 
So lets say at 3000 FPS. What does the Nosler give me in inches, energy and FPS at 300 and 500 yards? Let me see if I can find a ballistic calculator.

Nope I couldn't find a program working could you calculate it for me?

Thanks in advance
 
If you go to the Federal Web Site, they have an interactive ballistics table that is fantastic. You can get all the info on Accubond bullets on any round.
 
Buckshot:

Penetration

An 180-gr. AccuBond traveling at 3,000 fps MV should penetrate between 16" - 18" depending on what material it hits. This is according to Nosler's tests, which use a special mix of gluey elastic-like sticky substance that simulates an animal's muscles and internal organs. This substance is much much tougher than gelatin, which AccuBonds regularly penetrate over 20" in!

Velocity & Energy

According to a Calculator on www.Handloads.com , a 180-gr. AccuBond (in Utah at 4,500' above sea level) starting at 3,000 fps MV would be traveling 2,567 fps at 300 yards with a whopping 2,633 ft. lbs of energy! This basically means at 300 yards your round would have about the same hammer-effect as a .308 Win at the muzzle. The BC of an 180-gr. AccuBond is ".509".

500 yard velocity would be 2,258 fps and the bullet's energy would still be fairly high at 2,258 ft. lbs.

FYI - The Calculator also says 3,000 fps MV of the AccuBond would still have 1,502 ft. lbs of retained energy at 790 yards! Note: Winchester's and Federal's 2005 Ammo Catalogs have similar figures to those of the Calculator.

325-sequences.gif
 
I used the 7mm 154gr. Interbond on Gemsbok, Kudu, Zebra, Springbok and Hartebeest and was satisfied with the performance of the design. I only recovered a slug from the Gemsbok and it had a nice mushroom shape and no seperation. All shots were under 150 yards. My only beef with the manufacture is a differance of .005" with the ogive of the bullet. About 25 bullets in my box of 100 had this variation. This didn't make a big problem, but you'd think Hornady would control this aspect better.
That Nosler tech. sounds like he's putting a positive spin on the expectation that their bullet will break up and send pieces of lead and copper everywhere.
 
I shot a bull moose last season with 180 grn Interbonds at 167 yards. They had a muzzle velocity of 3450 fps. Both bullets literally hit the same hole and I recovered them in the opposite shoulder side by side. I think their retained weight was around 60%. It took a lot of loads, powder and work to get a group I was satisfied with. If I draw an elk license this year, I'm going to try some Accubonds to see if I can tighten my group up at all. By the way, the BC of each is miniscule if you're talking field performance. According to my ballistics software, for my load and elevation, there is only a difference of 36 fps at 450 yards. I'l let you figure the difference in foot pounds of energy as it's insignificant.
 
I agree!

Not much difference in the field between the 'Bonds - that is InterBond and AccuBonds.

325-sequences.gif
 
LAST EDITED ON Jun-16-05 AT 04:20AM (MST)[p]Thanks everyone for your reponses. Still working up a load. But some how or maybe it was over time but my leupold has gone south on me. Just shiped it back. I hope its the scope and not the gun. Last year it shot fine this year it won't shoot anything factory or handload even the factory I have been useing for years.

Thanks
buckshot.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom