Low information voters. LMMFAO
you're funny grizzly....so much smarter too...
a whole different level than us hicks....
Hey Elk you ever skin a Griz ?Hey grizzly?
Is that why 440 would F'N Argue with Himself?
Hey Elk you ever skin a Griz ?
I tried to read the attachment. I'm too stoopid to understand how anyone could take it seriously. Lead author's credentials are that he is from world famous Hunter College?(PDF) The Cognitive and Emotional Sources of Trump Support: The Case of Low-Information Voters
PDF | This article provides empirical evidence for the hypothesis that Donald Trump distinctively attracted unprecedented levels of support from... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGatewww.researchgate.net
It can be explained to you, but it can't be learned for you.
Griz is a Shifty sort of guy ?I'm still laughing. The new wizard of smarts is trying to dazzle us with his liberal non sense. You and LeBron have plenty in common
Prove it LeBron!
What ever Greta ?
Grizzly, you are in the minority for wanting Trump to escalate a war with Iran. Since the majority of Americans disagree with you on that point that makes your opinion almost worthless.
You just have a severe case of TDS and you do not have big enough brass ones to just admit it and try to justify your opinion with out right B.S.
RELH
I do feel like with regards to Iran you are leaving out the fact we did blow up their top ranked general, and arguably the 2nd or 3rd most powerful person in the country.
I have an MBA for what it is worth.
Talk about weak. Did you get that info from Yahoo or Msnbc?
He was probably #2, but that's not the point. The response is the point.
It's probably not a good idea to attack a military leader from another country if you're not ready to respond to the fallout. It makes us weak, by Trump's own words. That's why he tweeted we had 52 targets ready to strike if they reciprocated and when they did, he packed it in and said nobody was injured... which we now know was another lie.
You didn't answer my question - Has an American President ever NOT responded with military might when a foreign enemy government launched a direct military strike against our troops? Especially at night, aimed at our barracks in an attempt to do the most damage possible? If it wasn't for our early warning system we'd likely have hundreds of American Soldiers killed. And then what? Do we then get into war with Iran? If not, what was our plan when we killed their General? Did Trump always intend to throw the first punch, get kicked in the teeth, and then surrender while declaring victory by lying to the American people? Trump just started a fight he wasn't prepared to finish. IDIOTIC AND WEAK!
Lead author's credentials are that he is from world famous Hunter College?
I sure hope them dummies get riled up again.
Grizz, To be clear I was mocking the article you linked. Doesn't make for a very strong argument.
Benghazi for $500 grizz.
Nobody has answered if a President has ever failed to defend our troops from attack by a foreign government besides Trump. Anybody?
Whomever you want. I don't even know who I'm voting for. Just don't be the statistically accurate uninformed Trump voter.Thanks for clearing that up. Just to make sure I gets it right, who should I vote for?
USS Liberty. What do I win?
Grizzly just like most TDS persons, you like to leave some facts out in order to make your point sound more devastation. Those concussion injuries were not reported until several days later.
Trump gave his comment on "no injuries" within hours of the missile strike.
As for not striking back, smart move on Trump's part based on majority opinion just before a major election. After he wins his election, I think he will strike Iran in order to destroy their ability to make nukes. I would not be surprised if Israel will also be involved in the strike and the Saudis will give their blessing.
He is still a far better president then Hillary would ever have been, and the Democrat candidates today can not hold a candle to Trump for the betterment of this country.
RELH
Some people who were involved disagree. And Israel paid for some reason. Just admit I'm right.Whomever you want. I don't even know who I'm voting for. Just don't be the statistically accurate uninformed Trump voter.
Haha. The ship mistakenly attacked by our ally, Israel, when they thought it was an Egyptian ship during the Six Day War, of which we weren't even involved. Israel quickly apologized. This is much more akin to Iran shooting down the passenger aircraft two weeks ago then the attack on our troops.
Anybody else? Serious question, because I don't know of any President that has done what Trump just did.
And some people think we didn't land on the moon. And some people think Bush brought down the Twin Towers to start a war so his friends could get rich.Some people who were involved disagree. And Israel paid for some reason. Just admit I'm right.
Mainly in academia. The esteemed Hunter College probably has classes where you learn about such things.And some people think we didn't land on the moon. And some people think Bush brought down the Twin Towers to start a war so his friends could get rich.
...the longer you're in college....the longer liberal professors have to mold the weak minds.....to convince them they are the smartest...
I will accept this as your admission that I was right. But again to clear things up for you, I was mocking the "study" you linked and academia in general. You should refresh the link so people can judge for themselves.Even Bluehair has made the argument that better colleges make more qualified individuals
Taking this from a different perspective, you could argue our embassy was under attack and the missiles launch at the general were a retaliation to us being attacked. I dont think the event can be viewed in a vacuum.
Hillary/Obama were wrong and weak and it shouldn't have happened. See, that's an honest answer. There's no politics there. The dishonest ones are the ones that bring up Benghazi (which was a militia attack, hugely different) and sit idly by while our President starts a fight with another country and allows our soldiers to be bombed while he lies to the American people to give cover for the fact he won't finish the fight he started.
Nobody has answered if a President has ever failed to defend our troops from attack by a foreign government besides Trump. Anybody?
Does that apply to Roberts, Alito, Ginsberg, Kavanaugh, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kennedy, Trump, Bush, Warren, Obama, etc...?
They're all Ivy League Graduates.
Or maybe it's because leaders of both political persuasions went to good schools because they really are smarter than most. Even Bluehair has made the argument that better colleges make more qualified individuals.
But without thinking it through, YBO jumps all over the promotion of ignorance and lack of education. He probably regrets starting this thread, especially since the entire premise was name calling and attacking those with whom he disagrees.
yes....stoney bet nemont $2500 that Trump would reverse Bears ears NMAbout a year ago some poster came over to the political forum and made a bet with one of regulars. I believe the nrw poster lost the bet and welched on it. Anyone remember the details?
I've got stuff to do tonight. You guys keep arguing and I'll check back another time.
Grizzly- let's cut through the BS. How about $300 that Trump will have enough ignorant hicks to beat all comers? I need to replace the last liberal moron that ran off after our bet.
^^^ And that, folks, is the true definition of Trump Derangement Syndrome! When Trump says he could shoot a person on 5th Avenue and his supporters will still vote for him, he's describing the true TDS! An honest person wouldn't vote for a person regardless of their actions, they'd vote for them because of their actions.
It sounds like you are saying THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS (when it comes to Trump)...
Is that correct DW?
Don't tell that to Trey Gowdy, Jason Chaffetz, or US Atty John Huber... all of which led investigations into Clinton's and found no evidence of wrongdoing. Of course, this is while over a dozen Trump compatriots have been convicted or pled guilty to federal crimes.I will say this, my personal feeling is that far more Democrats will be found dirty then Republicans.
I base that on recent findings for the past 10 years of dirty ones caught and others which had strong suspicion but not indicted.
Don't tell that to Trey Gowdy, Jason Chaffetz, or US Atty John Huber... all of which led investigations into Clinton's and found no evidence of wrongdoing. Of course, this is while over a dozen Trump compatriots have been convicted or pled guilty to federal crimes.
But don't let facts get in the way of your TDS!
Unfortunately my candidate dropped out in December (Tulsi Gabbard) so I am now left with (crooks, fanatics, snakes,etc....). Will have to see when the dust begins to settle in the next 6-9 months. Might have to write in...
Care to tell us what the crimes were and when they were committed? Tough to convict somebody when all the witnesses suspiciously die.
Clinton body count - Conservapedia
www.conservapedia.com
Grizzly there you go again and fail to tell both sides of the story. There was a massive coverup on Hillary and her foundation by the Obama adminstration and the FBI led by the liar himself, James Comey. They allowed Hillary to destroy thousands of emails and texts and did not arrest her for obstruction of Justice after she destroyed those emails that had been under subpoena to turn in.
You protecting crooks like Hillary, Biden tells us a lot about your morals and where you fit into society.
RELH
lmao....I know who he is....there are republican never Trumpers like you all over....THEY are part of the swamp.
You look down your nose at us like them...be proud
Wrong. Kupperman, for example, ignored his subpoena. He then went to court and the House withdrew it (after he already had failed to appear) as they decided to not wait for courts that could drag out until summer... such as the cases going before SCOTUS. This is what Trump wanted as he wanted the impeachment expedited.none of these witnesses were subpoena'd by the house Sam......
that's the way it works grizz.....are you denying the legitimacy of privilege???Wrong. Kupperman, for example, ignored his subpoena. He then went to court and the House withdrew it (after he already had failed to appear) as they decided to not wait for courts that could drag out until summer... such as the cases going before SCOTUS. This is what Trump wanted as he wanted the impeachment expedited.
none of these witnesses were subpoena'd by the house Sam......