A real spike unit trophy

ridgetops

Very Active Member
Messages
2,692
Here's a bull that has the makings of a great spike unit trophy, as long as he doesn't branch out on that dropper / spike side.
Hopefully I'll run across him this October since he's actually on an any bull unit.
HUNT0100 - Copy.JPG
 
A “spike bull” means a bull elk which has at least
one antler beam with no branching above the ears. Branched means a projection on an antler longer than one inch, measured from its base to its tip (R657-5-

As of right now there are two antlers longer then one inch above the base.

Not a Spike
 
A “spike bull” means a bull elk which has at least
one antler beam with no branching above the ears. Branched means a projection on an antler longer than one inch, measured from its base to its tip (R657-5-

As of right now there are two antlers longer then one inch above the base.

Not a Spike

You are correct that one antler beam has two antlers branching above the ears that are longer than 1 inch. However, the other side appears to not have that. Meaning…spike bull under Utah definition.

Everyone is correct that you have to wait and see what that back end on the left side does, but it’s got a shot.
 
So the brow tine is not considered a projected antler branched off the main bean measured from the base to its tip??

Could be wrong but that’s how I’m reading it...
 
So the brow tine is not considered a projected antler branched off the main bean measured from the base to its tip??

Could be wrong but that’s how I’m reading it...
I tend to agree with you because broken bulls get shot when they really shouldn’t. I passed a last day general muzzleloader bull a couple years ago that was broken just above the eye guard. He would have been within the rules but knowing he would be a solid 330 bull had he not broke, I let him walk.
I personally wish they’d change it to a legal spike having no browtines.
 
I got a great idea how about just do away with spike hunting period...pretty simple

That bull that ridgetops has camera is legal on a spike unit he's a young bull I'll bet he forks though and I'll bet he has great potential to be a big bull in another 2 to 3 years....
 
Brow tines branch below the ear.

The bull above would be considered a " Legal spike" under Utah rules at the time of the picture.

Moral of the story: Know the rules.
Is that the Moral of the story Mr Richard Head...

Some people show their true colors on here for sure...
 
Is that the Moral of the story Mr Richard Head...

Some people show their true colors on here for sure...
LOL. Why go to insults? That speaks Volumes of your character or lack there of.

I know the rules and would kill that bull given the chance.

You, Not so much. So ya, knowing the rules matter.
 
A “spike bull” means a bull elk which has at least
one antler beam with no branching above the ears. Branched means a projection on an antler longer than one inch, measured from its base to its tip (R657-5-

As of right now there are two antlers longer then one inch above the base.

Not a Spike
See any branching of his left antler above the ear there bud?
 
Ba
A “spike bull” means a bull elk which has at least
one antler beam with no branching above the ears. Branched means a projection on an antler longer than one inch, measured from its base to its tip (R657-5-

As of right now there are two antlers longer then one inch above the base.

Not a
I hope I get this right what they are meaning There are two bases when scoring.
one is the overall beam length which is from the base of the Burr to the back end of the antler.
Now when you’re measuring your G1 G2 G3 etc. the main beam is the base of that horn if that makes sense and that’s what they are referring too..


 
Last edited:
So the brow tine is not considered a projected antler branched off the main bean measured from the base to its tip??

Could be wrong but that’s how I’m reading it...

Yes, you are wrong. The branch has to be above the ear to count. Utah's spike definition is kind of silly, if you ask me, but it is still the definition.
 
Aren’t the entire antlers above the ears, as in, higher on the head than the attachement of the ears? I could see if it said “above the tips of the ears when held vertically” or something more precise. that is one weird definition (using ears to define antlers) and one risky/expensive mistake if wrong.

Granted, I am not from Utah, I am not a lawyer and this does not constitute legal advise……so this is ultimately worth SQUAT.
 
Aren’t the entire antlers above the ears, as in, higher on the head than the attachement of the ears? I could see if it said “above the tips of the ears when held vertically” or something more precise. that is one weird definition (using ears to define antlers) and one risky/expensive mistake if wrong.

Granted, I am not from Utah, I am not a lawyer and this does not constitute legal advise……so this is ultimately worth SQUAT.
It really is simple…. Does it branch above the ear?….. that’s it. Don’t make it into something it isn’t. It’s simple for a reason.
 
It really is simple…. Does it branch above the ear?….. that’s it. Don’t make it into something it isn’t. It’s simple for a reason.

Agreed. People try to make the spike definition WAAAAY more difficult than it really is. Now, there are antler configurations that are really close calls just because of how the antler is, and there are some that should give you pause to make sure it meets the definition, but the definition is quite simple.
 
I seen this same topic on a Utah Facebook Hunting group. And somebody added a screenshot off of M&M from10 years ago from Amy. That worked for the DNR. Adding ( Above the tip of the ear ) in the definition would definitely make it clearer.

8F5E01E9-F309-408B-A6A3-3ED5B9D5FB84.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Agreed. People try to make the spike definition WAAAAY more difficult than it really is. Now, there are antler configurations that are really close calls just because of how the antler is, and there are some that should give you pause to make sure it meets the definition, but the definition is quite simple.
Maybe, legally. So 5x3 with a brow tine and dropper and probable future trophy potential gets shot. Fine. But in this day and age of limited game and max pressure, maybe the definition should actually be re-worked to describe a spike that we all know and would describe as a spike, as in, an elk (typically a yearling) with unbranched antlers. Hows that for a simple, accurate, and agreeable definition.

In the meantime, maybe call them Loophole Units.
 
Adding ( Above the tip of the ear ) in the definition would definitely make it clearer.

View attachment 49581

The “ear” encompasses the entire ear, including the tip. I personally don’t think that makes it any more clear. Like I said, we try way too hard to make this difficult when the definition is really quite simple.

And Katoom, yes, the definition allows for something that YOU think is not a traditional spike to be shot as a spike. I think many that helped craft the definition the way it is would argue with you that the 5x3 you described had “future trophy potential” and would love to see that bull out of the gene pool. For me…I really don’t have an opinion on what the definition SHOULD be, I’m simply commenting about what the definition currently IS.

If the state redefined it to be as you described, I’d follow that rule the same as I would follow this one when I hunted spikes. A “spike bull” for lawful hunting purposes is simply what the state defines as a spike. Not what we think it SHOULD be.
 
Aren’t the entire antlers above the ears, as in, higher on the head than the attachement of the ears? I could see if it said “above the tips of the ears when held vertically” or something more precise. that is one weird definition (using ears to define antlers) and one risky/expensive mistake if wrong.

Granted, I am not from Utah, I am not a lawyer and this does not constitute legal advise……so this is ultimately worth SQUAT.
Some people say it’s clear and easy to read and understand. We’ll It all depends on who’s reading it. As to Katoom’s point in this picture it appears to me that all the antlers are above the ears. So it all depends on how you look at. Be it right or wrong definitely makes for a lively discussion.?

211C82A6-5E75-4B45-9DEA-69328B394514.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Some people say it’s clear and easy to read and understand. We’ll It all depends on who’s reading it. As to Katoom’s point in this picture it appears to me that all the antlers are above the ears. So it all depends on how you look at. Be it right or wrong definitely makes for a lively discussion.?

View attachment 49590
pull those ears up to the antler beam and the brow tines on both sides with be under the tip of the ear.
 
The DWR can’t go no eye guards, equal a spike. I have seen a lot of yearlings that are spikes , but have a 2” eye guard. How could you possibly pick out an eye guard at 200yds on a yearling bull.
 
Bearpaw Outfitters

Experience world class hunting for mule deer, elk, cougar, bear, turkey, moose, sheep and more.

Wild West Outfitters

Hunt the big bulls, bucks, bear and cats in southern Utah. Your hunt of a lifetime awaits.

J & J Outfitters

Offering quality fair-chase hunts for trophy mule deer, elk, shiras moose and mountain lions.

Shane Scott Outfitting

Quality trophy hunting in Utah. Offering FREE Utah drawing consultation. Great local guides.

Utah Big Game Outfitters

Specializing in bighorn sheep, mule deer, elk, mountain goat, lions, bears & antelope.

Apex Outfitters

We offer experienced guides who hunt Elk, Mule Deer, Antelope, Sheep, Bison, Goats, Cougar, and Bear.

Urge 2 Hunt

We offer high quality hunts on large private ranches around the state, with landowner vouchers.

Allout Guiding & Outfitting

Offering high quality mule deer, elk, bear, cougar and bison hunts in the Book Cliffs and Henry Mtns.

Lickity Split Outfitters

General season and LE fully guided hunts for mule deer, elk, moose, antelope, lion, turkey, bear and coyotes.

Back
Top Bottom