Let's Talk Spike Hunting

I won't argue 90% of what you just stated.

I'd be tickled to kill a 300" bull every few years.
Cool, glad you folks can agree on what you want out your Utah elk hunt.

Curious though, why should everybody get what they want except elkassassin? So we manage 95% of the elk for cow, spike and immature bulls harvest and 5% for mature bulls…….. is that the idea?

I’m asking for elkassassin cuz I wouldn’t kill another elk myself unless I was starving to death but I have empathy for the hunters who love mature big game, including elk.
 
That Last Sentence?

Ya!

I've Been Preaching That For Years!

F'N Spike Hunters In Amongst LE Hunters That Took Umpteen Years To Draw!

JUDAS!

F'N!

PRIEST!

Time to bust out "management" elk hunts where your tag is good for any bull with 4 points or less on one side... start takin out those "junk bulls" as the OP says... put them at the same time as the other LE hunts and get the spike hunts out of those seasons...
 
Time to bust out "management" elk hunts where your tag is good for any bull with 4 points or less on one side... start takin out those "junk bulls" as the OP says... put them at the same time as the other LE hunts and get the spike hunts out of those seasons...
 
Time to bust out "management" elk hunts where your tag is good for any bull with 4 points or less on one side... start takin out those "junk bulls" as the OP says... put them at the same time as the other LE hunts and get the spike hunts out of those seasons...
Why not just increase archery tags?
 
Cool, glad you folks can agree on what you want out your Utah elk hunt.

Curious though, why should everybody get what they want except elkassassin? So we manage 95% of the elk for cow, spike and immature bulls harvest and 5% for mature bulls…….. is that the idea?

I’m asking for elkassassin cuz I wouldn’t kill another elk myself unless I was starving to death but I have empathy for the hunters who love mature big game, including elk.
I believe a lot of us want the fun we had hunting, seeing, guiding, profiting from and helping friends and families kill the monster bulls that seemed endless back in the early 2000's, but that's long gone.

Those days have ruined many of today's hunters and Outfitters into thinking what we have now and hope to achieve in the near future isn't good enough.

We simply cannot manage for 380" bulls and sustain healthy herds.

Can anyone even fathom how many bulls it would take to achieve enough 380" bulls to apeaz 50% of LE Elk hunters who desire a once in a lifetime bull?

Maybe 1 in 10 bulls would have genetics to reach 380" but you want at least 50 or more bulls that size to choose from?

A unit would have to have literally hundreds of 7-9 year old bulls and 3x that many to replace and sustain the 50 "Trophies" for upcoming seasons.

Now figure how many cows would be needed.
Carrying Capacity?
Cut tags, lose opportunity, grow age class and worsen point creep?

Spikes don't automatically create 380" bulls, rare genetics do, and we can't hand pick those.

I'm all for more LE tags which in turn will lower top end quality even further, but we've got to be realistic in our expectations and just be grateful we live in a state that has such great elk hunting opportunities all around.
 
Last edited:
I believe a lot of us want the fun we had hunting, seeing, guiding, profiting from and helping friends and families kill the monster bulls that seemed endless back in the early 2000's, but that's long gone.

Those days have ruined many of today's hunters and Outfitters into thinking what we have now and hope to achieve in the near future isn't good enough.

We simply cannot manage for 380" bulls and sustain healthy herds.

Can anyone even fathom how many bulls it would take to achieve enough 380" bulls to apeaz 50% of LE Elk hunters who desire a once in a lifetime bull?

Maybe 1 in 10 bulls would have genetics to reach 380" but you want at least 50 or more bulls that size to choose from?

A unit would have to have literally hundreds of 7-9 year old bulls and 3x that many to replace and sustain the 50 "Trophies" for upcoming seasons.

Now figure how many cows would be needed.
Carrying Capacity?

Spikes don't automatically create 380" bulls, rare genetics do, and we can't hand pick those.

I'm all for more LE tags which in turn will lower top end quality even further, but we've got to be realistic in our expectations and just be grateful we live in a state that has such great elk hunting opportunities all around.
You are going to get your wish.

As others have suggested……. Enjoy it while it lasts.
 
So Slam sees a "huge" group of elk with 17 spikes on the Wasatch and now every unit has a surplus of bulls? I live in the belly button of some of the top tier elk units in the state and can say there isn't a surplus of bulls, or elk in general in the southern part of the state. Those 17 spikes are probably the only 17 from Provo Canyon to Point of the Mountain.

Carrying capacity is a non issue because we've never seen enough animals that the landscape couldn't sustain.

You live in Cedar City/Enoch area. I would not call that the belly button of trophy elk units.
Richfield yes belly button. Enoch somewhere south east of the belly button.
 
You live in Cedar City/Enoch area. I would not call that the belly button of trophy elk units.
Richfield yes belly button. Enoch somewhere south east of the belly button.
Ok fair enough. Dutton, Boulder, Beaver, Panguitch Lake, SW Desert all within an hour or less. Not sure I would consider Monroe, Fish Lake, or Pahvant anymore top tier. Regardless, I don't buy their is a surplus of bulls on any of the units mentioned.
 
You live in Cedar City/Enoch area. I would not call that the belly button of trophy elk units.
Richfield yes belly button. Enoch somewhere south east of the belly button.
Belly button is definitely not Enoch.
Richfield area, Beaver, Monroe, Fish Lake.....epicenter of elk mecca, absolutely ?%

But somehow I'm guilty of exaggeration ?

Touche!?
 
The idea that the Monroe crashed because of the Spike hunt is as big a fabricated lie as any that the Democratic party tells.
There is guys on this site knows it was predicted the Monroe trophey bull potential was going to crash long before the Spike Hunts happened. That biologists working on the Monroe unit was predicting the Monroe was going to crash within a few years, and they was predicting that crash because of the mature bull carrying capacity.
I sat through two meetings and listened to the biologist working the Monroe unit tell his information and the DWR did not want to hear what he had to say and I know guys that are on this site sat through some of them meetings.
The verry same guys on this site that are b#$%^&*! about the SFW and other conservation organizations having the EXPO and banquites, auctioning off permits for high dollars are the verry same guys b@#$%^&*! about we don't have enough 400 inch bulls.
Do you relize the EXPO and banquet auction are successful because Utah is still the easiest state in the nation to kill a Boone and Crockett caliber bull. Pepole are not coming to the EXPO auction or other banquet auctions to have a chance to get a permit to kill a 340 or less bull.
 
Time to bust out "management" elk hunts where your tag is good for any bull with 4 points or less on one side... start takin out those "junk bulls" as the OP says... put them at the same time as the other LE hunts and get the spike hunts out of those seasons...
I agree ?

My description of lesser bulls (junk) has already been explained as a facetious comment as viewed by anyone who thinks all we need are 380" bulls around every tree.
 
Curious though, why should everybody get what they want except elkassassin? So we manage 95% of the elk for cow, spike and immature bulls harvest and 5% for mature bulls…….. is that the idea?

I’m asking for elkassassin cuz I wouldn’t kill another elk myself unless I was starving to death but I have empathy for the hunters who love mature big game, including elk.

Lumpy, this is not a true statement. Whatever elk hunting experience you want, it’s available in Utah. Take your pick what you want and stick to it.
 
Belly button is definitely not Enoch.
Richfield area, Beaver, Monroe, Fish Lake.....epicenter of elk mecca, absolutely ?%

But somehow I'm guilty of exaggeration ?

Touche!?
Both Enoch and Richfield are close to elk units that have had and still could still grow thousands more cows, calves, spikes, immature and mature bulls. Take your pick, they have in the past and they can again………. The elk can but…….. “they” won’t let them. They aren’t what they once were because “they” changed the management strategies. They are doing it again.

I’ll repeat, enjoy it while you can.
 
Ok fair enough. Dutton, Boulder, Beaver, Panguitch Lake, SW Desert all within an hour or less. Not sure I would consider Monroe, Fish Lake, or Pahvant anymore top tier. Regardless, I don't buy their is a surplus of bulls on any of the units mentioned.
I wish more people would listen to you and quit putting in for the Monroe. Full of junk bulls nobody waste your points on that unit.
 
Both Enoch and Richfield are close to elk units that have had and still could still grow thousands more cows, calves, spikes, immature and mature bulls. Take your pick, they have in the past and they can again………. The elk can but…….. “they” won’t let them. They aren’t what they once were because “they” changed the management strategies. They are doing it again.

I’ll repeat, enjoy it while you can.
Don't we have more elk in Utah now then we did in the glory early 2000's?
 
Do we have "more elk" on private than public. Could that be a reason for a decline in the desired bull size. As in the elk move to private CWMU's or other private when the pressure is on so it leaves less on public
 
Belly button is definitely not Enoch.
Richfield area, Beaver, Monroe, Fish Lake.....epicenter of elk mecca, absolutely ?%

But somehow I'm guilty of exaggeration ?

Touche!?
Haha ok you can have your Fish Lake tag. I'll gladly take a Boulder, Dutton, Pang Lake tag...Monroe meh.

From what I've seen out of my Tracker window my opinion is there aren't the bulls on Boulder, Dutton, and Pang Lake that would constitute a surplus.
 
"Elk" yes, not Trophy bulls by definition.
Sorry, I don’t accept that as a fact, at least not on the Fish Lake, Monroe, Dutton, Pahvant, Beaver, Boulder, Panquitch. Not even close on the over all population nor on the number of cows, calves, spikes, immature nor matures. If you show me data that says otherwise I’ll call it pure BS.
 
1000002179.jpg

The only thing I could find was in the states management plan.
 
If the graph is correct and we are growing the herd. I think that means more elk are carrying over to the next years hunts, why are the big bulls not being produced like they once were. Was the elk herd out of whack back then and this is more normal?
 
I can't really speak on the early 2000's elk herd, just curious about it. I didn't grow up hunting elk and my 1st elk was a cow in 2010 when I was 30. I enjoy the spike hunt every year just because my family didn't hunt them them growing up.
 
Sorry, I don’t accept that as a fact, at least not on the Fish Lake, Monroe, Dutton, Pahvant, Beaver, Boulder, Panquitch. Not even close on the over all population nor on the number of cows, calves, spikes, immature nor matures. If you show me data that says otherwise I’ll call it pure BS.
Screenshot_20230110_212925_OneDrive.jpg
 
I guess you either are misreading my post or I am not explaining what I post well enough. Obviously, you are irritated because I have a different opinion.

Let me try this again since writing must not be my strong point.

1- Yes, I understand that cows do have calves.
2- I am not saying to eliminate the shooting of spikes. What I am saying is eliminate spike only units and increase the open bull tags. Of course there will be less tags overall (as opposed to the spike tags) but there will be an increase in any bull tags. In my opinion, there would be a very large increase.
3- Do you believe that by doing this all elk units would be over maximum carrying capacity?

Does Arizona, Nevada, and Wyoming need spike only units?
Woodruff I see your point but we have 17,000 spike Hunters that we get thrown into that pool I like keeping them separate and out of the way. Imo
 
@2lumpy

I'm sure with a little digging, we could find unit by unit trends.

Some are down like Book Cliffs I'm sure, but the statewide elk numbers are rising annually.
 
Yes you certainly did ?
And I have done my digging Slammy. And it’s not in the pages of Utah’s big game reports. I’ve lived on the Monroe, for over 47 years, 5 miles from the Pahvant, 6 miles from the Fish Lake, I’ve owned a cabin at Fish Lake for 23 years, I’m 31 miles from the Beaver and 23 miles from the Boulder. I’m 51 miles from the Dutton. I’ve followed these elk for 45 years. You want to accept populations by trends? I can give trends on ever one of these units, both when they went from next to none, up to thousands and back down to what they are and why.

Believe what you want………. I couldn’t convince you, if i showed you videos of these herds…….. lol

Like I’ve said, this is the third time tonight.

Enjoy it while you can.
 
To say the Boulder isn’t producing the bulls it used to is laughable a 420 bull was killed opening day of the muzzy. Lots of great bulls were killed on the unit this year. A killer monsoon season made the elks bodies healthy. We are in the midst of one of the best water years right now and if we have another good monsoon season look the heck out cause this year it’s going into the antler growth even more.
 
Woodruff I see your point but we have 17,000 spike Hunters that we get thrown into that pool I like keeping them separate and out of the way. Imo
I may be misreading your post. With my plan, there would not be the 17,000 spike hunters. For example - there could be 3,000 any bull hunters (I am not saying it would be 3,000, but significantly less than 17,000). Then, the numbers could be monitored year to year.

I realize that people would not hunt every year. However, I would rather have one of these tags every few years than shoot a spike. But, that is just me.

Bigwiffy had a good point. He said that he does not see the units at full carrying capacity. Although I have not been on all the units, I can speak for the Cache Unit in that I do not believe it is at full capacity. That is just my opinion.

Regardless of what happens, someone will not like it.
 
To say the Boulder isn’t producing the bulls it used to is laughable a 420 bull was killed opening day of the muzzy. Lots of great bulls were killed on the unit this year. A killer monsoon season made the elks bodies healthy. We are in the midst of one of the best water years right now and if we have another good monsoon season look the heck out cause this year it’s going into the antler growth even more.
There will always be a few big bulls on Boulder. It's thick, nasty, and bulls can get age. I would say to you it's laughable if you think there is a surplus of bulls. Because, well there's not.

Lowest density of animals in general on that unit now as I've seen in 30 years. Dutton is worse.
 
And I have done my digging Slammy. And it’s not in the pages of Utah’s big game reports. I’ve lived on the Monroe, for over 47 years, 5 miles from the Pahvant, 6 miles from the Fish Lake, I’ve owned a cabin at Fish Lake for 23 years, I’m 31 miles from the Beaver and 23 miles from the Boulder. I’m 51 miles from the Dutton. I’ve followed these elk for 45 years. You want to accept populations by trends? I can give trends on ever one of these units, both when they went from next to none, up to thousands and back down to what they are and why.

Believe what you want………. I couldn’t convince you, if i showed you videos of these herds…….. lol

Like I’ve said, this is the third time tonight.

Enjoy it while you can.
Fair enough.

It's like my observation right above my house.
17 spikes and at least 4 rags and that observation doesn't hold merit to physical counting by some reading this thread.

And data?
About 50% of the muzzleloader scope users tossed that out the window as well.

What gives ?‍♂️
 
I may be misreading your post. With my plan, there would not be the 17,000 spike hunters. For example - there could be 3,000 any bull hunters (I am not saying it would be 3,000, but significantly less than 17,000). Then, the numbers could be monitored year to year.

I realize that people would not hunt every year. However, I would rather have one of these tags every few years than shoot a spike. But, that is just me.

Bigwiffy had a good point. He said that he does not see the units at full carrying capacity. Although I have not been on all the units, I can speak for the Cache Unit in that I do not believe it is at full capacity. That is just my opinion.

Regardless of what happens, someone will not like it.
But what is "Capacity" by the ones claiming it's there?

Livestock have have massive power over wildlife.
What we physically see as unused habitat during summer may already be factored into grazing rights.

Then there's winter range Carrying Capacity on top of that which is generally smaller.

Seeing a lush meadow currently unoccupied doesn't mean it needs 25 elk standing in it.
 
"But what is "Capacity" by the ones claiming it's there?"

If I gave an answer, it would be wrong. Like I said in a previous post, it's just my opinion that the herd (at least up here) is not overabundant. I am fine saying that is pure speculation.

"Seeing a lush meadow currently unoccupied doesn't mean it needs 25 elk standing in it"

I never said that it did.

And, with the snow we are getting this year, and if it keeps going as it is, we may be at "capacity".
 
But what is "Capacity" by the ones claiming it's there?

Livestock have have massive power over wildlife.
What we physically see as unused habitat during summer may already be factored into grazing rights.

Then there's winter range Carrying Capacity on top of that which is generally smaller.

Seeing a lush meadow currently unoccupied doesn't mean it needs 25 elk standing in it.
Southern units have plenty of capacity to hold more elk than they currently are. Regardless of beef, sheep, or winter range loss. Those things don't help, but there are areas that historically have held elk, and lots of elk on the winter range and the numbers have dwindled. They've cut late antlerless tags back, but a few years too late.

If the last time you stepped foot on Dutton was with Stinkystomper you would be singing the same tune if you spent some time recently.
 
Southern units have plenty of capacity to hold more elk than they currently are. Regardless of beef, sheep, or winter range loss. Those things don't help, but there are areas that historically have held elk, and lots of elk on the winter range and the numbers have dwindled. They've cut late antlerless tags back, but a few years too late.

If the last time you stepped foot on Dutton was with Stinkystomper you would be singing the same tune if you spent some time recently.
Oh I believe you on Dutton, it's been quiet for a couple years.
I've been there plenty after his adventure, I love that mountain even when I hate it.
 
"But what is "Capacity" by the ones claiming it's there?"

If I gave an answer, it would be wrong. Like I said in a previous post, it's just my opinion that the herd (at least up here) is not overabundant. I am fine saying that is pure speculation.

"Seeing a lush meadow currently unoccupied doesn't mean it needs 25 elk standing in it"

I never said that it did.

And, with the snow we are getting this year, and if it keeps going as it is, we may be at "capacity".
I must apologize, my post wasn't necessarily pointing directly at your comments, I was referring to the Carrying Capacity and threw a little community jibber jabber for the audience ?
 
There will always be a few big bulls on Boulder. It's thick, nasty, and bulls can get age. I would say to you it's laughable if you think there is a surplus of bulls. Because, well there's not.

Lowest density of animals in general on that unit now as I've seen in 30 years. Dutton is worse.
I actually don’t think there is a huge surplus of bulls as a matter of fact they’ve killed far too many cows on that unit. I think it has a good bull to cow ratio compared to most elk units and it’s know where on its way to the population cliff the beaver is about to fall off of. There are also areas completely void of elk. I think the Boulder is a lot harder to screw up based on the thick remote country it holds. And I’m in no way a huge fan of spike hunting or cow hunting from August to the end of January. I’m all for moving the rifle hunt out of the rut and increasing archery tags to push guys through the point pool and keep low success rates.
 
Sorry, I don’t accept that as a fact, at least not on the Fish Lake, Monroe, Dutton, Pahvant, Beaver, Boulder, Panquitch. Not even close on the over all population nor on the number of cows, calves, spikes, immature nor matures. If you show me data that says otherwise I’ll call it pure BS.
I have spent a lot of time on the Fish lake over the last 5 to 10 years mostly Gooseberry and 7 mile and there is plenty of elk.
I was told by a Salina UDOT worker that last winter was the most elk hit by vehicles up I-70.
I do not believe that was from the lack of elk.
I would dare to bet there was more 400 class bulls killed off of the Manti last 3 years than any one of the units Bigwiffy stated other than the Beaver.
Just because we do not see them on MM doesn't mean they did not get killed.
 
Southern units have plenty of capacity to hold more elk than they currently are. Regardless of beef, sheep, or winter range loss. Those things don't help, but there are areas that historically have held elk, and lots of elk on the winter range and the numbers have dwindled. They've cut late antlerless tags back, but a few years too late.

If the last time you stepped foot on Dutton was with Stinkystomper you would be singing the same tune if you spent some time recently.
The Dutton has the amount if elk it should have, that unit should have never had the amount of elk that it had back in the early 2000s. We complain because we have no deer have any if you guys consider that the fact the deer population has gone down hill right along as the elk numbers increased.
During droughts like we have been in for much longer than most pepole recognized, the carrying capacity changes. It is only obvious you can not have as many feeders with less feed and water.
 
And Like Somebody Once Said:

You Will Never Satisfy All These Different Types Of Hunters!

But These F'N Elk Slaughters They Run It To January With The Cow Elk & Spike Slaughters During LE Is TOTAL BS!
 
Could the increase in the Monroe population be linked to the big Coyote depredation project they did there?
 
"the remaining 15 will be 9 year old 280-320" bulls till they die."

When the average Utah hunter rarely shoots an elk on the anybull general units, and they rarely see any deer bigger than a 2 point on the general deer hunts............When they see a 240" raghorn on their LE hunt.......most can't resist pulling the trigger. 280-320 bulls most definitely get shot at on the LE units.
 
"the remaining 15 will be 9 year old 280-320" bulls till they die."

When the average Utah hunter rarely shoots an elk on the anybull general units, and they rarely see any deer bigger than a 2 point on the general deer hunts............When they see a 240" raghorn on their LE hunt.......most can't resist pulling the trigger. 280-320 bulls most definitely get shot at on the LE units.
This is 100% true for many hunters - most couldn't differentiate a 280" bull from a 320" bull. A 300" bull is a big mature bull, no matter what anyone says. If the early 2000's of elk hunting did anything, it distorted the view of trophy hunting in our state. In order to get 380"-400" bulls you have to let a lot of bulls live to reach that size because many will NEVER reach that point. Just ask yourself this- how many Shaquille O'Neale's do you see walking around our country?

For the most part, a 400" bull is a genetic freak and to get those bulls on the landscape, you are wasting a lot of others that will never reach that size. Let's stop scoffing at 320-350" bulls-they are a great representation of the species (we now have data that proves this).
 
I'm a little perplexed with @Lumpys comments.

Not 80, in fact I'm 48. I've hunted and been the Manti since I was 4months old.

THERE WERE VERY FEW ELK. Until, Manti went LE, and.......they started hunting spikes.

That placed exploded with elk.

Yeah, it "wasn't what it was". True, but they lowered the age class intentionally, to create more LE tags, allowing them to keep it higher on the big 5, while still allowing hunting.

Notdon is 100% right on truly big bills taken off it, and neither of us probably know the totality.

So it's perplexing that a guy of Lumpy age, can look at places where there we very few elk, and very limited elk hunting, and make any case about mismanagement due to spike hunting.

I also have friends with hay fields. With hay at record prices, they don't want more elk. Manti, for one, has been in massive drought, and combined with dead zones caused by beetle kill, means "carrying capacity" isn't what it was 10-15 years ago either. And yet, the biggest unit, with the most elk on it statewide, just keeps on keeping on.

The last weekend of the rifle deer hunt I saw the usual field herds, with spikes all over them. On the MTN, one herd had over 100 elk, with screaming raghorns, and 9 spikes.

This concept of museum management that Lumpy and Bess(and a few others) keep spouting, isn't practical, nor is it biologically sound.

But since both Bess and Lumpy get to criticize using there neighborhood, then I get to use mine.

Within 10 miles of my house are more 30" bucks, more 200" bucks, than anyplace in Utah. So, I guess my personal observation means Utah is deer heaven?
 
For lumpy and Bess-

What is your ideal bull to cow ratio on these units?

Not what you think others say is best, not what you think it currently is, but what do YOU want to see? What is the ideal for your world?
 
Here We F'N Go Again!

JUDAS!

When Real Biologists Take Over & We Start Doing Some REAL Management there Won't Be Any Of This Buck To Doe Ratio/Bull To Cow Ratio BS Management!

Niller!

I've Told You a Million F'N Times!

Start Worrying About Total Numbers Of Healthy Herds!

And I Quote:

BY GAWD!

The Herd Looks Good!

We've Only Got 50 Head Left But By Damn there's 6 MOTL Bucks Within Them!

GEEZUS!

Let's Get The Numbers Up!

And Within Them Numbers!

I'm Talking Some Decent Breeding Stock Left Come Rut Time!

GFHC!



For lumpy and Bess-

What is your ideal bull to cow ratio on these units?

Not what you think others say is best, not what you think it currently is, but what do YOU want to see? What is the ideal for your world?
 
Here We F'N Go Again!

JUDAS!

When Real Biologists Take Over & We Start Doing Some REAL Management there Won't Be Any Of This Buck To Doe Ratio/Bull To Cow Ratio BS Management!

Niller!

I've Told You a Million F'N Times!

Start Worrying About Total Numbers Of Healthy Herds!

I actually agree with this, but I asked the question because this idea completely contradicts the idea of needing to let more bulls be on the landscape or letting them get bigger than 3-5 years old.

We could kill quadruple the amount of bulls we’re killing and still double the size of the herd overall. On ANY limited entry unit except the BC. So you’re for opportunity now too!

It took a while, but it’s good to have you on board Bessy! I’m crackin a cold Dew tonight to celebrate our union.
 
Last edited:
Here We F'N Go Again!

JUDAS!

When Real Biologists Take Over & We Start Doing Some REAL Management there Won't Be Any Of This Buck To Doe Ratio/Bull To Cow Ratio BS Management!

Niller!

I've Told You a Million F'N Times!

Start Worrying About Total Numbers Of Healthy Herds!

And I Quote:

BY GAWD!

The Herd Looks Good!

We've Only Got 50 Head Left But By Damn there's 6 MOTL Bucks Within Them!

GEEZUS!

Let's Get The Numbers Up!

And Within Them Numbers!

I'm Talking Some Decent Breeding Stock Left Come Rut Time!

GFHC!


Museum management.

You know, if we just quit hunting, there would be more........

Bears, cats, coyotes. Nature hates a vaccum
 
Hey Hossy:

Current Management!

How's That Treating You Just About Now?

Pretty good. I hunt, yearly, for elk. Get on elk yearly. My frame packs elk yearly.

Under your plan, Doyle's clients would. The rest of us will sit home for 4 decades.

My 17 yr old has horns on the wall. Much better than when I was his age, and elk were pretty hard to come by


As for deer. 4 years in I've yet to see YOUR video tearing up your deer tag prior to the hunt. Proving yet again, you want OTHER DUDES to not hunt to help the herds.

When your over for the expo, ask the $fw guys why they haven't "saved the mule deer", or created the "Serengeti of the West", after 3 decades and tens of millions. Then hand them some more cash, and wonder why their client base is killing it, and your still complaining
 
Last edited:
Hey Hossy?

A While Back It Seemed You Were Sayin It Wasn't All That Good?

Yes!

You Can Hunt Every Year!

I Didn't Have To tear My Tag Up This Last Year!

It Was Made Out Of Such PISS POOR Paper It Self Destructed All By Itself!

So Hossy?

The Only Legal Gambling In The State & You;d Rather See Me Go To Wendover & Leave It There?




Pretty good. I hunt, yearly, for elk. Get on elk yearly. My frame packs elk yearly.

Under your plan, Doyle's clients would. The rest of us will sit home for 4 decades.

My 17 yr old has horns on the wall. Much better than when I was his age, and elk were pretty hard to come by


As for deer. 4 years in I've yet to see YOUR video tearing up your deer tag prior to the hunt. Proving yet again, you want OTHER DUDES to not hunt to help the herds.

When your over for the expo, ask the $fw guys why they haven't "saved the mule deer", or created the "Serengeti of the West", after 3 decades and tens of millions. Then hand them some more cash, and wonder why their client base is killing it, and your still co
 
And One More Thing Hossy!

Word Finally Made It To The Basin on The 2022 Trophies You Guys Harvested!

Nice Job!

I'd Like To See The 30"ER If You Don't Mind?
 
I know this Thread is specifically about Spike Hunting, but all I read is the excessive amount of "lesser" bulls on the landscape and out of whack ratio's. I have only seen one post about a 4 point or less hunt. Is there a specific reason we cannot have a "Rag horn" hunt to go along with the spike hunt? Either add the tags or take from the Spike tags ?
 
I wouldn’t be opposed to management tags on the LE units.

The push back you’re going to get from the opposition is the same as on the spike hunt. If you’re killing them at 4 points or less, how can we possibly sell them to the highest bidder as an 400 inch bull a few years later?

(That is not MY argument, but that is what they’ll say because they are already saying it now.)
 
There are very few bulls that as a 2 year old bull will not have a 5x5 rack. This 4 point or less argument isn't going to get much traction.

They did management bull tags on the LE units about 10-15 years ago, they was 5 point or less. I can't remember the reason for shutting it down, I think they only did it for a couple years.
 
Hey Hossy?

A While Back It Seemed You Were Sayin It Wasn't All That Good?

Yes!

You Can Hunt Every Year!

I Didn't Have To tear My Tag Up This Last Year!

It Was Made Out Of Such PISS POOR Paper It Self Destructed All By Itself!

So Hossy?

The Only Legal Gambling In The State & You;d Rather See Me Go To Wendover & Leave It There?


So your not serious about a problem, as long as you get to see some nice mounts, your good?
 
And One More Thing Hossy!

Word Finally Made It To The Basin on The 2022 Trophies You Guys Harvested!

Nice Job!

I'd Like To See The 30"ER If You Don't Mind?


I've never killed one.

So we better shut down hunting because I've never killed one, obviously.

I've also never killed a 400" bull.

Now that I think about it, hunting in Utah does suck.

No 30" er and no 400 bull yearly.

And no 6ft tall blonde nympho with a dump truck backside and DD at the house. We better not have weddings anymore either?
 
There are very few bulls that as a 2 year old bull will not have a 5x5 rack. This 4 point or less argument isn't going to get much traction.

They did management bull tags on the LE units about 10-15 years ago, they was 5 point or less. I can't remember the reason for shutting it down, I think they only did it for a couple years.
An elk’s first antlers are usually spikes. In good habitat, a bull may have a 5-point rack as a 2-1/2-year-old and then a small six-point rack as a 3-1/2-year-old. Its best antlers, however, usually come at age 9-1/2 to 12-1/2, so remember that not every 6×6 is a trophy.


If this is True and as many spikes are surviving as people are saying, I fail to see where there may be opportunity here at 4 point or less. I personally dont like 5 point or less because as we all know, there can be some great 5 points that a Big Bull LE hunter would be very happy to harvest. Dont forget too, a spike is still a 4 point or less bull.
 
There are very few bulls that as a 2 year old bull will not have a 5x5 rack. This 4 point or less argument isn't going to get much traction.

They did management bull tags on the LE units about 10-15 years ago, they was 5 point or less. I can't remember the reason for shutting it down, I think they only did it for a couple years.
If my memory services me right, they removed what they wanted removed and also found many hunters were killing a broken antlered 6x6 bulls………. Image that.
 
In my mind, the middle aged bulls have the same value as a spike on an LE unit, they just have more meat for the freezer.

But, adding those bulls to the tag pool would require keeping the same number of tags as we currently have on Spikes because the harvest rates would increase significantly.
 
If my memory services me right, they removed what they wanted removed and also found many hunters were killing a broken antlered 6x6 bulls………. Image that.
Yes, hunters will definitely use those loopholes to kill a big bull, just as they do now with a mature bull having multiple points on one side, spike on the other.
 
Well!

I'll Refresh Memories!

Management Bull Hunt My Ass!

Alot Of Big Bulls Were Killed on Them Permits!

Everybody was looking For a Broke Big Bull!

And At The Time/Peak of LE Units They Tried It On, Hunters Were Finding Bulls That Qualified For A Management Bull,Even Though They Were Not Management Bulls!

The Story/BS That Bothered Me The Most was a Story Another Guy Told Me About!

A JACKASS & I'm Sure There Was More Than One,Had Shot A Trophy Bull that Wasn't Broken,He Then Took A Piece of 2" Steel Pipe & Broke One Of The Points Off To Make It a Management 5 Point,Then BRAGGED To this Guy He'd Have The TAXI Fix It Later!

The Guy I Talked With Wouldn't Tell Me Who Pulled This BS Off!

But There Was Some Shady Sshitt Going On!

Ya!

And I Quote:

"I Shot a 380" Management Bull"

SAD!





There are very few bulls that as a 2 year old bull will not have a 5x5 rack. This 4 point or less argument isn't going to get much traction.

They did management bull tags on the LE units about 10-15 years ago, they was 5 point or less. I can't remember the reason for shutting it down, I think they only did it for a couple years.
 
Well!

I'll Refresh Memories!

Management Bull Hunt My Ass!

Alot Of Big Bulls Were Killed on Them Permits!

Everybody was looking For a Broke Big Bull!

And At The Time/Peak of LE Units They Tried It On, Hunters Were Finding Bulls That Qualified For A Management Bull,Even Though They Were Not Management Bulls!

The Story/BS That Bothered Me The Most was a Story Another Guy Told Me About!

A JACKASS & I'm Sure There Was More Than One,Had Shot A Trophy Bull that Wasn't Broken,He Then Took A Piece of 2" Steel Pipe & Broke One Of The Points Off To Make It a Management 5 Point,Then BRAGGED To this Guy He'd Have The TAXI Fix It Later!

The Guy I Talked With Wouldn't Tell Me Who Pulled This BS Off!

But There Was Some Shady Sshitt Going On!

Ya!

And I Quote:

"I Shot a 380" Management Bull"

SAD!
This is why I said 4 points or less. It should take the "trophy" part out of the equation. One would think anyways. haha
 
This is why I said 4 points or less. It should take the "trophy" part out of the equation. One would think anyways. haha
OK but what would that accomplish???? The majority of 2 year old bulls are 5x5s.

And not all 1 year olds are spikes, a lot of the better genetic bulls will at least branch out, now you want to target those bulls as well?

The spike hunt accomplishes the goal of reducing bulls while giving opportunity, if your going to change anything it needs to be removal of the spike hunt and increased LE tags, but that is going to cut a very significant number of hunters out of the field.
 
There Was a Bull on SJ A couple Years ago that Woulda Went 400" If He Woulda Had A Matching 6 On the Other Side Rather Than a Spike!

The Spike Side Was Just a Main Beam As Long As The 6 Side!

He Was A Cool Bull!

And I Never Heard What Happened To Him!

I Do Know There Was Several Spike Hunters Looking For Him!

He Was A Big Bull!
 
OK but what would that accomplish???? The majority of 2 year old bulls are 5x5s.

And not all 1 year olds are spikes, a lot of the better genetic bulls will at least branch out, now you want to target those bulls as well?

The spike hunt accomplishes the goal of reducing bulls while giving opportunity, if your going to change anything it needs to be removal of the spike hunt and increased LE tags, but that is going to cut a very significant number of hunters out of the field.
I see plenty of 3x and 4X bulls they are not all jumping straight to 5x it would get a few more out of the point pool and not have a adverse affect on the top end
 
I see plenty of 3x and 4X bulls they are not all jumping straight to 5x it would get a few more out of the point pool and not have a adverse affect on the top end
Nobody is burning points to shoot a 3x3 or 4x4 rag horn bull.

And I could argue that it would have an adverse effect because how many of those 3 and 4 points are yearlings with great genetics?

Also I never said "all" I said "most" so you want to start a LE management hunt to address a very small portion of the bull population? Yeah, That makes a lot of sense. ?
 
My 2 cents:

I have hunted long enough to have seen the value in the spike hunt. I remember growing up hunting the Manti with my Dad. I still remember when someone in camp saw an elk. We told everyone we knew about it. Elk were there but not common.
Once it went spike only the herd exploded. Karpowitz was on to something. Protecting adolescent bulls as they aged led to cows getting bred earlier in the year (first cycle) which led to older calves - better survival and more elk.
Hunting spikes allows for a crap ton of opportunity with very little impact on the herd.
You can’t eliminate 15,000 spike tags and add 15,000 LE tags and call it a wash. The success rates for spikes is in the 10% range. Success rates for those 15,000 LE tags would be thru the roof. Crushing our age class of bulls.
IMO the issue we’re up against is the lack of cows on our units. The DWR has crushed the cows - first on the Fish Lake, then the Wasatch, then Beaver. The list goes on.

The answer?? I know it’s not as simple as just bull to cow ratios but that is a major component. We need to lower the bull to cow ratios on units like beaver by killing more bulls. 1:1 ratio is a disaster.

Harvest objectives are a sham, based on trophy potential rather than herd health. We now know that often times a 6.5-7 year old bull will stay a 290-320 bull and not the 360+ we wish he was. Managing in “hopes” of trophy potential has put us in the position we are now.

I would have no problem if they dropped the spike hunt on the Book Cliffs. That herd is in real trouble. The deer herd is even worse. Hopefully a great winter will help with fawn/calf survival and kick start that herd.
 
Nobody is burning points to shoot a 3x3 or 4x4 rag horn bull.

And I could argue that it would have an adverse effect because how many of those 3 and 4 points are yearlings with great genetics?

Also I never said "all" I said "most" so you want to start a LE management hunt to address a very small portion of the bull population? Yeah, That makes a lot of sense. ?
This idea should be unit specific not statewide and in some instances to address a small population of bulls and yes folks will burn points to shoot rags…..
 
Deseret Land and Livestock-

I guided there for about 10 years.....crazy fun Elk Hunting even knowing you're not going to even see a bull over 360".
It's happened yes, but they are rare.

Arguably the healthiest free ranging elk herd in the entire country.

Bull to Cow ratio 1:1 and has been for 3 decades.

200,000 acre low fence Cattle Ranch at 6000-9000 ft elevation in Northeastern Utah to the Wyoming border near the Monte Cristo area.

Approximately 8,500 head of grazing cattle.

Approximately 2500 elk utilize the ranches pristine habitat, 10,000 big game animals combined between Elk, Mule Deer, Pronghorn and Moose.

Hunting Permits-
110 Elk
90 Deer
40 Pronghorn
4 Moose

110 Bulls culled from 1,250 bulls (2500÷2 @ 1:1 ratio) leaves 1,140 bulls as carryover stock.
Cow numbers culled to match.

No designated spike hunts and hunters aren't harvesting branch antlered bulls by choice.

330" average on bull score with success rates close to 100%.

DLL doesn't manage for quality, they manage for quantity (opportunity) of mature bulls and an outstanding Elk Hunting experience.

What's The Difference?-
They have adopted a "Rest Rotation" program of the land and it's habitat for grazing cattle.
The ranch is grazed in a Grid System of 100 acre parcels that allows the habitat to rest and recover by herding the cattle at different periods throughout the season.

Could this system be a key process to Utah's public lands as well and is it even feasible?

It's no secret that the Cattlemen Society has major pull in our wildlife management.
Could it be a possibility to force free ranging Cattlemen and Sheep to rotate their Livestock better to rest the Habitat?

If we can find a more sound way to take care of our Habitat, maybe we could stop harvesting spike bulls and open far more opportunities for LE tags where more mature bulls are culled off the top.

There will always be "Stud Bulls" on most LE units, we don't kill them all.

It is simply impossible to manage for 380+ Trophy Bulls without culling bulls somewhere, otherwise the balance tips and we are Bull Heavy because we are not killing enough bulls in trying to grow 10 "Trophies" out of 100 bulls.
In turn, we would have to remove Cows to sustain overall herd numbers which is an absurd philosophy.

If we are to think a phenomenal elk hunt consists of seeing 10 mature bulls fighting over 3 cows, we've lost or minds.

BALANCE AND OPPORTUNITY
 
Deseret Land and Livestock-

I guided there for about 10 years.....crazy fun Elk Hunting even knowing you're not going to even see a bull over 360".
It's happened yes, but they are rare.

Arguably the healthiest free ranging elk herd in the entire country.

Bull to Cow ratio 1:1 and has been for 3 decades.

200,000 acre low fence Cattle Ranch at 6000-9000 ft elevation in Northeastern Utah to the Wyoming border near the Monte Cristo area.

Approximately 8,500 head of grazing cattle.

Approximately 2500 elk utilize the ranches pristine habitat, 10,000 big game animals combined between Elk, Mule Deer, Pronghorn and Moose.

Hunting Permits-
110 Elk
90 Deer
40 Pronghorn
4 Moose

110 Bulls culled from 1,250 bulls (2500÷2 @ 1:1 ratio) leaves 1,140 bulls as carryover stock.
Cow numbers culled to match.

No designated spike hunts and hunters aren't harvesting branch antlered bulls by choice.

330" average on bull score with success rates close to 100%.

DLL doesn't manage for quality, they manage for quantity (opportunity) of mature bulls and an outstanding Elk Hunting experience.

What's The Difference?-
They have adopted a "Rest Rotation" program of the land and it's habitat for grazing cattle.
The ranch is grazed in a Grid System of 100 acre parcels that allows the habitat to rest and recover by herding the cattle at different periods throughout the season.

Could this system be a key process to Utah's public lands as well and is it even feasible?

It's no secret that the Cattlemen Society has major pull in our wildlife management.
Could it be a possibility to force free ranging Cattlemen and Sheep to rotate their Livestock better to rest the Habitat?

If we can find a more sound way to take care of our Habitat, maybe we could stop harvesting spike bulls and open far more opportunities for LE tags where more mature bulls are culled off the top.

There will always be "Stud Bulls" on most LE units, we don't kill them all.

It is simply impossible to manage for 380+ Trophy Bulls without culling bulls somewhere, otherwise the balance tips and we are Bull Heavy because we are not killing enough bulls in trying to grow 10 "Trophies" out of 100 bulls.
In turn, we would have to remove Cows to sustain overall herd numbers which is an absurd philosophy.

If we are to think a phenomenal elk hunt consists of seeing 10 mature bulls fighting over 3 cows, we've lost or minds.

BALANCE AND OPPORTUNITY
Couldn’t agree more with this. We need to manage for herd balance and opportunity.

Changing anything with the cattleman and sheep herders is a very long road. They control way to much of the say of what happens on our public lands. Controlled rotational grazing would be a great start.
 
This idea should be unit specific not statewide and in some instances to address a small population of bulls and yes folks will burn points to shoot rags…..
Your gonna stand by it huh?
You think a 4x4 or less hunt is a great idea?
What units need this hunt?
Would you burn points on that hunt?
 
Last edited:
Couldn’t agree more with this. We need to manage for herd balance and opportunity.

Changing anything with the cattleman and sheep herders is a very long road. They control way to much of the say of what happens on our public lands. Controlled rotational grazing would be a great start.
I completely understand DLL can be "Micro Managed", but I'd like to hear a legitimate reason why we cannot better manage our habitat usage in our public LE units.

A great pilot program would be the Book Cliffs since it's the unit facing the most negative issues.
 
Your gonna stand by it huh?
You think a 4x4 or less hunt is a great idea?
What units need this hunt?
Would you burn points on that hunt?
I know a lot of hunters who would burn points
It has more appeal than limited to a spike
I would put it in every 3rd year depending on the population
Is it a great idea , hell I don’t know it’s not any worse than what we got and if we can implement some data from the population on units to warrant it than cool
If not it’s just another arm chair biologist idea just like everyone eles
I won’t build points for elk I love shooting junk bulls every year on any bull units
 
I know a lot of hunters who would burn points
It has more appeal than limited to a spike
I would put it in every 3rd year depending on the population
Is it a great idea , hell I don’t know it’s not any worse than what we got and if we can implement some data from the population on units to warrant it than cool
If not it’s just another arm chair biologist idea just like everyone eles
I won’t build points for elk I love shooting junk bulls every year on any bull units
I really don't consider myself a trophy Hunter but what's the difference between a 4x4 and a spike? I love the spike program It give 17,000 or so people a chance to hunt without impact on the herd opening up more opportunity for others on Le and general season tags.
 
I completely understand DLL can be "Micro Managed", but I'd like to hear a legitimate reason why we cannot better manage our habitat usage in our public LE units.

A great pilot program would be the Book Cliffs since it's the unit facing the most negative issues.

Deseret isn’t a great case in point for large public land management for wildlife because the ranch, as you’ve illustrated, does everything it can to maximize quality range land. We really don’t have the resources to do this or enforce this on large tracts of public lands.

Also, no matter how hard of a winter we have, those elk will not go hungry at Deseret. Even when it isn’t a terrible winter those elk are fed well.

While I agree it is a glimpse into what could be, there is also a big caution for using it as an example for vast public lands that don’t have the same resources and enforcement abilities.
 
I know a lot of hunters who would burn points
It has more appeal than limited to a spike
I would put it in every 3rd year depending on the population
Is it a great idea , hell I don’t know it’s not any worse than what we got and if we can implement some data from the population on units to warrant it than cool
If not it’s just another arm chair biologist idea just like everyone eles
I won’t build points for elk I love shooting junk bulls every year on any bull units
Lol I would like to see the people that would burn points on that hunt, not only would you be burning points, you are also going into the waiting period.

And unless you are counting the spikes but for argument sake let's exclude them as most would just buy a spike tag rather than burn points.

You now are essentially hunting 2 year old bulls,

Let's say every year there are 100 bulls born, that first year the spike hunters remove half of those, you now have 50 going into year two of that 50 maybe half of those will be 5x5. You now only have 25 bulls if you are lucky that will be available to hunt. (Numbers are arbitrary for arguments sake)

Hell that sounds like a pretty tough hunt to me, plus add in the fact you have to be absolutely sure the bull isn't a 5 point man count me out, that is an extremely tough hunt. But hey I guess if someone is dumb enough to put in for it let them have it. Lol
 
I really don't consider myself a trophy Hunter but what's the difference between a 4x4 and a spike? I love the spike program It give 17,000 or so people a chance to hunt without impact on the herd opening up more opportunity for others on Le and general season tags.
It’s just a thought some guys would really think it was a big difference some won’t
 
Deseret isn’t a great case in point for large public land management for wildlife because the ranch, as you’ve illustrated, does everything it can to maximize quality range land. We really don’t have the resources to do this or enforce this on large tracts of public lands.

Also, no matter how hard of a winter we have, those elk will not go hungry at Deseret. Even when it isn’t a terrible winter those elk are fed well.

While I agree it is a glimpse into what could be, there is also a big caution for using it as an example for vast public lands that don’t have the same resources and enforcement abilities.
Agreed 100%.

My point was the possibility of adopting a better and biologically proven range management program to improve habitat.
 
Last edited:
Kinda Funny DLL Can Manage Elk Without Decimating Their Herd!

If There Were Any Other Units with a 1 to 1 Bull To Cow Ratio The Dollar Signs Were Start Rolling In The DWR's Eyes & I'll Guarantee You There'd Be Bull & Cow Slaughters!

They'd Take The Bulls First!

And When There Wasn't Enough Bulls Left They'd Hammer On The Cows!

Kinda Funny That When Managed Properly Utah Will Grow Big Bucks & Big Bulls just about anywhere in the State isn't It?
 
Kinda Funny DLL Can Manage Elk Without Decimating Their Herd!

If There Were Any Other Units with a 1 to 1 Bull To Cow Ratio The Dollar Signs Were Start Rolling In The DWR's Eyes & I'll Guarantee You There'd Be Bull & Cow Slaughters!

They'd Take The Bulls First!

And When There Wasn't Enough Bulls Left They'd Hammer On The Cows!

Kinda Funny That When Managed Properly Utah Will Grow Big Bucks & Big Bulls just about anywhere in the State isn't It?
And we can hunt them by helicopter up there!?
 
Here’s a question, wherein the correct answer, might put the current discussion in perspective and add a glimmer of logic to a solution.

What year was first Utah spike only elk hunt?

Where did the idea to hold spike only elk hunts get tried first.

Why did Utah want to try spike only elk hunt management?

Who proposed it to the Big Game Board?

What happened to the elk age classes in the years following 10 year of the spike elk strategy in Utah? Why?

What has happened to the elk population in the last 10 years? Why?

If you can answer those questions you may have a fair idea what you want to do next……. for the elk…….. after you decide what you want to do for the elk, then you can decide how best to accomplish that by us of wise hunter management.

Or not.

Truthfully, I’d rather see another 500,000 deer in Utah and give elk back to Yellowstone to feed the wovles.
 
Hey Lumpy!

Somebodies BS BIOLOGY Claimed That Spikes Never Evolve In To BIG Bulls!

So KILL ALL THE SPIKES HUNTS Started!

The Worst Management Plan Ever Brought In To LE Units!

I Tried To Get Them To Start 3 ANY TYPE OF BULL HUNTS/REGIONS a couple of Decades Ago!

But They Didn't & Wouldn't Do It!

The 3 Regions/Units Could & Should Be For The Opportunists!

Let Them Hunt Them Any F'N Way They Want To!

But When The 3 Units Are Destroyed They Are NOT Gonna Stomp in To LE Units & Destroy Them As Well!

Nothin Worse Than a F'N Whining Opportunist Wanting To Destroy LE Units Just Because of GREED!
 
The opportunists are the ones seeing dollars signs and with greed?

Haha! Bessy, you crack me up man. Makes as much sense as your chopper pic above. Never change, my friend.
 
My biggest issue with spike hunts, and any general hunt, is that they do not do anything to help control point creep. We complain about point creep on LE hunts, because everyone wants a LE tag, yet we still expect to have GS opportunity hunts available every year. Well guess what? That is not a reasonable expectation in Utah. There are too many people and not enough habitat. I don’t care how many MDF/RMEF/SFW banquets are thrown, we can‘t have it both ways.

Simple solution in my mind is to put all deer and elk tags in the same lottery, including antlerless hunts. This would address point creep, big time, and probably give us a chance to improve overall hunt quality for everyone.
 
In Bessy's defense, the chopper pic with me as the pilot was created years ago when someone posted that DLL herded elk by copter.....he was actually defending me in that post ?
The opportunists are the ones seeing dollars signs and with greed?

Haha! Bessy, you crack me up man. Makes as much sense as your chopper pic above. Never change, my friend
 
Kinda Funny DLL Can Manage Elk Without Decimating Their Herd!

If There Were Any Other Units with a 1 to 1 Bull To Cow Ratio The Dollar Signs Were Start Rolling In The DWR's Eyes & I'll Guarantee You There'd Be Bull & Cow Slaughters!

They'd Take The Bulls First!

And When There Wasn't Enough Bulls Left They'd Hammer On The Cows!

Kinda Funny That When Managed Properly Utah Will Grow Big Bucks & Big Bulls just about anywhere in the State isn't It?


Ask slam what a tag costs on DLL, then let's hear you ***** about $$$$ rolling in
 
Bearpaw Outfitters

Experience world class hunting for mule deer, elk, cougar, bear, turkey, moose, sheep and more.

Wild West Outfitters

Hunt the big bulls, bucks, bear and cats in southern Utah. Your hunt of a lifetime awaits.

J & J Outfitters

Offering quality fair-chase hunts for trophy mule deer, elk, shiras moose and mountain lions.

Shane Scott Outfitting

Quality trophy hunting in Utah. Offering FREE Utah drawing consultation. Great local guides.

Utah Big Game Outfitters

Specializing in bighorn sheep, mule deer, elk, mountain goat, lions, bears & antelope.

Apex Outfitters

We offer experienced guides who hunt Elk, Mule Deer, Antelope, Sheep, Bison, Goats, Cougar, and Bear.

Urge 2 Hunt

We offer high quality hunts on large private ranches around the state, with landowner vouchers.

Allout Guiding & Outfitting

Offering high quality mule deer, elk, bear, cougar and bison hunts in the Book Cliffs and Henry Mtns.

Lickity Split Outfitters

General season and LE fully guided hunts for mule deer, elk, moose, antelope, lion, turkey, bear and coyotes.

Back
Top Bottom