300 Win. Mag. Load?

NvrEnuf

Very Active Member
Messages
1,817
Hey fellas, I have never been in this forum and was wondering if any of you might have some advice on a good all around load for Muleys. I have a bit of experience with reloading shotgun shells but don't know much about centerfire loads. I would like something that can reach out and touch one if needed (maybe out to 500yds or so) but would also like to make sure that it still has plenty of knock down power. A freind of mine is all set up to load pretty much anything I want. I'm just not sure were to start.

He mentioned that we could try out the following recipe:

Winchester Brass
RL 22 Powder
215 M Federal Primers
165 gr Nosler Ballistic Tips

What do you guys think? Anything help is much appreciated.

NvrEnuf
 
When the 300 winy was concieved its founders had the 180 grain bullet in mind...

For a 300 I would go with 180 gr projectiles of some sort. If you plan on shooting long ranges go with a bigger bullet i.e. 180's or 200's. They are more stable in the air and will pack a little bit more on the receiving end, but not much.

Here is an example of what loads will look like zeroed at 200 yards. The velocity was achieved by averaging reloding data.

165 grn nosler BT (3150fps at muzz)
200 yards 2750fps 2800fpe 0"
300 yards 2580fps 2430fpe -6"
400 yards 2400fps 2110fpe -17"
500 yards 2230fps 1830fpe -35"

180 grn nosler BT (3050 at muzz)
200 yards 2690fps 2900fpe 0"
300 yards 2520fps 2550fpe -6"
400 yards 2361fps 2230fpe -18"
500 yards 2200fps 1950fpe -36.5"

As you can see the bigger bullets carry a little more energy but not much about 5%. The only advantage that they offer is that they would be a little more stable in a crosswind... I'd work up the 180's then you have a load that will work well for elk as well.

As far as a good load... all rifles shoot loads better/worse than others... I've found that RL22 is a very consistant load in magnums though. Other powders that work well are IMR4831, IMR4350, and Hodgdon 4350. I would start with these powders, at or about 10% less than max and work your way up. Groups will most likly vary with diffrent weights of the same powder. The process takes a little time.

Good luck and have fun

Ivan
 
Thanks a bunch BBS. It sounds like the rifles can be just about as finiky as my dang muzzleloader was. I better get after it so I can have a load worked up in time for the hunts. I have actually benn hunting with the 180 grainers and they definitely do the job. Maybe I'll just mess around with the powder amounts and see what I can come up with on the conagraph.

Thanks again for the advice.

Good luck this year.

NvrEnuf
 
i like 165's myself, but there ain't enough difference in them and 180's to fight about. i've always been able to shoot better groups with a 165, so just use them. either one will put down a deer if he's hit right. but i'd sure stay away from anything with a plastic tip. i've never seen a balistic tip do anything but ruin hunts. i'd stay with something with lead on the end. a .300 holds lots of powder and doesn't seem to be real picky about how much you put in it. the more the better for me. no sense in having a .300 and shooting '06 loads through it. and use some kind of magnum primer.
 
Try IMR7828 powder.
A good magnum dose of this fills the case more than IMR4350 or H4831.
This usaully = better ignition characteristics and more uniform loads.
Try it out and see.
Best of luck on whatever you decide and good luck on the hunt.
Jerry-TheKnack
 
I went out last night and shot 25 rounds through my 300 win. magnum. I am just fire-forming the cases right now so my buddy recomended that we load up some lighter loads that would be easier on the shoulder. I shot 165 grain molly coated softpoints hoping to make the clean up a little easier. WOW! I couldn't beleive how slick it was to clean the gun. My groups were averaging around 1.5" to 2"'s but it was very windy and I am pretty sure the light loads didn't help much either. I want to try shooting the molly coated bullets with my hot loads. Have any of you have had much experience shooting molly. Is it worth the extra couple bucks or should I just stick with copper? The cleaning part is nice but is not a big deal for me either way.

NvrEnuf
 
hmm no experiance with molly but i would go with 180 grainers in your .300.
hicountry
 
here's a recepy that works well I use a rem 700 300 win mag I shoot
150 grain nosler ballistic tip or barns x bullets using
73 grains of imr 4350 and on my chronagraph you will get 3300 fps now thats max load in a good working order rifle but in my rifle and a buddies rifle ( savage ) both shoot 1\2 groups at 100 yards also primer # federal match GM215M large magnum rifle primers thay are a match grade primer
try it you won't be sorry and u will still have enough knock down power at 500 yards
 
Not excally a 300 win but I shoot a 300 RUM and I handload 180gr combind techinology partition golds (moly) bullets, They are the schite, i will never load anything else.
 
I am also new on this forum, I have been reading it alot and really like everything I've seen so far. Just happened to see your question and thought I would throw in my two cents. I have a suggestion, and also agreeing with Bambistew about the bigger bullets. I am originally a Colorado Native having to move to Alabama this year due to a plant closure and have hunted there all my life. My suggestion is loading 165 Hunting Ballistic Tips with RL19 at 75 grains( if your gun can handle the max load) getting close to 3200 fps and 180 Partition Spitzers with Rl22 at 75.5 grains, also max in the manual, and also getting close to 3200 fps. The Ballistic coefficient for the Partition is .474 and .475 for the Ballistic Tip. The Ballistics in the charts at the back of the manual are exactly the same at 3200 fps. You have the smaller Ballistic Tip for Muleys and the Partition for anything bigger. Works great, I have a Ruger Stainless No. 1 in 300 Win Mag and get chronographed results of a little over 3200 fps. I'm going off the Nosler fifth edition manual. I set my 100 yard placement at 7.8 inches above the bulls eye, this puts me dead on at 500 yards. With a range finder and target knobs on my 4.5x14x50mm Leupold Vari-x III this is a great long distance combo. The areas I use to hunt had some long shots sometimes. Anyway, hope this helps. A very tried and true process.
 
Lots of things happen on long range attempts. Wind is usually a factor that most don't consider or are not careful enough with. I carry a wind speed meter and my drop/drift charts.

To make life a bit safer I would not attempt to shoot anything less than 180s in your rifle. If going to 165 the only bullet I'll consider is the X. I shoot the X in 180s in my 300s.

While the lighter bullets speed makes up in the front end, once the distance becomes longer the bullets bleed speed AND energy faster such that the heavy bullets are usually close to equal at 300 and beyond that start to hold all the advantages.

That being said in the win mag your brass choice is fine. Make sure it stays all the same brand as others can vary in capacity enough to make a safe load dangerous.

Start and stick with RL22 as it works super and has speed. If you are not happy at the moment with your loads and can't make them the best(IE you have 1.5 inches and want 1 inch or less) play with primer swaps. Often times its more important than switching powder or seating depths.

BTW I know for a fact that X bullets open up out beyond 600 yards in a 338 Win mag load so don't let bullet design sway you. Those X will penetrate bone where as lighter designed bullets may not. And weird things happen in the .75 second or more it takes for a bullet to travel a long ways.

So I'd say you have a good plan. Be careful on headspace sizing issues and you can probably size off the shoulder instead of the belt which is a good thing. But FL size it all AND test each reloaded round for chambering before trusting to a hunt. Each piece of brass can have a bit different springback charateristics and may size more or less than the previous. Hence the check.

Best of luck!

Jeff
 
i shoot a .300 win. a lot. i prefer the 165's. reason i started shooting the 165's is because the real accurate .308 diameter target bullets are usually 168's. they have a very good coefficient and seem to me to be a little more accurate than the 180's. in my 2 rifles, i can get almost 200 fps more with the 165's. i use the regular ol' hornady boattail softpoints, exclusively. don't like any of the plastic tips or all copper bullets. but i am intrigued by the new hornady SST's. my son loaded some in his .270 wsm and they worked great on a couple real nice wyoming muleys last week. personally, i don't care if the bullet shoots all the way through or not. i like to find it wadded up under the skin on the off side, and this is almost always the case with the hornadys. i want all the energy of the bullet expended in the animal. one hole is enough bloodtrail for me. i use an over max load of H4831sc. i won't list the load because i don't want anyone blowing up their rifle. when you get hi pressures, the overall cartridge length can really play hell with pressures. i make sure my bullets all touch the lands, to make sure and get the most out of the cartridge. 180's are fine, but for me, in the .300 and the '06, it's all 165's.
 
I know I don't know squat, but trying to expand all the bullet in the animal will leave you wanting one day. Not for blood trail but for penetration. Even if you take a perfect shot everytime something will happen that will make a hit require penetration.

Its like passing power, you don't need it often, but Murphy says you need it on the largest animal you'll ever have the chance to take.

Remember if you are shooting long range that 200 fps with the 165s will not be an advantage anymore further out.

PS 168s are not the only good bullet match wise. I've shot tons of 168s out to 1000 yards, but I've shot more 180 match, 190 match and 200 grain 30 cal match bullets. The 168s were forced due to the choice of an M14 rifle. In bolt guns you are a fool to hit the target range with 168s for mid to long range. Its also a good note to see the military saw the problem with the lightweight bullets and their LR ammo is now still M118LR but carries the 175 grain bullet instead of the 168.

But what would I know :)

Jeff
 
I shoot a 7mag and reload my own bullets. I use RL22 with nosler's new ACCUBOND in a 160 grain. You ought to try the 180 grain .30 cal in your .300 Win mag. It is comparable to the their ballistic tip other than it's a controlled expansion bullet (great weight retension, bonded core and jacket). I think you can find a good load combination that will shoot good in your gun.
 
i don't understand not wanting the bullet to wad up under the skin? if it does that, ain't that like about 1/8" from total penetration? i've tried barnes and don't like em. in my .270 i lost over 200 fps because the light copper bullet is so long and has to be loaded so deep it cuts down on case capacity and the extra length causes so much barrel drag that the pressure went sky high. if i loaded them the extra .0050" deeper like barnes said too, it would have been even more loss. after shooting about 25 or 20, in different loads, i pulled the bullets and abandoned the project. and they are real 'spensive. all the "premium" bullets are real spendy. outside of the one experiment with the x bullets, i've been using the regular ol' hornady run o' the mill boattail soft points in everything i use except .22 cal. for over 20 years, and have yet to have one not do what it was supposed to. i ain't a big time target shooter, but spend enough time at the range and reloading to know what i'm doing. but i am a hunter. and for big game, deer and elk anyway, i really this type of bullet. if i was after alaska moose or a brown bears, i might look at some controlled expansion bullet like a nosler. nothing wrong with any bullet, if used correctly. but my preference is to hammer em as hard as i can and not worry too much about extreme distance shooting. i'm usually sneaky enough to get within 300-400 yards of what i'm after.
 
RLH

Don't want into a peeing match. Actually your 1/8 inch from the end has been more penetration because the skin acts like a big rubber band. The bullet probably went a few inches further out but because it was out of steam it got pulled back and stayed under the hide.

I won't argue the X bullet thing. I know some guns wont' shoot them. My 22-250 will NOT. My 300s and 338s love them. And they are a solid performer, not blowing up close, opening up way out there, and retaining enough shank weight to penetrate straight and go through bone.

In an ideal world your penetration would be perfect. But for my once in a lifetime elk tag, when he comes out at a bad angle and is about to follow a cow, I want the bullet and power to punch him however I have to. I've seen too many things happen over the years. Deer angling, taking steps etc... And it happens at 200 yards and less that turns a perfect rib shot into anything. I prefer the safety just in case I need it.

You mention spendy. I can see my view and yours. If I hunt deer here I use regular bullets. I can pass an iffy shot. Its only home hunting. But spend 750-3000 on a tag, travel 3000 miles or more, well you get the point. Meat hunting who cares. Heck I haven't shot a meat deer past 300 yards in years and they all get shot in the head anyway. Most are shot at 50 yards. But you say you are sneaky enough to get within 300 or so. Try my last hour caribou in Alaska where the tallest thing between he and I was about 6 inches tall. That case I had to do what I had to do. And its that exact moment, you can't wait till the next outing, the season is over, the weather is changing, your flight leaves, etc...... Well its then that you have to be all you can be and your choice of gun, scope, bullet, powder, practice etc..... all can pay off. I don't mind leaving without, but given the chance I go home with game. Not just to shoot, but when I see what I want.

Heck if truth be told and I lived in an elk state, I'd do most all my deer and elk hunting with one of my favorite 243s. No good shot, no big deal. Not close enough to be an easy pack out or next to the road, don't shoot.

What it boils down to, in my meager opinion, is the situation.

Jeff
 
Rost495,

I hope you drank alot of water today because you got alot of peeing to do. Ol' RLH can really argue.

JB
 
JB;

Heck! you havn't seen an argument yet, I just might get into the middle of it and really stir up the pot and jerk a few d##kstrings.
I'll be nice this time, both of the above posts have valid points, a person will just have to decide which point is better for him and go with that after seeing both ends of the spectrum.

RELH
 
RELH,

Please do, I love reading these arguments. Everybody is right. All these high powered rounds are really so close that the elk don't really care which one blows out his lungs. I like all guns and want one of every new round but I realize that there really hasn't been alot of break throughs in 60 years. I've got nearly all of them but I can't bring myself to hunt with anything but my 300H&H.

JB
 
300 H&H. What a classic round. I think I'll have one of those right after I get the bigger brother. Hmm a larger gun safe may be needed :eek:) Maybe I can justify it too since I'm not gonna be burning up 2 barrels a year competitively.

Jeff
 
like i said, there ain't really a bad bullet, if you use it right. i've been in on several hundred elk kills. just got home from a trip that resulted in 3 real nice 6x6's. one was shot 5 or 6 times with an '06 using some kind of premium hotshot bullet. took him forever to die. had to chase it nearly a mile. like i've always said, a gutshot is a gutshot, don't matter what gun it is. once he finally hit it in a good place, it died. the 2nd one was shot with barnes bullets from a .300 win. bullet holes going out were about the same size as where they entered. i wasn't imressed, with the guys marksmanship or with the bullet. wasn't real long range or anything. but he hit it twice in the lungs and a couple other places, and it took off and then he broke it's back. had to shoot it again. real big bodied bull. old tough fighter for sure. can't say if a lead bullet would have done any better, but it damn sure wouldn't have done any worse. the 3rd was dropped with one shot from a .338/.378 with a barnes bullet. hit it in the spine in the hump of the shoulder, angling from left to right. dropped it dead. so would a lead bullet in the same place. any bullet out of that cannon would have dumped it. this guy did a considerably better job shooting than the other 2. some time at the range would have made a lot more sense than expensive ammo, on this hunt. before they shot their elk, there was a lot of talk about how great their ammo was. ammo doesn't make much difference if you can't shoot. i don't know a better shot at game than me. might be some guys that are as good, like my ol'man or my buddy earl. at least like my ol' man used to be. he's pretty old and shakes a little. there's probably guys that are better now, but really, at one time, on running game, i'd have bet on me against anyone i know. to me, shot placement, and the ability to do it in adverse hunting conditions, is the whole story. and if you use a good bullet, it doesn't matter. shoot any animal in the lungs, any animal, and it will die soon. like in just a few seconds. even a big ol' bull elk won't go far. 100 yards or so maybe. about as far as he can hold his breath. i've said it before, when someone says they shot center and it ran off, they're lyin'. they gutshot it. and if you gutshoot something, it doesn't matter much what you're shooting. i've shot through big bulls, full length, from the front and the rear. and they all died real quick. and i used lead bullets. i don't know how much more penetration you can get than shooting from windpipe to bunghole. didn't hit a bone to slow the bullet down and they passed on through. copper bullets are fine. but for me, i'll use my ol' cheap lead hornadies. i've made dozens upon dozens of kills with them, and have never had one come apart. have never been disapointed in the bullet. no matter what the range. and if a bullet does come apart, like the sierras i used to shoot seemed to, i don't see a big problem. as long as they do it inside and not on the skin like some of the plastic tipped ones seem to do. especially on deer. caliber, bullet weight and type, speed, high dollar rifles, fancy scopes, none of it matters if you can't shoot. i usually shoot a 55 year old rifle with a 25 year old scope when i'm real serious about hunting. both are top of the line, good stuff, especially for their day, but they ain't stainless or synthetic or any of that. i own dozens of rifles in all kinds of calibers and configurations. target rifles, varmint rifles, cannons to popguns. when i'm serious, i take my .270. i've shot it so many times that it's an extension of me and i can pick it up and shoot it anytime. and there ain't nothin' in the lower 48 that scares it. and in 2 weeks it's gonna be my turn. hope i can still hit.
 
RLH

Hey, best of luck in 2 weeks!! Your PMA guarantees that you'll do fine and could get em with a 22 probably.

BTW I'll make your day! You've just finally met someone that can shoot better than you do.

Jeff
 
all target shooting is to me, is a way to zero my rifle for hunting. if i can shoot tight groups at a given range and then apply some kentucky windage in the field, i usually do ok. my ol' man was at on time one of the militaries best snipers. he never shot competively, other than intra-military stuff, but he's the best shot i ever knew. and he has some real different perspectives about shooting. if you're shooting live targets, folks or game, you have a lot more leeway than if you're shooting groups. i've always been more interested in a kill shot than in precise placement. my buddy earl, now he's done some competitive shooting. shot on a national guard team and brought home a lot of trophies from camp perry, with his ol' garand. he's about as deadly as anyone i've ever seen. i don't know if an animal can get far enough away from him. where he is good is more or less rapid fire stuff. like when half a dozen coyotes come in at once. he'll get em all, with a 4 shot model 788 .222. drops one clip and pops in another. pretty amazing. i've learned a trick or three from these 2 fellers. i like to track stuff up and shoot it however it happens. it's just fun. as far as bullets, for what i do, anything will work. but i stick with what has worked for me for a long time. i know one thing, november can't get here soon enough.
 
Wish I was going with ya.

Wow Garand trophies. Thats a bit of time ago. Since then the AR has taken over and we've rewritten the record books. One of my loads even fired the first ever 1000 yard perfect score with a service rifle EVER at Quantico about 2 years back. Times keep changing. BUT I've got a handful of M1s in the safe, and a few M1As also. Just can't get rid of something that feels like a real gun. Not mattel plastic.(though they shoot circles around the rest)

The good thing about hunting is its only one shot. You don't have to repeat that perfect shot 22 times in a row to prove anything.

What Guard team did Earl shoot with? Might even have heard of him and his team mates. I always liked rapid fire type stuff. We even had an Osama match with pop ups and walking targets. Its amazing how many times you can hit a moving target at 300 yards once you figure the lead and have a good cadence.

Please thank Earl and your father for their service. I know so many of the military shooters. They all have the sniper tabs. Those seem easy enough to come by once you have the shooting skills. The rest is woodsmanship. The real snipers are the hunters game should fear... The sniper motto should be allhunters motto !!

Best, Jeff
 
RLH

Hey heres a funny story to pass along to Earl. Our state championships in service rifle were always won by the Marines or Guard teams. The trophy was about 5 feet tall. The military put together the best 4 shooters from all over the US and flew them in. They had trouble packing the trophy back home all the time. They petitioned to have the trophy become a plaque they could put in the suitcases. Done deal.

Except that year for the first time ever in our state, my wife and I and a junior Gal and another good friend of ours were coached by a former Palma winner. Civilians(us) won the match outright. So though we could have drove the 5 footer home we got their plaques!

Thats one record that'll probably never be done again.

Jeff
 
Earl shot for one of the guard teams here in Az. don't know if there was more than one team or not. seems like it was one in the Phoenix area. he shot from probably the early 60's until the mid 80's. until he retired from the guard. like me, he shoots an old model 70 standard, .270, for most game species. his rifle is even older than mine. he shoots 150's. i prefer 140's in mine. he shoots 150's because he got a good buy on a couple thousand bullets about 30 years ago he's too cheap to switch to good bullets.
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom