The OTHER verdict is in

I commented in one of the Rittenhouse threads that this was the case where the defendants had much to worry about. I bet the guy that videoed this is bummed he came forward with his video as he is now behind bars permanently
 
This murder wasn't much different than most. Some person or persons doing something stupid that doesn't go anything like they thought it would and when it goes bad they panic and kill somebody. They didn't go outside that day expecting or wanting to murder black men. They had a warped view of what was legal and they became zealous.

At the same time, lucky for us They videoed their stupidity and stupidly shared the video.
 
Nary a word in the msm about Andrew Coffee (a black man) acquitted on all charges in his self defense case the same day as the Rittenhouse verdict. Justice was served in all 3 cases. When logic, truth & evidence prevail over politics we have the greatest justice system in the world
 
Did you think we were a bunch of racists OW? I'm more interested in the Clinton pedo case. Think we'll hear what a racist that guy was that plowed threw the Christmas parade Killin grandmas and little kids?
 
Did you think we were a bunch of racists OW? I'm more interested in the Clinton pedo case. Think we'll hear what a racist that guy was that plowed threw the Christmas parade Killin grandmas and little kids?
It’s the SUV’s fault DW
39C45767-DA83-449E-872A-796A6E850C98.jpeg
 
 
Do you have a reading comprehension issue?


Why were you surprised by the lack of coverage here on this trial? The fact is these 2 or 3 idiots were guilty. 2 or 3 armed men vs 1 unarmed man is cut and dry. The media's incorrect influence on the Rittenhouse case is what drove the comments. Even fooled a few here. Their bias will probably drive the comments on the obvious racist Wisconsin attack as well.
 
Last edited:
Why were you surprised by the lack of coverage here on this trial? The fact is these 2 or 3 idiots were guilty. 2 or 3 armed men vs 1 unarmed man is cut and dry. The media's incorrect influence on the Rittenhouse case is what drove the comments. Even fooled a few here.
You know, you really shouldn’t let your mind wander; it's really not strong enough to be allowed out on its own.

I was surprised because it was a HIGH PROFILE CASE BEING BROADCAST LIVE! and also dealt with self-defense claims.

And....if you're implying I was one of those "few" it really confirms you have a reading comprehension issue. In message #98 of the original Rittonhouse thread, I was one of the first ones to say...

"If I'm on that jury, he's already acquitted -- even though he was an idiot to be there in those circumstances to begin with."

So until you have have something intelligent to add, crawl back in your hole & quit trying to make me the issue.

 
Funny you being the one who brought up reading comprehension....

"2 or 3 armed men vs 1 unarmed man is cut and dry."

Maybe it was the "cut and dry" that tripped you up. The self defense claim was a hail Mary by the defense. No intelligent person who read the scorecard would see it as much more than that. This is why I asked my original question. I assumed you were an intelligent individual and saw that, and the only other explanation I could come up with was maybe he thinks we're racist.?‍♂️
 
Funny you being the one who brought up reading comprehension....

"2 or 3 armed men vs 1 unarmed man is cut and dry."

Maybe it was the "cut and dry" that tripped you up. The self defense claim was a hail Mary by the defense. No intelligent person who read the scorecard would see it as much more than that. This is why I asked my original question. I assumed you were an intelligent individual and saw that, and the only other explanation I could come up with was maybe he thinks we're racist.?‍♂️
Not sure what the hell you're talkng about. Are you?
 

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom