OH YA!!! TAKE THE MUZZ SCOPES!!!

Damn skippy!

Entitled much? What the hell does voting have to do with anything? Once again, bringing up a clearly irrelevant point to make an irrelevant point.

We? Who's we? Do you really think you're someone who's hung the moon? Because, Hummer, you haven't.

Must be a millennial...:rolleyes:

I never thought “having a clue” meant millennial. That’s a weird label.

Listen, moron, you just said we should move thousands of tags into a time when elk are on their winter range. What could possibly go wrong?

You seriously don’t have the first clue about anything. I’m glad you’ve revealed that so I can give future posts the attention and responses they are worthy of.

Rifle elk in December. Goodness. Heaven help us all! (And I shouldn’t assume you’ve kept your right to vote with stupid comments like above. You may have had those taken from you. I apologize for assuming otherwise.)
 
Last edited:
Hey blue!

You Still Didn't Get What I Throwed at You!

First Your LEZBY!

Then your F-250! (((Ya,That's Gonna F'N Hurt!)))

My suby hauls flowers to refugees.

There weren’t any scopes on front stuffers back when these primitive weapon seasons were established (speaking generally, not necessarily everywhere). Then things changed in ways most folks back then didn’t see coming.

Kinda like trans-ginger swimmers and stuff. If you think scopes are ok, surely dudes taking advantage of technology to win swim meets is ok too? :ROFLMAO:

Here’s to the future ?
 
Easy There Niller!

We've Been Hunting Animals/Mostly Cow Elk for Decades in to the Winter Months!

And If You've Got Enough Money You Can Hunt Trophy Bucks & Bulls in to the First of the Following Year!



I never thought “having a clue” meant millennial. That’s a weird label.

Listen, moron, you just said we should move thousands of tags into a time when elk are on their winter range. What could possibly go wrong?

You seriously don’t have the first clue about anything. I’m glad you’ve revealed that so I can give future posts the attention and responses they are worthy of.

Rifle elk in December. Goodness. Heaven help us all! (And I shouldn’t assume you’ve kept your right to vote with stupid comments like above. You may have had those taken from you. I apologize for assuming otherwise.)
 
Hey blue!

You Still Didn't Get What I Throwed at You!

First Your LEZBY!

Then your F-250! (((Ya,That's Gonna F'N Hurt!)))
Even if I didn’t catch your drift, I bet it won’t be long until it’s pitched again. ?

And it’s a 350. Bigger tank :oops:
 
Easy There Niller!

We've Been Hunting Animals/Mostly Cow Elk for Decades in to the Winter Months!

And If You've Got Enough Money You Can Hunt Trophy Bucks & Bulls in to the First of the Following Year!


And you pizz and moan about it every year. So let’s add thousands more bull tags at that time. Like I said, what could go wrong?
 
I'm NOT Saying add More Tags Any-F'N-where!

I'm Sayin if The Crowd that wants SmokePole Scopes Banned gets their way it'll be to Add More Tags which both You & Me Disagree with!





And you pizz and moan about it every year. So let’s add thousands more bull tags at that time. Like I said, what could go wrong?
 
Good luck out there this year boomers = ?

I’m pretty sure I know what JP means, but I could be wrong. Let’s get some input as to what the rest of you think he means.
Means he's a millennial.. Gives us the reason he is being the way he is...... Actually explains a lot. Already figured it though, the way he brags about his accomplishments (embellished?)
 
Means he's a millennial.. Gives us the reason he is being the way he is...... Actually explains a lot. Already figured it though, the way he brags about his accomplishments (embellished?)
Nope. Born well before the millennial generation. Don’t remember bragging? Do tell
 
I never thought “having a clue” meant millennial. That’s a weird label.

Listen, moron, you just said we should move thousands of tags into a time when elk are on their winter range. What could possibly go wrong?

You seriously don’t have the first clue about anything. I’m glad you’ve revealed that so I can give future posts the attention and responses they are worthy of.

Rifle elk in December. Goodness. Heaven help us all! (And I shouldn’t assume you’ve kept your right to vote with stupid comments like above. You may have had those taken from you. I apologize for assuming otherwise.)

"Moron"? Wow! Such a keyboard warrior!

Never said to move thousands of tags to Dec. You did. I said Nov OR Dec. I am also sooo glad you will address my posts going forward with the attention you pretend they need.

:rolleyes:

You shouldn't let your day be decided when you lose an argument with the guy you see in the mirror every morning.

Enjoy your Sunday tomorrow as you reflect on how you treat your fellow man...
 
You think moving a rifle season into the rut somehow helps something? I’m not all caught up on you and vanillas pissing match but I gotta say that doesn’t sound like the most thoroughly thought out idea
 
You think moving a rifle season into the rut somehow helps something? I’m not all caught up on you and vanillas pissing match but I gotta say that doesn’t sound like the most thoroughly thought out idea

It’s not a pizzing match. He’s still upset about some disagreement we had like 5 years ago apparently that I didn’t even know happened. He’ll get over it. And if he doesn’t, he can repent of that on his Sunday tomorrow.

Some people just have to be heard. In a thread talking about removing scopes off muzzleloaders he needs to talk about moving the LE rifle elk seasons to December! And then posts about something being irrelevant. You can’t make this stuff up. What do you do?

I still think it would be a mistake for the Utah Wildlife Board to institute that restriction. We already know it doesn’t do anything biologically. There is not even a claim it will. The other claim that is out there is it will reduce success rates so they can give more tags. Success rates just haven’t increased in any statistically significant way since variable powered scopes were allowed a handful of years ago. So it won’t even meet the goals of that claim. The last thing I hear a lot about is returning the muzzy hunt to a “primitive weapon” hunt. At least in Utah, it never was nor was it intended to be a primitive weapon hunt.

So why again are we even discussing this? I don’t even muzzleloader hunt anymore and I think this is a really bad idea. Restrictions and changes just for the sake of change seems to be the desire of some on these forums. I just don’t get it.
 
It’s not a pizzing match. He’s still upset about some disagreement we had like 5 years ago apparently that I didn’t even know happened. He’ll get over it. And if he doesn’t, he can repent of that on his Sunday tomorrow.

Some people just have to be heard. In a thread talking about removing scopes off muzzleloaders he needs to talk about moving the LE rifle elk seasons to December! And then posts about something being irrelevant. You can’t make this stuff up. What do you do?

I still think it would be a mistake for the Utah Wildlife Board to institute that restriction. We already know it doesn’t do anything biologically. There is not even a claim it will. The other claim that is out there is it will reduce success rates so they can give more tags. Success rates just haven’t increased in any statistically significant way since variable powered scopes were allowed a handful of years ago. So it won’t even meet the goals of that claim. The last thing I hear a lot about is returning the muzzy hunt to a “primitive weapon” hunt. At least in Utah, it never was nor was it intended to be a primitive weapon hunt.

So why again are we even discussing this? I don’t even muzzleloader hunt anymore and I think this is a really bad idea. Restrictions and changes just for the sake of change seems to be the desire of some on these forums. I just don’t get it.
I guess I’ve always lived in states where it is indeed a primitive season. My perspective I’ve that’s what it should be. Being I do respect the residents of each state to have the say in there hunting I guess I don’t care what Utah does. It comes up in Idaho I’ll be real vocal in opposition
 
As Soon As You Add Restrictions on the Archery StickFlippers & The Rifle Long Rangers as Well I'll Mark That as a YES!

But To Hone In On One Weapon Type is Total BULLSH!T!
Ok. So is it start with 1 and move to 2-3-4-etc? You Or cherry pick what you like? Or all 50 or nothing?

What one of those sounds most productive?
 
I Never Ever Said Just Start With One!

It's All Give Some!

Not Some Give All!

I've Said For Decades There Is 50+ Reasons Why Our Herds are In PISS POOR Shape!

One Little PISSCUTTER Change Ain't Gonna Fix it!



Ok. So is it start with 1 and move to 2-3-4-etc? You Or cherry pick what you like? Or all 50 or nothing?

What one of those sounds most productive?
 
I Never Ever Said Just Start With One!

It's All Give Some!

Not Some Give All!

I've Said For Decades There Is 50+ Reasons Why Our Herds are In PISS POOR Shape!

One Little PISSCUTTER Change Ain't Gonna Fix it!
So they means you can’t start with one change? Sound logic…
 
You think moving a rifle season into the rut somehow helps something? I’m not all caught up on you and vanillas pissing match but I gotta say that doesn’t sound like the most thoroughly thought out idea

No, moving a rifle hunt out of the rut. If the point was to reduce success rates, that is a way to do it. Not the removal of a scope. Pretty obvious really.

See, vanilla stirs s_ _t up with a snarky post or comment, adds something sensless (this time voting?) that has absolutely nothing to do with anything, and then throws his hands up and cries "it wasn't me, it wasn't me". I really don't think he's aware of what he says sometimes. In my line of work, you get to be fired for behavior like this.

I've never had a problem with him until someone pissed on his Cherrios one day and somewhere and then took it out on me during the trail cam discussions, not 5 years ago. I decided to just not comment on any of his posts, this guy just can't leave anything alone. A normal functioning person would simply ask for clarification, but for some reason he can't.
 
Last edited:
So they means you can’t start with one change? Sound logic…
Seriously……… start with one. we’ve only started with one……..fifty times…….

We’ve tried “one” so many times, we’re on the third time around the two track…..

Oh ya…….. you ain’t a boomer, how would you have known…….
 
? coming from the kid who wants people to believe he kills big game at 900 yards! PRICELESS!
Well 964 is my furthest. But I could care less who believes it. I’ll still be killing deer every year regardless of some washed up old man who needs a power cart to “pack out” piss cutters believes. By your standards I’m a super hunter anyway being my closest is 7 yards. You want me to believe you have a clue about hunting and i don’t. Your inconsistency’s on here are so hard to follow I stopped trying
 
Well 964 is my furthest. But I could care less who believes it. I’ll still be killing deer every year regardless of some washed up old man who needs a power cart to “pack out” piss cutters believes. By your standards I’m a super hunter anyway being my closest is 7 yards. You want me to believe you have a clue about hunting and i don’t. Your inconsistency’s on here are so hard to follow I stopped trying
? Now it’s 964, by tomorrow it will be 1,000 yards and by the end of the week it will be a Mile! You’re a true Quigley Down Under!
 
? Now it’s 964, by tomorrow it will be 1,000 yards and by the end of the week it will be a Mile! You’re a true Quigley Down Under!
I never said what my longest shot was on this thread. There another one several weeks ago I have, and it’s 964. I used 900 yards in context of range. Again, comprehension is not your strong suit
 
If you want to see an example of a lie go back and read your post where you “done that” cold bore one shot at 900 and it wasn’t a big deal. You don’t own a range finder. How did you know it was 900?
 
The Changes That Have Destroyed Our Herds Happened Way Quicker than They'll ever be Reversed!

Do You Understand That?
So to you that means do nothing? That particular logic I don’t think I could ever understand. I guess if it makes sense in your mind good for you
 
Do Nothing My ASS!

I've Seen The Herd Declining all My Life!

I Guess You Missed HELL-RIGHT?

The Very Few Changes that have been Tried Have FAILED Miserably!

The BS Buck To Doe Ratio Management is Worst Management Ever Drempt Up!

I'm All For Changes That Need to Be Made!

But Don't Pick Just One Item & Think Abracadabra It's Fixed!

It's a BIG Combination of Issues!

Until That's Comprehended Just Sit Back,Do Nothing & Watch it get Worse!









So to you that means do nothing? That particular logic I don’t think I could ever understand. I guess if it makes sense in your mind good for you
 
Do Nothing My ASS!

I've Seen The Herd Declining all My Life!

I Guess You Missed HELL-RIGHT?

The Very Few Changes that have been Tried Have FAILED Miserably!

The BS Buck To Doe Ratio Management is Worst Management Ever Drempt Up!

I'm All For Changes That Need to Be Made!

But Don't Pick Just One Item & Think Abracadabra It's Fixed!

It's a BIG Combination of Issues!

Until That's Comprehended Just Sit Back,Do Nothing & Watch it get Worse!
Well. At least your honest about not wanting to be any part of a solution. I can respect that
 
This is the thing bessy and I have gone back and forth on for a long time. I think everyone understands that the problems facing mule deer decline in the west are multifaceted and complex. There is no silver bullet out there that solves the problem on its own. But here is the conversation with bessy when you ask him to pick something:

Q: What is the most important thing?
A: ITS NOT ONE THING, HELL-RIGHT!

Q: Okay, pick three things you’d like to see changed.
A: NOT THREE F’N THINGS EITHER NILLER! ITS 50, BUT THEN EVEN MORE THAN THAT! BEEN SAYIN IT FOR 40 F’N YEARS!

Q: Got it. But we can’t do 50+ things all at once. We have to start somewhere. Where do we begin. What are the things that should get priority to get us started?
A: UR SO F’N DENSE NILLER! YOU DONT GET IT THAT IT WILL TAKE HELL-RIGHT TO SAVE THE HERDS!

Translation: He doesn’t have a clue and doesn’t even want to be a part of fixing it. But we all love bessy. I’d break bread with that dude any day. I’d maybe even let him crack one of my cold Dew Zeroes with me!

RAZZIN YA bobcat. Kind of.
 
Loving and protecting what you love will always take some giving and some sacrificing.
If you truly love Mule Deer then it is time to start sacrificing, a little needs to ‘give’ from each weapon type.
But, instead of telling the discipline you don’t use what they need to give up is not the right way.
The tech that needs to be limited needs to first come from each user group.
I am a muzzy user and will go first:
In order to hunt every year I will give up scopes, range finders, and pelletized powder.
That is only three simple little things, not fifty.
If each weapon user group gave up three items each, that would only be nine items.
Will it help?
Not as much as restoring wintering grounds, growing healthy and easy to access forage, and building hundreds of game tunnels under highways.
Will it help a little?
I would think it can’t hurt, if nothing else it would help put the activity of actually ‘hunting’ back in to ‘hunting season’ instead of becoming ‘shooting season’ like where it is headed now.
To you archers who truly love Muleys, what three little sacrifices are you willing to make?
Rifle guys, you?
Guys that loved Waterfowing back in the day self-imposed bans on punt guns, baiting, live decoys, no limits, etc on the resource and look what we have today thanks to the ones who truly loved the game they pursued.
 
If you truly love Mule Deer then it is time to start sacrificing, a little needs to ‘give’ from each weapon type.

Why though? Tell me why each weapon user needs to give a little? What is the expected result?

Is pelletized powder the cause of our deer herds declining? If not, why would getting rid of it help increase deer herds?
 
Why though? Tell me why each weapon user needs to give a little? What is the expected result?

Is pelletized powder the cause of our deer herds declining? If not, why would getting rid of it help increase deer herds?
So implementing regulations can only be related directly to increased deer herds? That’s going to be tough dots to connect and I don’t believe is the sole precedent for regulations in general. I think muzzle loaders shouldn’t have scopes based on the seasons there given because of the primitive weapon designation and association to fair chase. I don’t have that stance in any way shape or form as a conservation method. Haven’t really seen it presented that way outside of MM either
 
You Still Don't Get What I'm Sayin Do You?

So?

I Take It You Don't MuzzleLoader Hunt?

I Take it You Don't Archery Hunt?

We Know You're a Rifle Long Ranger!

No!

You're Not Gonna Start TAKING Just from the StickFlippers!

Anybody with any Common Sense Can See The Over-Kill with Technology & GADGETRY on ALL Types of Weapons!

I'm Not against a few Restrictions/Changes!

But If You're F'N with One Weapon Type You're gonna Do it Evenly & Fairly across The Board on all 3 Types of Weapons!

Your 900+ Yard Shots Days Might be in Jeopardy!

So Be-F'N-Careful What You're Wishin For!

How about we start with archery then? You in now?
 
Hey Niller!

We Are Just Sayin:

If They're Taking!

They're Taking EQUALLY Across the Board On All 3 Weapon Types!

Now Agreed Niller!

Without Other Changes(Which MrShane Mentioned a couple others!)Taking away From Weapons Does Nothing to Improve Our Herds!

I Think We Both/All Agree on that?



Why though? Tell me why each weapon user needs to give a little? What is the expected result?

Is pelletized powder the cause of our deer herds declining? If not, why would getting rid of it help increase deer herds?
 
Loving and protecting what you love will always take some giving and some sacrificing.
If you truly love Mule Deer then it is time to start sacrificing, a little needs to ‘give’ from each weapon type.
But, instead of telling the discipline you don’t use what they need to give up is not the right way.
The tech that needs to be limited needs to first come from each user group.
I am a muzzy user and will go first:
In order to hunt every year I will give up scopes, range finders, and pelletized powder.
That is only three simple little things, not fifty.
If each weapon user group gave up three items each, that would only be nine items.
Will it help?
Not as much as restoring wintering grounds, growing healthy and easy to access forage, and building hundreds of game tunnels under highways.
Will it help a little?
I would think it can’t hurt, if nothing else it would help put the activity of actually ‘hunting’ back in to ‘hunting season’ instead of becoming ‘shooting season’ like where it is headed now.
To you archers who truly love Muleys, what three little sacrifices are you willing to make?
Rifle guys, you?
Guys that loved Waterfowing back in the day self-imposed bans on punt guns, baiting, live decoys, no limits, etc on the resource and look what we have today thanks to the ones who truly loved the game they pursued.
I’m using the same rifle, scope and sling I’ve been using for over 4 decades. I’m not willing to give any of it up as I don’t believe it’s the cause of deer decline. If only it was that simple.
 
How about antler restrictions?

Any of yall willing to ban bucks less than 22 inch spread and less than 9 points?????
 
So implementing regulations can only be related directly to increased deer herds? That’s going to be tough dots to connect and I don’t believe is the sole precedent for regulations in general. I think muzzle loaders shouldn’t have scopes based on the seasons there given because of the primitive weapon designation and association to fair chase. I don’t have that stance in any way shape or form as a conservation method. Haven’t really seen it presented that way outside of MM either

We can implement regulations for any reason we want. But with the qualifier of “If you truly love mule deer then…” it sounds like we’re talking about the survival of the species, not purely subjective views of what a hunt “should” be. So if we need to do this based on our love for mule deer, I want more information. Hence the “why?”

I can respect your opinion on what fair chase is without agreeing with it. I am failing to understand how putting a scope on a muzzleloader is not fair chase but putting one on a rifle is fine. That is some serious mental gymnastics to make sense of that.
 
We can implement regulations for any reason we want. But with the qualifier of “If you truly love mule deer then…” it sounds like we’re talking about the survival of the species, not purely subjective views of what a hunt “should” be. So if we need to do this based on our love for mule deer, I want more information. Hence the “why?”

I can respect your opinion on what fair chase is without agreeing with it. I am failing to understand how putting a scope on a muzzleloader is not fair chase but putting one on a rifle is fine. That is some serious mental gymnastics to make sense of that.
This is from the dusty corners of my memory and from either AZ or Co, so has absolutely nothing to do with the tar baby y’all wresting with here except for context.

The argument for putting the hunts during the early season was to tilt the tables in favor of the hunter BECAUSE OF the inherent disadvantages of the primitive weapon.

So again, it was about sportsmanship more than population management. This is the only place where I have seen the argument that lethality of harvest methods has no bearing on herd health, but then again I don’t get out much.

As jp says, why have the hunt during the elk rut if there’s no functional difference in weapons. I would damn sure beat that drum if I was still a serious archer.
 
Last edited:
Why though? Tell me why each weapon user needs to give a little? What is the expected result?

Is pelletized powder the cause of our deer herds declining? If not, why would getting rid of it help increase deer herds?
I already told you in my post that it might not help the herds, but it will make the experience more rewarding in the end.
Anyone can make a shot when a rangefinder gives exact distance to a target or you just need to drop a glued up slug of powder down the barrel, especially in the heat of the moment.
My opinion is we need to slow our roll a little in the technology realm is all, strictly my opinion.
If you don’t want to cut back on tech a little, just say that.
 
Again, this is for New Mexico, where I reside. Everyone keeps on going on about this not bringing the herds back. I've explained several times that is not what it is about. This is a measure so they do not have to cut tags for the muzzy seasons even more. It's not that hard to understand. They aren't having to make changes to the rifle or archery, because even with their advancements, success rates haven't gone up very much. Maybe a couple percent on average. But, muzzys have gone up quite a bit more. It is either limit them, or cut tags. This is not going to bring the herds back, it is about keeping the opportunity to hunt there for muzzleloader hunters.
 
This is the only place where I have seen the argument that lethality of harvest methods has no bearing on herd health, but then again I don’t get out much.
That's because it doesn't, providing certain other criteria is used regarding the TOTAL harvest.
 
Again, this is for New Mexico, where I reside. Everyone keeps on going on about this not bringing the herds back. I've explained several times that is not what it is about. This is a measure so they do not have to cut tags for the muzzy seasons even more. It's not that hard to understand. They aren't having to make changes to the rifle or archery, because even with their advancements, success rates haven't gone up very much. Maybe a couple percent on average. But, muzzys have gone up quite a bit more. It is either limit them, or cut tags. This is not going to bring the herds back, it is about keeping the opportunity to hunt there for muzzleloader hunters.

I would submit the advances in the the smokepole itself, along with precision made projectiles and QC'd propellent (powder), has had a larger impact than scopes alone. An "el-cheapo" muzzleloader accurate out to 150 yds with a scope is probably just as effective as the premium sniper version capable out to 500 yds but limited to normal sight distances without a scope, or 150 yds.

So, do you limit the sighting device, or do you limit the build of the rifle along with its capabilities?
 
I already told you in my post that it might not help the herds, but it will make the experience more rewarding in the end.
Anyone can make a shot when a rangefinder gives exact distance to a target or you just need to drop a glued up slug of powder down the barrel, especially in the heat of the moment.
My opinion is we need to slow our roll a little in the technology realm is all, strictly my opinion.
If you don’t want to cut back on tech a little, just say that.

That’s a better description. When you lead with “if you truly love mule deer” it doesn’t lead to a logical conclusion of just talking about the hunting experience.

I’m actually okay with reasonable and rational restrictions on technology. I’ve listed some I’m very much in favor of above already in this thread. What I’m not in favor of, however, is feel good regulations that restrict people but accomplish nothing by doing so other than make some other people feel good. This feels a lot like that. Some people think the muzzy hunt should be a “primitive” hunt, but in Utah (the state this thread was originally about) the muzzy hunt was never intended as a primitive weapon hunt.

And while I assumed taking scopes off muzzies would decrease harvest and could result in more tags, as many others have also assumed, I personally tabulated the data to find out and that simply isn’t the case in Utah.

So all we’re accomplishing is legislating one’s own subjective view of “fair chase” in these regulations?

No thank you. That’s not the Utah way.
 
Vannila….you have said this twice now, “in Utah the muzzy hunt was never intended as a primitive weapon hunt.”

I have said that is not a fact, twice now.

What is the source, for your statement?

It was most definitely intended as a primitive weapon hunt.

Are you suggesting the term “primitive weapon” has a different meaning than something that pre-dates a breach loading, rim fire/center fire rifle?
 
Vannila….you have said this twice now, “in Utah the muzzy hunt was never intended as a primitive weapon hunt.”

I have said that is not a fact, twice now.

What is the source, for your statement?

It was most definitely intended as a primitive weapon hunt.

Are you suggesting the term “primitive weapon” has a different meaning than something that pre-dates a breach loading, rim fire/center fire rifle?


Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn’t the ML “season” originally not even a season on its own? It was simply an extension of the rifle season that people could get a stamp or something similar and get an extended season added on to their rifle tag? And I do not believe there were any restrictions on weapons outside of caliber and energy. (Not dissimilar to the restrictions on our rifle weaponry today.) This all predates my hunting and particularly my hunting with muzzleloaders, but this is what I’ve found in my reading up on the topic.

That does not sound like a primitive hunt to me. I guess we can get caught in the weeds on what the definition of “primitive” is and go round and round over semantics, but can you point to any official sources from the state of Utah calling it a primitive weapon hunt? And further, what qualifies something as “primitive?”

I maintain my statement on intent and primitive vs just another season to hunt. I’m happy to be corrected if you can show me where I’ve got it wrong.
 
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn’t the ML “season” originally not even a season on its own? It was simply an extension of the rifle season that people could get a stamp or something similar and get an extended season added on to their rifle tag? And I do not believe there were any restrictions on weapons outside of caliber and energy. (Not dissimilar to the restrictions on our rifle weaponry today.) This all predates my hunting and particularly my hunting with muzzleloaders, but this is what I’ve found in my reading up on the topic.

That does not sound like a primitive hunt to me. I guess we can get caught in the weeds on what the definition of “primitive” is and go round and round over semantics, but can you point to any official sources from the state of Utah calling it a primitive weapon hunt? And further, what qualifies something as “primitive?”

I maintain my statement on intent and primitive vs just another season to hunt. I’m happy to be corrected if you can show me where I’ve got it wrong.
Thank you for your responsible reply Vannila. I’m just headed out for a movie night with my sweetheart, I’ll respond later this evening or tomorrow.
 
You Still Don't Get What I'm Sayin Do You?

So?

I Take It You Don't MuzzleLoader Hunt?

I Take it You Don't Archery Hunt?

We Know You're a Rifle Long Ranger!

No!

You're Not Gonna Start TAKING Just from the StickFlippers!

Anybody with any Common Sense Can See The Over-Kill with Technology & GADGETRY on ALL Types of Weapons!

I'm Not against a few Restrictions/Changes!

But If You're F'N with One Weapon Type You're gonna Do it Evenly & Fairly across The Board on all 3 Types of Weapons!

Your 900+ Yard Shots Days Might be in Jeopardy!

So Be-F'N-Careful What You're Wishin For!
I’m primarily an archer and have taken several deer and 2 elk with a muzzle loader. Open sights by the way. But I much prefer my bow so I sold the muzzle loader a few years ago. Funny thought that one can’t be proficient in more then one discipline. Maybe just because use you can’t? What I hunt with doesn’t sway my opinion or use of common sense
 
Well!

I Hunt With All 3 Weapon Types!

You Sold Your MuzzleLoader Huh?

Makes perfect Sense!



I’m primarily an archer and have taken several deer and 2 elk with a muzzle loader. Open sights by the way. But I much prefer my bow so I sold the muzzle loader a few years ago. Funny thought that one can’t be proficient in more then one discipline. Maybe just because use you can’t? What I hunt with doesn’t sway my opinion or use of common sense
 
Vanilla,
I tried to look up deer muzzleloader season and weapons restrictions in my 1978 proclamation but it only mentions Elk, Moose,Antelope, Buffalo, and Bighorns in it.
Not a single thing about deer.
Not even sure if there was a muzzy season for deer until the 80’s?
Must have also been a special proclomation for deer?
Of special note in my proclamation it mentions that to report wildlife violations use your CB on channels 14 and 19 to report violations.

D829C70F-37FA-4119-84A3-037D259CB2DB.jpeg
 
I have been an archer for 50+ years, other than for birds, a bow is all I hunt with. Now my son wrestled all throughout his school years, so in order to be able to hunt, he hunted with a muzzle-loader. The season dates worked better for him and his wrestling schedule.

He grew to enjoy the muzzle-loader and that is what he still hunts with. Here is another opinion about scopes on muzzys. My son is a good example, he wont shoot past about 150 yards period. His gun will but he wont, he is not interested in wounding anything. This has gone on for a good hand full of years now.

The biggest change I have noticed while hunting with him since scopes is this...There are indeed a few long range shooters. But there are far more folks like my son. I have noticed a trend, I see and hear about far less wounded animals now since scopes were allowed. Most hunters can shoot accurately with a scope at 100-150 yards. Very few are anywhere near as accurate with open sights.

Myself I grew up shooting open sights, I like them and can shoot well with them. This does not apply to most guys I see hunting now days, at all. I think having far less wounded animals overrides the few who carry it to an extreme and shoot many hundreds of yards.

We used to see guys looking for wounded deer each and every year, for years. Most never find them and keep hunting anyway. In the years since scopes, I have only seen 1 guy, a long range guy at that, who were looking for wounded animals. How can fewer wounded animals be a bad thing? If scopes are taken, the long range hunters will just switch to rifles, and extend their range to even more ridiculous ranges. Thus more wounded animals. There are many sides to this but I never hear this pointed out, wounding less animals is a good thing, and IMHO over-rides the very few who shoot super long range shots. Take scopes away and those few will still find a way to get an advantage. All it would accomplish is going back to more wounded animals.

Now as far as archery...I think anyone who wants to hunt with a bow, no matter their age, should have to pass a shooting test. A test involving shooting with broad-head tipped arrows. Again IMHO...this would cut the number of archers in half...or more. Few spend the time to acquire good skills with a bow. A large amount of them never shoot with a broad-head tipped arrow, until it is at an animal they are shooting at. Every year I seen terrible, pathetic, shooters flinging arrows at animals, these folks have no business being allowed to hunt with a bow. Everyone should have to pass a competency test. If you don't practice often with broad-head tipped arrows...you shouldn't be hunting our big game with them.
 
I have been an archer for 50+ years, other than for birds, a bow is all I hunt with. Now my son wrestled all throughout his school years, so in order to be able to hunt, he hunted with a muzzle-loader. The season dates worked better for him and his wrestling schedule.

He grew to enjoy the muzzle-loader and that is what he still hunts with. Here is another opinion about scopes on muzzys. My son is a good example, he wont shoot past about 150 yards period. His gun will but he wont, he is not interested in wounding anything. This has gone on for a good hand full of years now.

The biggest change I have noticed while hunting with him since scopes is this...There are indeed a few long range shooters. But there are far more folks like my son. I have noticed a trend, I see and hear about far less wounded animals now since scopes were allowed. Most hunters can shoot accurately with a scope at 100-150 yards. Very few are anywhere near as accurate with open sights.

Myself I grew up shooting open sights, I like them and can shoot well with them. This does not apply to most guys I see hunting now days, at all. I think having far less wounded animals overrides the few who carry it to an extreme and shoot many hundreds of yards.

We used to see guys looking for wounded deer each and every year, for years. Most never find them and keep hunting anyway. In the years since scopes, I have only seen 1 guy, a long range guy at that, who were looking for wounded animals. How can fewer wounded animals be a bad thing? If scopes are taken, the long range hunters will just switch to rifles, and extend their range to even more ridiculous ranges. Thus more wounded animals. There are many sides to this but I never hear this pointed out, wounding less animals is a good thing, and IMHO over-rides the very few who shoot super long range shots. Take scopes away and those few will still find a way to get an advantage. All it would accomplish is going back to more wounded animals.

Now as far as archery...I think anyone who wants to hunt with a bow, no matter their age, should have to pass a shooting test. A test involving shooting with broad-head tipped arrows. Again IMHO...this would cut the number of archers in half...or more. Few spend the time to acquire good skills with a bow. A large amount of them never shoot with a broad-head tipped arrow, until it is at an animal they are shooting at. Every year I seen terrible, pathetic, shooters flinging arrows at animals, these folks have no business being allowed to hunt with a bow. Everyone should have to pass a competency test. If you don't practice often with broad-head tipped arrows...you shouldn't be hunting our big game with them.
Should muzzleloaders and rifle hunters have to pass a competency test?
 
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn’t the ML “season” originally not even a season on its own? It was simply an extension of the rifle season that people could get a stamp or something similar and get an extended season added on to their rifle tag? And I do not believe there were any restrictions on weapons outside of caliber and energy. (Not dissimilar to the restrictions on our rifle weaponry today.) This all predates my hunting and particularly my hunting with muzzleloaders, but this is what I’ve found in my reading up on the topic.

That does not sound like a primitive hunt to me. I guess we can get caught in the weeds on what the definition of “primitive” is and go round and round over semantics, but can you point to any official sources from the state of Utah calling it a primitive weapon hunt? And further, what qualifies something as “primitive?”

I maintain my statement on intent and primitive vs just another season to hunt. I’m happy to be corrected if you can show me where I’ve got it wrong.
I had the same difficulties as Shadow had, finding specific dates on Utah’s muzzleloader hunt history. Here are my personal experiences at that time how ever, not that it really matter at all but I would guess the UDWR has written minutes of the meeting in the 1970’s in their archives.

Jeremiah Johnson was a movie released in 1972, Staring Robert Redford and Will Gere about a Mountain man and his quarrel with the Crow Indian Tribe. Johnson found an old fur trapper wounded and frozen dead, at the foot of a pine tree, in his lap was a (Thompson Center) 50 Caliber Hawken style muzzleloader, with a note attached, giving it to whomever found it.

This movie sparked a large interest in the western sport hunting community in the early 70’s.

Prior to the movie the interest in muzzleloader shooting was from a small group of Pre Civil War and Civil War groups and a few Eastern States Colonial and Revolutionary War enthusiasts. Military re-enactments and Colonial Days celebrations were held in the States, primarily east of the Mississippi River. Most of the muzzleloaders prior the early 1970’s were either the Eastern Flintlock, Kentucky style Long Rifles, (in pre 1920’s they were made for traveling and hunting one foot and not on horse back) or the Military type muskets like the long barreled, often smooth bore muzzleloaders. A common muzzleloader used by early modern day sport hunters was the Zouave Rifle.

The Jeremiah Johnson movie sparked a lot of interest in muzzleloader ownership and muzzleloader shooting. Most purchased the Thompson Center Hawken style rifle but because they were cheaper, some purchased the Zouave Rifles from places like the Dixie Gun Works etc.

CVA sold a cheaply made muzzleloader and was consider to be hardly more than a risky piece of scrap by most modern traditionalist muzzleloader hunters. (They have come a long way since then.)

I can not give the first year specifics and the first year a separate muzzleloader hunt was held in Utah but for sure it was a year or two before 1975 maybe three years before. I know this for a fact because I moved to Utah in 1975 and the muzzleloader hunt was in place before I arrived here. In 1075 it was a primitive weapon hunt, specifically regulated to 45 caliber or larger, only muzzleloading, it was an over the counter tag, the season was nine or ten days, as I recall, it limited to four or five units only. (Out of 62 units). I don’t recall all five but I know two for sure where the Wellsville Unit and the Boulder/Parker Mt. Unit. The hunt was in August and if I remember correctly it started the same day the archery hunt opened.

I was not in Utah the first year it started but I was informed it was an experimental, five year trial season. The experiment ended in 1977 or 1978.

From this point in time forward, I was personal involved on both the local level and the State level. In the 1970s there were 15 or 20 local active muzzleloader clubs (Cedar City, Beaver, Richfield, Emery County, Carbon County, Unitah County, Vernal, Salt Lake City, Brigham City, and Logan were some I remember, there were more.)and a State muzzleloader organization. Most all of the clubs belonged to the State organization.

An old muzzleloader enthusiast from Monroe, Utah had been elected as the President State Muzzleloader Organization, I was elected Vice President.

After the five year trial hunt ended in 1977 or 1978, the State Archery people and the State modern Rifle hunting people were up in arms. They had both been raising hell with the DWR…… the archers were mad because they had loud guns being discharged during the archery season, on the five units and they dang sure were not going stand for a State wide muzzleloader hunt in August during the archery season. The rifle hunter groups were also angry because they feared if the muzzleloader season became a State wide season, preceded the any weapon (rifle) hunt, it would ruin the rifle hunt……. the tradition Utah deer hunt.

In response to these complaints from the majority of the Utah hunting community and it’s hunting clubs/organizations, the Utah Division of Wild Resources, represented by Norman (Norm) Hancock , Chief of Game Management, proposed to the Utah Board of Big Game Control Agenda (today’s Wildlife Board) that the five year experimental hunt demonstrate that it would be counter productive, and it was the Utah DWR m’s recommending to the Board that muzzleloader hunting not have an individual and specific hunt season, limited to muzzleloaders.

So I can not speak to who or why the original five year muzzleloader experiment was started, in the early 1970’s but I suspected it had something to do with a gentleman by the name of Lee Robertson, who was Utah’s Father of the Utah DWR’s Hunter Education Program, who was probably the most influential muzzleloader in the State of Utah at that time. Lee was a died in the wool primitive muzzleloader and a highly regarded leader in the DWR agency and throughout the hunting community.

The organized hunting public’s response to Mr. Hancocks agenda recommendation, to not have a primitive weapons muzzleloader hunt in Utah………the following is mostly what I posted in Item #33 of this thread, last week.

Rather than retype it, I’m just going to cut and past it here:

In 19777 or 1978, sportsmen asked, 100% for a Primitive Muzzleloader Weapon hunt. 100% driven by the long gone Utah State Muzzleloader Federation, represented by Al Rucksaker President, and supported by Utah State Archers and the all powerful (pre 1993) and also long gone, Utah Wildlife Federation. This hunt was vigorously opposed by Utah’s Department of Wildlife Resources, represented by Norman Hancock, in all five public hearings, to the Utah Wildlife Big Game Board during the late 1970’s.

The request to the Board was this:
The Utah Muzzleloaders are requesting a specific Muzzleloader Deer Hunting Season. We asked that we be allowed to dress in tradition mountain man/fur trapper clothing, have the opportunity to camp in primitive teepees and trapper period leantos, and shoot period lead balls and with blackpowder in our muzzleloaders.

We requested a season was for after all other mule deer hunts were over, so as not to offend any archers or any weapon (rifle) season hunters. Muzzleloader’s agreed to take, “the left overs” in order to hunt with a primitive weapon. 100% driven by hunters wanting a primitive weapon, non-archer, hunting season. We told the Board we didn’t care when the hunt was held and would be perfectly happy to hunt after both the archery and any weapon seasons were finished. After the other hunters had shot most of the bucks already.

There were five public hearings, basically in the same places the RAC meeting are held now days. Mr Rucksaker and I took time off from work, attended and presented at all five meetings, along with support from the archers, the any weapon representatives and numerous local sportsmen but mostly other muzzleloader enthusiasts. We all attended the sixth meeting, in Salt Lake DWR office Board meeting. At that meeting the Board of Big Game Control voted to establish a State wide muzzleloader season for 9 days, the first week of November, opening every year the same day as the traditional pheasant hunt.

At that time, in 1977 or 1978, all muzzleloaders were “primitive”. That is there were no in-lines, no sabots, no scopes, no range finders, no commercial shooting sticks, no 209, I do believe some folks were starting to use Pyrodex but it was frowned onby the “traditionists” but to no avail.?

The first inline muzzleloader didn’t come to market until 1985 by Tony Knight, of Knight Muzzleloaders.

To my knowledge Utah hunter never register a strong position against in-line, fast twist barrel muzzleloaders. After they became popular and the new found muzzleloader hunting interest numbers over took the traditional hunters, technology enhance too, over took the muzzleloader hunt.

Jerry Mason, a sportsman’s representative on the Utah Wildlife Board recommended 1x scopes, because he and other older hunters were complaining they could no longer see with open sights. Out of the “aged hunter” argument, the Board passed his recommendations, that was in the mid to late 1990’s, as I recall.

In all reality, I personally wish I/we had failed and Mr. Hancock and the DWR had won. In the 1970’s sportsmen including muzzleloaders had no idea mule deer numbers where going to crash and muzzleloaders and people like myself are every bit to blame for allowing it to happen by demanding more and more and more opportunity, with more and more lethal weaponry. Not to mention elkassassin’s other fifty reasons.

Lee Robertson early DWR employee and avid early muzzleloader.

1E03496A-7873-4A2C-A7AB-615EB84E4A28.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Thanks Lumpy!

Then Came The Technology/GADGETRY For Rifles & Archery Equipment!

Archery Equipment Back in The Day Was Recurves,Wooden Arrows,Moccasins,20 & 30 Yard Shots Were BRAGGIN Material But Then Came High Powered Compounds,Better Sights,Fiber Arrows,Better Broad-heads,RangeFinders & Etc!

Rifles were Always a Longer Range Weapon but I Remember when 300-400 Yard Shots Were BRAGGIN Material,But Then Came Higher Powers Scopes,RangeFinders,Bigger/Better Calibers,Better Powders,Better Bullets,Better Powders & Etc!

No Matter Which Weapons You Hunt With We are ALL Guilty of Something With Damn Few Exceptions!

I Don't Hear Anybody Bittching & Moaning About Modern Day Optics!

(((Other Than Having Them On SmokePoles!)))

We All Have Optics of Some Caliber!

Tell Me Bino's & Spotting Scopes Didn't Change The Picture in Hunting And I Don't Give a Rats Ass what Weaponry You Use!
 
Thanks Lumpy!

Then Came The Technology/GADGETRY For Rifles & Archery Equipment!

Archery Equipment Back in The Day Was Recurves,Wooden Arrows,Moccasins,20 & 30 Yard Shots Were BRAGGIN Material But Then Came High Powered Compounds,Better Sights,Fiber Arrows,Better Broad-heads,RangeFinders & Etc!

Rifles were Always a Longer Range Weapon but I Remember when 300-400 Yard Shots Were BRAGGIN Material,But Then Came Higher Powers Scopes,RangeFinders,Bigger/Better Calibers,Better Powders,Better Bullets,Better Powders & Etc!

No Matter Which Weapons You Hunt With We are ALL Guilty of Something With Damn Few Exceptions!

I Don't Hear Anybody Bittching & Moaning About Modern Day Optics!

(((Other Than Having Them On SmokePoles!)))

We All Have Optics of Some Caliber!

Tell Me Bino's & Spotting Scopes Didn't Change The Picture in Hunting And I Don't Give a Rats Ass what Weaponry You Use!
Of course they do. Every item you mentioned has taken another piece, some large and some small but in their “totality” they have been devastating. If we’re compare the consequences of technology on big game animals, the image of that Native American shooting that buffalo of the back of that horse is another example. There are historians from the 1860-70 who claim the Native Americans had already started to deplete the bison population, with their adaptation to horse technology before the European hide hunters ever arrived on the plains. True or not, it’s been an issue for a 150 years in North America.

One or two things did not destroyed the mule deer population and one or two things will not fix it. It’s has gone too far for that to be possible.
 
In pure numbers I am going to go with rifle.
Per 100 hunters, my guess would be archery.

The margin of error for a complete miss with archery tackle is higher, if a shot is even made, with an extremely low chance for a follow up second shot.

The margin of error is lower for a rifle, with follow up shots that more likely cause a semi-lethal wound if the first shot is a miss.

An acquaintance of mine works at a custom meat processing plant. When they did wild game, the average (based on this anecdotal evidence) was approximately 25/75 on archery/rifle wounds on an animal with either a broadhead or bullet somewhere embedded in bone that had healed around the wound.

My speculation is the lost mortality rate would be similar. If you go by the bowhunters that "punch their tag" after drawing blood regardless of retrieve, this number would be higher.
 
Don't worry 2Lumpy. Banning 3-4 things a year will have the mule deer stabilized in about a decade.

Of course all that will be left will be 10 people getting a tag for a 1 day season. They will only be able to have a single all copper bullet to take on their hunt, to be shot out of state issued rifle with a fixed 4 power scope with 2 safeties on it. Any binoculars over 8X are not allowed and you will not be allowed to take a photo of your kill. Really rich people will take a portrait painter with them. Guides and family members will be outlawed. At all times you will have to wear sleigh bells.

Enjoy!
 
Don't worry 2Lumpy. Banning 3-4 things a year will have the mule deer stabilized in about a decade.

Of course all that will be left will be 10 people getting a tag for a 1 day season. They will only be able to have a single all copper bullet to take on their hunt, to be shot out of state issued rifle with a fixed 4 power scope with 2 safeties on it. Any binoculars over 8X are not allowed and you will not be allowed to take a photo of your kill. Really rich people will take a portrait painter with them. Guides and family members will be outlawed. At all times you will have to wear sleigh bells.

Enjoy!

This will make the flat-brimmer crowd mad by not being able to crowd in 34 guys for the hero pic. Don't be surprised if one shows up one day to call you a moron :ROFLMAO:
 
I can remember deer hunting in California before there was an archery or muzzy season. I bow hunted the first year we had an archery season. A wood/fiberglass long bow with cedar arrows. I think it was reported that less than 10 deer were taken the first year. To get within 25 yards of a blacktail is almost impossible. I missed a broadside shot at about 20 yards. Buck fever. We had fun but didn't hurt the deer numbers.

Then you add recurves, compound bows, aluminum arrows, sights, range finders and 1000% more people doing it and it becomes an issue. Humans have a remarkable ability to be efficient at whatever we decide to do.

At some point something has to give. I think we all agree to that.
 
I can remember deer hunting in California before there was an archery or muzzy season. I bow hunted the first year we had an archery season. A wood/fiberglass long bow with cedar arrows. I think it was reported that less than 10 deer were taken the first year. To get within 25 yards of a blacktail is almost impossible. I missed a broadside shot at about 20 yards. Buck fever. We had fun but didn't hurt the deer numbers.

Then you add recurves, compound bows, aluminum arrows, sights, range finders and 1000% more people doing it and it becomes an issue. Humans have a remarkable ability to be efficient at whatever we decide to do.

At some point something has to give. I think we all agree to that.
One of wildest memories I have was an archery hunt back in the 70’s. Two deer were standing broadside at 20 or less yards, I proudly held my new, hand built recurve, with cedar arrows tipped with the old pressed metal, Zewicky arrow heads.

The deer stood, one above the other, the top one had it’s head behind a scrub oak and lower one was a yearling two point. I drew back on the lower buck and was so close I had no idea where to aim. I let fly, intended to hit the buck behind the front shoulder, to utter amazement, the arrow hit the top deer, square, on the tip of the shoulder, the cedar shaft exploded into a thousand tooth picked sized pieces.

Besides the shock of seeing the arrow explode, on the shoulder of the wrong deer, which I thought was a doe…….. out stumbled another two point yearling buck. Went into triple shock, all within less than two seconds.

Nope…….. never did retrieve the buck, my guess was a rifle hunter killed it a month later and cursed some dumb assed archer, and rightly so.
 
Last edited:
I can remember deer hunting in California before there was an archery or muzzy season. I bow hunted the first year we had an archery season. A wood/fiberglass long bow with cedar arrows. I think it was reported that less than 10 deer were taken the first year. To get within 25 yards of a blacktail is almost impossible. I missed a broadside shot at about 20 yards. Buck fever. We had fun but didn't hurt the deer numbers.

Then you add recurves, compound bows, aluminum arrows, sights, range finders and 1000% more people doing it and it becomes an issue. Humans have a remarkable ability to be efficient at whatever we decide to do.

At some point something has to give. I think we all agree to that.
My start into archery was a 45# Ben Pearson wooden recurve, cedar arrows with two-edged broadheads in a hip quiver & shooting with one of those 3-finger open glove dealies & a leather armguard. After aluminum arrows debuted, I actually managed to kill one little 3-pt. mule deer & one javelina.

The late Jim Varney (Ernest in the movies) was an avid traditionalist. He used a LONG bow with wooden arrows & was a deadly shot with it. At the annual Buckmasters Classic in AL, he would compete against the guys shooting bows with all the whizbang gear & stay right up with them on the pop-up deer targets.

Varney.jpg
 
Last edited:

Click-a-Pic ... Details & Bigger Photos
Back
Top Bottom