Utah Muzzy Scope Controversy

Now Just What Kind of a F'N Statement Is That?

""" or scopes with greater than X amount of magnification on rifles."""

JUDAS!

F'N!

PRIEST!

X Amount Huh?

You Wanna SPLAIN That One hawkeye?


There is more than one way to skin a cat but here are my suggestions for limiting technology: (1) no scopes on muzzleloaders; (2) no laser rangefinding sights on bows; and (3) no electronic scopes (e.g., Sig Sauer BDX, Burris Eliminator, etc.) or scopes with greater than X amount of magnification on rifles. Also, keep a close eye on new and developing technology moving forward.

I look forward to the proposals from the committee and the resulting whining and emotion leading up to the RAC and WB meetings. I fully expect the proposed changes to affect me and the way I currently hunt but I am hopeful that the changes will help our herds (quantity and quality) and increase the opportunity to hunt in the future.

Hawkeye
 
I did turn them in but clearly I didn’t see them shoot it was cloud cover and still dark. The DWR officer ask if I seen them do it I told them it was to dark but we did see the flash come out of the barrel. But you have to see them do it.
Scopes where the culprit and you know it or they wouldn’t of shot they couldn’t of seen those elk with open sights.?
Too bad you didn’t see them, would have been one heck of a sight to see 4 elk shot in the dark. Night Vision Scopes should be taken off muzzleloaders for sure ?
 
Hey hawkeye?

Let's Make It a Little More Challenging Than That:

ARCHERS:Fred Bear/Recurves Only!

SMOKEPOLERS: HAWKENS & FLINTLOCKS Open Sights Only!

RIFLE HUNTERS: Nothing More Powerful/Bigger Than a 30-30 Open Sights Only!

Let's Hear The BAWLING!
 
Got a doctor note From your Family Doc saying you can't pull your bow so now you get to shoot a crossbow U see Ad's about 100 yds groups all bolts touching. There is guy's saying they kill at 140 yds and more. So where does archery start and end and where is the Crossbow season??????????????
But they want to limit a ML with a low power scope.
 
For me it is principle, if I don’t believe something is right I am not going to do it. Regardless if it’s the cool thing to do or if it’s legal or not. If I’m about helping the “herd” and fair chase, I just don’t think it’s right to do something that goes against your beliefs because it’s legal. I hardly think shooting a muzzy without a scope is like bringing a knife to gun fight. I’m willing to bet Slam could kill just as many deer with or without scope
sure we can kill as many deer, but how about Quality?
 
These remarks are why I'm fighting this subject so hard.
1st of all, these proposed changed for all three weapons are apples and oranges. the proposes for archery and rifle only effect about 10 percent of those hunters right now, it's mainly setting things up for the future, while the proposed changes for the muzzy will effect about 90 percent of the hunters right now.
Also, you guys got to stop claiming this will help the herds because it won't.
It won't even save very many bucks.
We already have a way of keeping enough bucks in the herd for breading each fall with a set number of bucks per does post season on each unit.
The quality will not change that much if the buck/doe ratios are kept the same and if you raise the buck ratio, then you will have tag cuts. It's almost impossible to have both quality and quantity at the same time without without fixing the fawn and winter range losses first.
And these remarks keep getting old trying to tell all the opposed that we and I have stated multiple times that these changes aren't meant to fix the "herds", and the herds are being worked on from every angle possible from excessive predator control to collaring studies and habitat projects, highway fencing and crossings, etc, etc, problem areas for all big game, especially our Mule Deer.

Again....when and where do we draw a line??
 
sure we can kill as many deer, but how about Quality?
I’m pretty sure Slam doesn’t shoot 2 points off the side of the road. So I would think the quality would be close to the same. Are you saying all the quality deer have been shot by scoped muzzies so there’s none left? Or it’s so easy to shoot deer at long ranges with them that everyone is shooting big bucks?
 
Hey hawkeye?

Let's Make It a Little More Challenging Than That:

ARCHERS:Fred Bear/Recurves Only!

SMOKEPOLERS: HAWKENS & FLINTLOCKS Open Sights Only!

RIFLE HUNTERS: Nothing More Powerful/Bigger Than a 30-30 Open Sights Only!

Let's Hear The BAWLING!
I’d be fine with those changes but I’m guessing the WB won’t go that far! You could definitely increase opportunity with those limitations!
 
And these remarks keep getting old trying to tell all the opposed that we and I have stated multiple times that these changes aren't meant to fix the "herds", and the herds are being worked on from every angle possible from excessive predator control to collaring studies and habitat projects, highway fencing and crossings, etc, etc, problem areas for all big game, especially our Mule Deer.

Again....when and where do we draw a line??
Salesmanship.
Clearly the "proposed changes haven't addressed the "perceived" problem.

I'm sorry if I missed the definition of the "problem" trying to be solved. If it's not the herd is it the quality? Are we killing too many deer or just too many "big, quality" deer?

We were sold mini units. We were sold reduced tags. We were sold choose your weapon. We were sold habitat projects.

How about actually punishing successful hunters if that is the problem? After all it is not people hunting killing deer, Just the successful hunters.
 
Now Just What Kind of a F'N Statement Is That?

""" or scopes with greater than X amount of magnification on rifles."""

JUDAS!

F'N!

PRIEST!

X Amount Huh?

You Wanna SPLAIN That One hawkeye?
I was suggesting a limit on the maximum amount of magnification for rifle scopes to be determined by the WB. I think 9x would be plenty and would really limit long range plinking.

What type of scope do you have on your Lapua, Elkster?

Hawkeye
 
These remarks are why I'm fighting this subject so hard.
1st of all, these proposed changed for all three weapons are apples and oranges. the proposes for archery and rifle only effect about 10 percent of those hunters right now, it's mainly setting things up for the future, while the proposed changes for the muzzy will effect about 90 percent of the hunters right now.
Ridge-

Many of us believe that scopes never should’ve been allowed on muzzleloaders in the first place. It was a bad move pushed by a few vocal members of the WB. So since the rule change just a few years ago, 90% of muzzleloader hunters have put magnified scopes on their rifles? If 90% of muzzleloader hunters are really using scopes, then you have you ask why they are using scopes? The answer is obvious. They are using scopes on their muzzleloaders because it extends their lethal range and makes them more effective at harvesting animals. That is precisely why I mounted a 4-12 power scope on my muzzleloader. Let’s return the muzzleloader hunt to more of a primitive hunt!

Hawkeye
 
The 3 Types Of Weapons I Hunt With hawkeye are way Down The TOTEM Pole from the Weapons You Use!

I've Got A Rifle That Will Out-Shoot The Rifle I Hunt With!

My SmokePole Doesn't Have a 4X12 On it,It's a Medium Range SmokePole at Best!

My Archery Equipment Is Out-Dated So Bad You'd Laugh At it!

But Hey!

Just Think!

When You Guys With All Your High Tech Sshit Becomes Banned & You've Gotta Buy A Whole Bunch of New JUNK To Be Legal I'll Just Keep Using What I've Been Using Forever!

Ain't Gonna Cost Me One F'N Dime!

I was suggesting a limit on the maximum amount of magnification for rifle scopes to be determined by the WB. I think 9x would be plenty and would really limit long range plinking.

What type of scope do you have on your Lapua, Elkster?

Hawkeye
 
Can you guys imagine if they would have allowed Crossbows during archery season and then tried to take them back after a few years. This is a really good lesson on letting the cat out of the bag and walking back technology--it tends to really p!ss people off for some reason! :p
 
All you need is a family Doc to write it off as a shoulder injury and you can use a crossbow during archery season.
Wait can we get a note from the Doc for eye injury and get a bigger scope for ML.
This could work. LOL
 
Current muzzleloading is so far from being what it started out as: a primitive season. To be honest, they might as well just allow single shot center fire rifles instead. The difference between the two is dwindling fast.
 
Current muzzleloading is so far from being what it started out as: a primitive season. To be honest, they might as well just allow single shot center fire rifles instead. The difference between the two is dwindling fast.
Huge difference!
One must be loaded at the muzzle with multiple components.
The other is wham bam as fast as you can throw a singular cartridge in the breech.
 
This is where we are headed ladies and gentlemen.

Are we seriously going to allow it?
View attachment 82605
Mr Slam,
NO, THIS ISN'T WHAT'S COMING because it's illegal already!
You're just being inflammatory and scaring the kids.

If you don't know that these items aren't what we're taking about, you shouldn't be talking at all!!
These are night vision optics and they're already illegal to use for big game.... and you know that or should.
Like I said before, the technology to which you're referring and claim is coming, will not be had for a paltry $2K.

Zeke
 
I'll be fine however it all plays out. My White still has the original aim point red dot from 25+ years ago and still gets used now. Just change the others for the son's to whatever is the case (low magnification. 1X, red dot, peep sights or open sites. Have killed ten fold with my White muzzleloader then with my Remington.

However, I still believe rifles need to be backed off and not just pushed under the carpet as if they are what they have always been. 95% of my rifles still have their original 3X9's on them.

All this conversation is so concentrated/worried about the muzzleloaders and scopes and do not even realize/care that the newly added opportunity for rifle hunters (early rifle hunt) starts just 6-days later with all the high tech, high power scopes. It is not like the hunts are in different seasons where the deer behavior has changed (Muzzy ends on Thursday and Early Rifle begins on the following Wednesday).

I KNOW THIS WILL CAUSE ALMOST AS MUCH OF A STIR AS THIS MUZZLELOADER SCOPE CONVERSATION, BUT HERE IS MY SUGGESTION, and yes I have been inn the program 4 different times and plan on it in next 2 years. As for DEDICATED HUNTER PROGRAM, I believe it has it's place. However, with tags getting harder to draw, I would suggest making the dedicated hunter's program become a PICK YOUR WEAPON. This allows a hunter to be on the mountain for the 3 years with the desired weapon of choose, but does not allow the hunters to hunt 27-days archery, 9-days muzzy, 5-days Early Rifle & 9-days Regular Rifle. Scout if you wish, but not with a weapon in hand to pattern and have numerous chances at the bigger bucks. This would still be very desirable to be garrenteed a tag for 3 years running. Right now a lot of general tags take more then a point to draw and up to 5-6 points to draw. At least when drawn for DH you have a tag for 3 years in a row and still can only tag two bucks. (Less pressure on all the seasons, more selective on killing just any buck and still get wildlife projects completed.
 
Last edited:
Mr Slam,
NO, THIS ISN'T WHAT'S COMING because it's illegal already!
You're just being inflammatory and scaring the kids.

If you don't know that these items aren't what we're taking about, you shouldn't be talking at all!!
These are night vision optics and they're already illegal to use for big game.... and you know that or should.
Like I said before, the technology to which you're referring and claim is coming, will not be had for a paltry $2K.

Zeke
You are correct, I should have been more clear and precise on my picture post.
I wasn't meaning to point out night vision capabilities which those scopes have, I was talking about the other technology in that line of scopes and others like it.
Example...
Screenshot_20220802-133733_Chrome.jpg
 
Huge difference!
One must be loaded at the muzzle with multiple components.
The other is wham bam as fast as you can throw a singular cartridge in the breech.
I disagree. Didn’t say they were the same. But the difference for that first shot (which is all you may get) is smaller and smaller.

Current regs are NOT primative.
 
I'll be fine however it all plays out. My White still has the original aim point red dot from 25+ years ago and still gets used now. Just change the others for the son's to whatever is the case (low magnification. 1X, red dot, peep sights or open sites. Have killed ten fold with my White muzzleloader then with my Remington.

However, I still believe rifles need to be backed off and not just pushed under the carpet as if they are what they have always been. 95% of my rifles still have their original 3X9's on them.

All this conversation is so concentrated/worried about the muzzleloaders and scopes and do not even realize/care that the newly added opportunity for rifle hunters (early rifle hunt) starts just 6-days later with all the high tech, high power scopes. It is not like the hunts are in different seasons where the deer behavior has changed (Muzzy ends on Thursday and Early Rifle begins on the following Wednesday).

I KNOW THIS WILL CAUSE ALMOST AS MUCH OF A STIR AS THIS MUZZLELOADER SCOPE CONVERSATION, BUT HERE IS MY SUGGESTION. As for DEDICATED HUNTER PROGRAM, I believe it has it's place. However, with tags getting harder to draw, I would suggest making the dedicated hunter's program become a PICK YOUR WEAPON. This allows a hunter to be on the mountain for the 3 years with the desired weapon of choose, but does not allow the hunters to hunt 27-days archery, 9-days muzzy, 5-days Early Rifle & 9-days Regular Rifle. Scout if you wish, but not with a weapon in hand to pattern and have numerous chances at the bigger bucks. This would still be very desirable to be garrenteed a tag for 3 years running. Right now a lot of general tags take more then a point to draw and up to 5-6 points to draw. At least when drawn for DH you have a tag for 3 years in a row and still can only tag two bucks. (Less pressure on all the seasons, more selective on killing just any buck and still get wildlife projects completed.
How about we just shorten seasons for DH hunters. They get half the bowhunt. 5 days on the muzzy, 3 on the rifle. Other than that, they still can hunt 2-3 years, only kill 2 deer. Hunt 3 seasons. If your unit has 2 rifle seasons, you must pick one and specify which rifle hunt you have and those dates are printed on your tag
 
I'll be fine however it all plays out. My White still has the original aim point red dot from 25+ years ago and still gets used now. Just change the others for the son's to whatever is the case (low magnification. 1X, red dot, peep sights or open sites. Have killed ten fold with my White muzzleloader then with my Remington.

However, I still believe rifles need to be backed off and not just pushed under the carpet as if they are what they have always been. 95% of my rifles still have their original 3X9's on them.

All this conversation is so concentrated/worried about the muzzleloaders and scopes and do not even realize/care that the newly added opportunity for rifle hunters (early rifle hunt) starts just 6-days later with all the high tech, high power scopes. It is not like the hunts are in different seasons where the deer behavior has changed (Muzzy ends on Thursday and Early Rifle begins on the following Wednesday).

I KNOW THIS WILL CAUSE ALMOST AS MUCH OF A STIR AS THIS MUZZLELOADER SCOPE CONVERSATION, BUT HERE IS MY SUGGESTION. As for DEDICATED HUNTER PROGRAM, I believe it has it's place. However, with tags getting harder to draw, I would suggest making the dedicated hunter's program become a PICK YOUR WEAPON. This allows a hunter to be on the mountain for the 3 years with the desired weapon of choose, but does not allow the hunters to hunt 27-days archery, 9-days muzzy, 5-days Early Rifle & 9-days Regular Rifle. Scout if you wish, but not with a weapon in hand to pattern and have numerous chances at the bigger bucks. This would still be very desirable to be garrenteed a tag for 3 years running. Right now a lot of general tags take more then a point to draw and up to 5-6 points to draw. At least when drawn for DH you have a tag for 3 years in a row and still can only tag two bucks. (Less pressure on all the seasons, more selective on killing just any buck and still get wildlife projects completed.
Why not have a DH style GS deer hunt.

Lets give everyone a deer tag so there was over 110,000 applicants that applied.
So in order to do this we might want to split the tags in half so roughly 55,000 would get tags the first year and the other half would get the second year

You can only harvest one Deer in 5 years.

You will be guaranteed a tag for 5 years, you will have to pick your weapon for that 5 years. You will have to turn your tag back in at the end of each season.
But if you don't then a 5 year waiting period starts over.
Now if you harvest in that 5 years. Then a 5 year waiting period starts.

I think you will find that most people would be more selective on what they harvest. I will bet that some would not harvest at all in 5 years. I know I would probably be one of them.

By doing this gets all of the residents a tag in there pocket and the DWR will make their $ every year
none residents can't apply.

This would get rid of GS points creep


I hope that make sense.
What do you guys think? I don't know if it would work It was just something I thought of.
 
Last edited:
Why not have a DH style GS deer hunt.

Lets give everyone a deer tag so there was over 110,000 applicants that applied.
So in order to do this we might want to split the tags in half so roughly 55,000 would get tags the first year and the other half would get the second year

You can only harvest one Deer in 5 years.

You will be guaranteed a tag for 5 years, you will have to pick your weapon for that 5 years.
You will have to turn your tag back in at the end of each season.
But if you don't then a 5 year waiting period starts over.
Now if you harvest in that 5 years. Then a 5 year waiting period starts.

I think you will find that most people would be more selective on what they harvest.
I will bet that some would not harvest at all in 5 years. I know I would probably be one of them.

By doing this gets all of the residents a tag in there pocket and the DWR will make their $ every year
none residents can't apply.

This would get rid of GS points creep


I hope that make sense.
What do you guys think? I don't know if it would work It was just something I thought of.
Hmmmmm, very interesting concept.
It would definitely make people more selective ?
 
Why not have a DH style GS deer hunt.

Lets give everyone a deer tag so there was over 110,000 applicants that applied.
So in order to do this we might want to split the tags in half so roughly 55,000 would get tags the first year and the other half would get the second year

You can only harvest one Deer in 5 years.

You will be guaranteed a tag for 5 years, you will have to pick your weapon for that 5 years.
You will have to turn your tag back in at the end of each season.
But if you don't then a 5 year waiting period starts over.
Now if you harvest in that 5 years. Then a 5 year waiting period starts.

I think you will find that most people would be more selective on what they harvest.
I will bet that some would not harvest at all in 5 years. I know I would probably be one of them.

By doing this gets all of the residents a tag in there pocket and the DWR will make their $ every year
none residents can't apply.

This would get rid of GS points creep


I hope that make sense.
What do you guys think? I don't know if it would work It was just something I thought of.
Do you know how many untagged deer would be put in freezers every year?

A number far higher than you’d possibly imagine.

Here’s an idea. How about we leave the DH the way it is. The demand for it isn’t nearly as high as other general tags. It has a purpose and it generates good money and work for habitat and conservation in utah.
 
Hmmmmm, very interesting concept.
It would definitely make people more selective ?
I thought one of the "goals" of the tech ban/challenge was to NOT TARGET some of the top-tier bucks.
These two thought are diametrically opposed.

Zeke
 
I thought one of the "goals" of the tech ban/challenge was to NOT TARGET some of the top-tier bucks.
These two thought are diametrically opposed.

Zeke
I knew this was coming when I typed it.

As it is now, everything is getting whacked.

Saving younger bucks to grow older gives better quality on the opposite end, but the way we are harvesting now with no incentives to pass, everything gets taken out from spikes to 4x4's.

It's a new question presented and a quick thought process on my end....
 
Why not have a DH style GS deer hunt.

Lets give everyone a deer tag so there was over 110,000 applicants that applied.
So in order to do this we might want to split the tags in half so roughly 55,000 would get tags the first year and the other half would get the second year

You can only harvest one Deer in 5 years.

You will be guaranteed a tag for 5 years, you will have to pick your weapon for that 5 years. You will have to turn your tag back in at the end of each season.
But if you don't then a 5 year waiting period starts over.
Now if you harvest in that 5 years. Then a 5 year waiting period starts.

I think you will find that most people would be more selective on what they harvest. I will bet that some would not harvest at all in 5 years. I know I would probably be one of them.

By doing this gets all of the residents a tag in there pocket and the DWR will make their $ every year
none residents can't apply.

This would get rid of GS points creep


I hope that make sense.
What do you guys think? I don't know if it would work It was just something I thought of.
Kind of an interesting idea. If it came down to it, I'd rather hunt 5 years and kill one deer them hunt once in 5 years and still kill one deer.

It would put more people on the mountain every year, but put less lead in the air per capita, is my guess.

Maybe that's what we're looking for?
 
I thought one of the "goals" of the tech ban/challenge was to NOT TARGET some of the top-tier bucks.
These two thought are diametrically opposed.

Zeke
Slammy-daddy is so focused on looking for fresh meat, he has a hard time staying focused on the topics and goals that he climbed under the desk for in the first place
 
Kind of an interesting idea. If it came down to it, I'd rather hunt 5 years and kill one deer them hunt once in 5 years and still kill one deer.

It would put more people on the mountain every year, but put less lead in the air per capita, is my guess.

Maybe that's what we're looking for?
Pick up a bow, muzzy or change units and you can hunt every or every other year and kill 2-5 deer in that same 5 year time frame.

There’s solutions to everyone’s problems without making any changes at all
 
Kind of an interesting idea. If it came down to it, I'd rather hunt 5 years and kill one deer them hunt once in 5 years and still kill one deer.

It would put more people on the mountain every year, but put less lead in the air per capita, is my guess.

Maybe that's what we're looking for?
It'd probably be a tough sell, as the general population of deer hunters just want to harvest a deer as often as possible, regardless of size, and that population of hunters are the majority.

Personally it has a neat ring to it.

Maybe it could be similar to the DH program and also implemented into a limited quota type of draw so the GP can still do their thing if they choose.

I would apply for it, hunt 5 years and take one buck.
 
It'd probably be a tough sell, as the general population of deer hunters just want to harvest a deer as often as possible, regardless of size, and that population of hunters are the majority.

Personally it has a neat ring to it.

Maybe it could be similar to the DH program and also implemented into a limited quota type of draw.

I would apply for it, hunt 5 years and take one buck.
I so would apply for it as well.

Truthfully it means more to me having a tag in my pocket then being successful.

Think about it this way it will make me think twice on harvesting a deer if I know I have to wait 5 years to apply again. But you bet your butt if I come across a wall hanger I would take it.
 
I so would apply for it as well.

Truthfully it means more to me having a tag in my pocket then being successful.

Think about it this way it will make me think twice on harvesting a deer if I know I have to wait 5 years to apply again. But you bet your butt if I come across a wall hanger I would take it.
It's definitely something to ponder and take upstream.

Maybe a 1in3 year versus 1in5 would be a better sell?
Similar to DH but you choose one weapon season only.

It would definitely help keep harvest rates lower and allow opportunity, which is exactly what the WB is looking to accomplish until we can get overall numbers in a better place.
 
It's definitely something to ponder and take upstream.

Maybe a 1in3 year versus 1in5 would be a better sell?
Similar to DH but you choose one weapon season only.

It would definitely help keep harvest rates lower and allow opportunity, which is exactly what the WB is looking to accomplish until we can get overall numbers in a better place.
DH is limited already to a quota per unit. some years a lot hit their 3 years and opens up a lot of DH openings. Other years very few reach the 3 year mark and very few are available for DH. This year there was 1 DH tag issue for a unit due to this and tag decreases and it went to a person with a few points. Keep it limited to a percent of the allotted tags in a unit, but the DH will be far more selective if they even kill a buck but be able to hunt for 3 years once drawn.

I KNOW THIS WILL CAUSE ALMOST AS MUCH OF A STIR AS THIS MUZZLELOADER SCOPE CONVERSATION, BUT HERE IS MY SUGGESTION, and yes I have been in the program 4 different times and plan on it in next 2 years. As for DEDICATED HUNTER PROGRAM, I believe it has it's place. However, with tags getting harder to draw, I would suggest making the dedicated hunter's program become a PICK YOUR WEAPON. This allows a hunter to be on the mountain for the 3 years with the desired weapon of choose, but does not allow the hunters to hunt 27-days archery, 9-days muzzy, 5-days Early Rifle & 9-days Regular Rifle. Scout if you wish, but not with a weapon in hand to pattern and have numerous chances at the bigger bucks. This would still be very desirable to be garrenteed a tag for 3 years running. Right now a lot of general tags take more then a point to draw and up to 5-6 points to draw. At least when drawn for DH you have a tag for 3 years in a row and still can only tag two bucks. (Less pressure on all the seasons, more selective on killing just any buck and still get wildlife projects completed.
 
DH is limited already to a quota per unit. some years a lot hit their 3 years and opens up a lot of DH openings. Other years very few reach the 3 year mark and very few are available for DH. This year there was 1 DH tag issue for a unit due to this and tag decreases and it went to a person with a few points. Keep it limited to a percent of the allotted tags in a unit, but the DH will be far more selective if they even kill a buck but be able to hunt for 3 years once drawn.

I KNOW THIS WILL CAUSE ALMOST AS MUCH OF A STIR AS THIS MUZZLELOADER SCOPE CONVERSATION, BUT HERE IS MY SUGGESTION, and yes I have been in the program 4 different times and plan on it in next 2 years. As for DEDICATED HUNTER PROGRAM, I believe it has it's place. However, with tags getting harder to draw, I would suggest making the dedicated hunter's program become a PICK YOUR WEAPON. This allows a hunter to be on the mountain for the 3 years with the desired weapon of choose, but does not allow the hunters to hunt 27-days archery, 9-days muzzy, 5-days Early Rifle & 9-days Regular Rifle. Scout if you wish, but not with a weapon in hand to pattern and have numerous chances at the bigger bucks. This would still be very desirable to be garrenteed a tag for 3 years running. Right now a lot of general tags take more then a point to draw and up to 5-6 points to draw. At least when drawn for DH you have a tag for 3 years in a row and still can only tag two bucks. (Less pressure on all the seasons, more selective on killing just any buck and still get wildlife projects completed.
Now we're getting somewhere, I like it!

Take an idea and expand on it.....this is how it should be ?
 
Them DAMN DH's!

At Best!

They took 2 Bucks in 3 Years!

They Sent Some Extra $$$ to The DWR!

Or They Worked On Projects To Help Wildlife!

While The PISSCUTTER POUNDERS/OPPORTUNISTS Took 3 in 3 Years To Get Their Famous IG Pics Published on the WWW!

And What'd They Do To Help Wildlife?
 
Them DAMN DH's!

At Best!

They took 2 Bucks in 3 Years!

They Sent Some Extra $$$ to The DWR!

Or They Worked On Projects To Help Wildlife!

While The PISSCUTTER POUNDERS/OPPORTUNISTS Took 3 in 3 Years To Get Their Famous IG Pics Published on the WWW!

And What'd They Do To Help Wildlife?
One thing about the DH program, just because they can doesn't mean they do.

I've known several who killed one in 3 and none in 3.

Same thing will happen in this new idea, 5 years of hunting won't always result in the one punched tag, it just means you have that option.

The people who would choose this option won't be killing a yearling.
 
You Can Tell There's a Perty Nice Breeze!

But I Guess It's All Auto Calculated!

She Wastes NO TIME Pulling The Trigger After She JACKS One In!
 
It'd probably be a tough sell, as the general population of deer hunters just want to harvest a deer as often as possible, regardless of size, and that population of hunters are the majority.

Personally it has a neat ring to it.

Maybe it could be similar to the DH program and also implemented into a limited quota type of draw so the GP can still do their thing if they choose.

I would apply for it, hunt 5 years and take one buck.
Am I’m I missing something here? “Now if you harvest in that five years. Then a five year waiting period starts.” Hunt five years, take a buck on the 5th year then have a five year waiting period. So 1 deer in 10 years!! No Thanks, for me.
 
Still like the 3 years, but with a chosen weapon. Already a waiting period in several units that take several DH points to draw already.
Just a wild hair idea at this point, but it's quite possibly got what the WB is trying to accomplish along with all the other change proposals across the entire system.
 
Am I’m I missing something here? “Now if you harvest in that five years. Then a five year waiting period starts.” Hunt five years, take a buck on the 5th year then have a five year waiting period. So 1 deer in 10 years!! No Thanks, for me.
It was just an idea I came up with there is always room for improvements.
Just need to tweak some thing and I think it would work.
 
Just a wild hair idea at this point, but it's quite possibly got what the WB is trying to accomplish along with all the other change proposals across the entire system.
When does the deer committee propose a new deer plan is it every 3 years or 5?
Slam
 
One thing about the DH program, just because they can doesn't mean they do.

I've known several who killed one in 3 and none in 3.

Same thing will happen in this new idea, 5 years of hunting won't always result in the one punched tag, it just means you have that option.

The people who would choose this option won't be killing a yearling.
I only harvested 1 deer in 3 years I harvested my buck on the last year the only reason I did was because it was a 160” 4 point I was totally fine going home empty handed.
Like I said before I just wanted a tag in my pocket so I could go hunt so I stretched it to the end.
 
I believe it's always been a 5 year plan that they change every two years ?
So I really like the 3 year.
I know a lot of people out there that want to do the DH program.
but they simply can’t find the time to do the projects and they definitely don’t want to buy out there hours.
I think this would give those guys a chance at this and we could issue a lot more tags on this program.
I think this program would never need a points system. maybe I’m wrong. but I think it will free up some hunter’s applying for GS and DH and it just might bring the points creep down a little.
 
I have an idea. Split the Muzzy up to Scoped and Primitive (no Scope.. Call the hunt as is a 10 day hunt end of September. Same # of tags given. you can either choose to hunt the first (5) days primitive or the last 5 days (Scoped). Not both. Tags split down the middle. Set the dates to include a weekend for the 1st wave as well as a weekend for the second wave. Do you take 1st crack or the scoped advantage ? At least there is choice.
 
I have an idea. Split the Muzzy up to Scoped and Primitive (no Scope.. Call the hunt as is a 10 day hunt end of September. Same # of tags given. you can either choose to hunt the first (5) days primitive or the last 5 days (Scoped). Not both. Tags split down the middle. Set the dates to include a weekend for the 1st wave as well as a weekend for the second wave. Do you take 1st crack or the scoped advantage ? At least there is choice.
or keep the sept. season the same as it is now with scopes and have a muzzy no scope season in place of the current LE late season gen. unit hunts. Then have the LE have it's own no scope season the same time as the others and have the gen. muzzy elk hunt just a week later. Have about 5 percent of the tags set aside for these no scope seasons.
 
I have an idea. Split the Muzzy up to Scoped and Primitive (no Scope.. Call the hunt as is a 10 day hunt end of September. Same # of tags given. you can either choose to hunt the first (5) days primitive or the last 5 days (Scoped). Not both. Tags split down the middle. Set the dates to include a weekend for the 1st wave as well as a weekend for the second wave. Do you take 1st crack or the scoped advantage ? At least there is choice.
I disagree. Already takes points to draw as it is in most units and splitting it would double that. Figure out what the scope out come is and make a more even cut in tags between the rifle and the other two weapon seasons. If you want the high power scope wait just 5-days after the muzzy deer hunt ends and hunt the early rifle season with your long range rifles, tech and high power scopes.
 
I disagree. Already takes points to draw as it is in most units and splitting it would double that. Figure out what the scope out come is and make a more even cut in tags between the rifle and the other two weapon seasons. If you want the high power scope wait just 5-days after the muzzy deer hunt ends and hunt the early rifle season with your long range rifles, tech and high power scopes.
I guess I dont see how it doubles the amount of applicants. Muzzy guys will still be Muzzy guys. Obviously we dont have data, but lets assume the applicants would be the same total #. Now you just decide between the Hawkin or the Rem Ultimate. Just spit balling for conversation and view points.
 
What do you guys think about this idea? Leave Muzzy hunt where it is and leave scopes on. Turn Limited entry muzzleloader hunts into your primitive muzzleloader hunts with no scopes since this is most likely the reason the scopes will come off anyway. Same for elk.
 
I guess I dont see how it doubles the amount of applicants. Muzzy guys will still be Muzzy guys. Obviously we dont have data, but lets assume the applicants would be the same total #. Now you just decide between the Hawkin or the Rem Ultimate. Just spit balling for conversation and view points.
I really don't want to cut the muzzy hunt in half. I spend the full 9-days on the mountain plus one or two days prior to the hunt. Only fill a tag occasionally, but there for the memories and the time on the mountain with friends and family. Probably not double, but lets not keep adding hunts and diminishing a hunt and run the animals into the ground. (rifle hunt is 9-days, with an added early hunt of 5-days, archery is just short of a month. Maybe selfish, but I enjoy being on mountain for 9 plus days hunting. I just enjoy time on the mountain and it is nice to do it with a weapon in hand if something tickles the trigger finger.


MIGHT BE WORTH LOOKING AT REPLACING THE EARLY RIFLE HUNT WITH THE HIGH TECH MUZZLELOADER HUNT WITH THE HIGH POWER SCOPES. KIND OF A COMPROMIZE WITHOUT ADDING ANOTHER HUNT AND MAY KEEP THE HIGH DOLLAR, TECH MUZZY GUYS HAPPY!!! I know the rifle guys would not like this, but they are the high success hunters ;)
 
Last edited:
The easiest thing to do would be to have a 1 year waiting period every time you drew a Gen Deer permit. Then, make DH 2 bucks in 4 years with 48 hours of service and a maximum of 24 hours paid for with cash.
 
I really don't want to cut the muzzy hunt in half. I spend the full 9-days on the mountain plus one or two days prior to the hunt. Only fill a tag occasionally, but there for the memories and the time on the mountain with friends and family. Probably not double, but lets not keep adding hunts and diminishing a hunt and run the animals into the ground. (rifle hunt is 9-days, with an added early hunt of 5-days, archery is just short of a month. Maybe selfish, but I enjoy being on mountain for 9 plus days hunting. I just enjoy time on the mountain and it is nice to do it with a weapon in hand if something tickles the trigger finger.


MIGHT BE WORTH LOOKING AT REPLACING THE EARLY RIFLE HUNT WITH THE HIGH TECH MUZZLELOADER HUNT WITH THE HIGH POWER SCOPES. KIND OF A COMPROMIZE WITHOUT ADDING ANOTHER HUNT AND MAY KEEP THE HIGH DOLLAR, TECH MUZZY GUYS HAPPY!!! I know the rifle guys would not like this, but they are the high success hunters ;)
I really like that idea. Turn the early rifle deer into a muzz with scopes hunt. Leave the September muzz deer as open sights only.
 
What do you guys think about this idea? Leave Muzzy hunt where it is and leave scopes on. Turn Limited entry muzzleloader hunts into your primitive muzzleloader hunts with no scopes since this is most likely the reason the scopes will come off anyway. Same for elk.
I’ve always wondered why guys are trying to manage general opportunity hunts for LE quality. We have LE hunts for a reason. If you want to hunt a big buck, draw a LE tag. Otherwise enjoy your general hunts and shoot that 18” 3x3 when you find one. Or don’t. It’s your choice! But general hunts are NOT designed for trophy animals.

People are greedy. And most suck at hunting. This whole thing has nothing to do with “doing it for the animals”. This is all in an effort to try to get more mature animals on the landscape for a few to hopefully kill a bigger deer. That’s it. I’ve said this from the beginning. Any restrictions made will just set things up for the rifle deer hunters to have a better hunt experience. That’s it. Any big bucks saved by archery and muzzy restrictions will just be killed 1-2 months later than when they normally would be.

I’m tired of catering to rifle hunters in every way imaginable. How about we just pull scopes off their rifles and leave the other weapon types alone. Let’s see what impact that has first before we start ignoring hard data and statistics and begin trying to fix broken water lines with duct tape and nails.
 
All three are getting restrictions.

Some think it's too much, some not enough.

The doors will also be left cracked for Emerging Technology as it comes along.
I thought these were recommendations not rules (yet) ? I’m not sure the board will adopt, seems like a lot of us common folk disagree with it. Just like pols, they listen to the squeaky wheel. Of course there is always an axe to grind by a board member, or an organization.

Seems to me if you are looking at technology you look at emerging technology not existing technology. But, what the hell do I know. This just doesn’t seem like it will make a nickels worth of difference and is more emotionally driven than fact driven
 
It's definitely something to ponder and take upstream.

Maybe a 1in3 year versus 1in5 would be a better sell?
Similar to DH but you choose one weapon season only.

It would definitely help keep harvest rates lower and allow opportunity, which is exactly what the WB is looking to accomplish until we can get overall numbers in a better place.
I like the idea as well. However what the hell does it have to do with technology?
 
If you want to limit harvest, increase opportunity, and control technology just follows Idaho's muzzy regs. Loose powder, flint or percussion only, no 209's, lead conicals or round balls (no sabots or hyperdynamic alloy bullets). Open or peep sights, if you need a scope to see, limit it to IDFG review to doctors letter and max of 4X. I'd be happy with all of those.
 
If you want to limit harvest, increase opportunity, and control technology just follows Idaho's muzzy regs. Loose powder, flint or percussion only, no 209's, lead conicals or round balls (no sabots or hyperdynamic alloy bullets). Open or peep sights, if you need a scope to see, limit it to IDFG review to doctors letter and max of 4X. I'd be happy with all of those.
We looked at those along with every state around us but wanted to try not to be so complicated.

Keep in mind we have two law officers on the committee that weigh in on things from their perspective.
 
So I guess archery hasn’t changed any since my grandpa archery hunted? But let’s chase the muzz hunters…
4" groups at 500 yards in a muzzleloader is quite a bit different than grandpa's long bow at 50 yards versus today's normal 70 yard groups.
20 yards more on average isn't killing more bucks than 100yd vs 500 and beyond.
Huge difference, apples n oranges.

Even an average inline today with a variable scope is extremely deadly at 200 versus grandpa's Hawkin at 100.
But look how fast these "Emerging Technology" Muzzies are coming along.

If we want to kill bucks at 500 yards, we hunt in October during the ALW hunt.
 
Interesting description and conversation in the classifieds on this muzzleloader for sale ?‍♂️
View attachment 83535View attachment 83536
"Don't put restrictions on muzzleloaders" they
Manage the wildlife not the social aspects! I highly doubt that there are enough of these super muzzy’s to worry about, much less the owners being skilled enough to use them to their potential. there’s always somebody in this state that’s complaining about what someone else has or does.

Does technology need to be looked at? Yes, but that should be emerging technology not existing. Can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube once it’s out, oh you can try but it’s messy and it’s never is as good looking as it was before. Similar situation here, the gymnastics being done with why it has to be restricted is laughable. Like a lot have said, grow the herd..... I better shut up now or this will be a war and peace novel.....?
 
Manage the wildlife not the social aspects! I highly doubt that there are enough of these super muzzy’s to worry about, much less the owners being skilled enough to use them to their potential. there’s always somebody in this state that’s complaining about what someone else has or does.

Does technology need to be looked at? Yes, but that should be emerging technology not existing. Can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube once it’s out, oh you can try but it’s messy and it’s never is as good looking as it was before. Similar situation here, the gymnastics being done with why it to be restricted is laughable. Like a lot have said, grow the herd..... I better shut up now or this will be a war and peace novel.....?
Um....these types of rifles are emerging technology but are tamed without the Huskemaw scope.

You're correct about the probability of low numbers of them out there now, but as they get cheaper copycats on the shelves in the new future, they'll be the new thing, just like when the first $500 inline hit the shelves and people laughed.
 
4" groups at 500 yards in a muzzleloader is quite a bit different than grandpa's long bow at 50 yards versus today's normal 70 yard groups.
20 yards more on average isn't killing more bucks than 100yd vs 500 and beyond.
Huge difference, apples n oranges.

Even an average inline today with a variable scope is extremely deadly at 200 versus grandpa's Hawkin at 100.
But look how fast these "Emerging Technology" Muzzies are coming along.

If we want to kill bucks at 500 yards, we hunt in October during the ALW hunt.
Not apples and oranges, when my grandma hunted with a recurve 30 yards was a looooong shot… We’re talking about technology and killing mature bucks, archers are killing bucks at 120 yards plus…
I’m all for the reduction in technology but let’s make it across the board…
 
Um....these types of rifles are emerging technology but are tamed without the Huskemaw scope.

You're correct about the probability of low numbers of them out there now, but as they get cheaper copycats on the shelves in the new future, they'll be the new thing, just like when the first $500 inline hit the shelves and people laughed.
Take the scopes off and the rifle still shoots the same distance. You know as well as anyone that sliding peeps will go on and guys will still be shooting 500 yards. Scopes will come off because of a few premium limited entry units. Why not just regulate those units with scope less muzzleloader hunts then?
 
Um....these types of rifles are emerging technology but are tamed without the Huskemaw scope.

You're correct about the probability of low numbers of them out there now, but as they get cheaper copycats on the shelves in the new future, they'll be the new thing, just like when the first $500 inline hit the shelves and people laughed.
So you want to punish thousands of hunters, so a handful can be tamed? That really makes sense.
 
4" groups at 500 yards in a muzzleloader is quite a bit different than grandpa's long bow at 50 yards versus today's normal 70 yard groups.
20 yards more on average isn't killing more bucks than 100yd vs 500 and beyond.
Huge difference, apples n oranges.

Even an average inline today with a variable scope is extremely deadly at 200 versus grandpa's Hawkin at 100.
But look how fast these "Emerging Technology" Muzzies are coming along.

If we want to kill bucks at 500 yards, we hunt in October during the ALW hunt.
Not disagreeing, but you forgot to include that todays rifles and turret scopes are extremely deadly compared to grandpa's old military 303 British, Russian 7.62 or even the old common 30-30 Winchester.

Just stating that I agree that yes all three have really changed and are extremely more effective.
 
I hate how being successful hunting is becoming a bad thing.

Im okay with some restrictions but I feel like the real reasons behind some of these new ideas sound purely financial. Lower success equals more tags equals more money. Those average Joe hunters championing the idea to lower success rates may be noble at heart but I really don't think these ideas will make any difference in the quality, quantity, or satisfaction of their hunt.

Require mandatory harvest reporting. Sell the right amount of tags based on harvest rates instead of try and influence harvest rates to sell tags. Keep hammering the habitat projects, predation projects, and road kill projects. Expand the waterfowl and upland game hunting opportunities in the state to help people wait their turn on drawing a big game tag. Just my two cents.
 
I apologize if this has been mentioned, but why not limit the rangefinders instead of the scopes power? The scopes power increses the efficacy of the shot. Could you limit rangefinders and shot distance instead. Max distance for shooting at and ranging deer is 300 yards for a muzzle and 600 for a rifle?

The problem with limiting scopes is the likely increase in mortal wounding of animals that occurs. Look at data from bows vs. rifles on that issue.
 
I apologize if this has been mentioned, but why not limit the rangefinders instead of the scopes power? The scopes power increses the efficacy of the shot. Could you limit rangefinders and shot distance instead. Max distance for shooting at and ranging deer is 300 yards for a muzzle and 600 for a rifle?

The problem with limiting scopes is the likely increase in mortal wounding of animals that occurs. Look at data from bows vs. rifles on that issue.
That’s funny nri……. and don’t be bringing up the one tool that would limit harvest…… and the really really really fun thing is it would apply equally across archery, muzzleloader and any weapon seasons……. but ……….. Nnnnnnnooooooope, not that technology. ???
 
You guys crack me up.
Has Archery improved over the years absolutely. a 120 yard shot is a long ways for a bow.

There is not a lot of bow hunters at all that can take that shot especially in the wind heck a 80 yard shot is a hard shot in the wind.

Has Muzzleloaders improved over the years absolutely. 200/300/400/500 yard shots. But there is a lot of muzzy hunters that are taken these shots especially with scopes. A 200 yard shot in the wind with a muzzleloader is a chip shot.

So how can you compare the two?

If you want to compare Muzzeys and Archery.
We need to ban inline and go back to flintlock patch round ball and iron sights.
This will put it more inline with the two, Then I could stand by your claim on restricting archery even more.

When they allowed scopes on Muzzleloaders there was no pushback at all.
But dam to take them off is a whole different thing.
 
That’s funny nri……. and don’t be bringing up the one tool that would limit harvest…… and the really really really fun thing is it would apply equally across archery, muzzleloader and any weapon seasons……. but ……….. Nnnnnnnooooooope, not that technology. ???
Why would anyone want to promote wounding more animals? I can assure you more will be wounded if range finder were taken away.
 
I should get to hunt with my scoped muzzleloader during the archery hunt. It isn’t fair to limit technology.
 
Why would anyone want to promote wounding more animals? I can assure you more will be wounded if range finder were taken away.
That may well be the case ridge……… but there’s lots of rabbit holes we can go down when it come to mule deer these days.

And I’m not promoting anything…….. but it’s difficult to keep my mouth shut when facts get shared and nri did state a fact didn’t he? And so did I…… I think. But you probably did too. Three wins……. Take you pick boys……. It’s your future…..fight for what you want. Kill ‘‘em off or help’em grow….. your’s to decide.
 
I am a muzzy guy, if I were to be so jealous of archery guys I would go join them.
It cracks me up that the ALW Long Rangers are SO jealous of muzzy guys they would rather hurt them then join them.
 
Why would anyone want to promote wounding more animals? I can assure you more will be wounded if range finder were taken away.
That is exactly why I don't think you should llimt scope power. More power = less wounding I didn't mean take them away, but limit allowed shot distances by only allowing rangefinders to range a certain distance. Example: you can only use a 600-yard max rangefinding device...i was hoping to reduce wounding.
 
Bearpaw Outfitters

Experience world class hunting for mule deer, elk, cougar, bear, turkey, moose, sheep and more.

Wild West Outfitters

Hunt the big bulls, bucks, bear and cats in southern Utah. Your hunt of a lifetime awaits.

J & J Outfitters

Offering quality fair-chase hunts for trophy mule deer, elk, shiras moose and mountain lions.

Shane Scott Outfitting

Quality trophy hunting in Utah. Offering FREE Utah drawing consultation. Great local guides.

Utah Big Game Outfitters

Specializing in bighorn sheep, mule deer, elk, mountain goat, lions, bears & antelope.

Apex Outfitters

We offer experienced guides who hunt Elk, Mule Deer, Antelope, Sheep, Bison, Goats, Cougar, and Bear.

Urge 2 Hunt

We offer high quality hunts on large private ranches around the state, with landowner vouchers.

Allout Guiding & Outfitting

Offering high quality mule deer, elk, bear, cougar and bison hunts in the Book Cliffs and Henry Mtns.

Lickity Split Outfitters

General season and LE fully guided hunts for mule deer, elk, moose, antelope, lion, turkey, bear and coyotes.

Back
Top Bottom