If Buzz and Grizz we're consistent, then they would be vocal about cases in the reverse, like Sandmann, or Rittenhouse( who POTUS even slandered), but they aren't about folks "getting what they deserve" for having big mouths, they are for "right wingers" getting smacked.
Now Grizz and Buzz will say "what aboutism", which is a tell. Grizz is a bright guy(Buzz is not so much) he knows of course,he can't show you where he supported or encouraged Sandmann or Rittenhouse as they seek "vengeance". As they should be awarded millions from deep pocketed "far left" folks who ran their mouths, got them banned from colleges, forced them to hire private security, caused them pain and anguish.
No, if you point out the obvious, that both Grizz and Buzz only vocally are pro "getting what he deserves" as long as it's a "far right" person(glad to retract if either can show otherwise), then YOU create strawmen, talk in "what aboutism", don't understand "the law", etc, etc, etc.
Doesn't mean Grizz is a bad guy, (Buzz is a ***) in fact far from it. It does mean he's as biased as all the Trumsters he claims everyone else is. But, he's a well spoken, good dude, so cracking him about that bias, is pretty fun. Him not being malicious even when telling folks to "seek help?" is why it's enjoyable debating with him. We all have that buddy that as we are sitting around the fire drinking a beer and eating a steak, cracks open a White Claw and eats a salad?
Glad Founder is letting some stuff go. It's the Campfire. We don't all sit around one eating s'mores and singing songs. We talk about Brandon, trucks and boobs.?
www.latimes.com
redstate.com
